• Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510120, China;
Export PDF Favorites Scan Get Citation

Objective  To seek the statistical solution in the comparison of different effects from multi-center randomized controlled trials (RCTs).
Methods  The data collected from a multi-center RCT were used as the examples and processed by CMH test and meta-analysis.
Results  The result of CMH test indicated that the significant difference of the effect values existed among centers (P 〈0. 05 ). While meta-analysis showed no significant difference (P 〉0.05 ) by heterogeneity test. However, when using fixed effect model, inter-group significant difference of merged effect values was observed (P 〈0.05 ).
Conclusions  In the clinical research based on the method of multi-center RCT, met.a-analysis can be applied if the difference of inclination of the inter-group therapeutic effect is found among different centers. The proper mathematical model should be selected based on the result of heterogeneity test to merge and compare the effect values. The conclusions should be drawn from the results of both meta-analysis and CMH test.

Citation: Ou Aihua ,LAO Yingrong,HE Yiting,HE Xiaohong,WANG Baojuan. Application of CMH Test and Meta-analysis in Multi-center Randomized Controlled Trials. Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, 2006, 06(1): 50-54. doi: Copy

Copyright © the editorial department of Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine of West China Medical Publisher. All rights reserved