目的 观察鼻内镜下三种不同微创手术治疗非侵袭型真菌性上颌窦炎的疗效及氟康唑冲洗术腔的临床意义。 方法 回顾性分析我科2006年1月－2010年12月收治的284例非侵袭型真菌性上颌窦炎住院患者资料。患者分别采用单纯鼻内镜下上颌窦窦口开放术（术式1）、鼻内镜下上颌窦窦口开放联合经唇龈沟上颌窦前壁开窗（术式2）、以及鼻内镜下上颌窦窦口开放联合下鼻道开窗（术式3）进行治疗；术式3治疗的患者术后定期换药时，分别使用生理盐水或氟康唑反复冲洗鼻腔和上颌窦。所有患者门诊随访至少半年。 结果 在本组接受术式1、术式2和术式3治疗的患者分别有51例、45例和188例。上述三种术式治疗的患者中，分别有15例，9例和6例患者出现复发，复发率分别为29.6%、20.0%和3.2%；其中术式3治疗的患者复发率显著性低于术式1或术式2治疗的患者（P＜0.05）。在术式3治疗的患者中，生理盐水和氟康唑冲洗的伤口愈合时间分别为3.8周和 3.7周，两种冲洗方式对伤口的愈合影响差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）。 结论 鼻内镜下上颌窦窦口开放联合下鼻道开窗是治疗非侵袭型霉菌性上颌窦炎的最佳方式，且伤口愈合时间与冲洗液种类无关。
ObjectiveTo systematically evaluate the reliability and stability of transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy vestibular approach (TOETVA) and conventional open thyroidectomy (COT) in the treatment of differentiated thyroid cancer.MethodsThe clinical studies of TOETVA and COT in the treatment of differentiated thyroid cancer were retrieved from major databases including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Wanfang, and CNKI by computer. The search date ended on March 1, 2020. Two investigators screened the literatures strictly and extracted the data following the pre-defined inclusion and exclusion criteria, and then used RevMan 5.3 software for meta-analysis.ResultsA total of 7 studies including 1 465 patients were included in this meta-analysis. The results showed: compared with the COT group, the operation time of the TOETVA group was longer [WMD=35.18, P=0.000 1], and the number of lymph node dissections in the central area was larger [WMD=1.42, P=0.000 5]. But the intraoperative blood loss [WMD=–5.32, P=0.39], the length of hospital stay after operation [WMD=0.05, P=0.94], the incidences of transient recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy [OR=0.81, P=0.43], transient hypocalcemia [OR=0.55, P=0.35], permanent hypocalcemia [OR=0.39, P=0.22], permanent recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy [OR=1.34, P=0.73], and hematoma [OR=1.29, P=0.69] were not statistically significant between the two groups.ConclusionsTOETVA has a higher stability. Although the COT has a shorter operation time, the former has a higher central lymph node dissection rate, and there is no scar on the neck after surgery and no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative complications.
Objective To explore complications of endoscopic thyroidectomy and conventional thyroidectomy and to analyze causes of them in order to reducing complications of endoscopic thyroidectomy. Methods A total of 1 112 patients with thyroid diseases from September 2008 to March 2017 in the Shanghai Tongren Hospital were collected, then were designed to endoscopic thyroidectomy group and conventional thyroidectomy group. The recurrent laryngeal nerve injury, hypoparathyroidism, postoperative bleeding, tracheoesophageal injury, poor healing of surgical wound, skin ecchymosis and subcutaneous effusion, neck discomfort, and CO2 related complications were observed. Results ① There were 582 cases in the endoscopic thyroidectomy group and 530 cases in the conventional thyroidectomy group, the baselines such as the gender, age, most diameter of tumor, diseases type, operative mode, operative time, and intraoperative bleeding had no significant differences between the endoscopic thyroidectomy group and the conventional thyroidectomy group (P>0.05). ② All the operations were performed successfully, none of patients was converted to the open operation. The rates of the recurrent laryngeal nerve injury, hypoparathyroidism, postoperative bleeding, and tracheoesophageal injury had no significant differences in these two groups (P>0.05). The rates of the poor healing of surgical wound and neck discomfort were significantly lower and the rate of the skin ecchymosis and subcutaneous effusion was significantly higher in the endoscopic thyroidectomy group as compared with the conventional thyroidectomy group (P<0.05). There were 32 cases of CO2 related complications in the endoscopic thyroidectomy group. Conclusion Results of this study show that endoscopic thyroidectomy is safe for thyroid diseases, it’s complications could be reduced by improving operation technique.
