Correlative Analysis of Two Computed Tomography Imaging Scoring to Bedside Index for Severity in Acute Pancreatitis for Evaluating Severe Acute Pancreatitis_CHINESE JOURNAL OF BASES AND CLINICS IN GENERAL SURGERY

Authors：

 WANGYi , HUANGZi-xing ,  SONGBin

Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan Province, China;

Corresponding author：

SONGBin, Email: cjr.songbin@vip.163.com

Keywords：

Severe acute pancreatitis; Bedside index for severity in acute pancreatitis; CT severity index; Modified CT severity index

DOI：

10.7507/1007-9424.20150365

Video：

Export PDF Favorites Scan Get Citation

Abstract Full text Figures/Tables Video References Cited by

Objective To investigate correlation of bedside index for severity in acute pancreatitis (BISAP) and computed tomography severity index (CTSI) or modified CT severity index (MCTSI) in assessing severe acute pancreatitis (SAP). Methods Thirty-eight patients confirmed SAP from July 2015 to October 2015 in West China Hospital of Sichuan University were prospectively included into this study. Contrast-enhanced multi-detector-row CT scan was performed for all the patients. The abnormal imaging features, such as pancreatic and peri-pancreatic inflammatory changes, involvement of other organs, and local complications, were observed and used to calculate by CTSI score and MCTSI score. The clinical data were also collected to calculate BISAP score and as compared with CTSI score and MCTSI score. Results The results of BISAP score were as follows:3 cases gradeⅠ(8.9%), 20 cases gradeⅡ(52.6%), 15 cases gradeⅢ(39.5%). The results of CTSI score were as follows:6 cases gradeⅠ(15.8%), 22 cases gradeⅡ(57.9%), 10 cases gradeⅢ(26.3%). The results of MCTSI score were as follows:2 cases gradeⅠ(5.3%), 19 cases gradeⅡ(50.0%), 17 cases gradeⅢ(44.7%). The results of interobserver agreement were good (BISAP:Kappa=1, P < 0.01; CTSI:Kappa=0.748, 95% CI 0.00-0.076, P < 0.01; MCTSI:Kappa=0.788, 95% CI 0.00-0.076, P < 0.01). There was a positive correlation between CTSI score (r_s=0.385, P=0.001) or MCTSI score (r_s=0.326, P=0.004) and BISAP score using the Spearman test. Conclusion There is a weak correlation between CTSI score or MCTSI score and BISAP score.

Citation： WANGYi, HUANGZi-xing, SONGBin. Correlative Analysis of Two Computed Tomography Imaging Scoring to Bedside Index for Severity in Acute Pancreatitis for Evaluating Severe Acute Pancreatitis. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BASES AND CLINICS IN GENERAL SURGERY, 2015, 22(11): 1386-1389. doi: 10.7507/1007-9424.20150365 Copy

