Objective To study the diagnosis and treatment of the acute medial collateral ligament ruptures of the knee.Methods From August 1998 to August 2003, 87 cases of acute medial collateral ligament ruptures were examined with physical method and MR imaging. Out of them, 35 cases of Ⅰdegree and Ⅱ degree ruptures were treated with non-surgery and 52 cases of Ⅲ degree ruptures were treated surgically. The torn medial collateral ligaments were mended, 21 of which were strengthened with the anterior partial gracilis muscle tendon after the arthroscopy. Results In 35 cases of Ⅰ and Ⅱ degree ruptures, 32 were followed up 13 months on average. According to Lysholm scoring system, the clinical results were classified as excellent or good in 93.7% of the cases. In 52 cases of Ⅲ degree ruptures, 50 were followed up 16 months on average. The excellent or good result was 90%.Conclusion For Ⅰ and Ⅱ degree ruptures, MR imagimg is an important way to definitely- diagnose medial collateral ligament ruptures. Abduction stress test of knee extension shows that the medial direct instability is a main way to definitely diagnose Ⅲ degree ruptures. The results of conservative treatment of Ⅰ degree and Ⅱ degree ruptures are excellent. Surgical therapy are fitfor the cases of Ⅲ degree ruptures.
ObjectiveTo compare the clinical efficacy between medial collateral ligament (MCL) repair and MCL reconstruction in multi-ligament injury. MethodsThirty-one patients with MCL rupture and multi-ligament injury of knee joint were treated between August 2008 and August 2012, and the clinical data were retrospectively analyzed. Of 31 patients, 11 cases underwent MCL repair (repair group), and 20 cases underwent MCL reconstruction (reconstruction group). There was no significant difference in gender, age, body mass, injury side, injury cause, and preoperative knee Lyshlom score, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective score, range of motion, and medial joint opening between 2 groups (P > 0.05). The postoperative knee subjective function and stability were compared between 2 groups. ResultsAll incisions healed by first intention, and no postoperative complication occurred. All patients were followed up 2-4 years (mean, 3.2 years). At 2 years after operation, the IKDC subjective score, Lyshlom score, and range of motion were significantly increased in 2 groups when compared with preoperative ones (P < 0.05). The range of motion of reconstruction group was significantly better than that of repair group (P < 0.05). No significant difference was found in IKDC subjective score and Lyshlom score between 2 groups (P > 0.05). The medial joint opening was significantly improved in 2 groups at 2 years after operation when compared with preoperative one (P < 0.05), but no significant difference was found between 2 groups (P > 0.05). ConclusionBoth the MCL reconstruction and MCL repair can restore medial stability in multi-ligament injury, but MCL reconstruction is better than MCL repair in range of motion.
Objective To observe the effectiveness of the combination of dynamic and static stabil ity in the treatment of old knee medial collateral l igament injury. Methods Between March 2004 and June 2008, 26 cases of old knee medial collateral l igament injury were treated, including 19 males and 7 females with a mean age of 38 years (range, 21-48 years). Injury was caused by traffic accident in 6 cases, by sprains in 12 cases, by fall ing from height in 8 cases. The location was left knee in 15 cases and right knee in 11 cases. Of them, 24 patients showed the positive result of knee valgus test, 2 cases showed sl ightly relaxed knee tendon. The knee X-ray films of valgus stress position showed that the medial joint space differences between both knees were 3-5 mm in 2 cases and 5-12 mm in 24 cases. The injuries included avulsion of the medial femoral condyle starting point in 19 cases, central laceration in 6 cases, and tibial point laceration concomitant meniscus injury in 1 case. The time from injury to hospital ization was 3-14 months (mean, 6.4 months). Gracil is muscle was used to repair knee medial collateral l igament and the sartorius muscle transfer to reconstruct the medial rotation of knee stabil ity function. Results All incisions healed by first intention. No joint infection, deep vein thrombosis, or other postoperative compl ications occurred. Twentysix cases were followed up 12-58 months with an average of 30 months. The results of knee valgus stress test were negative with no joint tenderness. At 3 months after operation, the knee X-ray films of valgus stress position showed the medial joint space differences between both knees were less than 1 mm. According to the modified Lysholm-Scale score, the results were excellent in 18 cases, good in 7 cases, and fair in 1 case with an excellent and good rate of 96% at last follow-up. Conclusion A combination of dynamic and static stabil ity in repairing old knee medial collateral l igament injury is easy-to-operate and has the advantages to perform the operation in the same incision, so it can avoid the shortcomings of single repair method and achieve better effectiveness.