ObjectiveTo study the application value of multi-slice CT portography (MSCTP) in the diagnosis and evaluation of esophageal and gastric varices (EGV) caused by cirrhosis. MethodsPatients with cirrhosis diagnosed between September 2009 and December 2012 were screened in this study. And the consistency of MSCTP and digestive endoscopy in the diagnosis, classification and grading of EGV in cirrhosis were evaluated. ResultsA total of 78 patients were included in this study, and there were 55 patients with EGV diagnosed by endoscopy, including 35, 16 and 4 patients with GOV1, GOV2 and IGV1 respectively by Satin type standards; and the number of patients with mild, moderate and severe EGV by general grading standards was 2, 15, and 37, respectively. In this cohort, the findings of MSCTP examination also showed that 58 patients had EGV, including 36, 17, 4 and 1 patients with GOV1, GOV2, IGV1 and IGV2 by Satin type standards; and the number of patients with grade I,Ⅱ andⅢ EGV by Kim grading standards was 5, 16 and 37, respectively. Statistical analysis showed that there was a high consistency between endoscopy and MSCTP in the diagnosis (Kappa=0.712, P=0.000), typing (Kappa=0.732, P=0.000) or grading (Kappa=0.863, P=0.000) of EGV. ConclusionMSCTP has a high application value in the diagnosis and severity evaluation of EGV in patients with cirrhosis.
Objective To investigate the effectiveness of one-hole split endoscope (OSE) technique in the treatment of single segment lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). Methods The clinical data of 32 single segment LSS patients treated with OSE technique for simple spinal canal decompression between January 2022 and December 2022, who met the selection criteria, were retrospectively analysed. There were 18 males and 14 females, the age ranged from 45 to 82 years, with an average of 65.1 years. The disease duration was 9-72 months, with an average of 34.9 months. The surgical segments included L3, 4 in 3 cases, L4, 5 in 19 cases, and L5, S1 in 10 cases. The incision length, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, intraoperative radiation exposure frequency, postoperative mobilization time, and the area of the patient’s lesion segment dural sac before operation and at 1 month after operation were recorded. Low back pain and leg pain were assessed by visual analogue scale (VAS) score before operation and at 3 days, 3 months, and 12 months after operation; functional recovery was assessed by Oswestry disability index (ODI) before operation and at 3 months and 12 months after operation; the effectiveness was assessed by modified MacNab criteria at last follow-up. Results All 32 patients successfully completed the operation, with an average incision length of 2.05 cm, an average operation time of 88.59 minutes, an average intraoperative blood loss of 46.72 mL, an average intraoperative radiation exposure frequency of 3.84 times, and an average postoperative mobilization time of 11.66 hours. All patients were followed up 12-16 months, with an average of 13.5 months. One patient experienced lower limb numbness, pain, and decreased muscle strength after operation, while the remaining patients did not experience complications such as dural tear or important nerve damage. The VAS scores of low back pain and leg pain and ODI in patients at various time points after operation were significantly better than preoperative ones, and each indicator further improved with time. The differences between time points were significant (P<0.05). At 1 month after operation, the area of the patient’s lesion segment dural sac was (123.13±19.66) mm2, which significantly increased compared to preoperative (51.25±9.50) mm2 (t=−18.616, P<0.001). At last follow-up, the improved MacNab criteria were used to evaluate the effectiveness, with 18 cases achieving excellent results, 11 cases being good, and 3 cases being fair, with an excellent and good rate of 90.6%. ConclusionThe effectiveness of using OSE technique for simple spinal canal decompression treatment of single segment LSS is satisfactory, with the advantages of minimal surgical trauma and fast recovery.
Objective To investigate whether intraductal electrocautery incision （IEI） could decrease the recurrence of post-liver transplant anastomotic strictures （PTAS） after conventional endoscopic intervention of balloon dilatation （BD） and plastic stenting （PS）. Methods The clinical data of 27 patients with PTAS who were given endoscopic treatment of BD＋PS or IEI＋BD＋PS in our hospital from January 2007 to October 2011 were reviewed retrospectively. Results The treatment of BD＋PS was initially successful in 9 of 11 （81.8%） cases， but showed recurrence in 5 of 9 （55.6%）. The treatment of IEI＋BD＋PS was initially successful in 14 of 16 （87.5%） cases, and the recurrence was observed only in 3 of 14 （21.4%）. The total diameter of inserted plastic stents in IEI＋BD＋PS group was significantly greater than that in BD＋PS group 〔（12±3.2） Fr vs. （8±1.3） Fr，P=0.039〕. All recurrences were successfully retreated by IEI＋BD＋PS. Procedure-related complications included pancreatitis in 5 cases （18.5%）, cholangitis in 8 cases （29.6%）, bleeding after EST in 1 cases （3.7%）, which were all cured with medical treatment. No complications related to intraductal endocautery incision procedure such as bleeding and perforation were observed. Median follow-up after completion of endoscopic therapy was 22 months （range 1-49 months）. Conclusions Intraductal electrocautery incision is an effective and safe supplement to balloon dilatation and plastic stenting treatment of PTAS, which can decrease the recurrence of anastomotic strictures in conventional endoscopic intervention.
