• 1. Chinese Evidence-Based Medicine Center, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China;
  • 2. Department of Respiratory, Nuclear Industry 416 Hospital, Chengdu 610051, China;
  • 3. Department of Medical Administration, 363 Hospital, Chengdu 610041, China;
LIYou-ping, Email: yzmylab@163.com
Export PDF Favorites Scan Get Citation

Objective To evaluate the quality of pancreatic cancer guidelines using evidence-based methods based on the global burden of pancreatic cancer, so as to explore its status, region distribution, characteristics of coverage themes, and difference of therapies recommended by the guidelines of various quality, and to provide references for clinical decisionmaking. Methods PubMed, The Cochrane Library (Issue 11, 2013), CBM, CNKI, and VIP, as well as the website of National Guidelines Clearinghouse (NGC), Guidelines International Network (GIN), and National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) were systematically searched for pancreatic cancer treatment guidelines. The Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE Ⅲ) was applied to assess methodological quality of included guidelines. Results A total of 14 relevant guidelines (including five evidence-based guidelines) were included involving seven countries of four continents (Asia, Europe, North America and Oceania) and four international academic organizations. There were only two domains, namely "scope and purpose" and "clarity of presentations" which got high average scores (more than 60%) among all 14 guidelines. The mean AGREE domain scores in guidelines varied with areas, and the quality of five evidence-based guidelines was superior to that established by consensus. According to the outcomes of AGREE Ⅲ, 11 guidelines were weakly recommended, while 3 were not recommended due to poor methodological quality. The subjects of 14 guidelines covered six treatment categories, including chemotherapy, surgery, radiotherapy, support therapy, radiotherapy, and interventional therapy. Conclusion The overall methodological quality of pancreatic cancer guidelines is not high among different countries or regions. The quality of evidence-based guidelines is superior to that established by consensus. Chemotherapy, surgery, radiotherapy and support therapy were reccommended as predominant choice by these guidelines.

Citation: LICui-cui, WANGYing-qiang, LIYou-ping, LIXiang-lian. Critical Appraisal of Clinical Practice Guidelines for Pancreatic Cancer Based on the Global Disease Burden. Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, 2015, 15(2): 144-151. doi: 10.7507/1672-2531.20150026 Copy

Copyright © the editorial department of Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine of West China Medical Publisher. All rights reserved

  • Previous Article

    Adaption of Medication Adherence Management Guidelines on Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy
  • Next Article

    Evidence-based Clinical Guidelines on Medication Therapy for Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: A Systematic Review