1.	Triantopoulou C, Lytras D, Maniatis PA, et al. Computed tomography versus acute physiology and chronic health evaluationⅡscore in predicting severity of acute pancreatitis. Pancreas, 2007, 35(3):238-242.
2.	King NK, Powell JJ, Redhead D, et al. A simplified method for computed tomographic estimation of prognosis in acute pancreatitis. Scand J Gastroenterol, 2003, 38(4):433-436.
3.	Sun JK, Li WQ, Ni HB, et al. Modified gastrointestinal failure score for patients with severe acute pancreatitis. Surg Today, 2013, 43(5):506-513.
4.	Banks PA, Bollen TL, Dervenis C, et al. Classification of acute pancreatitis-2012:revision of the Atlanta classification and definitions by international consensus. Gut, 2013, 62(1):102-111.
5.	Wu BU, Johannes RS, Sun X, et al. The early prediction of mortality in acute pancreatitis:a large population-based study. Gut, 2008, 57(12):1698-1703.
6.	Balthazar EJ, Ranson JH, Naidich DP, et al. Acute pancreatitis:prognostic value of CT. Radiology, 1985, 156(3):767-772.
7.	Balthazar EJ, Robinson DL, Megibow AJ, et al. Acute pancreatitis:value of CT in establishing prognosis. Radiology, 1990, 174(2):331-336.
8.	Mortele KJ, Wiesner W, Intriere L, et al. A modified CT severity index for evaluating acute pancreatitis:improved correlation with patient outcome. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2004, 183(5):1261-1265.
9.	周航, 罗放.早期急性胰腺炎严重性评价进展.检验医学与临床, 2014, 11(9):1267-1268, 1297.
10.	金涛, 林子琦, 薛平, 等.多种CT评分对早期重症急性胰腺炎患者假性囊肿形成的预测价值比较.四川大学学报:医学版, 2013, 44(6):970-973.
11.	中华医学会消化病学分会胰腺疾病学组.中国急性胰腺炎诊治指南(草案).现代消化及介入诊疗, 2007, 12(3):206-208.
12.	王兴鹏, 李兆申, 袁耀宗, 等.中国急性胰腺炎诊治指南(2013, 上海)中国实用内科杂志, 2013, 18(7):530-535.
13.	严志汉, 闵鹏秋, 章士正.急性胰腺炎严重程度和预后评价的研究进展.中华放射学杂志, 2005, 39(4):432-435.
14.	乐星华, 谢会忠.急性胰腺炎评分标准的评价.现代消化及介入诊疗, 2007, 12(3):195-199.
15.	De Waele JJ, Delrue L, Hoste EA, et al. Extrapancreatic inflammation on abdominal computed tomography as an early predictor of disease severity in acute pancreatitis:evaluation of a new scoring system. Pancreas, 2007, 34(2):185-190.
16.	李峥艳, 张凌, 金涛, 等. CT评分与重症急性胰腺炎合并急性肾损伤的相关性分析.四川大学学报:医学版, 2011, 42(5):695-698, 703.
17.	Bollen TL, Singh VK, Maurer R, et al. Comparative evaluation of the modified CT severity index and CT severity index in assessing severity of acute pancreatitis. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2011, 197(2):386-392.
18.	Perez A, Whang EE, Brooks DC, et al. Is severity of necrotizing pancreatitis increased in extended necrosis and infected necrosis? Pancreas, 2002, 25(3):229-233.
19.	Singh VK, Wu BU, Bollen TL, et al. A prospective evaluation of the bedside index for severity in acute pancreatitis score in assessing mortality and intermediate markers of severity in acute pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol, 2009, 104(4):966-971.
20.	Gao W, Yang HX, Ma CE. The value of BISAP score for predicting mortality and severity in acute pancreatitis:a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One, 2015, 10(6):e0130412.
21.	Chen L, Lu G, Zhou Q, et al. Evaluation of the BISAP score in predicting severity and prognoses of acute pancreatitis in Chinese patients. Int Surg, 2013, 98(1):6-12.
22.	周圆圆, 杨丽, 廖忠莉, 等. BISAP与Ranson's评分对急性胰腺炎患者预后评估的比较.第三军医大学学报, 2012, 34(7):658-661.
23.	Papachristou GI, Muddana V, Yadav D, et al. Comparison of BISAP, Ranson's, APACHE-Ⅱ, and CTSI scores in predicting organ failure, complications, and mortality in acute pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol, 2010, 105(2):435-441.

