On January 11, 2022, the European Society of Vascular Surgery (ESVS) completed its first update in the “European Society for Vascular Surgery 2022 Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Management of Chronic Venous Disease of the Lower Limbs” since 2015. Based on the existing literatures and expert consensus, the guidelines added and revised the treatment strategies, postoperative monitoring, and postoperative anticoagulation of superficial venous insufficiency of the lower extremities and pelvic venous diseases. The new and modified parts will be interpreted.
ObjectiveTo summarize the progress of perioperative pain management in patients with lower limb vascular diseases. MethodRetrieved the literature about pain management in patients with lower limb vascular diseases both at home and abroad in recent years and reviewed the literature. ResultsLower limb vascular diseases were very common in elderly patients. Whether it was limb ischemic pain or surgery-related pain, it often increased the stress response and activation of the autonomic system, which was not conducive to the recovery of the disease. Good analgesic management was important for these patients. Perioperative pain management could be performed by intravenous analgesics, oral analgesics, local anesthesia, neuraxial anesthesia and peripheral nerve block. Acute and chronic pain should be actively managed during perioperative period. Pre-emptive analgesic strategies could be implemented in patients with severe peripheral vascular disease. ConclusionsGood perioperative analgesia management is necessary. Pain management which employes one or more analgesic methods is important in maximizing pain relief, function, and quality of life for this patient group.
Inpatients after COVID-19 infection, especially those admitted to intensive care unit (ICU), may encounter a series of coagulation dysfunction, which may lead to thrombosis, such as pulmonary embolism (PE), deep vein thrombosis (DVT) or arterial thrombosis (AT). Although there are many literatures on the incidence rate, prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 infection, there are few data on the symptomatic and subclinical incidence rate of VTE after COVID-19 infection discharge. Therefore, there are no specific recommendations or guidelines for the prevention of VTE after discharge from hospital due to COVID-19 infection, and the current guidelines are controversial. In this study, we reviewed and summarized the existing literature on the incidence rate, prevention, diagnosis and treatment of venous thromboembolism in patients with COVID-19 infection, in order to provide guidance for VTE prevention in patients with COVID-19 infection after discharge.
Objective To identify and analyze all medical injury liability disputes lawsuits pertaining to inferior vena cava filters (IVCF) in “Lexis®China” database, the causes and outcomes of litigation of the cases were clarified with a view, and to provide suggestions for preventing potential medical patient dispute lawsuits and improving the clinical diagnosis and treatment level of doctors. Method The term “inferior vena cava filter” was searched in Lexis®China, and spanning from 2011-01-01 to 2022-12-31. Results A total of 221 cases of medical injury liability disputes were found, after screening and exclusion, a total of 179 relevant cases were included in this study for analysis. All first instance lawsuits were brought by patients against hospitals and had a high rate of compensation awarded (91.6%). Forty four cases were entered second instance litigation, and the proportion of maintaining the original judgment was high (68.2%). The main content involving the modification of the judgment was to increase the compensation amount (85.7%). In the 14 lawsuits related to the failure to place IVCF by the medical authority, the litigation points were all disputes arising from the hospital’s improper diagnosis and treatment of VTE patients, which led to the failure to place IVCF, with the highest proportion (92.3%) of improper diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary embolism (PE). For PE and deep vein thrombosis patients with clear indications for IVCF implantation but not placed, leading to litigation, the hospital bore different liability for compensation (18%–100%) depending on the fault factors of the hospital’s negligence in diagnosis and treatment. The hospital could also be held responsible for inadequate informed disclosure to affect patient judgment (23.1%). In 165 lawsuits related to the placement of IVCF, the vast majority of IVCF implants were for the diagnosis and treatment of VTE in patients (73.9%). However, such unplanned operations caused additional injuries and expenses to patients, and VTE occurred most frequently during hospitalization (76.2%). This type of embolism was most commonly secondary to fracture incision and fixation surgery (31.2%), and the average liability of hospitals for compensation varied due to different secondary factors. The occurrence of intraoperative and postoperative complications related to IVCF implantation could also lead to litigation (18.8%), and the proportion of dead patients in litigation was relatively high (32.3%). The most common complication leading to litigation was PE recurrence or exacerbation (22.5%), while intraoperative complications were vascular injury during interventional procedures (2/3). The overall trend of IVCF-related lawsuits reserves between 2011 and 2020 showed an overall upward trend, reaching a peak of 37 cases in 2020; the average amount of damages exceeded 100 000 yuan per case in 10 of the 12 years included in the statistics. Conclusions In China’s IVCF-related medical liability lawsuits, patients most often sue their doctors, who are often sued for failure to insert a filter due to untimely diagnosis and treatment of VTE, inadequate notification of informed consent for IVCF insertion, unplanned IVCF insertion due to the presence of VTE and IVCF-related complications, and the outcome is often unfavourable to the doctors. In addition, the number of IVCF related lawsuits and hospital compensation amounts have remained high in recent years.
Objective To explore the feasibility and the security of one-day stay ward in stripping surgery of saphenous vein varicosity. Methods Two hundred and eighty two patients treated in our hospital in 2011 were enrolled in this study， according to the operation mode， these patients were divided into 2 groups， ninety patients in one-day stay ward group and one hundred and ninety two patients in in-patient group. Their clinical features and medical operation indexs（included preoperative waiting time， duration of hospital stay， and medical cost）were retrospectively analyzed. Results There was no statistical differences on clinical features between the two groups. But compared with in-patient group， the preoperative waiting time， duration of hospital stay， and medical cost were shorter or lower in one-day stay ward group （P＜0.05）. Conclusions The one-day stay ward operation mode can decrease preoperative waiting time， duration of hospital stay and medical cost significantly， and it also can ensure the safety of clinical treatment. So it’s worthy in the clinical promotion.