WANG Guoliang , LI Li , WANG Fan , DAI Yixiang , LI Hua , SHI Qinglü
  • Department of Sports Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming Yunnan, 650032, P. R. China;
SHI Qinglü, Email: esakmxc@163.com
Medial patella femoral ligament reconstruction; recurrent patellar dislocation; patellar tunnel
10.7507/1002-1892.202409002
Export PDF Favorites Scan Get Citation

Abstract Full text Figures/Tables References Cited by

Objective  To investigate the effectiveness of modified single patellar tunnel medial patella femoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction in the treatment of recurrent patellar dislocation. Methods Between January 2023 and June 2023, a total of 61 patients with recurrent patellar dislocation who underwent MPFL reconstruction with autologous semitendinosus were enrolled and divided into 2 groups using random number table method. In the patellar anchor group, 31 patients were treated with MPFL reconstruction with double medial patellar anchors, and 30 patients in the patellar tunnel group were treated with MPFL reconstruction with single patellar tunnel. The femoral ends of both groups were fixed with absorbable compression screws. There was no significant difference in baseline data such as gender, age, side, tibial tubercle-trochlear groove (TT-TG), Q angle, Caton-Deschamps index, number of dislocation, and preoperative Kujala score, preoperative patellar inclination angle (P>0.05). Patellar tunnel, patellar anchor position, patellar reduction, and the patellar inclination angle were measured by CT scan after operation. Kujala score was used to evaluate the function of knee joint before operation, at 2 weeks and 1, 3, 6, 12 months after operation. Incision aesthetic satisfaction score was performed at 3 months after operation. The signal-to-noise quotient (SNQ) of the transplanted tendon was measured by knee MRI at 12 months after operation to compare the maturity of the graft between the two groups. Results  There was no significant difference in operation time and intraoperative blood loss between the two groups (P>0.05). Knee CT reexamination showed that the patellar tunnel and the patellar anchor position were consistent with the intraoperative fluoroscopy. There was no significant difference in the difference of the patellar inclination angle between the two groups before and after operation (P>0.05). All patients were followed up for an average of 12.8 months (range, 12-14months). There was 1 case of patellar anchor suture rejection in patellar anchor group, and the wound healed after debridement and dressing change. During the follow-up, there was no complication such as recurrence of patellar dislocation, infection and postoperative stiffness. The Kujala scores of the two groups significantly improved at each time point after 1 month of operation when compared with those before operation (P<0.05), and the Kujala scores of the two groups returned to normal levels at 3 months after operation. The Kujala score in the patellar tunnel group was significantly higher than that in the patellar anchor group in the very early stage (2 weeks) (P<0.05), and there was no significant difference between the two groups at other time points (P>0.05). Patients in the patellar tunnel group were significantly better than those in the patellar anchor group in the score of incision aesthetic satisfaction at 3 months after operation and the SNQ at 12 months after operation (P<0.05). Conclusion  Modified single patellar tunnel MPFL reconstruction was used to treat patients with recurrent patellar dislocation without pathological TT-TG. The slide-fixation structure formed by single patellar tunnel positioning provides a variable degree of freedom for the reconstructed MPFL, which shows good effectiveness in the very early stage of the rehabilitation process.

Copyright © the editorial department of Chinese Journal of Reparative and Reconstructive Surgery of West China Medical Publisher. All rights reserved