ObjectiveTo assess the method and the results of tricuspid annuloplasty performed(TVP) with the Edwards MC3 ring. MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 312 patients with functional tricuspid regurgitation(FTR) secondary to left-sided valve disease in our hospital from June 2012 through May 2014. There were 147 males and 165 females at mean age of 55.7±7.3 years. ResultsThere was no death in the patients because of the planting of MC3 ring. The mean follow-up rate was 99.4%(310/312) for 2 patients immigration abroad. The follow-up time was 0-24(14.2±4.7) months. The ultrasoundcardiogram showed that all the ejection fraction(EF) of right ventricle improved compared with preoperation(P<0.05). The pulmonary artery systolic pressure(SPAP), both internal diameter and regurgitation volume of right ventricle were decreased(P<0.05). In the 310 patients, 302 patients(97.4%) were with the TR class 0-Ⅰ, 5 patients(1.6%) with class Ⅱ, 3 patients(1.0%) with class Ⅲ. There was no severe TR or no patient with reoperation. ConclusionThe MC3 ring is easy for planting and has good repeatability, which provides stable and satisfactory results for plasty of the tricuspid annulus with seldom residue or recurrent TR.
摘要:目的:探讨改良De Vega环缩术与经典De Vega环缩术相比对于治疗重度三尖瓣返流是否具有更好的成形效果。方法: 2007年12月至2009年3月对29例重度三尖瓣返流的患者行De Vega环缩术。其中16例行改良De Vega环缩术,13例行经典De Vega环缩术,随访比较两组患者三尖瓣返流程度,右心室舒张期末内径,EF值及心功能分级。以秩和检验分析研究两组患者三尖瓣返流程度和心功能分级的差异,以t检验研究两组患者右心室舒张末期内径及EF值变化。结果:术前两组患者一般指标无显著差异。两组患者随访时间无显著差异。随访经典De Vega组重度返流1例,中度返流5例,轻度返流5例,微量及无返流2例;改良De Vega组无中、重度返流,轻度返流8例,微量及无返流8例。经分析显示两组患者三尖瓣返流程度结果差异有统计学意义(Plt;0.05)。经典De Vega组心功能分级I级5例,II级7例,III级1例;改良De Vega组I级7例,II级8例,III级1例,两组患者心功能差异无统计学意义(Pgt;0.05)。两组患者右室舒张期末内径及EF值组内比较随访与术前差异均有统计学意义(Plt;0.05),随访时组间比较差异有统计学意义(Plt;0.05), 改良De Vega环缩术随访时右室舒张期末内径缩小更显著,射血分数改善更明显。结论:改良De Vega环缩术治疗重度三尖瓣返流效果优于经典De Vega环缩术。Abstract: Objective: To compare the efficacy of one kind of modified De Vega technique and traditional De Vega technique for the correction of severe tricuspid regurgitation. Methods: From December 2007 to March 2009, 29 patients were treated with tricuspid valve annuloplasty. These were 16 patients in modified De Vega annuloplasty group and the others (13 patients) in traditional De Vega annuloplasty group. The grade of tricuspid regurgitation、New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class、ejection fraction (EF) and the right ventricular enddiastolic dimension of two groups were followed and reviewed. Results: There was no statistically difference between two groups about preoperative characteristics and followup time. There was 1 patient with severe TR, 5 patients with moderate TR, 5 patients with mild TR and 2 patients without TR in traditional De Vega annuloplasty group after the operations. In modified De Vega annuloplasty group, no patient was observed with severe or moderate TR, 8 patients with mild TR, and 8 patients without TR. At interval time, there was significant difference in the grade of tricuspid regurgitation between two groups (Plt;0. 05). Both tricuspid valve plasty techniques could reduce the right ventricular enddiastolic dimension and improve ejection fraction significantly (Plt; 0. 05), and there was significant difference in the right ventricular enddiastolic dimension and ejection fraction at interval time between two groups (Plt;0.05). Conclusions: The outcome of modified tricuspid De Vega technique is superior to that of traditional De Vega technique in correcting severe tricuspid regurgitation.
