Objective To investigate clinical application and safety evaluation of sedative demulcent anesthesia in therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP).Methods Totally 1660 patients underwent ERCP at the First Hospital of Lanzhou University were prospectively divided into two groups: venous sedative demulcent group (n=800, using sufentanil and midazolam and propofol continuing infusion) and conventional sedative demulcent group (n=860, using common medicine). The heart rate (HR), respiration (R), blood pressure (BP) and peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2) of pre-anesthesia, post-anesthesia, during operation and after analepsia in every group were detected. The narcotism was evaluated by Ramsaymin grading method and the related adverse reactions such as cough, restlessness, harmful memory, and abdominal pain after operation were recorded. Results Compared with conventional sedative demulcent group, vital signs of patients in venous sedative demulcent group were more stable. For postoperative adverse reactions, abdominal pain, abdominal distension and nausea and vomiting were respectively 4.4%(35/800), 2.6%(21/800) and 3.6%(29/800) in venous sedative demulcent group, which were respectively higher of the incidence of 36.3%(312/860), 49.0%(421/860) and 53.0%(456/860) in conventional sedative demulcent group (P＜0.01). The postoperative satisfaction and adverse reactions recall between venous sedative demulcent group and conventional sedative demulcent group was respectively significant different (96.9% vs. 2.9%, 4.8% vs. 97.9%, P＜0.01). Conclusion Sufentanil and midazolam and propofol continuing infusion have good effect of sedative demulcent anesthesia, which can be widely used.
【摘要】 目的 观察丙泊酚在重症监护室（ICU） 外科术后对患者的镇静效果及作用。 方法 2006年7月-2008年7月，对行外科手术后在ICU观察室采用丙泊酚镇静的45例患者的镇静效果、停药苏醒时间及给药前后呼吸、循环参数的变化进行观察，并与治疗前进行比较。 结果 丙泊酚镇静起效快，镇静治疗后大多数患者开始血压有所下降（Plt;0.05）但不久恢复正常，所有患者心率、呼吸频率、血氧饱和度无明显变化（Pgt;0.05），停药后苏醒快。 结论 丙泊酚是外科术后患者较理想的镇静剂，但应根据患者情况调整给药速度、剂量及时间。 【Abstract】 Objective To observe the sedative effect of propofol on the patients after surgical operations in intensive care unit (ICU). Methods Forty-five patients underwent the injection with propofol after surgical operations in ICU from July 2006 to July 2008. The sedative efficacy, recovery time after the propofol administration, and changes of respiratory, circulate parameter before and after medication were observed, which were compared with those before the treatment. Results The sedative reactive time of propofol was short. Most of the patients had decreased blood pressure after injection with propofol (Plt;0.05) but recovered soon. The heart rate, respiratory rate, and pulse oxygen saturation did not significantly changed (Pgt;0.05). The recovery time was short after propofol administration was stopped. Conclusion Propofol is an effective sedative for the patients after surgical operations in ICU, but the medicated speed, amount and time according to state of the patients should be adjusted.
ObjectiveTo investigate the effect of etomidate and propofol on inflammatory cytokines and cortisol for patients with lung adenocarcinoma. MethodSixty patients scheduled for lung cancer surgery under general anesthesia were studied. All patients were randomly divided into an etomidate total intravenous anesthesia group (group E, 30 patients, 16 males and 14 females at age of 58.0±5.0 years) and a propofol total intravenous anesthesia group (group P, 30 patients, 17 males and 13 females at age of 55.0±5.0 years), with 30 patients in each group. ResultsThe concentration of IL-6 in serum of patients in the two groups at time points T1, T2 and T3 was significantly higher than those at time point T0 (P < 0.01). The concentration of IL-10 and TNF-α in serum of patients at time points T1 and T2 was significantly higher than those at time point T0 (P < 0.01). And the difference of the concentration of TNF-α in serum of patients at time points T0 and T3 was not statistically significant (P > 0.05). The level of Cor of patients in the group E at time point T0 was slightly higher than those at time point T1, but lower than that at time points T2 and T3. There was no statistical difference in the concentration of IL-6 and TNF-α in serum of patients between the two groups. The level of IL-10 of patients in the group E at time points T2 and T3 was lower than those in the group P (P < 0.05), but no significant difference was observed at the other time points. The concentration of Cor in the patients in the group E at time point T1 was lower than that in the group P (P < 0.01), but no significant difference was observed either at the other time points. ConclusionThe effect of etomidate used for maintenance of general anesthesia on the inflammatory factors is essentially similar to that of propofol.
