SCI papers of West China Hospital of Sichuan University cited by guidelines: a cross-sectional study_Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine

Authors：

TANG Ruixian ^1,2 , LONG Youlin ^1,2,3 , ZHANG Na ^1,2,3 , WANG Xinyao ^1,2,3 , WANG Xinyi ^1,2 , GUO Qiong ⁴ , DU Liang ^2,3,4 ,  LI Zhengchi ⁵ ,  WANG Zheng ⁶

1. General Practice Medical Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, P. R. China;
2. Medical Device Regulatory Research and Evaluation Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, P. R. China;
3. Chinese Evidence-based Medicine Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, P. R. China;
4. West China Periodical Press, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, P. R. China;
5. CPC Committee Office, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, P. R. China;
6. Department of Science and Technology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, P. R. China;

Corresponding author：

LI Zhengchi, Email: 603172078@qq.com; WANG Zheng, Email: wangzh028@163.com

Keywords：

Guideline citation; Cross-sectional study; Article; Systematic review; Review

DOI：

10.7507/1672-2531.202308076

Video：

Export PDF Favorites Scan Get Citation

Abstract Full text Figures/Tables Video References Cited by

Objective To understand the guideline citation of papers published by West China Hospital of Sichuan University, and to provide references for evaluating quality of papers. Methods We searched Web of Science core collection database to identify the published papers with the first author's primary affiliation at West China Hospital of Sichuan University until December 31^st, 2022. Two reviewers independently performed the screening process and identified eligible papers. Afterward, we extracted the data from the selected papers, obtained their citation papers, and then separately constructed two databases, the West China Paper Database and its Citation Database. The differences in guideline citation among different types of papers and different levels of papers were analyzed using the χ² test and Mann-Whitney U test, respectively. Results A total of 22 681 papers and 252 336 citations were included, of which 18 026 (79.5) articles, 2 773 (12.2) systematic reviews and 1 882 (8.3) reviews. The rates of article, systematic review and review were 2.6%, 15.8% and 2.2%, respectively. There were significant differences in three types (P<0.001). The citation rates of papers among the top 10 disciplines were different apparently: the highest citation rate was 13.9%, while the lowest citation rate was 2.6%. The guideline citation among different levels of papers showed no significant difference, but Q1 papers were more likely to be cited by Q1 guidelines (P<0.05). Conclusion Papers cited by guidelines are unevenly distributed across their article types and subject areas. High-quality papers are more likely to be cited by high-quality guidelines. Therefore, the citation of papers by guidelines can be considered as one of the indicators to evaluate the quality of papers.

Citation： TANG Ruixian, LONG Youlin, ZHANG Na, WANG Xinyao, WANG Xinyi, GUO Qiong, DU Liang, LI Zhengchi, WANG Zheng. SCI papers of West China Hospital of Sichuan University cited by guidelines: a cross-sectional study. Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, 2024, 24(2): 149-154. doi: 10.7507/1672-2531.202308076 Copy

1.	江澜, 关卫屏, 游苏宁. 应将论文被引用频次作为未来科研成果评价的指标. 中华医学杂志, 2009, 89(24): 1727-1728.
2.	Tousoulis D, Stefanadis C. How can we assess scientific quality. Citation index only for original research and/or for authorship in the guidelines? Hellenic J Cardiol, 2014, 55(5): 353-354.
3.	董建军. 中国知网收录的国家自然科学基金论文的被引情况分析. 中国科技期刊研究, 2012, 23(5): 776-778.
4.	刘雪立, 方红玲, 周志新, 等. 科技期刊反向评价指标—零被引论文率及其与其他文献计量学指标的关系. 中国科技期刊研究, 2011, 22(4): 525-528.
5.	俞立平, 潘云涛, 武夷山. 学术期刊来源指标与影响力关系的实证研究. 科研管理, 2010, 31(6): 173-179.
6.	Moed HF. New developments in the use of citation analysis in research evaluation. Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz), 2009, 57(1): 13-18.
7.	Garfield E. Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation. Science, 1972, 178(4060): 471-479.
8.	Braun TGW, Schubert A. World flash on basic research - the newest version of the facts and figures on publication output and relative citation impact of 100 countries 1981-1985. Sci entometrics, 1988, 13: 181-188.
9.	科技部. 印发《关于破除科技评价中“唯论文”不良导向的若干措施(试行)》的通知. 2020.
10.	Canadian Academy of Health Sciences. Impact assessment framework and recommended indicators. 2023.
11.	The World University Rankings. The impact rankings 2020: methodology.
12.	中国医学科学院医学信息研究所. 中国医院/医学院校科技量值. 2023.
13.	Medical Research Council. Researchfish database of MRC outcome. 2023.
14.	胥美美, 单连慧, 安新颖. 基于国际临床指南引用论文的中国研究影响力评价—以呼吸病学为例. 情报工程, 2022, 8(1): 111-121.
15.	Wang X, Chen Y, Yang N, et al. Methodology and reporting quality of reporting guidelines: systematic review. BMC Med Res Method, 2015, 15(1): 74.
16.	Zhang S, Wu L, Wang Y, et al. Methodological and reporting quality of pediatric clinical practice guidelines: a systematic review. Ann Trans Med, 2021, 9(15): 1258.
17.	四川大学华西医院. 四川大学华西医院科技成果转移转化九条激励政策(试行). 2023.
18.	四川大学华西医院. 四川大学华西医院科学研究. 2023.
19.	朱晓燕, 王旭, 陶莹, 等. 上海市专科医院临床研究人才队伍建设存在的问题及对策研究. 上海预防医学, 2021, 33(12): 1209-1214.
20.	晏艳阳, 王娟. 产业政策如何促进企业创新效率提升—对“五年规划”实施效果的一项评价. 产经评论, 2018, 9(3): 57-74.
21.	程国辉. 加强基础研究投入, 为经济注入“强心针”. 科学导报, 2015.
22.	中国知网. 公立医院高质量发展背景下华西医院科研管理体系建设. 2023.
23.	陶斯宇, 谭宗颖. 生物医学领域基础研究转化的测度方法研究—以干细胞和免疫学领域国家自然科学基金资助面上项目产出论文为例. 图书情报工作, 2023, 67(14): 50-61.
24.	Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Standards for Developing Trustworthy Clinical Practice Guidelines. Clinical practice guidelines we can trust. Washington DC: National Academies Press (US), 2011.
25.	王梦书, 李乐, 张红霞, 等. 影像诊断系统评价被临床实践指南引用情况调查. 中国循证医学杂志, 2016, 16(3): 341-347.

