目的 评价术前立体超选择性动脉灌注化疗在ⅡB～ⅢA期乳腺癌保留乳房手术中的价值。方法 36例乳腺癌患者，其中ⅡB期10例、ⅢA期26，术前采用立体超选择性动脉灌注丝裂霉素、表阿霉素和5-氟尿嘧啶，化疗后再进行手术。结果 36例患者灌注化疗后病灶缓解32例，好转3例，无明显变化1例; 缓解率达88.9%（32/36），该32例患者肿瘤直径均缩小到2 cm以下，获得保乳手术机会。结论 术前立体超选择性动脉灌注化疗可使局部晚期乳腺癌降期获得保乳机会。
Objective To study the cause of the low rate of breast conservation and reconstruction by investigating the approval degree of breast conserving therapy and breast reconstruction of women with breast diseases, to help the breast surgeons make better communication with the patients and make more pertinent choices of therapeutic methods. Methods The age, occupation, educational background, the attitudes towards breast conserving therapy and breast reconstruction， and the choice of operative method of breast reconstruction of 139 patients with breast cancer and 224 patients with benign breast disease were investigated by questionnaire. Results In breast cancer group, 23.9% （28/117） of patients chose breast conserving therapy and 35.9%（42/117） of patients chose breast reconstruction, while the rates of breast conservation and reconstruction were 53.3% （106/199） and 63.8% （127/199） in benign breast disease group. In both groups, the higher rates of breast conservation and reconstruction were associated with better educational background (in breast cancer group: P=0.029， P=0.296; in benign breast disease group: P=0.081, P=0.019） and lower age (all Plt;0.05). Patients engaged in commerce showed higher rates of breast conservation and reconstruction （in breast cancer group: P=0.013, P=0.042； in benign breast disease group: P=0.032, P=0.044）. Age, occupation or educational background was not related with the choice of operative method of breast reconstruction （Pgt;0.05). Conclusions Patients with lower age, better educational background, and better job condition have ber desire of breast conservation and reconstruction. Breast surgeons should enhance communication with those patients about relevant information of breast conservation and reconstruction to make the more pertinent choice of therapeutic methods.
Objective To summarize the techniques for reconstruction of partial breast defects after breast-conserving surgery in breast cancer. Methods The relevant literatures were reviewed and the oncoplastic techniques and their surgical indications, incision selection, advantages， and disadvantages were summarized. Results Kinds of poor aesthetic outcomes still exist in some patients after breast-conserving surgery due to the breast deformity. How to choose the surgical incision and repair breast defects after tumor resection so as to obtain better cosmetic outcomes is still a focus of breast-conserving surgery. Oncoplastic techniques can not only achieve safe cancer treatments but also have satisfactory aesthetic outcomes. Conclusions Oncoplastic techniques in the breast conservative therapy for early stage breast cancer is a safe and effective procedure， with highly satisfactory cosmetic outcomes in the majority of patients..
Objective To explore the tumor shrinking pattern, the image evaluation methods of the residual lesions after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and the indications, the resection range, the surgical margins, the management of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) and axillary lymph nodes of breast conserving surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Methods Domestic and foreign literatures about the breast conserving surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy were collected and reviwed. Results Breast conserving surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy raised the rate of breast conserving surgery and improved the postoperative life quality of patients, while the overall survival rate had no significant difference compared with mastectomy. Tumor shrinking pattern and its related factors after neoadjuvant chemotherapy remain required further study. At present, the indications for breast conserving surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy still mainly refered to that for early stage breast cancer. Resection range was more recognized to the scope of residual tumor lesions after chemotherapy. The margins were more widely accepted as which were without tumor involved. Although there were some controversies about the use of SLNB and the management of axillary lymph nodes based on the results of SLNB in breast conserving surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, it was still considered necessary at the basis of the accurate biopsy technique acquired. Conclusions At present, breast conserving treatment after neoadjuvant chemotherapy is considered safe and effective. However, it is necessary to proceed cautiously under the conditions of adequate communication of local recurrence rate, standardized local treatment, standard postoperative radiotherapy, systemic adjuvant therapy, and regular follow-up.
At present, breast cancer is most common malignant tumor among female population. The treatment of breast cancer comprises surgery, radiotherapy, neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy, with surgical as the main treatment approach. Common surgical methods for breast cancer include breast conservation surgery (BCS) and mastectomy. This article reviews the recent researches about the survival of breast cancer patients receiving BCS, the quality of life for patients receiving BCS, the survival of young and elderly patients receiving BCS, BCS after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, BCS for patients with breast cancer susceptibility gene mutation, and BCS for patients with ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence, so as to provide reference for the follow-up work of medical staff.
