ObjectiveTo understand patients’ cognition of third-party mediation model for medical disputes, analyze the factors influencing the trust of patients on third-party mediation, and propose recommendations for building third-party mediation mechanisms. MethodsFrom November 2013 to April 2014, we referred past literature to design a relevant questionnaire on the cognition of third-party mediation for medical disputes. Patients who had reached the end of the treatment were surveyed by random cluster sampling. The raw data were put into the computer for statistical analysis by SPSS 18.0. ResultsAfter giving out 500 questionnaires, we acquired 486 effective questionnaires. The result showed that 61.52% of the patients knew of third-party mediation; 55.35% of the patients considered that thirdparty mediation should be set in and supervised by the court or judicial administrative department; if the mediation failed, 57.41% of the patients chose to resolve the dispute through legal channels, and 67.90% of the patients tended to confirm the force of mediation conclusion by arbitration; 70.58% of the patients considered that mediators should have professional background of medicine and law; 73.05% of the patients tended to take conclusions of forensic identification as the basis for mediation; 64.81% of the patients were biased to take Tort Liability Act as the basis for determining the compensation; 53.70% of the patients believed that financial allocations could solve the fund problems of third-party mediation, while 38.48% of the patients thought the funds should be provided by insurance companies; 91.15% of the patients thought the medical institutions should purchase medical liability insurance, and 54.32% of the patients thought insurance companies should not intervene the process of meditation. Conclusions Government should provide financial allocations to ensure the funds of third-party mediation. Besides, medical insurance should be brought in as a supplement. Medical institutions should purchase medical liability insurance to solve problems caused by medical disputes. Third-party mediation should be set in and supervised by the court or the judicial administrative department. Mediators should have professional background of medicine and law. Conclusions of forensic identification should be the basis for third-party mediation.
目的 从法医学角度探讨儿科医疗纠纷案件特点及成因。 方法 对四川华西法医学鉴定中心2002 年1月－2011年12月受理的184例儿童死亡并进行尸检的儿科医疗纠纷案件的法医学鉴定资料进行回顾性研究。 结果 儿科医疗纠纷呈逐年升高趋势，年龄以新生儿为主，死因以呼吸系统疾病为主；临床-尸检符合率低（55.23%），医疗过错率高（60.47%），且两者呈负相关。 结论 儿科医疗纠纷临床-尸检符合率比所有年龄段人群低，医疗过错率比所有年龄段人群高，且呈现出临床-尸检诊断符合率越低，医疗过错率越高的特征。
ObjectiveTo provide references in the forensic identification of injury and cerebrovascular malformation involved death cases, and to reduce the relevant medical dispute by exploring the forensic pathological features, identification of medical dispute as well as relationship between injury and disease. MethodsWe collected 33 cases of cerebrovascular malformation from January 2006 to December 2014 in West China Center of Forensic Medicine, including details of cases, clinical medical record and forensic pathology examination, and then the cases were retrospectively analyzed. ResultsIn the 33 cases, the average age of the individuals was 37.4 years old, and the male/female ratio was 23/10. Nineteen patients (57.6%) died within 1 hour. Seventeen patients with mixed pathological type of cerebrovascular malformation dominated (51.5%). Medical dispute happened in 7 cases (21.1%), 4 of which were identified to be led by medical fault and 3 with no medical fault. Relationship between injury and disease was analyzed in 11 cases (33.3%), in which injury was identified to take full responsibility in 1 case, inductive cause of death in 9 cases, and no relationship between injury and death in 1 case. ConclusionComprehensive and systematic investigation of forensic pathology plays an important role in the proper settlement of medical disputes as well as the identification of cause of death and relationship between injury and disease.