目的 观察右美托咪啶复合丙泊酚靶控静脉麻醉在纤维支气管镜检查术中的麻醉效果。 方法 2010年12月－2012年4月，将60例行纤维支气管镜检查术的患者随机分为丙泊酚麻醉组（对照组）和右美托咪啶复合丙泊酚麻醉组（观察组），每组各30例。观察记录不同时点平均动脉压（MAP）、心率、呼吸次数（RR）、脉搏血氧饱和度（SpO2），镇静评分、手术时间、苏醒时间、丙泊酚总用量、不良反应发生率及患者满意度。 结果 所有患者均能顺利完成操作，诱导入睡后观察组MAP、心率下降（P＜0.05），丙泊酚总用量、不良反应发生率均少于对照组（P＜0.05），镇静评分优于对照组（P＜0.05）；两组RR、SpO2、苏醒时间、手术时间及患者满意度差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）。 结论 右美托咪定复合丙泊酚靶控输注适用于纤维支气管镜检查术麻醉，是一种更加安全有效的麻醉方法。
目的:比较七氟醚吸入麻醉和丙泊酚、瑞芬太尼静脉麻醉用于小儿手术的临床效果。方法:100例1～8岁的患儿随机分为丙泊酚、瑞芬太尼组(A组)与七氟醚吸入组(B组）。麻醉诱导后,A组持续输注丙泊酚和瑞芬太尼维持麻醉,B组吸入七氟醚维持麻醉。术中根据生命体征调整丙泊酚、瑞芬太尼的输注速度及七氟醚的吸入浓度,记录术中循环变化、术后麻醉恢复情况。结果:与B组相比,A组术中MAP下降明显(Plt;005)。结论:与A组相比,B组术中生命体征控制平稳;术后清醒迅速、完全、平稳,拔管时间无明显差异。
Objective To systematically review the effects of lidocaine for preventing pain on injection of propofol. Methods Databases including The Cochrane Library (Issue 4, 2012), PubMed, MEDLINE, Ovid, HighWire, EMbase, CBM and CNKI were searched electronically to collect literature published from January, 1985 to December, 2012. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were indentified about lidocaine for preventing injection pain of propofol. References of the included studies were also retrieved. Two reviewers independently screened literature according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted data, and assess the quality of the included studies. Then meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.1 software. Results Fifteen trials involved 1 332 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis indicated that, adding lidocaine into propofol lowered the incidence of pain on injection compared with blank control, with a significant difference (RR=0.36, 95%CI 0.30 to 0.44, Plt;0.000 01); using different doses of lidocaine before injection lowered the incidence of pain on injection compared with blank control, with a significant difference (RR=0.59, 95%CI 0.47 to 0.75, Plt;0.000 1); using different doses of lidocaine after venous occlusion lowered the incidence of pain on injection compared with blank control, with a significant difference (RR=0.44, 95%CI 0.37 to 0.52, Plt;0.000 01). Conclusion Lidocaine could reduce the pain on injection of propofol. Using lidocaine 40 mg after venous occlusion is a relatively effective method to lower the incidence of pain on injection which is more suitable for outpatient who receive intravenous anesthesia without preoperation medication.
Objective To evaluate the sedative and analgesic efficacy and adverse effect of dexmedetomidine versus propofol on the postoperative patients in intensive care unit (ICU). Methods The relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were searched in The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, PubMed, SCI, SpringerLinker, ScinceDirect, CNKI, VIP, WanFang Data and CBM from the date of their establishment to November 2011. The quality of the included studies was evaluated after the data were extracted by two reviewers independently, and then the meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 5.1. Results Ten RCTs involoving 793 cases were included. The qualitative analysis results showed: within a certain range of dosage as dexmedetomidine: 0.2-2.5 μg/(kg·h), and propofol: 0.8-4 mg/(kg·h), dexmedetomidine was similar to propofol in sedative effect, but dexmedetomidine group needed smaller dosage of supplemental analgesics during the period of sedative therapy. The results of meta-analysis showed: the percentage of patients needing supplemental analgesics in dexmedetomidine group was less than that in propofol group during the period of sedative therapy (OR=0.24, 95%CI 0.08 to 0.68, P=0.008). Compared with the propofol group, the duration of ICU stay was significantly shorter in the dexmedetomidine group (WMD= –1.10, 95%CI –1.88 to –0.32, P=0.006), but the mechanical ventilated time was comparable between the two groups (WMD=0.89, 95%CI –1.15 to 2.93, P=0.39); the incidence of adverse effects had no significant difference between two groups (bradycardia: OR=3.57, 95%CI 0.86 to 14.75, P=0.08; hypotension: OR=1.00, 95%CI 0.30 to 3.32, P=1.00); respiratory depression seemed to be more frequently in propofol group, which however needed further study. Mortalities were similar in both groups after the sedative therapy (OR=1.03, 95%CI 0.54 to 1.99, P=0.92). Conclusion Within an exact range of dosage, dexmedetomidine is comparable with propofol in sedative effect. Besides, it has analgesic effect, fewer adverse effects and fewer occurrences of respiratory depression, and it can save the extra dosage of analgesics and shorten ICU stay. Still, more larger-sample, multi-center RCTs are needed to provide more evidence to support this outcome.