Objective To investigate the effect of acid, basic fibroblast growth factor (aFGF, bFGF) and epidermal growth factor (EGF), andtheir combination on the proliferation of rabbit anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and medial collateral ligament (MCL) in vitro. Methods Thecells of ACL and MCL were isolated and subcultured from the knee joints of tenweek-old New Zealand white rabbits. The cells were seeded into 96-well corning cluster plates. Three growth factors of different concentration alone or in combination were added into the culture medium respectively, which were 0, 1, 5, 10, 50 and 100 ng/ml for aFGF, bFGF and 0, 1.56, 3.13, 6.25, 12.5, 25 and 50 ng/ml for EGF. The proliferation of the fibroblasts was measured for 48 h with XTT method. Results All of the three growth factors alone promoted the cell proliferation of ACL and MCL fibroblasts. The concentration of aFGF hada significant effect on the proliferation of both ACL and MCL fibroblasts. The concentration of 1 ng/ml bFGF and 5 ng/ml EGF was most effective in promoting the proliferation of ACL, and both bFGF and EGF had a significant effect on MCL. 5ng/ml aFGF with 50 ng/ml EGF had effect on ACL. 1 ng/ml aFGF with 3.13 ng/ml EGF had effect on MCL. Conclusion The three growth factors may promote the cell proliferation of ACL and MCL. These findings suggest that topical application of aFGF, either alone or in combination with EGF may have the potential to promote the proliferation of rabbit ACL and MCL,and aFGF of low concentration in combination with EGF is more effective than single growth factor.
【Abstract】 Objective When knee medial collateral ligament (MCL) rupture, the upper surface of medial meniscus is exposed totally, like the gulf panoramic, which is called “panoramic views of the bay sign” or the “bay sign”. To investigate the reliability and significance of the “bay sign” in diagnosis of knee MCL rupture under arthroscope. Methods Between March 2007 and March 2011, 127 patients with knees injuries were divided into the observation group (n=59) and control group (n=68) based on the MRI results. In the observation group, 59 patients had MCL rupture by MRI, including 12 cases of MCL injury alone, 16 cases of MCL injury with lateral meniscus torn, 27 cases of MCL injury with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury, 3 cases of MCL injury with ACL and posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) injury, and 1 case of MCL injury with patellar dislocation; there were 38 males and 21 females with an average age of 23.2 years (range, 16-39 years). In the control group, 68 patients had no MCL rupture by MRI, including 38 cases of ACL injury, 4 cases of ACL and PCL injury, and 26 cases of ACL and lateral meniscus injury; there were 45 males and 23 females with an average age of 31.8 years (range, 25-49 years). The “bay sign” was observed under arthroscope in 2 groups before and after operation. Results The positive “bay sign” was seen under arthroscope in the patients of the observation group before MCL repair; the “bay sign” disappeared after repair. No “bay sign” was seen in patients of the control group before and after ACL reconstruction. Conclusion The “bay sign” is a reliable diagnostic evidence of MCL injury. It can be used as a basis to judge the success of MCL reconstruction during operation.