1. Triantopoulou C, Lytras D, Maniatis PA, et al. Computed tomography versus acute physiology and chronic health evaluationⅡscore in predicting severity of acute pancreatitis. Pancreas, 2007, 35(3):238-242.
2. King NK, Powell JJ, Redhead D, et al. A simplified method for computed tomographic estimation of prognosis in acute pancreatitis. Scand J Gastroenterol, 2003, 38(4):433-436.
3. Sun JK, Li WQ, Ni HB, et al. Modified gastrointestinal failure score for patients with severe acute pancreatitis. Surg Today, 2013, 43(5):506-513.
4. Banks PA, Bollen TL, Dervenis C, et al. Classification of acute pancreatitis-2012:revision of the Atlanta classification and definitions by international consensus. Gut, 2013, 62(1):102-111.
5. Wu BU, Johannes RS, Sun X, et al. The early prediction of mortality in acute pancreatitis:a large population-based study. Gut, 2008, 57(12):1698-1703.
6. Balthazar EJ, Ranson JH, Naidich DP, et al. Acute pancreatitis:prognostic value of CT. Radiology, 1985, 156(3):767-772.
7. Balthazar EJ, Robinson DL, Megibow AJ, et al. Acute pancreatitis:value of CT in establishing prognosis. Radiology, 1990, 174(2):331-336.
8. Mortele KJ, Wiesner W, Intriere L, et al. A modified CT severity index for evaluating acute pancreatitis:improved correlation with patient outcome. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2004, 183(5):1261-1265.
9. 周航, 罗放.早期急性胰腺炎严重性评价进展.检验医学与临床, 2014, 11(9):1267-1268, 1297.
10. 金涛, 林子琦, 薛平, 等.多种CT评分对早期重症急性胰腺炎患者假性囊肿形成的预测价值比较.四川大学学报:医学版, 2013, 44(6):970-973.
11. 中华医学会消化病学分会胰腺疾病学组.中国急性胰腺炎诊治指南(草案).现代消化及介入诊疗, 2007, 12(3):206-208.
12. 王兴鹏, 李兆申, 袁耀宗, 等.中国急性胰腺炎诊治指南(2013, 上海)中国实用内科杂志, 2013, 18(7):530-535.
13. 严志汉, 闵鹏秋, 章士正.急性胰腺炎严重程度和预后评价的研究进展.中华放射学杂志, 2005, 39(4):432-435.
14. 乐星华, 谢会忠.急性胰腺炎评分标准的评价.现代消化及介入诊疗, 2007, 12(3):195-199.
15. De Waele JJ, Delrue L, Hoste EA, et al. Extrapancreatic inflammation on abdominal computed tomography as an early predictor of disease severity in acute pancreatitis:evaluation of a new scoring system. Pancreas, 2007, 34(2):185-190.
16. 李峥艳, 张凌, 金涛, 等. CT评分与重症急性胰腺炎合并急性肾损伤的相关性分析.四川大学学报:医学版, 2011, 42(5):695-698, 703.
17. Bollen TL, Singh VK, Maurer R, et al. Comparative evaluation of the modified CT severity index and CT severity index in assessing severity of acute pancreatitis. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2011, 197(2):386-392.
18. Perez A, Whang EE, Brooks DC, et al. Is severity of necrotizing pancreatitis increased in extended necrosis and infected necrosis? Pancreas, 2002, 25(3):229-233.
19. Singh VK, Wu BU, Bollen TL, et al. A prospective evaluation of the bedside index for severity in acute pancreatitis score in assessing mortality and intermediate markers of severity in acute pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol, 2009, 104(4):966-971.
20. Gao W, Yang HX, Ma CE. The value of BISAP score for predicting mortality and severity in acute pancreatitis:a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One, 2015, 10(6):e0130412.
21. Chen L, Lu G, Zhou Q, et al. Evaluation of the BISAP score in predicting severity and prognoses of acute pancreatitis in Chinese patients. Int Surg, 2013, 98(1):6-12.
22. 周圆圆, 杨丽, 廖忠莉, 等. BISAP与Ranson's评分对急性胰腺炎患者预后评估的比较.第三军医大学学报, 2012, 34(7):658-661.
23. Papachristou GI, Muddana V, Yadav D, et al. Comparison of BISAP, Ranson's, APACHE-Ⅱ, and CTSI scores in predicting organ failure, complications, and mortality in acute pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol, 2010, 105(2):435-441.

Previous Article
快速康复外科理念在日间手术中的实践
Next Article
Application of Adjacent Tissue Flap in Reconstruction of Breast Defect Following Breast Conserving Surgery for Early Breast Cancer

CHINESE JOURNAL OF BASES AND CLINICS IN GENERAL SURGERY

Correlative Analysis of Two Computed Tomography Imaging Scoring to Bedside Index for Severity in Acute Pancreatitis for Evaluating Severe Acute Pancreatitis

Abstract Full text Figures/Tables Video References Cited by

Previous Article

Next Article

Format

Content