Objective To analyze the significance of operation date in clinical path designing of cleft lip-palate. Methods The case records of cleft lip-palate patients from 8 hospitals in Gansu province were collected from 2005 to 2008. By means of comprehensive analysis of case records and frequencies of hospitalization duration, analyzed the influence of operation date selection on hospitalization duration in clinical path designing. Result In Gansu province, the average hospitalization duration of cleft lip-palate was 11 days, and the operation was usually done at the sixth day. The main preparations for operation were kinds of examinations. Within five days after operation, most treatments were postoperative care, diet and antibiotic therapy. Conclusion The strategy of operation date selection is much important to ascertain the real hospitalization duration in clinical path designing.
ObjectiveTo analyze the clinical manifestations and pathological patterns of renal diseases requiring percutaneous renopuncture, evaluate the clinical significance of renal biopsy and the value of clinical pathway for renal biopsy. MethodsWe retrospectively summarized and analyzed the clinical and pathological data, and the clinical pathway implementation of 224 patients who underwent renal biopsy between October 2009 and September 2014. ResultsIn the 224 patients, there were 62 cases of IgA nephropathy (27.68%), 50 cases of minimal change nephropathy (22.32%), 28 cases of lupus nephritis (12.5%), 26 cases of membrane nephropathy (11.6%), 26 cases of mesangial proliferative glomerulonephritis (11.6%), 6 cases of purpura nephritis (2.68%), 4 cases of focal segmental glomerular sclerosis (1.79%), 4 cases of hepatitis B virus-associated membrane nephropathy (1.79%), 4 cases of nodular diabetic glomerulosclerosis (1.79%), 4 cases of acute tubulointerstitial nephropathy (1.79%), 2 cases of hypertensive renal damage (0.89%), 2 cases of membrano-proliferative glomerulonephritis (0.89%), 1 case of lipoprotein kidney disease (0.45%), and 1 case of fibrillary glomerulopathy (0.45%). A total of 220 specimens in the 224 cases were qualified, accounting for 98.21%. Diagnosis of 70 patients in the qualified 220 cases were re-corrected according to their renal pathology reports, accounting for 31.81%. In the 224 cases, there were 16 cases of gross hematuria (7.14%) and 24 of peri-renal hematoma (10.71%) after renal biopsy. Patients who met the requirement of clinical pathway were divided into clinical pathway group and control group randomly. Average hospitalization time of the clinical pathway group was (7.6±1.2) days, and the average cost was (5 860±237) yuan, both lower than the control group [(11.8±2.3) days, (7 658±360) yuan)]. The difference was statistically significant. ConclusionsIgA nephropathy is the most common pathological type of primary glomerular diseases, and minimal change nephropathy the second. Lupus nephritis, membranous nephropathy, mesangial proliferative glomerulonephritis are still the most common types of glomerular diseases. Lupus nephritis becomes the first secondary glomerular disease. Ultrasound guided percutaneous renal biopsy is safe and has high success rate and high clinical application value. The implementation of clinical pathway can shorten the average length of hospital stay and reduce the average hospital cost.
ObjectiveTo explore the effect of clinical pathway in peri-operative nursing management of patients with esophageal carcinoma. MethodsA total of 120 patients with esophageal cancer who underwent the operation between January 2010 and April 2012 were divided into control group and trial group. the patients in control group was given conventional esophageal carcinoma peri-operative management; while the ones in the trial group received clinical pathway standardized management. The hospitalization days, costs of hospitalization, complications, satisfaction of the patients and families were compared between the two groups. ResultsThe length of hospitalization days and costs in the trial group were lower than those in the control group (P<0.01); the patients and families satisfaction in the trial group was superior to the control group (P<0.05); the difference in complications occurrence between the two groups was not significant (P>0.05). ConclusionThe clinical pathway of peri-operative nursing management for patients with esophageal cancer could effectively decrease the costs, improve satisfaction of the patients and families, and ensure the quality of care and improve the nursing efficiency.
ObjectiveTo explore the application of clinical pathway in patients undergoing orthopedic day surgery.MethodsPatients who were scheduled for orthopedic treatment at Day Surgery Department of the Second Hospital of Shanxi Medical University from May to October 2020 were selected as the clinical pathway group, and all of them were managed by clinical pathway. Patients who were scheduled for orthopedic treatment at Day Surgery Department of the Second Hospital of Shanxi Medical University from May to October 2019 were selected as the routine group, and all of them were managed by conventional clinical methods. The general conditions of patients, physicians’ work efficiency, medical costs and medical quality were compared between the two groups.ResultsThe clinical pathway group included 246 patients, and the routine group included 391 patients. There was no significant difference in gender, age or disease distribution between the two groups (P>0.05). Compared with the routine group, the clinical pathway group had obvious advantages in terms of average time spent by a physician in issuing a medical order each time [(5.64±3.29) vs. (2.12±1.05) min], average number of revisions per physician’s order (1.40±0.24 vs. 0.38±0.19), rate of filing medical records within 3 days (90.28% vs. 97.97%), hospital costs [(7462.10±1035.01) vs. (6252.52±1189.05) yuan], drug costs [(652.21±88.53) vs. (437.17±108.20) yuan], length of stay [(1.23±1.04) vs. (1.02±0.18) d] and delayed discharge rate (7.93% vs. 2.03%), with statistically significant differences (P<0.05). There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of unplanned reoperation rate, unplanned rehospitalization rate, or patient satisfaction (P>0.05).ConclusionCompared with routine clinical management, clinical pathway management can improve work efficiency, reduce medical cost and improve medical quality more effectively in the implementation of orthopedic day surgery, which has very positive effects and is worthy of promotion and application.
