ObjectiveTo review and evaluate the research progress of the robot-assisted joint arthroplasty.MethodsThe domestic and foreign related research literature on robot-assisted joint arthroplasty was extensively consulted. The advantages, disadvantages, effectiveness, and future prospects were mainly reviewed and summarized.ResultsThe widely recognized advantages of robot-assisted joint arthroplasty are digital and intelligent preoperative planning, accurate intraoperative prosthesis implantation, and quantitative soft tissue balance, as well as good postoperative imaging prosthesis position and alignment. However, the advantages of effectiveness are still controversial. The main disadvantages of robot-assisted joint arthroplasty are the high price of the robot system, the prolonged operation time, and the increased radioactive damage of the imaging-dependent system.ConclusionCompared to traditional arthroplasty, robot-assisted joint arthroplasty can improve the accuracy of the prosthesis position and assist in the quantitative assessment of soft tissue tension, and the repeatability rate is high. In the future, further research is needed to evaluate the clinical function and survival rate of the prosthesis, as well as to optimize the robot system.
ObjectiveTo investigate the effectiveness of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with or without patellar resurfacing.MethodsBetween March 2013 and August 2015, 30 patients (60 knees) with osteoarthritis who met the inclusion criteria were recruited in the study. Of 30 cases, 24 were male and 6 were female with an average age of 57.2 years (range, 37-65 years). The body mass index ranged from 19.5 to 40.3 kg/m2 (mean, 28.2 kg/m2). According to Kellgren-Lawrence grading, there were 8 cases at grand Ⅲ and 22 cases at grand Ⅳ. All patients underwent primary bilateral TKA. The patellar resurfacing was done at the unilateral knee randomly (resurfacing side); the opposite treatment was done at the other side (non-resurfacing side). The indexes of 2 groups were recorded and compared, including the intraoperative blood loss, operation time, knee society score (KSS), " Forgotten Joint” scale (FJS), anterior knee pain, anterior patellar spirant, knee constraint feeling, anterior patellar clunk, muscle power of knee extension, and ability of up and down stairs, weight-bearing flexion, squatting down, cross-legged, knee down, knee extension, and patient satisfaction. Radiographic examination was used to analyze the prosthesis position.ResultsThe operation time were (126±14) minutes and (112±11) minutes in resurfacing side and non-resurfacing side, respectively, showing significant difference between two sides (t=5.103, P=0.030); and there was no significant difference in intraoperative blood loss between two sides (t=3.431, P=0.800). All patients were followed up 2-4 years (mean, 2.6 years). There was no significant difference (P>0.05) between two sides in KSS clinical and functional scores at preoperation and 6 weeks, 6 months, and 2 years after operation; in visual analogue scale (VAS) score of anterior knee pain at preoperation and 6 weeks after operation; in incidences of anterior patellar spirant, knee constraint feeling, anterior patellar clunk, and muscle power of knee extension at 6 weeks, 6 months, and 2 years after operation; in incidences of disability of up and down stairs, weight-bearing flexion, squatting down, cross-legged, knee down, and knee extension at 6 weeks, 6 months, and 2 years after operation; in ratio of FJS score at 2 years after operation. The VAS scores at 6 months and 2 years after operation in resurfacing group were significantly lower than those in non-resurfacing group (Z=–1.997,P=0.046; Z=–2.197,P=0.028). Patient satisfaction of resurfacing side was superior to the non-resurfacing side at 6 weeks after operation (χ2=4.271, P=0.039). Radiographic examination showed no prosthesis loosing occurred.ConclusionThe effectiveness of TKA with patellar resurfacing is better than that with non-resurfacing in patients satisfaction.
Objective To compare the mid- and long-term effectiveness of patellar resurfacing versus non-resurfacing in primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Methods Twenty-six patients who underwent bilateral TKA between March 2013 and September 2015 were selected as the study subjects. One side was randomly chosen for patellar resurfacing (resurfacing group), and the other side was not (control group). There were 4 males and 22 females, the age ranged from 51 to 65 years, with an average of 59 years. According to Kellgren-Lawrence classification, there were 21 cases of grade Ⅳ and 5 cases of grade Ⅲ in both knees. There was no significant difference in the surgical side, and preoperative clinical and functional scores of the Knee Society Score (KSS), visual analogue scale (VAS) score, and the composition ratio of anterior knee pain localization points between the two groups (P>0.05). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative abnormal signs such as patellar clunk, feeling of constraint, patellar tendon weakness, crepitus, or snow-on-glass sensation, and the occurrence of complications were recorded and compared. Patient subjective evaluations included Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) and the degree of difficulty in high-level knee activities (including flexion with load bearing, going upstairs, going downstairs, squatting and standing up, kneeling, knee extension, and crossing legs for 7 items); KSS clinical/functional scores and VAS scores were used to evaluate the recovery of knee joint function, and the location of anterior knee pain was determined by a localization diagram. Results The operation time of the resurfacing group was significantly longer than that of the control group (P<0.05), and there was no significant difference in intraoperative blood loss between the two groups (P>0.05). All patients’ incisions healed by first intention; the hospital stay ranged from 8 to 23 days, with an average of 12.6 days. All patients were followed up 9-11 years, with an average of 9.7 years. Except for 1 case who died of multiple organ failure due to internal diseases at 9 years after operation and 5 cases with incomplete radiological data, the rest 20 patients were assessed radiologically and found that 1 side of the knee joint in the control group had patellar dislocation; the remaining patients had no prosthetic failure (fracture, loosening, displacement, etc.), patellar fracture, patellar necrosis, patellar instability, patellar tendon rupture, prosthetic revision, etc. No patients had reoperations due to patellar-related complications or anterior knee pain in both knee joints. At 2 years postoperatively and at last follow-up, there was no significant difference in the incidence of abnormal signs such as patellar clunk, feeling of constraint, patellar tendon weakness, crepitus, or snow-on-glass sensation, the incidence of high-level knee activity difficulty, and the composition ratio of anterior knee pain localization between the two groups (P>0.05). The KSS clinical scores, functional scores, and VAS scores of both groups significantly improved compared to preoperative ones (P<0.05); there was no significant difference in the comparison between the two groups at the two time points postoperatively (P>0.05). At 2 years postoperatively and at last follow-up, there was no significant difference in FJS scores between the two groups (P>0.05). ConclusionPatellar resurfacing or not has similar mid- and long-term effectiveness in primary TKA.