目的 探讨全凭静脉麻醉中腺苷对丙泊酚用量的影响。 方法 2011年1月－12月期间59例行择期手术的患者全凭静脉麻醉，随机分为腺苷静脉持续输注组（A组）和对照组（B组），A组患者麻醉诱导后持续输注腺苷70 μg/（kg·min），直至术毕。B组麻醉后按常规处理。比较两组患者麻醉时间、苏醒时间、瑞芬太尼用量，麻醉过程中平均动脉压（MAP）、心率，以及麻醉过程中丙泊酚的用量。同时记录使用腺苷过程中的不良反应。 结果 两组患者麻醉时间、苏醒时间、瑞芬太尼用量比较均无明显差异，无统计学意义（P＞0.05）。两组患者麻醉过程中MAP、心率比较亦无明显差异，无统计学意义（P＞0.05）。两组患者麻醉过程中丙泊酚平均用量比较，A组明显低于C组，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05），且不良反应发生率低。 结论 腺苷能明显降低全凭静脉麻醉中丙泊酚的使用剂量。
目的 探讨磷丙泊酚钠后处理对大鼠肝脏缺血再灌注损伤的影响及是否呈剂量相关性。 方法 40只SD大鼠随机分为5组（每组n=8），即：假手术组（SP组）、生理盐水后处理组（NS组）、丙泊酚后处理组（PRO组）、低剂量磷丙泊酚钠[6 mg/（kg·h）]后处理组（LFOS组）、高剂量磷丙泊酚钠[12 mg/（kg·h）]后处理组（HFOS组）。除SP组外，其余4组在肝脏缺血60 min后给予药物后处理直至手术结束。在缺血60 min、再灌注60 min和120 min时采集血样，测定血清中丙氨酸氨基转移酶（ALT）、天门冬氨酸氨基转移酶（AST）、乳酸脱氢酶（ LDH）含量；在灌注120 min时取大鼠肝左外叶，用于HE染色，观察肝脏的形态学改变。 结果 与NS组相比，SP组、PRO组、LFOS组和HFOS组血清中的ALT、AST、LDH值明显降低（P＜0.05）；与SP组比较，PRO组、LFOS组、HFOS组和NS组的ALT、AST、LDH值升高（P＜0.05）；与PRO组比较，LFOS组的ALT、AST和LDH值差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05），HFOS组的ALT、AST和LDH值降低（P＜0.05）；LFOS组与HFOS组比较，HFOS组的ALT、AST和LDH值降低更为明显（P＜0.05）。 结论 磷丙泊酚钠后处理对大鼠肝脏缺血再灌注损伤具有保护作用，且高剂量磷丙泊酚钠[12 mg/（kg·h）]的保护作用更为明显，保护作用存在剂量依赖性。
Objective To investigate the preventive effect of rapid preoxygenation technique on hypoxia caused by respiratory depression during outpatient obstetrics-gynecology operations. Methods According to a computer-generated random sequence, a total of 120 ASA I-II patients undergoing outpatient obstetrics-gynecology operations were randomly allocated into the trial group or the control group, 60 in each group. Patients in the control group received preoxygenation with tidal volume breathing. Patients in the trial group received preoxygenation with eight deep breaths (DB) in 1 min before anesthesia. All patients were induced with midazolam 1 mg, fentanyl 1μg /kg and propofol 2 mg/kg, and were maintained with propofol when needed. The following parameters were observed, including the incidences of respiratory depression and apnea, the onset time of anesthesia, the total doses of propofol as well as the changes in PetCO2 and SpO2. Results No significant differences were observed in demographic characteristics, the onset time of anesthesia, the total doses of propofol, and the incidences of respiratory depression and apnea between the two groups (P gt;0.05). However, the SpO2 in the control group was decreased significantly with a higher incidence of hypoxia (Plt;0.05). Conclusions Rapid preoxygenation technique may increase the oxygen reserves and improve the tolerance to hypoxia. It is effective in avoiding hypoxia caused by respiratory depression and apnea during outpatient obstetrics-gynecology operations.