Objective To investigate the application value of the binding pancreaticogastrostomy in pancreatico-duodenectomy. Methods The clinical data of 13 patients that performed pancreaticoduodenectomy with binding pancr-eaticogastrostomy from Jan. 2010 to Mar. 2013 in our hospital were retrospectively analyzed. The incidence of postoper-ative complications were counted. Results There was 1 patient with pancreatic stump bleeding after operation， and then recovered after conservative treatment. There was no patient with pancreatic fistula， bile fistula， delayed gastric empt-ying， and other complications after operation in whole group. Peritoneal fluid and amylase level in peritoneal fluid were gradually reduced or degraded after operation. The gastrointestinal function was recovered better. All patients were compl-etely cured. Conclusion The binding pancreaticogastrostomy in pancreaticoduodenectomy has its own unique advantage.It could be reduce the incidence of pancreatic fistula in postoperative patients by using binding pancreaticogastrostomy reasonably.
Four techniques in Whipple operation improved by the anthor in this article are as follow: ①the jejunum was pulled up to the area above transverse colon through the duodenal canal behide intestinal mesenteric radix. ②As Hofmeister’s method, the duodenojejunostomy or gastrojejunostomy was made through mesentery of transverse colon. ③The internal drainage tube inserted into the pancreatic duct was extended to about 25 to 30 cm. ④A silicon tube for feeding about 3 mm diameter was placed into distal jejudum through anterior wall of gastric antrum, pylorus and duodenojejunal anastomosis. The techniques and their advantages are elaborated in this paper.
目的 探讨十二指肠良性肿瘤的诊断与治疗。方法 对1992~1998年间收治的10例患者的临床资料行回顾性总结分析。 结果术前经纤维十二指肠镜确诊7例 ，上消化道X线钡餐确诊3例。肿瘤位于十二指肠降部7例，球部3例。其中6例行手术治疗，4例因心肺脑等严重合并症行保守治疗。手术为十二指肠肿瘤局部切除连同周围肠壁组织部分切除。术后病理报告2例为平滑肌瘤，2例为布鲁氏纳氏腺瘤，2例为间质瘤。结论 十二指肠良性肿瘤可引发严重并发症，如出血、腹痛、肠梗阻、穿孔等，并约有15%的病例可发生恶变。一经诊断，应及早手术治疗，手术一般宜行局部切除。
Objective To improve the diagnosis and treatment of primary adenocarcinoma of the duodenum. MethodsLiteratures were reviewed.ResultsThe morbidity of primary duodenal adenocarcinoma was low and its clinical manifestation had no characteristics.The most effective methods in the diagnosis of the disease were gastrointestinal radiography and endoscopy with the accuracy of 88% and 89% respectively.The disease could be cured by resection of the lesion. The selection of operative type depended on the stage and position of the tumor.Radical resection and tumor stage played an important role in the prognosis.Conclusion Early diagnosis and rational operation are the major ways to improve the resectability and to modify the therapeutic result.
ObjectiveTo investigate how to shorten the learning curve of the laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD). MethodsClinical data of 5 patients who underwent the LPD in our hospital from May 2015 to November 2015 were retrospectively analyzed. ResultsThe mean age of 58.8 years old. There were four patients who were diagnosed with periampullary tumor, one patient was distal bile duct carcinoma. The median operative time was 588 min, the average blood loss was 290 mL, the time of feeding was 5 days, the mean hospital stay was 25 days. One case died of cardiovascular event on postoperative day 1. One patient had postoperative bleeding after LPD, who recovered smoothly after reoperation for hemostasis laparoscopiclly. Conciusions LPD needs basic learning curve. The key of this procedure are appropriate treatment of pancreatic head and digestive tract reconstruction. Rich operative experience of surgeon in pancreaticoduodenectomy, optimization of the operation process, skilled in laparoscopic procedures, appropriate cases, appropriate perioperative management, and steady surgical team are also important factor for the success of LPD and shorten learning curve.
目的 探讨闭合性十二指肠损伤的诊断与术式选择及其效果。 方法对1980～1999年间收治的33例闭合性十二指肠损伤患者临床资料进行回顾性总结分析。结果 合并伤27例，其中胰腺损伤占24.2%(8/33)，术前诊断率为18.2%(6/33)，术中漏诊率为15.2%(5/33)。术式选择：单纯十二指肠损伤以修补为主，十二指肠裂口较大或缺损者，可采用空肠浆膜覆盖术及十二指肠空肠Y型吻合术等其它术式，合并有胰腺损伤者宜行Graham简化术。同时应行充分的十二指肠减压和腹腔引流。术后并发症发生率为39.4%(13/33)，治愈率为84.8%(28/33)，死亡率为15.2%(5/33)。 结论 十二指肠损伤应重视早期诊断，在剖腹探查中应识别其损伤特征，并掌握切开探查方法，防止漏诊；术式选择宁简勿繁，不同患者适时、适当地采用最佳的诊断和治疗方法是十二指肠损伤手术成功的关键。
ObjectiveTo analyze the surgical effect, postoperative complications and effects on the body inflammatory response of laparoscopic gastroduodenal perforation repair, and to further evaluate the efficacy of laparoscopic perforation repair. MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 123 patients with gastroduodenal ulcer perforation treated between February 2010 and February 2015. Among the patients, 65 underwent laparoscopic gastroduodenal ulcer perforation repair (laparoscopic group), and 58 underwent routine open gastroduodenal ulcer perforation repair (open group). Then, we compared the surgical effects (average bleeding volume, ambulation time, postoperative ventilation time, postoperative hospital stay), postoperative complications (wound infection, wound dehiscence, gastroduodenal fistula, abdominal abscess, intestinal obstruction), inflammatory reaction[preoperative and 1, 3, 5-day postoperative white blood cells (WBC) count, peripheral blood procalcitonin (PCT), C-reactive protein (CRP)] between the two groups. ResultsPatients in both the two groups underwent the surgery successfully. No patients in the laparoscopic group were transferred to open surgery. Compared with the open surgery, surgical bleeding volume, ambulation time, anal exhaust time and postoperative hospital stay of the laparoscopic group were significantly different (P < 0.05). Postoperative complications rate of the laparoscopic group was significantly lower than that of the open group (P < 0.05). One and 3-day WBC, PCT and CRP after surgery increased obviously in both the two groups. The above three indicators on the fifth day after surgery were not significantly different from those before the surgery in the laparoscopic group (P > 0.05), while they were significantly different from those before the surgery in the open group (P < 0.05). ConclusionsCompared with open perforation repair, laparoscopic perforation repair surgery is superior for its better surgical effects, fewer postoperative complications and lighter inflammatory response. It is a safe, effective and minimally-invasive treatment for gastroduodenal perforation.