Objective To investigate the method and curative effect of malposed-suture hanging and fastening method of double-lariat lock catch knot in repairing origin of medial collateral l igament (MCL) rupture. Methods From February 2008 to February 2009, 36 patients with acute MCL rupture were treated with malposed-suture hanging and fastening method of double-lariat lock catch knot. There were 21 males and 15 females with an average age of 40 years (range, 17-58 years),including 19 left knees and 17 right knees. Repture was caused by traffic accident in 5 cases, by fall ing in 11 cases, by kicking in 3 cases, by crush in 4 cases, and by sprain in 13 cases. The X-ray films of double knees at stress state showed the medial joint space of affected knee joint increased 6.5-13.5 mm (11.2 mm on average) when compared with that of normal knee joint. The time from injury to operation was 36 hours to 8 days (3.5 days on average). Results All wounds healed by first intention. Thirty-one cases were followed up 12-20 months (15 months on average). No compl ication of wound infection, deep venous thrombosis, and l igament rerupture occurred. The medial joint space of affected knee joint increased 1.5-5.6 mm (3.5 mm on average) when compared with that of normal knee joint. According to Lysholm assessment standard, the results were excellent in 20 cases and good in 11 cases, the excellent and good rate was 100%. Conclusion Repair of origin of MCL with malposedsuture hanging and fastening method of double-lariat lock catch knot has advantages of less injury, rel iable fixation, and rapid recovery of knee stabil ity.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the effectiveness of semitendinous and gracilis transfer for the treatment of medial collateral ligament (MCL) injury caused by total knee arthroplasty (TKA). MethodsBetween March 2009 and May 2014, 11 patients (11 knees) with MCL injuries caused by primary TKA were treated by semitendinous and gracilis transfer in primary TKA (injury group). Another 18 patients (21 knees) without MCL injury were included as the control group. There was no significant difference in gender, age, injury sides, disease duration, body mass index, knee varus deformity, and preoperative Knee Society Score (KSS) between 2 groups (P>0.05), with comparability. KSS score was used to evaluate the function after operation. ResultsPrimary healing of incision was obtained in all patients, and no complications of joint instability and pain occurred. The follow-up time was 6-29 months in injury group and was 7-34 months in control group. At last follow-up, the KSS clinical score and functional score were significantly increased to 89.82±3.76 and 89.54±3.50 in the injury group (P<0.05) and were significantly increased to 90.19±3.39 and 90.00±3.53 in the control group (P<0.05) respectively, but no significant difference was shown between 2 groups (t=0.158, P=0.877; t=0.820, P=0.432). X-ray films showed no prosthetic loosening or subsidence during follow-up. ConclusionThe semitendinous and gracilis transfer is reliable for the treatment of MCL injury caused by TKA. The insertions of semitendinous tendon and gracilis are close to that of the knee MCL, which can effectively improve knee function.
Objective To investigate the effect of complete anterior bundle of medial collateral ligament (MCL) on the valgus stability of the elbow after reconstruction and to assess the efficacy of artificial tendon and interference screw in reconstruction the anterior bundle of MCL. Methods The bone-tendon of the elbow were made in 12 adult upper limb specimens. There were 8 males and 4 females, left side and right side in half. Using biomechanic ways and pressure sensitive film, the valgus laxity, the stress area of the humeroulnar joint, and the intra-articular pressure were measured in integrated anterior bundle of MCL (control group, n=12) and reconstructed anterior bundle of MCL with artificial tendon and interference screw (experimental group, n=12) in elbow flexion of 0, 30, 60, and 90°. Results There was no significant difference in the valgus laxity within group and between groups in different flexion degrees (P gt; 0.05). No significant difference was found in the intra-articular pressure in elbow flexion of 30, 60, and 90° within group and between groups (P gt; 0.05) except in elbow flexion of 0° (P lt; 0.05). The stress area of the humeroulnar joint in 0° flexion was significantly larger than that in 30, 60, and 90° flexion in the control group (P lt; 0.05), but no significant difference was found within group and between groups in the other flexion degrees (P gt; 0.05). Conclusion The anterior bundle of MCL has important significance for maintaining the valgus stability of the elbow, after reconstructing the anterior bundle by using artificial tendon and interference screw, the medial stability of elbow can be recovered immediately.
