目的：探讨《医疗事故处理条例》颁布后医疗纠纷法医学鉴定的相关特点，启示医务人员在防范医疗纠纷时应注意的相关问题。方法：对四川华西法医学鉴定中心2002年～2006年受理的356例医疗纠纷法医学鉴定资料进行回顾性研究。结果：(1)《医疗事故处理条例》实施以来，医疗纠纷案例逐年增多，个体诊所和三级医院医疗纠纷比例和过错率降低，二级医院和一级医院医疗纠纷率和医疗过错率增加；(2)误诊误治等医疗技术方面的过失是导致医疗事故的主要原因；骨科、妇产科和普外科等手术科室的医疗风险最大；(3)医疗纠纷死亡的患者尸检主要集中在儿童和中青年。各年龄段常见死因不同。三级医院在医院临床死因诊断与法医尸检诊断上符合率最高；(4)侵犯患者知情同意权的现象比较多见；(5)疾病自然转归是被鉴定为非医疗事故的最常见原因；结论：《医疗事故处理条例》颁布后，医疗纠纷法医学鉴定案例逐年增多；目前医疗纠纷的特点和产生原因有了新的变化，其中尤以侵犯患者知情同意权和医患沟通障碍突出。
目的 分析心脏手术相关医疗纠纷的临床及法医学特点，并就发生原因进行剖析及提出相应防范措施。 方法 对2002年1月－2011年12月四川华西法医学鉴定中心受理的四川省各级医疗机构发生的17例与心脏手术相关的医疗纠纷法医学鉴定资料进行回顾性分析。 结果 17例心脏手术相关医疗纠纷中，12例进行了尸体解剖死因鉴定，死亡原因有心脏传导系统出血，术后感染，低心排量综合症、肺动脉高压、失血性休克致死等。其余5例加上尸体解剖2例在内共7例进行了医疗过错鉴定，存在的医疗过错包括术前检查不完善，告知不充分，手术操作不细致，术后观察、处理不足，医疗记录不完整等。 结论 心脏手术相关医疗纠纷与术后并发症关系密切，医护人员应重视对心脏术后并发症的防治。尸体解剖对解决心脏术后死亡引起的医疗纠纷具有重要意义。
【摘要】 目的 从法医病理学角度分析引起医疗纠纷的孕产妇死亡原因、医疗纠纷发生原因并提出相关防范措施。 方法 对1999年1月-2008年12月间46例引起医疗纠纷的孕产妇死亡案例进行回顾性分析。 结果 孕产妇死亡年龄以30岁以上多见，死亡时妊娠时间以围产期居多（87.0%）。死亡原因中产科失血性休克死亡21例（45.7%），栓塞类疾病死亡8例（17.4%），感染性疾病死亡5例（10.8%），其他原因死亡12例（26.1%）。46例中属非医疗过失性医疗纠纷8例（17.4%），医疗过失性纠纷38例（82.6%），医疗过失的原因主要为抢救不及时、处理不当、误诊误治等。涉及纠纷的医院以县区级医院居多（54.3%）。 结论 通过法医病理学司法鉴定查明死亡原因，明确医疗责任及医疗纠纷原因，已成为解决孕产妇死亡医疗纠纷的重要手段。【Abstract】 Objective To analyze the causes of maternal death with medical disputes, the causes of medical disputes, and to recommend the related preventions through a forensic pathological angle. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 46 cases of maternal death with medical disputes which were collected by West China Center of Forensic Medicine Service in Sichuan between January 1999 and December 2008. Results Most maternal deaths occurred over 30 years old. They most frequently happened during the peri-natal period (87.0%). The causes of death included obstetric hemorrhagic shock in 21 cases (45.7%), embolism-like diseases in 8 cases (17.4%), infectious diseases in 5 cases (10.8%) and other reasons in 12 cases (26.1%). Among all the 46 cases of medical disputes, 8 (17.4%) were not due to medical malpractices, while the other 38 cases (82.6%) had something to do with such medical malpractices as delayed or inappropriate treatment, misdiagnosis and so on. Most of the malpractices in these cases involved medical institutions at a county level (54.3%). Conclusion Forensic judicatory appraisal is important to resolve medical disputes of maternal death by finding out the cause of death, clarifying the medical responsibility and clearing the cause of medical disputes.
