Objective To systematically review the efficacy and safety of laparoscopic hepatectomy (LH) and open hepatectomy (OH) for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Methods PubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, CBM, WanFang Data, CNKI databases were electronically searched to collect the case-control studies about LH vs. OH for patients with HCC from inception to December, 2015. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies, then meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 5.3 software. Results A total of 28 studies involving 1 908 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that: the LH group was superior to OH group on complications (OR=0.35, 95%CI 0.26 to 0.48, P<0.000 01), hospital stay (MD=–4.18, 95%CI (–5.08, –3.29),P<0.000 01), and five years overall survival rate (OR=1.65, 95%CI 1.23 to 2.19,P=0.000 7) and disease-free survival rate (OR=1.51, 95%CI 1.12 to 2.03, P=0.006). However, no significant differences were found in one year and three years overall survival rate, disease-free survival rate, and postoperative recurrence rate. Conclusion Current evidence shows that the LH is superior to OH for the treatment of HCC, and may be amenable to surgery because of its safety and longtime efficacy. Due to limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high quality studies are needed to verify above conclusion.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the efficacy and safety of laryngeal mask versus endotracheal tubes for laparoscopic surgery.MethodsPubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, CNKI, WanFang Data and CBM databases were electronically searched to collect the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about the efficacy and safety of laryngeal mask versus endotracheal tubes for laparoscopic surgery from inception to April, 2017. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. Then meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 5.3 software.ResultsA total of 16 RCTs involving 1 593 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that: there was no significant difference in the success rate of the first insertion (RR=0.99, 95%CI 0.96 to 1.02, P=0.55). The airway pressure of patients whose position were head higher than foot was significantly lower in the laryngeal mask group than in the tracheal intubation group (MD=–1.20, 95%CI –1.81 to –0.59, P=0.000 1), but there was no significant difference between two groups in reverse position patients (MD=0.48, 95%CI –0.90 to 1.87, P=0.49). The incidence of sore throat (RR=0.58, 95%CI 0.46 to 0.74, P<0.000 01), the incidence of blood stain (RR=0.48, 95%CI 0.30 to 0.77, P=0.002), the incidence of laryngeal spasm/bronchial spasm (OR=0.30, 95%CI 0.11 to 0.80, P=0.02) and the incidence of cough/hiccup (RR=0.10, 95%CI 0.07 to 0.15, P<0.000 01) in the laryngeal mask group were significantly lower than those in the tracheal intubation group.ConclusionThe current evidence shows that compared with tracheal intubation, laryngeal mask can effectively reduce airway pressure of patients whose position are head higher than foot. The risks of various complications are significant higher in tracheal intubation in laparoscopic surgery. Laryngeal mask can maintain patients' normal respiratory functions while reduce damage and do not increase the occurrence of reflux aspiration. Due to limited quantity and quality of the included studies, more high quality studies are needed to verify above conclusion.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the efficacy and safety of operative treatment versus nonoperative treatment in patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD).MethodsPubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, WanFang Data, and CQVIP databases were searched for controlled studies about operative treatment versus nonoperative treatment for ASD published up till June 2019. ClinicalTrials.gov was searched for grey literatures informally published up till June 2019. Two reviewers independently screened literatures, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias. Meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 5.3 and Stata 14.0 softwares.ResultsA total of 10 non-randomized controlled studies were included, including 1 601 patients. The pooled results indicated that the operative group was superior to the nonoperative group in ability improvement [the increment of Scoliosis Research Society-22 score: weighted mean difference (WMD)=0.70, 95% confidence interval (CI) (0.69, 0.70), P<0.000 01; the decrement of Oswestry Disability Index score: WMD=11.12, 95%CI (10.74, 11.50), P<0.000 01], pain relief [the decrement of Numeric Rating Scale