目的总结急性胆源性胰腺炎(ABP)的治疗经验。方法我院2005年2月至2009年10月期间收治89例ABP患者，梗阻型ABP 29例，其中2例胆总管下端结石梗阻致坏死型胰腺炎患者，24 h内行开腹或腹腔镜胆囊切除（LC）、胆总管切开取石、T管引流、胰腺被膜切开减压、胰腺坏死组织清除; 8例肝外胆管结石患者急诊(24～48 h)行内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)+内镜下括约肌切开术(EST)+内镜下鼻胆管引流(ENBD); 17例胆囊结石伴胆总管结石及2例胆总管下端占位患者先行内科保守治疗病情得到控制，7 d后行CT、EST或ENBD，择期行LC、胆总管切开取石术、限期内镜胆管内支架放置术或开放根治术。非梗阻型ABP 60例，均为胆囊结石、胆囊炎所致，在入院后3～14 d急性胰腺炎控制后42例行胆囊切除术，18例行保守治疗。结果29例梗阻型ABP在及时或限时行胆道引流解除梗阻后均使胰腺炎得到控制，病情稳定后行手术治疗，均治愈出院; 60例非梗阻型ABP患者中，42例住院行一期胆囊切除术，治愈率达100%，18例保守治疗患者，1个月至1年胰腺炎复发9例，均再次入院，3例保守治疗好转后出院； 6例行胆囊切除术，其中LC 4例，开腹胆囊切除术2例，其中5例治愈，1例出现急性呼吸窘迫综合征抢救无效死亡。结论ABP应根据胆管有无梗阻分型治疗，梗阻型应尽早引流解除胆管梗阻，EST+ENBD能有效解除胆管梗阻控制胰腺炎症； 非梗阻型宜积极保守治疗，病情缓解后手术治疗，能有效降低并发症发生率和病死率。
Objective To compare the difference in efficacy of early precut of pancreatic duct sphincter and pancreatic duct stent placement in the prevention of pancreatitis after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) during high-risk patients. Methods A prospective study was conducted on 61 eligible patients who underwent ERCP treatment in Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery of The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University and Xianyang Hospital of Yan’an University, from November 2016 to November 2017. All cases were randomly divided into early pancreatic sphincterotomy group (n=30) and pancreatic duct stenting group (n=31) . The success rate of intubation, intubation, and incidence of complication were compared. Results There was no significant difference in the success rate of the first intubation between the 2 groups (P=0.580), but the intubation time of the early pancreatic sphincterotomy group was shorter than that of the pancreatic duct stenting group (P=0.007). In the early pancreatic sphincterotomy group, there was 1 case of post-ERCP pancreatitis, 1 case of biliary tract infection, and 1 case of postoperative bleeding. In the pancreatic duct stenting group, there was 1 case of post-ERCP pancreatitis, and 2 cases of biliary tract infection. No severe complications such as perforation or severe acute pancreatitis occurred in both 2 groups. There was no significant difference in the incidence of total complications and specified complication (included post-ERCP pancreatitis, biliary tract infection, and postoperative bleeding) between the 2 groups (P>0.05). Conclusions Thereis no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative pancreatitis after early precut of pancreatic duct sphincter and pancreatic duct stenting placement in patients with high-risk, but intubation time of early precut of pancreatic duct sphincter method is shorter than the pancreatic duct stenting placement method.
Objective To compare the effectiveness of unilateral biportal endoscopy (UBE) technique with the interlaminar uniportal endoscopy (IUE) technique for the treatment of L5, S1 lumbar disc herniation. MethodsThe clinical data of 69 patients with L5, S1 lumbar disc herniation who met the selection criteria between January 2020 and December 2020 were retrospectively analysed. The patients were divided into UBE group (30 cases) and IUE group (39 cases) according to endoscopic surgical technique. The general data, such as gender, age, body mass index, disease duration, and preoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) scores of low back/leg pain and Oswestry disability index (ODI), was not significantly different between the two groups (P>0.05). Perioperative outcomes [estimated blood loss (EBL), total operation time, extracanal operation time, intracanal decompression time, intraoperative radiation exposure dose, incision length, operative related complications, and postoperative hospitalization stay] and clinical outcomes (VAS score of low back/leg pain before operation and at 3 days, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after operation as well as the ODI before operation and at 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after operation) were recorded and compared between the two groups. ResultsAll patients completed the surgery successfully. The incision length, EBL, and extracanal operation time in UBE group were significantly longer than those in IUE group (P<0.05), and the intracanal decompression time in UBE group was significantly shorter than that in IUE group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the total operation time, intraoperative radiation exposure dose, and postoperative hospitalization stay between the two groups (P>0.05). Patients in both groups were followed up 12-15 months (mean, 13.3 months). Dural tear ocurred in 1 patient of the UBE group, and recurrence ocurred in 1 patient of the IUE group, the others of both groups had no surgery-related complications and recovered well after operation. The VAS scores of low back/leg pain and ODI in both groups at each time point after operation significantly improved when compared with those before operation (P<0.05); there was no significant difference in VAS scores and ODI at each time point after operation between two groups (P>0.05). ConclusionThe effectiveness of UBE technique in the treatment of L5, S1 lumbar disc herniation is similar to that of IUE technique, and the efficiency of intraspinal operation is better than that of IUE technique. Although UBE technique is inferior to IUE technique in terms of surgical trauma, there is no significant difference in postoperative recovery between the two techniques.