ZENG Yating 1,2,3 , HE Wenbo 3 , SU Xiaoyi 1,2,3 , MA Jinyi 1,2,3 , YU Zhiruo 1,2,3 , XU Yihan 1,2,3 , YUAN Huanhuan 2 , CHEN Fan 2 , LU Tianlin 2 , DU Liang 1,2,3 , LI Zhengchi 1,2,4
  • 1. Chinese Evidence-based Medicine Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, P. R. China;
  • 2. Center for Education of Medical Humanities, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, P. R. China;
  • 3. Innovation Institute for Integration of Medicine and Engineering, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, P. R. China;
  • 4. Institute of Hospital Management, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, P. R. China;
DU Liang, Email: duliang0606@vip.sina.com; LI Zhengchi, Email: lizhengchi@wchscu.cn
Export PDF Favorites Scan Get Citation

Objective To investigate the network structure of comorbid depression and anxiety symptoms among medical staff and analyze differences across institutional types. Methods A convenience sampling method was used to select medical stuff from medical institutions at various levels in Guang'an City as participants between August 10 and 15, 2024. General demographic questionnaires, the Chinese version of the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) for depression screening, and the Chinese version of the Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale (GAD-7) were used to survey them. The study aimed to analyze the influencing factors of anxiety and depression and construct a network model. Predictability, bridging strength, and node strength were used to assess the network structure. The non-parametric bootstrap method was employed to evaluate the accuracy and stability of the network, and finally, a Network Comparison Test (NCT) was used to examine the impact of different levels of healthcare institutions on the network model. Results A total of 889 participants were included in the study. The analysis showed that the incidence of depressive symptoms (PHQ-9≥5) among healthcare workers was 44.88%, while the incidence of anxiety symptoms (GAD-7≥5) was 43.98%, with a comorbidity rate of 36.67%. Network analysis revealed that the top three symptoms with the highest node strength were difficulty relaxing (A4), excessive worry (A3), and fatigue (D4). The top three symptoms with the highest bridging strength were irritability/anger (A6), fatigue (D4), and worrying about terrible things happening (A7). The different levels of healthcare institutions did not have a significant impact on the network model. Conclusion The central symptoms (such as difficulty relaxing, excessive worry, and fatigue) and key bridging symptoms (such as irritability/anger, fatigue, and worrying about terrible things happening) in the anxiety and depression symptom network can serve as potential intervention targets for healthcare workers at risk of depressive and anxiety symptoms.

Copyright © the editorial department of Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine of West China Medical Publisher. All rights reserved