Objective To investigate whether or not posterolateral rotatory instabil ity of the elbow is due to type-I and type-II coronoid process fracture together with anterior bundle of medial collateral l igament (AMCL) injury so as to provide a theoretic basis for its cl inical treatment. Methods Ten fresh-frozen upper extremities were collected from cadavera which was donated voluntarily with no evidence of fracture, dislocation, osteoarthritis, mechanical injury of the surrounding l igament and joint capsule. They included 9 males and 1 female with an average age of 25.1 years (range, 19-40 years), including 3 cases at left sides and 7 cases at right sides. All specimens were transected at the upper midhumeral and carpal levels preserving the distal radioulnar joints to get the bone-l igament specimens. An axial load of 100 N compressing the elbow joint was appl ied along the shaft of the forearm in the sagittal plane through the biomechanical study system. The load-displacement plot was measured and analyzed at elbow flexion of 90, 60, and 45° and under four conditions (intact elbow, type-I coronoid process fracture, type-I coronoid process fracture with AMCL deficient, and type-II coronoid process fractures with AMCL deficient). Results The posterior displacements were maximum at 90° elbow flexion. Hence, the results at 90° elbow flexion were analyzed: under condition of intact elbows, the posterior displacement was the smallest (2.17 ± 0.42) mm and the posterolateral rotatory stabil ity was the greatest; under condition of type-I coronoid process fracture, the posterior displacement was (2.20 ± 0.41) mm, showing no significant difference compared with that of the intact elbow (P gt; 0.05); under condition of type-I coronoid process fracture with AMCL deficient, the posterior displacement was (2.31 ± 0.34) mm, showing no significant difference compared with that of intact elbow (P gt; 0.05); and under condition of type-II coronoid process fracture with AMCL deficient, the posterior displacement was (2.65 ± 0.38) mm, showing a significant difference compared with that of intact elbow (P lt; 0.05). There was no macroscopic ulnohumeral dislocation or radial head dislocation during the experiment. Conclusion An simple type-I coronoid process fracture or with AMCL deficient would not cause posterolateral rotatory instabil ity of elbow and may not need to be repaired. But type-II coronoid process fractures with AMCL deficient can cause posterolateral rotatory instabil ity of elbow, so the coronoid process and the AMCL should be repaired or reconstructed to restore posterolateral rotatory stabil ity as well as valgus stabil ity.
ObjectiveTo evaluate and compare knee joint stability of grade Ⅲ medial collateral ligament (MCL) injury treated by single-bundle and anatomical double-bundle reconstruction methods, thus providing biomechanical basis for clinical treatment.MethodsNine fresh cadaver specimens of normal human knee joints were randomly divided into 3 groups on average. In intact MCL group: The anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) was detached and reconstructed with single-bundle techniques, and the MCL was intact. In single-bundle and double-bundle reconstruction groups, the superficial MCL (sMCL), posterior oblique ligament (POL), and ACL were all detached to manufacturing grade Ⅲ MCL injury models. After single-bundle reconstruction of ACL, the sMCL single-bundle reconstruction and anatomical double-bundle reconstruction of sMCL and POL were performed, respectively. Biomechanical evaluation indexes included anterior tibial translation (ATT), internal rotation (IR), valgus rotation (VAL), and stresses of MCL and ACL under internal rotation and valgus torques at different ranges of motion of the knee joint.ResultsThere was no significant difference in ATT at full extension and flexion of 15°, 30°, 45°, 60°, and 90° between groups (P>0.05). At full extension and flexion of 15°, the IR and VAL were significantly higher in single-bundle reconstruction group than in double-bundle reconstruction group and intact MCL group (P<0.05). At flexion of 30°, the VAL was significantly higher in single-bundle reconstruction group than in double-bundle reconstruction group and intact MCL group (P<0.05). While there was no significant difference between double-bundle reconstruction group and intact MCL group (P>0.05). There was no significant difference in the stresses of MCL and ACL between groups under the internal rotation and valgus torques at all positions (P>0.05).ConclusionMCL anatomical double-bundle reconstruction can acquire better valgus and rotational stability of the knee joint compared with single-bundle reconstruction.