score: WMD=3.25, 95%CI (3.16, 3.35), P<0.000 01], and Cobb correction [WMD=14.06°, 95%CI (13.60, 14.53)°, P<0.000 01]. The incidence of complications was higher in the operative group than that in the nonoperative group [relative risk=5.38, 95%CI (3.67, 7.88), P<0.000 01].ConclusionsSurgery shows superior efficacy on ability improvement, pain relief, and Cobb correction compared with nonoperative treatment in ASD patients, though its incidence of complications is high. Nonoperative treatment is also an effective treatment for patients with poor physical condition and intolerance to surgery. Due to the limited quantity and quality of included studies, more high-quality studies are required to verify the above conclusions.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the safety, efficacy, and cost-effectiveness of different uses of oxidized regenerated cellulose (ORC) in video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) for lung cancer resection to provide a reference for the selection, clinical use, and rational utilization of absorbable hemostatic materials. MethodsA retrospective analysis of relevant data from inpatients who underwent VATS for lung cancer resection at a tertiary hospital from July 2019 to January 2020 and from July 2020 to December 2020 was conducted. Patients were divided into two groups based on the use of ORC: 1) combined use group (ORC and collagen sponge) and 2) sole-use group (ORC). Safety, efficacy, and economic outcome indicators were compared between the two groups. ResultsThe main analysis included a total of 904 patients, with 466 in the combined use group and 438 in the sole-use group. Compared to the combined use group, the sole-use group had a significantly longer hospital stay, used fewer hemostatic drugs, had a lower average cost of hemostatic materials, and a lower median total hospitalization cost (P<0.05). No statistically significant difference was found between the two groups in terms of intraoperative blood loss volume, massive blood loss rate, perioperative transfusion rate, reoperation rate, postoperative 48-hour drainage volume, bloody drainage fluid rate, or postoperative laboratory test indicators. ConclusionThere was no significant difference in the safety or efficacy of VATS for lung cancer resection between the sole use of ORC and the combined use of ORC, but the sole use of ORC was associated with a lower cost of hemostatic materials and a lower total hospitalization cost. The sole use of hemostatic gauze in VATS for lung cancer resection may be a more cost-effective choice.
ObjectivesTo systematically review the efficacy and safety of oral drugs for treating women with uncomplicated lower urinary tract infection.MethodsPubMed, The Cochrane Library, EMbase, CBM, WanFang Data, CNKI and VIP databases were electronically searched to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of oral drugs for treating females with uncomplicated lower urinary tract infection from inception to November, 2018. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed risk of bias of included studies, then, network meta-analysis was performed by using " gemtc” packages in R 3.5.1 software.ResultsA total of 38 RCTs were included. The results of network meta-analysis showed that: quinolones (RR=1.24, 95%CI 1.11 to 1.37), furantoin (RR=1.21, 95%CI 1.06 to 1.37), trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMZ) (RR=1.20, 95%CI 1.06 to 1.35), fosfomycin (RR=1.17, 95%CI 1.04 to 1.31) and penicillin (RR=1.18, 95%CI 1.05 to 1.33) were superior to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDS) in clinical cure. Quinolones were better than fosfomycin (RR=1.07, 95%CI 1.03 to 1.12), penicillin (RR=1.18, 95%CI 1.13 to 1.23) and cephalosporin (RR=1.13, 95%CI 1.08 to 1.19); furantoin was better than penicillin (RR=1.15, 95%CI 1.08 to 1.21) and cephalosporin (RR=1.10, 95%CI 1.04 to 1.17); TMP-SMZ was better than penicillin (RR=1.15, 95%CI 1.09 to 1.21) and cephalosporin (RR=1.11, 95%CI 1.04 to 1.16); fosfomycin was better than penicillin (RR=1.10, 95%CI 1.04 to 1.16) in bacteriological cure. The adverse effect rates of quinolones were lower than furantoin (RR=0.83, 95%CI 0.70 to 0.98), TMP-SMZ (RR=0.88, 95%CI 0.78 to 0.99) and fosfomycin (RR=0.74, 95%CI 0.59 to 0.93), and which of fosfomycin was higher than penicillin (RR=1.33, 95%CI 1.01 to 1.74) and NSAIDS (RR=1.46, 95%CI 1.11 to 1.92). All differences were statistically significant.ConclusionsCurrent evidence shows that uncomplicated lower urinary tract infection should be recommended to therapy containing quinolones. Due to limited quality and quantity of included studies, more high-quality studies are required to verify the above conclusion.