目的:了解我院输血申请单规范填写的情况,分析其中存在的问题,以便采取积极有效的预防措施,规范输血申请单填写,提高临床输血安全性,防范因输血导致的医疗纠纷。方法:对2008年10月至2009年3月临床输血申请单(包括手术备血输血申请单)进行调查,以项目填写完整、字迹清楚工整、有经治医生和审核医生签字者为合格。结果:共调查7863份输血申请单,其中规范填写共6391份,占81.3%,未规范填写1 472份,占18.7%。结论:通过对临床输血申请单超填写的调查,分析其中存在的问题,以提高医务人员对规范填写输血申请单及临床输血相关的法律法规的认识,提高临床输血安全性,防范因输血导致的医疗纠纷。
目的 分析骨科医疗纠纷的原因及特点，为医疗纠纷的防范提供参考。 方法 收集2010年1月－2011年12月四川华西法医学鉴定中心涉及四川省各级医疗机构的骨科医疗纠纷鉴定案例55例，进行回顾性分析。 结果 55例骨科医疗纠纷中2010年25例，2011年30例；医源性医疗纠纷41例（74.5%），非医源性医疗纠纷14例（25.5%）。医源性医疗纠纷中医疗机构存在的问题主要以手术操作不当及失误为主（15例，占27.3%），其次为医患沟通不到位（8例，占14.5%）。 结论 骨科医疗纠纷防范的关键在于医务人员认真履行其诊疗义务。
目的：探讨《医疗事故处理条例》颁布后医疗纠纷法医学鉴定的相关特点，启示医务人员在防范医疗纠纷时应注意的相关问题。方法：对四川华西法医学鉴定中心2002年～2006年受理的356例医疗纠纷法医学鉴定资料进行回顾性研究。结果：(1)《医疗事故处理条例》实施以来，医疗纠纷案例逐年增多，个体诊所和三级医院医疗纠纷比例和过错率降低，二级医院和一级医院医疗纠纷率和医疗过错率增加；(2)误诊误治等医疗技术方面的过失是导致医疗事故的主要原因；骨科、妇产科和普外科等手术科室的医疗风险最大；(3)医疗纠纷死亡的患者尸检主要集中在儿童和中青年。各年龄段常见死因不同。三级医院在医院临床死因诊断与法医尸检诊断上符合率最高；(4)侵犯患者知情同意权的现象比较多见；(5)疾病自然转归是被鉴定为非医疗事故的最常见原因；结论：《医疗事故处理条例》颁布后，医疗纠纷法医学鉴定案例逐年增多；目前医疗纠纷的特点和产生原因有了新的变化，其中尤以侵犯患者知情同意权和医患沟通障碍突出。
【摘要】 目的 从法医病理学角度分析引起医疗纠纷的孕产妇死亡原因、医疗纠纷发生原因并提出相关防范措施。 方法 对1999年1月-2008年12月间46例引起医疗纠纷的孕产妇死亡案例进行回顾性分析。 结果 孕产妇死亡年龄以30岁以上多见，死亡时妊娠时间以围产期居多（87.0%）。死亡原因中产科失血性休克死亡21例（45.7%），栓塞类疾病死亡8例（17.4%），感染性疾病死亡5例（10.8%），其他原因死亡12例（26.1%）。46例中属非医疗过失性医疗纠纷8例（17.4%），医疗过失性纠纷38例（82.6%），医疗过失的原因主要为抢救不及时、处理不当、误诊误治等。涉及纠纷的医院以县区级医院居多（54.3%）。 结论 通过法医病理学司法鉴定查明死亡原因，明确医疗责任及医疗纠纷原因，已成为解决孕产妇死亡医疗纠纷的重要手段。【Abstract】 Objective To analyze the causes of maternal death with medical disputes, the causes of medical disputes, and to recommend the related preventions through a forensic pathological angle. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 46 cases of maternal death with medical disputes which were collected by West China Center of Forensic Medicine Service in Sichuan between January 1999 and December 2008. Results Most maternal deaths occurred over 30 years old. They most frequently happened during the peri-natal period (87.0%). The causes of death included obstetric hemorrhagic shock in 21 cases (45.7%), embolism-like diseases in 8 cases (17.4%), infectious diseases in 5 cases (10.8%) and other reasons in 12 cases (26.1%). Among all the 46 cases of medical disputes, 8 (17.4%) were not due to medical malpractices, while the other 38 cases (82.6%) had something to do with such medical malpractices as delayed or inappropriate treatment, misdiagnosis and so on. Most of the malpractices in these cases involved medical institutions at a county level (54.3%). Conclusion Forensic judicatory appraisal is important to resolve medical disputes of maternal death by finding out the cause of death, clarifying the medical responsibility and clearing the cause of medical disputes.
【摘要】 目的 探讨新生儿死亡医疗纠纷中临床及法医病理学特点,启示儿科医护人员在防范此类医疗纠纷时应注意的相关问题。方法 对四川大学华西基础医学与法医学院法医病理教研室1998年1月—2007年12月的60例新生儿死亡尸检案例进行回顾性统计分析。结果 60例中除3例非正常死亡外,57例为自然性疾病死亡。其中出生后24 h死亡32例(56.1%),死亡男婴40例(70.2%)。死亡原因主要为胎粪吸入综合征、肺透明膜病、肺出血等窒息性疾病(49.1%)。其中医疗过失性纠纷21例(36.8%),医疗过失的原因主要为观察不仔细、处理不及时、误诊漏诊、产前检查或助产处理不当、告知不足等。涉及纠纷的医院以市级医院居多(58.7%)。结论 医护人员应严格遵守诊疗常规和操作规范,对新生儿加强监护,及时抢救,同时应积极与家属沟通,以减少医疗纠纷的发生。
Family members are crucial for medical disputes. From the psychology and social perspective, the paper analyzes a specific medical dispute case, and discusses the psychological care for (potential) " shidu” (loss of the only child) family. Based on the current social context, an early intervention suggestion is proposed, that is to provide the whole-process psychological intervention to the special patients’ families. The intervention includes: regular psychological evaluation and psychological support if necessary; providing disease knowledge and death education; providing continuous psychological care by the hospital and community; offerring more psychological care for " shidu” family by society.