Due to optimizing medical service resources and improving service efficiency, day surgery has attracted the attention of medical and management experts worldwide. In 2019, day surgery was included as one of the performance assessment indicators of tertiary public hospitals. In recent years, hospital-based day surgery centers have begun to plan and build. Although the basic facilities have been perfectly improved, but how to efficiently and safely operate and manage the centralized day surgery has become the primary problem to clinicians and managers. The purpose of this paper is to introduce how the Day Surgery Center of West China Hospital of Sichuan University uses scientific management tools and establishes a professional multidisciplinary team, so as to carry out efficient operation management and control of medical quality and safety risks of the Day Surgery Center. And then provide practical experience guidance and suggestions with strong feasibility and operability for peers.
Objective To analyze and evaluate the present status of application of clinical pathway evaluation indexes in China, in order to provide references to establish an evaluation system on clinical pathway. Methods Such databases as CBM (2004-2009), VIP (2004-2009), CNKI (2004-2009) and WanFang Data (2004-2009), and some relevant websites were searched systematically for collecting Chinese literature about domestic clinical pathway evaluation indexes. Results Among the 1 175 articles included, 135 (11%) were published in the core periodicals, 19 (2%) were masterate theses, and 1 021 were other kinds of articles. As to 135 core periodical literature and 19 masterate theses, most of which were graded into the second level of evidence, accounting for 96%. The analysis on the appearance of indexes showed that 87% of inconsistency could be identified between the contents and terms of indexes. Common indexes were summarized as the following four aspects: cost index, clinical index, serving index and quality evaluation index. There were 78% of all the 1 175 articles focusing on the application of nursing and medical education, in which only one masterate thesis used social research methods such as Delphi, focus group, experts scoring (percentile), etc. Conclusion Currently, there are some issues existing in the evaluation indexes of clinical pathway in China, such as low methodological quality of literature, irregularly and randomly using statistical terms, and lack of studies on system construction of clinical pathway evaluation indexes.
目前，国内尚未制定出较为完整的康复医学专业常见骨关节疾病的康复临床路径，为适应现代康复医学发展的需要，四川大学华西医院康复医学科根据卫生部《临床路径管理指导原则》要求，结合康复医学科住院患者的疾病、康复评定、康复治疗、康复护理、康复教育等，于2011年制定了康复医学科常见疾病的康复临床路径，希望通过临床试用，对路径的临床实用性、可行性进行探讨，并逐渐完善。
ObjectivesTo investigate sources of evidence of the clinical pathways approved by the Chinese government.MethodsThe approved clinical pathways were obtained from the website of the National Health and Family Planning Commission. Two reviewers independently extracted the basic information, approval date, types of evidence of the clinical pathways and time of evidence. The variance analysis was performed for the diagnosis and treatment parts of clinical pathways and the LSD method was further used for comparison.ResultsThe main types of evidence were guidelines, textbooks, standard indicators and consensus views. Approximately 80% of the pathways cited clinical practice guidelines and 36% cited the textbooks. The median number of evidence for each clinical pathway was 2. Approximately 85% of the evidence could be obtained the time when the evidence published. The average time interval (between the time when the pathways released and the time when the evidence published) was 5.2 years. Specifically, textbooks constituted the largest proportion in all evidence that was over 15 years of time interval. In addition to the textbook comparison standard indicators, there were significant differences in time interval between guidelines or consensus and textbooks or standard indicators.Conclusions The evidence types selection is based on the concept of evidence-based medicine, yet the time span of the referred evidence is larger. Therefore, developing clinical pathways not only need to refer to the latest research evidence comprehensively and enhance transparency of clinical pathways, but also use evidence quality evaluation standards to evaluate and select the referred evidences.
ObjectivesTo analyze the citation of evidence in traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) clinical pathways in China, and to provide suggestions for future development and revision of TCM clinical pathways.MethodsTCM clinical pathways released on the websites of national administration of TCM and China association of Chinese medicine were obtained, with the retrieval time limit to June 2019. Two researchers separately utilized the Excel to extract data and performed a descriptive analysis.ResultsA total of 405 TCM clinical pathways were included, involving internal medicine, surgery, gynecology and pediatrics. Internal medicine accounted for the largest proportion of the TCM clinical pathways (133). All the 405 pathways cited references as evidence, among which the maximum and minimum quantities of cited references were 11 and 1, respectively, and the median was 3. More than 90% of the TCM clinical pathways cited the evidence in the parts of diagnosis and efficacy evaluation. For parts of TCM and western medicine treatment, the proportion of TCM clinical pathways which cited evidence was less than 75%; for parts of rehabilitation and nursing, the proportion of TCM clinical pathways which cited evidence was less than 2%. The types of evidence being cited were standard indicators (683), clinical practice guidelines (488), textbooks (236), consensus opinions, ancient books and clinical surveys. The released time was reported in 89.25% of the cited evidence; the largest time interval was between the release time of the standard indicators (evidence) and that of the TCM pathways. Among the evidence released more than 15 years before the release of the TCM pathways, the proportion of standard indicators was the highest (57.12%).ConclusionsThe published TCM clinical pathways are all developed based on evidence, however, the evidence citation ratio in different parts varies greatly. In some TCM clinical pathways, the cited evidences are not reported normatively, and some evidence are poor in timeliness.