Objective To assess the efficacy and safety of Shenmai injection for children with viral myocarditis. Methods All randomized and quasi-randomized controlled trials (RCTs and quasi-RCTs) of Shenmai injection for children with viral myocarditis were searched from CBM (1981 to November 2009), CNKI (1980 to November 2009) and VIP (1989 to November 2009), The Cochrane Library (Issue 1,2010), PubMed (1966 to 2009), EMbase (1966 to 2009). Cochrane systematic reviews Handbook 5.0.1 was taken as a reference to quality evaluation of the included studies, and the Cochrane Collaboration’s RevMan 5.0 software was used for data analyses. Results A total of 15 RCTs were included. The quality of the included trials was low. The result of meta-analyses showed that: (1) The effective rate (RR 1.16, 95%CI 1.07 to 1.25) and the ECG improvement rate (RR 1.55, 95%CI 1.25 to 1.93) in Shenmai injection group were better than those in the control group. CK and CK-MB in Shenmai injection were lower than those in the control group, but the AST level was similar in the two groups. (2) The effective rate (RR 1.12, 95%CI 1.01 to 1.25) and the ECG improvement rate (RR 1.35, 95%CI 1.07 to 1.70) in Shenmai injection group were better than those in the western medicine plus routine therapy (RT) group. CK, AST and LDH in Shenmai injection group were lower than those in the western medicine plus RT group, but CK-MB was similar in the two groups. (3) The effective rate (RR 1.26, 95%CI 1.12 to 1.42) in Shenmai injection plus RT and western medicine group was better than that in RT and western medicine group. CK and LDH-1 in Shenmai injection plus RT and western medicine group were lower than those in RT and western medicine group. Adverse reactions of Shenmai injection in 4 studies included mild rash, rubicundity and chest distress. No severe adverse reactions were reported. Conclusion The evidence currently available shows that Shenmai injection may have some effect on children with viral myocarditis, including improving the effective rate, reducing myocardial enzymes and improving the ECG improvement rate. However, because of the low methodological quality of the included trials, this conclusion needs to be interpreted cautionsly, and more well-designed, high-quality RCTs need to be performed.
Objectives To conduct a meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of thymosin-α1 for HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B. Methods We searched MEDLINE, Science Citation Index, Current Content Connect, Cochrane Controlled Trial Register and Chinese Biomedical Database (CBMdisc) to September 15, 2005, and screened the references of eligible trials by hand-searching. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing thymosin-α1 with non-antiviral interventions (placebo, no treatment and standard care) in patients with HBeAg positive chronic hepatitis B were eligible for inclusion. We conducted quality assessment and data extraction by two independent investigators with disagreement resolved by discussion. We used chi-square test and Galbraith plot to detect the heterogeneity, and used fixed (Mantel-Haenzel) and random effect model (DerSimonian-Laird) to pool the trials. When the results in two models differed, the results of random effect were reported. Subgroup analysis was performed to detect whether the duration affected the efficacy of thymosin. Results Four RCTs were included. It was found that the rate of loss of HBeAg was 38.8% in thymosin, significantly higher than that of 12.4% in control groups (RR 2.22, 95%CI 1.55 to 3.21, P=0.000). Loss of HBV-DNA was 36.9% in thymosin-α1, significantly higher than that of 13.8% in control groups (RR 2.18, 95%CI 1.50 to 3.17, P=0.000). Both short-duration (8-13 weeks) and regular duration (26-52 weeks) of thymosin-α1 achieved higher loss of HBeAg and HBV-DNA. The complete response rate was 32.3% in thymosin-α1, significantly higher than the control, 11.3% (RR 2.91, 95%CI 1.71 to 4.94, P=0.000). No statistical significance was found for HBeAg seroconversion and ALT normalization. No significant adverse drug reactions were found. Conclusions Thymosin-α1 might be efficacious in loss of HBeAg and HBV-DNA, and complete response for patients with HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B. Little evidence was available on HBeAg seroconversion, normalization of ALT, loss of HBsAg, and histological response. Further high-quality RCTs were needed for confirmation.
