An retrospective analysis of 112 cases with localized left hepatolithiasis (LLH) treated in our center in recent two decades was made. The results showed: ①Coexisting involvements of both left external hepatic duct (LEHD) and left medial hepatic duct (LMHD) were the most common pathological pattern (83.08%), came next the only LEHD involvement (12.31%). There was no localized LMHD caculi in this group. ②The rate of concomitant LHD stricture was 59.82% and that of LMHD or LEHD were 84.85% and 84.00% respectively, in which severe degrees dominate. ③Lateral segmentectomy was the most common clinical practice for LLH (58.93%), and left lebectomy was much less frequently used (12.50%), although the latter led to a significantly smaller rate of residual (7.14% vs 21.21%) and had a satification follow-up rate of 85.71% being superior to lateral segmentectomy (46.97%), or cholangiojejunostomy (40.00%), bile duct exploration and drainage (0). ④The most common prognostic factors were residual or recurrent stones of LMHD (62.50%) and residual LHD stricture (37.50%). ⑤There was no significant difference between left lobectomy and lateral segmentectomy in length of operation, intraoperative bleeding, and postoperative complications. The results indicate that too much dependence on lateral segmentectomy in the management of LLH is one of the most important factors affecting the longterm results, for which left lobectomy is an applicable and safe therapy of choice.

Citation： Sun Wenbing,Han Benli,Cai Jingxiu,et al.. SURGICAL TREATMENT OF THE LOCALIZED LEFT HEPATOLITHIASIS. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BASES AND CLINICS IN GENERAL SURGERY, 1998, 5(2): 87-89. doi: Copy

Copyright © the editorial department of CHINESE JOURNAL OF BASES AND CLINICS IN GENERAL SURGERY of West China Medical Publisher. All rights reserved