• General Hospital of Chengdu Military Command, Chengdu, Sichuan610083, China;
HU Juan, Email: sccdwrc@163.com
Export PDF Favorites Scan Get Citation

Objective  To assess the differences between a glucose meter and autoanalyzer at home and broad.
Method  MEDLINE, CNKI, FMJS, and CBM were searched electronically (1995 to May, 2008). The statistical analysis
of included studies was performed according to the Cochrane systematic reviews method.
Result  Twenty four studies, including 11 English records and 19 Chinese records involving 4 963 specimens, were included in this study. Meta-analysis showed us the blood glucose values of Abbott, Roche, and Johnson abroad subgroups are higher than the laboratory method, and their WMD (95%CI) are 0.57 (0.34,0.80), 0.43 (0.04,0.81), 0.41 (0.11,0.71). The blood glucose values of the Abbot and Roche domestic subgroups are comparable to the laboratory method [WMD= 0.60, 95%CI (– 0.79, 1.99); WMD= – 0.13, 95%CI (– 0.56, 0.29)]. The blood glucose value of the Johnson domestic subgroup is lower than laboratory method [WMD= – 0.95, 95%CI (– 1.42, – 0.48)].
Conclusion
  The results of the abroad studies are relatively consistent, and the blood glucose values of all abroad subgroups are higher than laboratory method. The domestic studies are different because of other factors.

Citation: PENG Yan,HU Juan,WANG Qingxu. Systematic Review of Blood Glucose Determined by Glucose Meter and Autoanalyzer. Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, 2009, 09(4): 446-451. doi: 10.7507/1672-2531.20090083 Copy

Copyright © the editorial department of Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine of West China Medical Publisher. All rights reserved

  • Previous Article

    Metformin plus Roziglitazone versus Metformin for Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic review
  • Next Article

    Fat Emulsion for Acute Pancreatitis: A Systematic Review