ObjectiveTo systematically review the incidence and influencing factors of early enteral nutritional feeding interruptions in critically ill patients. MethodsThe PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library, CNKI, WanFang Data and CBM databases were electronically searched to collect observational studies on the early enteral nutritional feeding interruptions in critically ill patients from inception to January 2, 2024. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of the included studies. Meta-analysis was then performed by using Stata 17.0 software. ResultsA total of 12 studies including 1 121 patients were included. Meta-analysis showed that the incidence of early enteral nutritional feeding interruptions in critically ill patients was 75.0% (95%CI 64.0% to 84.0%). Influenced by feeding intolerance, airway management, tube problems, radiological examination, and endoscopy, surgery and so on, interruptions of early enteral nutritional feeding frequently occur in critically ill patients. ConclusionCurrent evidence shows that early enteral feeding interruptions in critically ill patients are affected by many factors, and the incidence is high. Due to the limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high-quality studies are needed to verify the above conclusion.
Pulmonary rehabilitation is a comprehensive intervention based on a thorough patient assessment followed by patient-tailored therapies, which include, but are not limited to, exercise training, education, and behavior change, designed to improve the physical and psychological condition of people with chronic respiratory disease and to promote the long-term adherence of health-enhancing behaviors. It has been proven beneficial in reducing dyspnea and improving functional capacity and quality of life for patients with stable chronic respiratory disease. However, recent randomized clinical trials reported conflicting results on the timing of intervention, protocol and effectiveness of acute exacerbation or intensive care unit pulmonary rehabilitation to improve patient outcomes. We should find a balance between " dynamic” and " static” to maximize the benefit of patients from early pulmonary rehabilitation.
Lung transplantation has been proved to be an effective treatment after more than forty years of fast development, while more than 4000 cases of lung transplantation performed globally each year. Recently, lung transplantation in China has been advanced rapidly, and the number of transplants has increased year by year. Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine team has been recognized to play a crucial role in lung transplantation. It has an irreplaceable role and status in promoting lung transplantation, improving the preoperative evaluation of lung transplantation and the maintenance of donors, and carrying out perioperative management, as well as long-term follow-up. Lung transplantation is a systematic project, requiring the perfect cooperation and collaboration of team members and contributing to recipients’ recovery.
目的 探讨危重症手足口病的集束化综合救护的护理方案。 方法 通过比较儿科使用集束化综合护理方案后1年（2009年5月－2010年4月）的26例危重症手足口病并发症的发生率，确定预防危重症手足口病的集束化综合护理方案的有效性。 结果 使用集束化综合护理方案后，26例患儿均治愈出院，其中仅3例有后遗症。 结论 集束化综合护理救治作为主动预防措施比传统的被动预防更有针对性和有效。
【摘要】 目的 〖JP2〗研究质子泵抑制剂（PPI）是否为危重患者发生医院获得性肺炎的危险因素。 方法 收集2002年6月-2009年6月收治的198例重症患者资料，分为使用PPI组（96例）和未使用PPI组（102例）。采用logistic回归分析PPI使用情况和医院获得性肺炎的关系。 结果 使用PPI组肺炎的发生率较高（26.9%），尤其是PPI使用时间超过7 d者（37.5%）。在不同的多变量logistic回归模型中，分别用APACHE Ⅱ评分和入住重症监护室原因校正后，使用PPI以及使用天数均是医院获得性肺炎发生的危险因素（P=0.031，OR＝2.230，95%CI：1.957~2.947；P=0.002，OR＝1.824，95%CI：1.457~2.242）。 结论 长时间应用PPI可能是增加ICU患者发生医院获得性肺炎的一种风险因素。【Abstract】 Objective To identify whether proton pump inhibitors (PPI) is a risk factor of hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) in critical patients. Methods The clinical data of the critical patients admitted to ICU from June 2002 to June 2009 were retrospectively analyzed. A total of 198 patients were divided into two groups: 96 in PPI group and 102 in non-PPI group. The relationship between PPI and HAP was analyzed by logistic regression. Results The patients in PPI group had a higher risk of HAP (26.9%), especially who were treated with PPI more than 7 days (37.5%). Adjusted by APACHE Ⅱ score and reason for admission to ICU, PPI therapy and the using duration of PPI were both the risk factors of HAP in different multiple logistic models (P=0.031, OR=2.230, 95%CI: 1.957-2.947; P=0.002, OR=1.824, 95%CI: 1.457-2.242). Conclusion Long-term use of PPI is a risk factor of HAP.
Objective To evaluate the effect of exogenous melatonin and its analogues on the prevention of delirium in critically ill patients by meta-analysis. Methods Randomized controlled trials of exogenous melatonin and its analogues in the prevention of delirium in critically ill patients were searched by computer from the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Chongqing VIP, Wanfang, and SinoMed databases. The trial group was treated with melatonin or its analogues, while the control group was treated with placebo. The retrieval period was from the establishment of database to January 14th, 2021. Two researchers independently evaluated the literature quality, and meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4 software. Results A total of 11 randomized controlled trials containing 1177 patients were enrolled, including 588 patients in the trial group and 589 patients in the control group. The results showed that exogenous melatonin and its analogues could reduce the occurrence of delirium in critically ill patients [odds ratio (OR)=0.45, 95% confidence interval (CI) (0.22, 0.91), P=0.03] and shorten the time of mechanical ventilation [standard mean difference (SMD)=−0.49, 95%CI (−0.94, −0.03), P=0.04], while might not affect the mortality rate [OR=0.73, 95%CI (0.46, 1.17), P=0.19] or length of intensive care unit stay [SMD=−0.05, 95%CI (−0.26, 0.15), P=0.61]. Conclusions The current evidence shows that exogenous melatonin and its analogues have some effect on reducing the occurrence of delirium and shortening the duration of mechanical ventilation in critically ill patients, and have no significant effect on reducing the mortality or length of intensive care unit stay. The above conclusions need to be confirmed by more high-quality studies.
Massive and severe cerebral infarction can lead to a high mortality and disability rate, and it is the bottleneck of preventing and treating cerebrovascular disease. Once the malignant brain edema of massive cerebral infarction or the critical status of severe cerebral infarction occurs, the treatment effect is very poor. Therefore, we should not only focus on the treatment of critical cerebral infarction, but also prevent its occurrence. It is clinically important to prevent the occurrence of this critical condition in advance and to prevent the occurrence of massive cerebral infarction and severe cerebral infarction. This article points out that some patients with massive or severe cerebral infarction can be prevented from becoming critically ill. The definition, key risk factors and corresponding prevention and treatment strategies of critical cerebral infarction have also been proposed. Critical cerebral infarction can be divided into two categories with or without malignant brain edema, and the risk factors and prediction and prevention strategies by categories andphases can be studied separately.