The strategies of individualized enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) are particularly important in the anesthesia management of same-day surgery. This review focuses on the perioperative management of day surgeries following the experiences of Day Surgery Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University and different surgeries’ guidelines of ERAS, including anesthesia evaluation, preoperative education and optimization, comorbidity management, airway management, choice of technologies and drugs during anesthesia, intraoperative monitor and anesthesia management, postoperative analgesia, postoperative nausea and vomiting prevention, and postoperative management, which is significant to ensure the discharge of the patient in time for same-day surgeries.
ObjectiveTo explore effectiveness and rationality of using concept of enhanced recovery after surgery in treatment of hepatic hemangioma. MethodsThe clinical data of 289 patients with hepatic hemangioma underwent hepatectomy were analyzed retrospectively.These patients were divided into enhanced recovery after surgery group (n=146) and traditional perioperative treatment group (n=143) according to the different perioperative treatment methods.The postoperative hospital stay,hospitalization cost,postoperative bilirubin levels on day 1,3,and 5,postoperative complications rate,postoperative 24 h and 48 h pain numeric rating scale (NRS) score,postoperative ambulation status,intestinal ventilation time,mortality,and readmission rate were compared between these two groups. ResultsCompared with the traditional perioperative treatment group,the postoperative hospital stay and intestinal ventilation time were shorter (P<0.05),hospitalization cost was less (P<0.05),postoperative complications rate was lower (P<0.05),points of postoperative 24 h and 48 h NRS were lower (P<0.05),proportion of postoperative ambulation on day 1 was higher (P<0.05) in the enhanced recovery after surgery group.While the differences of the postoperative bilirubin levels on day 1,3,and 5,mortality,and readmission rate were not significantly different between these two groups (P>0.05). ConclusionThe concept of enhanced recovery after surgery in treatment of hepatic hemangioma is feasible and safe,which is in favor of postoperative functional recovery,and could shorten postoperative hospital stay and reduce hospitalization cost.
Objective To understand the status quo of depression and anxiety emotion in perioperative patients with thoracic neoplasms under the concept of enhanced recovery aftersurgery. Methods Huaxi emotional-distress index scale (HEI) was adopted to investigate the mental status of 195 patients with thoracic neoplasms in Department of Thoracic Surgery, West China Hospital, and the nursing outpatients between September and November in 2016. There were 118 males and 77 females at age of 17–80 (55.72±12.66) years. Results There was significant difference in mental health level between the preoperative patients and the postoperative patients (3.70±3.41vs. 11.01±9.78,P<0.001). The incidence of depression and anxiety emotion in the postoperative patients was significantly higher than that in the preoperative patients (50.00%vs. 9.60%, P<0.001). Besides, there was significant difference of depression and anxiety degree between the preoperative patients and postoperative patients (P<0.001). Moderate to severe depression and anxiety were mostly found in the postoperative patients while mild to moderate depression and anxiety in the preoperative patients. Conclusion Patients with thoracic neoplasms have much emotional obstacle in perioperative period. The incidence and severity degree of depression and anxiety emotion in postoperative patients are higher than those in preoperative patients.
ObjectiveTo compare the postoperative enhanced recovery outcomes of lobectomy performed under non-intubated video-assisted thoracic surgery (NIVATS) versus intubated video-assisted thoracic surgery (IVATS). Methods Computerized searches were performed in the following databases: China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang Data, VIP Information, China Biomedical Literature Database (CBMdisc), Web of Science, Clinicaltrials.gov, The Cochrane Library, EMbase, and PubMed. We collected randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies comparing NIVATS and IVATS. The search period extended from the inception of each database to April 1, 2023. Two independent researchers screened the literature and assessed study quality. ResultsA total of 14 studies were included, comprising 4 RCTs, 7 retrospective cohort studies, and 3 propensity score matching studies, involving 1 840 patients. Meta-analysis results indicated that, compared to IVATS, NIVATS was associated with significantly shorter operative time [MD=–13.39, 95%CI (–20.16, –6.62), P<0.001], shorter length of hospital stay [MD=–0.81, 95%CI (–1.39, –0.22), P=0.005], shorter chest tube duration [MD=–0.73, 95%CI (–1.36, –0.10), P=0.02], shorter postoperative anesthesia recovery time [MD=–20.34, 95%CI (–26.83, –13.84), P<0.001], and shorter time to oral intake after surgery [MD=–5.68, 95%CI (–7.63, –3.73), P<0.001]. Furthermore, NIVATS showed a lower incidence of postoperative airway complications [OR=0.49, 95%CI (0.34, 0.71), P<0.001] and less total chest tube drainage volume [MD=–251.11, 95%CI (–398.25, –103.98), P<0.001], all contributing to significantly accelerated postoperative enhanced recovery for patients. Conclusion NIVATS is a safe and technically feasible anesthesia method in thoracoscopic lobectomy, which can to some extent replace IVATS.