1. 江澜, 关卫屏, 游苏宁. 应将论文被引用频次作为未来科研成果评价的指标. 中华医学杂志, 2009, 89(24): 1727-1728.
2. Tousoulis D, Stefanadis C. How can we assess scientific quality. Citation index only for original research and/or for authorship in the guidelines? Hellenic J Cardiol, 2014, 55(5): 353-354.
3. 董建军. 中国知网收录的国家自然科学基金论文的被引情况分析. 中国科技期刊研究, 2012, 23(5): 776-778.
4. 刘雪立, 方红玲, 周志新, 等. 科技期刊反向评价指标—零被引论文率及其与其他文献计量学指标的关系. 中国科技期刊研究, 2011, 22(4): 525-528.
5. 俞立平, 潘云涛, 武夷山. 学术期刊来源指标与影响力关系的实证研究. 科研管理, 2010, 31(6): 173-179.
6. Moed HF. New developments in the use of citation analysis in research evaluation. Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz), 2009, 57(1): 13-18.
7. Garfield E. Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation. Science, 1972, 178(4060): 471-479.
8. Braun TGW, Schubert A. World flash on basic research - the newest version of the facts and figures on publication output and relative citation impact of 100 countries 1981-1985. Sci entometrics, 1988, 13: 181-188.
9. 科技部. 印发《关于破除科技评价中“唯论文”不良导向的若干措施(试行)》的通知. 2020.
10. Canadian Academy of Health Sciences. Impact assessment framework and recommended indicators. 2023.
11. The World University Rankings. The impact rankings 2020: methodology.
12. 中国医学科学院医学信息研究所. 中国医院/医学院校科技量值. 2023.
13. Medical Research Council. Researchfish database of MRC outcome. 2023.
14. 胥美美, 单连慧, 安新颖. 基于国际临床指南引用论文的中国研究影响力评价—以呼吸病学为例. 情报工程, 2022, 8(1): 111-121.
15. Wang X, Chen Y, Yang N, et al. Methodology and reporting quality of reporting guidelines: systematic review. BMC Med Res Method, 2015, 15(1): 74.
16. Zhang S, Wu L, Wang Y, et al. Methodological and reporting quality of pediatric clinical practice guidelines: a systematic review. Ann Trans Med, 2021, 9(15): 1258.
17. 四川大学华西医院. 四川大学华西医院科技成果转移转化九条激励政策(试行). 2023.
18. 四川大学华西医院. 四川大学华西医院科学研究. 2023.
19. 朱晓燕, 王旭, 陶莹, 等. 上海市专科医院临床研究人才队伍建设存在的问题及对策研究. 上海预防医学, 2021, 33(12): 1209-1214.
20. 晏艳阳, 王娟. 产业政策如何促进企业创新效率提升—对“五年规划”实施效果的一项评价. 产经评论, 2018, 9(3): 57-74.
21. 程国辉. 加强基础研究投入, 为经济注入“强心针”. 科学导报, 2015.
22. 中国知网. 公立医院高质量发展背景下华西医院科研管理体系建设. 2023.
23. 陶斯宇, 谭宗颖. 生物医学领域基础研究转化的测度方法研究—以干细胞和免疫学领域国家自然科学基金资助面上项目产出论文为例. 图书情报工作, 2023, 67(14): 50-61.
24. Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Standards for Developing Trustworthy Clinical Practice Guidelines. Clinical practice guidelines we can trust. Washington DC: National Academies Press (US), 2011.
25. 王梦书, 李乐, 张红霞, 等. 影像诊断系统评价被临床实践指南引用情况调查. 中国循证医学杂志, 2016, 16(3): 341-347.

Previous Article
Non-operative treatments for lumbar disc herniation: an evidence-based practice guideline GELong, LI Jing, SHANG Wenru, XING Xin, NIU Junqiang, MIN Kaili, HUI Xu, HE Shenghua, JIANG Hong, JIAO Feng, YAO Yuan, DONG Jingshi, XU Qian, HAO Guoxiong, LENG Xiangyang, LI Gang, LIN Dingkun, LIU Jun, MA Weihu, MO Wen, SHI Xiaolin, SONG Min, WANG Yongjun, WANG Yongping, YAO Xiaosheng, YU Jie, ZHAN Hongsheng, ZHU Liguo, XIE Xingwen, XING Dan, DU Liang, LU Weizhong, GUO Ke, LI Zijun, LI Xiuxia, LI Meixuan, LI Yanfei, ZHANG Licun, ZHAO Jirong, YANG Kehu
Next Article
Construction and validation of a nomogram prediction model for the risk of pregnant women's fear of childbirth HUANGLiping, DONG Zhixia, YANG Yifeng, TANG Huiyan

Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine

SCI papers of West China Hospital of Sichuan University cited by guidelines: a cross-sectional study

Abstract Full text Figures/Tables Video References Cited by

Previous Article

Next Article

Format

Content