• Department of CardiacThoracic Surgery,The People’s Hospital of Suining,Suining Sichuan 629000,China;
Export PDF Favorites Scan Get Citation

目的:探讨食道癌贲门癌术后两种重建方法的优劣。方法:实验组食管癌贲门癌切除术后采用圆形吻合器行食管胃器械吻合,吻合口4号丝线间断加强并另行吻合口大网膜缠绕并吻合合口减张。对照组行食管胃粘膜及粘膜下分层吻合加胃浆肌层与食管肌层缝合包埋吻合口并减张重建。比较两组手术时间,术后肺部感染和肺不张、吻合口瘘和狭窄及胃食管反流发生率。结果:实验组吻合口瘘发生率为0.6%(2/316),吻合口狭窄发生率为5.7%(18/316),对照组吻合口瘘发生率为1.6%(3/186),吻合口狭窄发生率为4.3%(8/186),均有显著性差异(P<0.05)。吻合口近端胃食管反流液随机抽样检查pH值,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。行机械吻合手术时间明显缩短,有统计学意义(P<0.05)。实验组肺部感染发生率0.3%(1/316),无肺不张,对照组肺部感染发生率1.6%(3/186),肺不张0.5%(1/186),其差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:食管癌贲门癌切除术中行机械吻合重建方便快捷,可减少并发症,适于临床临床推广。

Citation: YANG Shibing,YANG Xuquan,HU Jiewei,et al.. Contrast Analysis on Two Reconstructive Methods after Resection of Esophageal and Cardiac Carcinoma. West China Medical Journal, 2009, 24(1): 152-154. doi: Copy

Copyright © the editorial department of West China Medical Journal of West China Medical Publisher. All rights reserved