ObjectiveTo explore the influence of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) on intestinal flora in patients with colorectal cancer.MethodsBy convenient sampling method, 60 patients with colorectal cancer were selected from August 2018 to December 2019 in the Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery of West China Hospital of Sichuan University and randomly divided into ERAS group and traditional treatment group (traditional group). Among them, the perioperative clinical management was carried out according to the ERAS management and traditional treatment process in the the ERAS group and in the traditional group, respectively. The fresh fecal samples were collected within 24 h after admission and the first natural defecation after operation. The bacterial 16 Sr DNA V3–V4 region was sequenced by Illumina MiSeq sequencer, and the results were analyzed by bioinformatics.ResultsA total of 60 patients with colorectal cancer were included, 30 cases in the traditional group and 27 cases in the ERAS group (3 people temporarily withdrew from the study). There were no significant differences in the basic informations between the two groups (P>0.05). ① Before or after operation, there were no significant differences in Shannon index and Simpson index between the two groups. The difference between preoperative and postoperative comparison in the same group was also not statistically significant (P>0.05). ② Beta diversity analysis showed that there was no significant difference in community composition between the traditional group and the ERAS group before operation, and there was a clear boundary between the traditional group and the ERAS group after operation. ③ At the phylum level, compared with the preoperative abundance, the postoperative abundance Firmicutes decreased by 26.5% and 5.5% in the traditional and ERAS group, respectively; Bacteroidetes increased by 21.6% and 4.7% in the traditional and ERAS group, respectively; Proteobacteria increased by 7.2% and 2.2% in the traditional and ERAS group, respectively. At the genus level, compared with the preoperative abundance, the postoperative abundance of Bacteroides in the traditional group increased by 17.6% and in the ERAS group decreased by 1.6%; Bifidobacterium decreased by 1.8% and 1.3% in the traditional group and in the ERAS group, respectively.ConclusionsERAS does not affect species diversity of intestinal flora. Although ERAS has some damage to structure of intestinal flora, it is weaker than traditional process, so it is more conducive to reconstruction and restoration of intestinal microecological environment.
Objective To explore the effect of fast track rehabilitation in patients with gastric cancer during perioperative period. Methods Eighty patients were randomly divided into conventional method group （n=40） and fast track rehabilitation group （n=40）, and to compare the levels of total lymphocyte count （TLC） , C-reaction protein （CRP），IgG， IgM， IgA， CD3＋， CD4＋， CD8＋， and CD4＋/CD8＋ in serum on the days of 1 d before operation and 1 and 3 d after operation，and to record the duration of fever，first ventilation time of flatus， postoperative hospital stay time，and the postoperative complications. Results The first ventilation time after operation was advanced in patients of fast track rehabilitation group， and the postoperative fever time and hospital stay time after operation of patients was shorter in fast track rehabilitation group than that in conventional method group （P＜0.05）. The incidence difference of complications in two groups had not statistic significance （P＞0.05）. The TLC on 1 d after operation were lower than that on 1 d before operation in two groups, and the CRP values of 1 d after operation were higher than that of 1 d before operation in two groups （P＜0.01）. Compared with 1 d before operation, the CRP value on 3 day after operation in fast track rehabilitation group was lower than that in conventional method group, and the levels of IgG, IgM， IgA， CD3＋， CD4＋， CD8＋， and CD4＋/CD8＋ were higher than that in conventional group （P＜0.05）. Conclusions Fast track surgery applied to patients with gastric cancer during perioperative period is safe and efficient， which can mitigate the immunologic impairment of patients and accelerate postoperative rehabilitation．
Objective To study the effect of preoperative urination training combined with restrictive fluid therapy with enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) on postoperative urination in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients. Methods A total of 150 patients who were conducted the unilateral TKA from March to May 2018 were divided into two groups, the trial group and the control group, with 75 patients in each group. The patients in the control group did not undergo urination training before surgery and were given liberal intravenous fluid therapy on the day of surgery; while the patients in the trial group received urination training before surgery and were given restrictive fluid therapy on the day of surgery. The pre-, intra-, and post-operative infusion volume and the total infusion