Abstract： Objective To evaluate the surgical effect of ring annuloplasty using prosthetic vascular graft for the treatment of tricuspid regurgitation. Methods From July 2000 to July 2010, ring annuloplasty using prosthetic vascular graft was performed to a total of 56 patients with tricuspid regurgitation in Changhai Hospital of Second Military Medical University. There were 24 male patients and 32 female patients. Their mean age was（45.7±21.8）years (ranging from 14 to 73 years). All the patients were diagnosed as moderate to severe tricuspid regurgitation by color Doppler echocardiography examination, including 47 patients with rheumatic heart valve diseases, and 9 patients with congenital heart disease (Ebstein’s anomaly). All the 56 patients underwent ring annuloplasty using prosthetic vascular graft instead of Carpentier annuloplasty ring for the treatment of tricuspid regurgitation. Results There was no in-hospital death. Postoperatively, one patient had acute respiratory failure, one patient had acute kidney failure, and one patient had re-exploration for bleeding. All patients had none or mild tricuspid regurgitation by echocardiography examination one month after surgery. Forty eight patients were followed up from 1.0 to 9.5 years with a median follow-up time of 3.8 years. During follow-up, there was no late death, but one patient had brain embolism as an anticoagulation complication. Sixteen patients were in New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional classⅠ, 26 patients in NYHA classⅡ, and 6 patients in NYHA class Ⅲ. Thirty six patients had no tricuspid regurgitation, 10 patients had mild tricuspid regurgitation, and 2 patients had moderate tricuspid regurgitation by echocardiography examination during follow-up. Conclusion The early and mid-term follow-up results of ring annuloplasty using prosthetic vascular graft instead of Carpentier annuloplasty ring for the treatment of tricuspid regurgitation are satisfactory. It is a good choice for the surgical treatment of tricuspid regurgitation.
Objective To improve surgical results, the experience of surgical management of Ebstein anomaly in 36 cases is reported and reviewed. Methods Surgical procedures included tricuspid valve replacement (6 cases), Danielson’s operation (28 cases), Carpentier’s operation (2 cases), among them, there were 5 cases of ablation of right atrioventricular accessory pathway. Results Four patients died early after operation in the hospital, 3 from right heart failure (1 case of tricuspid valve replacement and 2 cas...
Objective To compare the efficacy of one kind of modified De Vega technique and traditional De Vega technique. Methods From January 2002 to August 2005, 70 patients were treated with tricuspid valve plasty. These patients were divided into modified De Vega annuloplasty group and traditional De Vega annuloplasty group randomly before operation. The tricuspid regurgitation （TR） were functional and secondary in all patients. The grade of TR and New York Heart Association（NYHA） functional class of two groups were analyzed by Ridit analysis. The changes of right ventricular end-diastolic dimension of two groups were analyzed by paired-sample t test. Results There was no statistically difference between two groups about preoperative characteristics. The follow-up time of modified De Vega annuloplasty group was 12.91±8.84 months and that of traditional De Vega annuloplasty group was 13.61±11.21 months. There was no significant difference between two groups. The outcome of follow-up was satisfactory. In modified De Vega annuloplasty group, there were 12 patient with no TR, 17 patient with mild TR, and 6 patients with moderate TR. There was no patient with severe TR. In traditional De Vega annuloplasty group, 7 patients were observed with no TR, 19 patients mild TR, 7 patients moderate TR and 2 patients severe TR. In modified De Vega annuloplasty group, 32 patients were in NYHA class Ⅰ, 2 patients in NYHA class Ⅱ and only 1 patient in NYHA class Ⅲ. As for traditional De Vega annuloplasty group, 31 patients were in NYHA class Ⅰ, 2 patients in NYHA class Ⅱ and 2 patients in NYHA class Ⅲ. The Ridit analysis showed that there was no significant difference about NYHA class between two groups. However, the difference of TR between two groups was statistically significant （P〈0.05）. The outcome of modified De Vega annuloplasty was superior to that of traditional De Vega technique. Paired-sample t test demonstrated that the modified De Vega annuloplasty could reduce the right ventricular end-diastolic dimension significantly （P〈0.05）. However, the right ventricular end-diastolic dimension of traditional De Vega annuloplasty groups did not change significantly （P 〉 0.05）. Conclusion The efficacy of modified tricuspid De Vega technique is superior to that of traditional De Vega technique in patients with secondary TR.