Objective To explore the efficacy of humidified high flow nasal cannula ( HHFNC) for respiratory failure after ventilator weaning in post-operative newborns and infants with congenital heart disease. Methods FromJanuary 2010 to August 2010, 33 newborns and infants [ ( 7. 8 ±8. 4) months, range 3 days to 36 months; weight ( 6. 6 ±3. 6) kg, range 2. 2 to 19. 6 kg] were treated with HHFNC ( 22 cases) and routine oxygen therapy ( 11 cases) for respiratory failure following ventilator weaning after operation of congenital heart disease. Symptoms, blood oxygen saturation ( SpO2 ) , partial pressure of oxygen( PaO2 ) , partial pressure of carbondioxide ( PaCO2 ) , incidence rate of re-intubation, duration of ICU, and hospital stay were assessed and compared between the HHFNC group and the routine oxygen therapy group.Results There were no statistical significance in the duration of ICU, hospital stay, duration of mechanical ventilation, or infection rate between the HHFNC group and the routine oxygen therapy group ( P gt; 0. 05) . But the incidence rate of re-intubation was lower in the HHFNC group than that in the routine oxygen therapy group. Meanwhile SpO2 and PaO2 increased and PaCO2 decreased significantly in the HHFNC group ( P lt;0. 05) . Conclusion HHFNC shows a clinical improvement rapidly and efficiently in preventing respiratory failure after ventilator weaning in post-operative newborns and infants with congenital heart disease.
ObjectiveTo provide an overview of systematic reviews on the efficacy and safety of massage for the treatment of cervical spondylotic radiculopathy.MethodsCNKI, WanFang Data, VIP, CBM, PubMed, The Cochrane Library and EMbase databases were electronically searched to collect the systematic reviews on the efficacy and safety of massage for the treatment of cervical spondylotic radiculopathy from inception to December 30th, 2018. Two reviewers independently screened the literature and extracted the data, applied the AMSTAR2 scale to evaluate its methodological quality, and GRADE to evaluate the quality of the evidence.ResultsA total of 7 systematic reviews/meta-analysis were included. The AMSTAR2 scale evaluation showed that the quality of the included studies was extremely low. The GRADE evidence grading results showed that the quality of the VAS score outcome index of the two literatures was intermediate, and the quality of the OASCSR outcome index of one literature was intermediate. The quality of the remaining outcome indicators reported is low or very low.ConclusionThe available evidence shows that the efficacy and safety of manual treatment of cervical spondylotic radiculopathy is acceptable, but the overall methodological quality of the systematic review is extremely low, and the quality level of evidence is generally low. The future clinical trials and systematic reviews should be strictly followed. The scientific research design of the medical science provides high-quality evidence and provides reference for clinical practice.
Objective To systematically review the efficacy and safety of umeclidinium/vilanterol in the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Methods PubMed, The Cochrane Library, WanFang Data, CNKI and VIP databases were electronically searched to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about umeclidinium/vilanterol for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease from inception to March 2017. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. Then, meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 software. Results Eight RCTs involving 8 992 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that: (1) umeclidinium/vilanterol vs. placebo: umeclidinium/vilanterol could significantly improve Trough FEV1 (MD=0.20, 95%CI 0.17 to 0.23, P<0.000 01) and the quality of life: TDI score (MD=0.99, 95%CI 0.71 to 1.28,P<0.000 01), SGRQ score (MD=–4.00, 95%CI –5.35 to –2.66,P<0.000 01), SOBDA score (MD=–0.16, 95%CI –0.23 to –0.09,P<0.000 01), and reduce the use of rescue drugs (salbutamol), while not increase the adverse events. (2) umeclidinium/vilanterolvs. fluticasone propionate/salmeterol: UMEC/VI could improve lung function in patients with COPD: Trough FEV1 (MD=0.09, 95%CI 0.07 to 0.11, P<0.000 01), reduce the use of rescue drugs (salbutamol), and had lower adverse events. But there was no significant difference in the quality of life between two groups. (3) umeclidinium/vilanterolvs. single bronchodilator: umeclidinium/vilanterol could significantly improve spirometric parameters: Trough FEV1 (MD=0.08, 95%CI 0.07 to 0.10, P<0.000 01), and the quality of life: TDI score (MD=0.38, 95%CI 0.17 to 0.59,P=0.000 3), SGRQ score (MD=–1.18, 95%CI –2.06 to –0.29, P=0.009). Umeclidinium/vilanterol could significantly reduce the use of rescue drugs (salbutamol) without increasing the adverse events. Conclusion UMEC/VI is superior to placebo in the treatment of COPD patients, which can significantly improve lung function, control symptoms and improve the quality of life, with good safety and tolerance. Compared with salmeterol/fluticacin, UMEC/VI has a significant effect on improving lung function and controlling symptoms without increasing adverse effects, while UMEC/VI is easier to use with better patient compliance. UMEC/VI is superior to bronchodilator alone in improving lung function, controlling symptoms and improving the quality of life without increasing the incidence of adverse events. Due to limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high-quality studies are required to verify above conclusions.