volume on the day of surgery of the two groups were recorded; and the urination situation, urination time for the first time and the hospital days in the two groups were compared. Results The total infusion volume on the day of surgery in the trial group and the control group was (1 581.40±277.54) and (2 395.00±257.40) mL, respectively. After operation, in the trial group, there were 73 patients with smooth urinating, 2 with smooth urinating after inducing method, and none with urethral catheterization; in the control group, there were 66 patients with smooth urinating, 3 with smooth urinating after inducing method, and 6 with urethral catheterization. The urination time for the first time after operation in the trial group and the control group was (1.85±0.91) and (2.93±1.48) hours after back to the ward, respectively. These differences between the two groups were statistically significant (P<0.05). The hospital stay in the trial group and the control group was (5.86±2.48) and (6.28±1.60) days, respectively, and the difference between the two groups was not statistically significant (P>0.05). Conclusions Preoperative urination training combined with restrictive fluid therapy (the total infusion volume controls in about 1 500 mL on the day of surgery) in the TKA patients after ERAS is good for postoperation urination. It also can reduce the rate of postoperative urinary retention, and enhance rehabilitation.
ObjectiveTo understand the current situation of unplanned readmission of colorectal cancer patients within 30 days after discharge under the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) mode, and to explore the influencing factors.MethodsFrom May 7, 2018 to May 29, 2020, 315 patients with colorectal cancer treated by Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University and managed by ERAS process during perioperative period were prospectively selected as the research objects. The general data, clinical disease data and discharge readiness of patients were obtained by questionnaire and electronic medical record. Telephone follow-up was used to find out whether the patient had unplanned readmission 30 days after discharge and logistic regression was used to analyze the influencing factors of unplanned readmission within 30 days after discharge.ResultsWithin 30 days after discharge, 37 patients were admitted to hospital again, the unplanned readmission rate was 11.7%. The primary cause of readmission was wound infection. Logistic regression analysis showed that the body mass decreased by more than 10% in recent half a year (OR=2.611, P=0.031), tumor location in rectum (OR=3.739, P=0.026), operative time ≤3 hours (OR=0.292, P=0.004), and discharge readiness (OR=0.967, P<0.001) were independent predictors of unplanned readmission.ConclusionsUnder the ERAS mode, the readmission rate of colorectal cancer patients within 30 days after discharge is not optimistic. Attention should be focused on patients with significant weight loss, rectal cancer, more than 3 hours of operative time, and low readiness for discharge. Among them, the patient’s body weight and discharge readiness are the factors that can be easily improved by clinical intervention. It can be considered as a new way to reduce the rate of unplanned readmission by improving the patients’ physical quality and carrying out discharge care program.
Objective To analyze the progress of evaluation indexes for enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) model at home and abroad, and to propose suggestions for constructing systematic evaluation model of ERAS. Methods Atfirst checked the Chinese and English databases, including Medline, Embase, Sciencedirect, ACP Journal Club, BioMed Central, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Science Citation Index Expanded, Cochrane Library, NHS Economic Evaluation Database, CNKI, VIP, and Wanfang databases (retrieval time was from January 1997 to December 2017), and then filtered the literatures, excluded duplicate documents, a total of 1 020 English literatures and 786 Chinese literatures were enrolled eventually to make an review. Results The literatures showed that, at present, there was no comprehensive and systematic evaluation index system about ERAS at home and abroad. The existing evaluation indexes mainly included the following deficiencies: localization and fragmentation of evaluation indicators, lack of evaluation indicators of ERAS organizational framework and process management, as well as lack of standardized operational definition of evaluation indicators. Conclusions The evaluation indexes of ERAS at home and abroad do not constitute a systematic evaluation index system according to scientific principles, which will restrict the standardization of accelerated surgical rehabilitation in our country. To establish a multidimensional and comprehensive quality evaluation index system based on multi-evaluation of hospital, patient, social, and medical management institutions, which covers ERAS organizational structure, process management, and clinical outcomes, is a necessary condition for the development of ERAS model.