Export PDF Favorites Scan Get Citation

Objective  To assess the effectiveness and safety of prulifloxacin in the treatment of urinary tract infection.
Methods  The double-blind, double dummy and randomized controlled method was adopted. One hundred and forty-four patients were randomized to the treatment group (prulifloxacin , 4 tablets, bid) and the control group (levofloxacin, 4 tablets, bid). The randomization code was produced by computer. The treatment duration for both groups was from 7 to 10 days.
Results  Data were analyzed on the basis of full analysis sets (FAS) and per-protocol (PP) analysis. The total improvement rates of the trial and control groups were 85.07% and 88.52% respectively by FAS analysis, and 90.48% and 91.53% respectively by PP analysis. There was no significant difference between the two groups in improvement rates (P gt;0.05). Bacterial negative rates in the trial and control groups were 93.75% and 93.88% respectively by FAS analysis and 97.83% and 97.87% respectively by PP analysis. The results showed no statistical significance difference between the two groups in bacterial negative rates (P gt;0.05). The adverse events in the prulifloxacin and levofloxacin groups were 2.80% and 5.60% respectively.
Conclusion  Prulifloxacin has the same clinical effectiveness as levofloxacin with a few toxic adverse effects in the treatment of urinary tract infection.

Citation: QIU Hongyu,CAI Yongning,FU Ping,ZHENG Li,WU Xiaohou,LENG Jing,ZHANG Guifa,ZHONG Hui,SHA Zhaohui,LI Zi,MI Xuhua,DAI Qiang,LU Ding. Prulifloxacin in the Treatment of Urinary Tract Infection: A Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial. Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, 2006, 06(6): 399-403. doi: Copy

Copyright © the editorial department of Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine of West China Medical Publisher. All rights reserved