Objective To review the development of endoscopic techniques in breast surgery, focusing on their use in benign breast lump resection and breast-conserving surgery for cancer, and also summarize the development and application of these techniques in China, highlighting promotion and homogenization challenges and future directions. Methods A systematic review of relevant literature was conducted to trace the historical evolution, clinical applications, and related research of endoscopic techniques in breast surgery, emphasizing their advantages and disadvantages of endoscopic benign breast lump resection and breast-conserving surgery for cancer. Results Endoscopic benign breast lump resection and breast-conserving surgery for cancer have improved patients’ postoperative psychological health and quality of life, particularly in scar-free surgery. However, challenges such as limited intraoperative visibility and prolonged surgery time lead to controversy in clinical practice. Conclusion Despite significant advancements, endoscopic techniques in breast surgery also face challenges. Future efforts should focus on technological improvements and clinical research to address these issues, promoting widespread application and standardization. The key to future development lies in the promotion and homogenization of these technologies.
Objective To explore the axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) could be safely exempted in younger breast cancer patients (≤40 years of age) who receiving breast-conserving surgery combined with radiotherapy in metastasis of 1–2 sentinel lymph node (SLN) and T1–T2 stage. Methods The data of pathological diagnosis of invasive breast cancer from 2004 to 2015 in SEER database were extracted. Patients were divided into SLN biopsy group (SLNB group) and ALND group according to axillary treatment. Propensity matching score (PSM) method was used to match and equalize the clinicopathological features between two groups at 1∶1. Multivariate Cox proportional risk model was used to analyze the relationship between axillary management and breast cancer specific survival (BCSS), and stratified analysis was performed according to clinicopathological features. Results A total of 1 236 patients with a median age of 37 years (quartile: 34, 39 years) were included in the analysis, including 418 patients (33.8%) in the SLNB group and 818 patients (66.2%) in the ALND group. The median follow-up period was 82 months (quartile: 44, 121 months), and 111 cases (9.0%) died of breast cancer, including 33 cases (7.9%) in the SLNB group and 78 cases (9.5%) in the ALND group. The cumulative 5-year BCSS of the SLNB group and the ALND group were 90.8% and 93.4%, respectively, and the log-rank test showed no significant difference (χ2=0.70, P=0.401). After PSM, there were 406 cases in both the SLNB group and the ALND group. The cumulative 5-year BCSS rate in the ALND group was 4.1% higher than that in the SLNB group (94.8% vs. 90.7%). Multivariate Cox proportional hazard analysis showed that ALND could further improve BCSS rate in younger breast cancer patients [HR=0.578, 95%CI (0.335, 0.998), P=0.049]. Stratified analyses showed that ALND improved BCSS in patients diagnosed before 2012 or with a character of lymph node macrometastases, histological grade G3/4, ER negative or PR negative. Conclusions It should be cautious to consider the elimination of ALND in the stage T1–T2 younger patients receiving breast-conserving surgery combined with radiotherapy when 1–2 SLNs positive, especially in patients with high degree of malignant tumor biological behavior or high lymph node tumor burden. Further prospective trials are needed to verify the question.
ObjectiveTo investigate the factors of breast cancer patients who met breast-conserving conditions after neoadjuvant chemotherapy when choosing surgical mode.MethodsA questionnaire survey was conducted on 228 breast cancer patients who met breast-conserving conditions after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Chi square test, nonparametric rank sum test and binary logistic regression were used to analyze the factors affecting the choice of surgical mode.ResultsUnivariate analysis showed that age, clinical stage, family history of cancer, molecular type, neoadjuvant chemotherapy effect, surgeon’s recommendation, chemotherapy side effects, and surgical complications were the factors affecting patient’s chose for breast-conserving surgery (P<0.05). Multivariate analysis showed that the effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy [OR=0.312, 95%CI (0.255, 0.662), P<0.001] and the surgeon’s recommendation [OR=53.947, 95%CI (4.570, 6.239), P=0.002] were independent factors that affected the choice of surgery.ConclusionsThe decision of the surgical mode is a process in which doctors and patients participate together. Individualized neoadjuvant chemotherapy improves the remission rate and the progress of the surgeon’s comprehensive treatment strategy can play a role in improving the breast-conserving rate and the rate of breast-conserving success. Doctors should give positive guidance in accordance with the specific situation of the patient to make the best choice.
Objective To compare the long-term outcome between breast-conserving therapy with mastectomy therapy for early stage invasive breast cancer through a Meta analysis of the randomized controlled trials published worldwide. Methods Cochrane systematic evaluation was used to search through Cochrane libraries of clinical comparative trials, PubMed, Embase, Cancer Lit, and so on. The quality of literatures was independently evaluated and cross-checked by two evaluators, indicators for assessment including death number at the end of follow-up, locoregional and total recurrence. The results were analyzed with RevMan 4.2.2 software. Results Six articles were involved in the Meta analysis with total 3 933 patients. No statistical difference was found in the death at the end of follow-up between breast-conserving therapy group and mastectomy therapy group (OR=1.05, 95% CI=0.93—1.19， P=0.45). Locoregional and total recurrence rate of breast-conserving therapy group were statistical higher than those in mastectomy therapy group (OR=1.64, 95% CI: 1.10—2.44， P=0.01； OR=1.42, 95% CI: 1.22—1.64， Plt;0.01). Conclusions Breast-conserving therapy and mastectomy therapy have comparable effects on mortality in patient with early stage invasive breast cancer, even after long-term follow up. However, breast-conserving therapy is associated with significantly greater risk of locoregional recurrence.