目的：从法医学角度探讨医疗纠纷的成因并提出相关防范措施。方法：对2000年～2005年四川大学华西法医学鉴定中心鉴定的共288例医疗纠纷资料进行回顾性整理分析。结果：近年来医疗纠纷有逐年增多的趋势。医疗纠纷的常见原因有医德医风问题、医疗技术或设备不过关、医务人员的失职或失误等。低级别医疗机构医疗纠纷所占比例相对较高。外科、妇产科等科室医疗纠纷所占比例较高。结论：通过增强医德修养，提高医务人员技术水平，强化医务人员自我保护意识，改善医患关系等措施，能够减少医疗纠纷发生。
目的 从法医学角度探讨儿科医疗纠纷案件特点及成因。 方法 对四川华西法医学鉴定中心2002 年1月－2011年12月受理的184例儿童死亡并进行尸检的儿科医疗纠纷案件的法医学鉴定资料进行回顾性研究。 结果 儿科医疗纠纷呈逐年升高趋势，年龄以新生儿为主，死因以呼吸系统疾病为主；临床-尸检符合率低（55.23%），医疗过错率高（60.47%），且两者呈负相关。 结论 儿科医疗纠纷临床-尸检符合率比所有年龄段人群低，医疗过错率比所有年龄段人群高，且呈现出临床-尸检诊断符合率越低，医疗过错率越高的特征。
ObjectiveTo understand the cognition and mediation tendencies of health care workers in terms of third-party mediation for medical disputes, analyze the factors influencing the trust of both doctors and patients on third-party mediation, and propose suggestions on building third-party mediation mechanisms for medical disputes. MethodsBetween August and December 2012, we made the cognition questionnaire on third-party mediation for medical disputes based on the past medical literature, and the knowledge of doctor-patient relationship as well as third-party mediation agency's organizational structure (including locations and management authorities), staffing, mediation basis, validity sources and fund ensuring. We performed the random cluster sampling survey on all health care workers in five hospitals of different levels. The original data were put into the computer for statistical analysis by SPSS 18.0. ResultsThe knowledge of health care workers on third-party mediation was high. They believed that the best place for solving medical disputes should be the court or judicial administrative department, and the management authorities should be health administrative departments. In case of mediation failure, the majority of health care staff chose to continue to solve the dispute through legal channels. For the effectiveness of mediation conclusion, most health care workers tended to believe in the form of arbitration. They thought that mediators should have professional background of medicine and law; the majority of those surveyed doctors tended to accept forensic conclusions as a basis for mediation. For determining the compensation, doctors were in favor of Applicable Regulations for Medical Malpractice. Over 40% of medical staff believed that third-party mediation should be financed by government financial allocation, and more than half of the medical staff believed that it should be paid by the insurance company. ConclusionThird-party mediation should be set in and managed by the court or judicial and administrative departments. Mediator group should be formed by professionals of law and medical sciences. In the mediation process, it is recommended that the focus of controversy should be identified by forensic identification in order to form a clear division of responsibilities and high mediation efficiency. We recommend that the government introduce in financial allocations at all levels on the basis of medical liability insurance system, and force medical institutions to purchase medical liability insurance through the regulations of law, in order to provide funding support for the operation of third-party mediation organizations. Meanwhile, medical liability insurance companies should be operated under strict supervision to avoid their interference on the mediation work.
目的 分析骨科医疗纠纷的原因及特点，为医疗纠纷的防范提供参考。 方法 收集2010年1月－2011年12月四川华西法医学鉴定中心涉及四川省各级医疗机构的骨科医疗纠纷鉴定案例55例，进行回顾性分析。 结果 55例骨科医疗纠纷中2010年25例，2011年30例；医源性医疗纠纷41例（74.5%），非医源性医疗纠纷14例（25.5%）。医源性医疗纠纷中医疗机构存在的问题主要以手术操作不当及失误为主（15例，占27.3%），其次为医患沟通不到位（8例，占14.5%）。 结论 骨科医疗纠纷防范的关键在于医务人员认真履行其诊疗义务。