ObjectiveTo systematically review the efficacy and safety of laryngeal mask versus endotracheal tubes for laparoscopic surgery.MethodsPubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, CNKI, WanFang Data and CBM databases were electronically searched to collect the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about the efficacy and safety of laryngeal mask versus endotracheal tubes for laparoscopic surgery from inception to April, 2017. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. Then meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 5.3 software.ResultsA total of 16 RCTs involving 1 593 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that: there was no significant difference in the success rate of the first insertion (RR=0.99, 95%CI 0.96 to 1.02, P=0.55). The airway pressure of patients whose position were head higher than foot was significantly lower in the laryngeal mask group than in the tracheal intubation group (MD=–1.20, 95%CI –1.81 to –0.59, P=0.000 1), but there was no significant difference between two groups in reverse position patients (MD=0.48, 95%CI –0.90 to 1.87, P=0.49). The incidence of sore throat (RR=0.58, 95%CI 0.46 to 0.74, P<0.000 01), the incidence of blood stain (RR=0.48, 95%CI 0.30 to 0.77, P=0.002), the incidence of laryngeal spasm/bronchial spasm (OR=0.30, 95%CI 0.11 to 0.80, P=0.02) and the incidence of cough/hiccup (RR=0.10, 95%CI 0.07 to 0.15, P<0.000 01) in the laryngeal mask group were significantly lower than those in the tracheal intubation group.ConclusionThe current evidence shows that compared with tracheal intubation, laryngeal mask can effectively reduce airway pressure of patients whose position are head higher than foot. The risks of various complications are significant higher in tracheal intubation in laparoscopic surgery. Laryngeal mask can maintain patients' normal respiratory functions while reduce damage and do not increase the occurrence of reflux aspiration. Due to limited quantity and quality of the included studies, more high quality studies are needed to verify above conclusion.
ObjectiveTo explore the influence of general anesthesia with laryngeal mask and preoperative inhalation of budesonide aerosol on the incidence of respiratory adverse events during pediatric anesthesia recovery. MethodsA total of 100 child patients scheduled to undergoing inguinal hernia repair between December 2012 and February 2014 were randomly divided into two groups (group A and B) with 50 in each. All the patients underwent general anesthesia with laryngeal mask, while patients in group B inhaled budesonide aerosol before anesthesia. Then, we observed the incidence of adverse events in both groups, including laryngospasm, respiratory tract infection, and pulmonary complications. ResultsCompared with group A, patients in group B had a lower incidence of adverse events (P<0.05). ConclusionPreoperative application of budesonide aerosol inhalation can significantly reduce adverse events in the process of anesthesia recovery in children.
Objective To systematically assess the effectiveness and safety of streamlined liner of the pharynx airway (SLIPA) compared with endotracheal tube (TT) for airway management in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy surgery. Methods Databases such as PubMed (1992 to February 2012), EMbase (1984 to February 2012), MEDLINE (Ovid, 1964 to February 2012), SCI (1992 to February 2012), CNKI (1992 to February 2012), CBM (2002 to 2012) as well as WanFang Data (1992 to February 2012) were searched for relevant literature. The references of the included articles were also manually traced. Two reviewers independently screened the trials according to inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted the data, and assessed the quality of methodology. Meta-analyses were performed using RevMan 5.0 software. Results Ten randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving 664 patients were included. Results of meta-analysis showed that: a) as for side effects, none of the patients experienced regurgitation or hypoventilation during operation; b) as for extubation response, SLIPA was proved fewer than TT during extubation with a significant difference (RR=0.14, 95%CI 0.05 to 0.36, Plt;0.000 1); c) SLIPA was superior to TT with regard to reducing postoperative sore throat (RR=0.15, 95%CI 0.06 to 0.38, Plt;0.000 1); d) SLIPA was similar to TT with regard to Ppeak after peritoneal insufflations (WMD=–0.07, 95%CI –0.73 to 0.59, P=0.83); e) as for PETCO2, the SLIPA group was lower than the TT group obviously after peritoneal insufflations (WMD=–1.09, 95%CI –1.70 to –0.49, P=0.000 4); f) as for hemodynamic change, the SLIPA group was more stable than the TT group during the operation with significant differences (Plt;0.05). Conclusion Current studies suggest that it is safe and effective to apply SLIPA for ventilation in laparoscopic cholecystectomy surgery. However, due to the limited quantity and quality of the included studies, more high-quality studies are need.
目的评价喉罩或单腔气管内插管在胸腔镜下胸交感神经链切断术的应用效果。 方法选择80例行胸腔镜下胸交感神经链切断术的手汗症患者，采用计算机随机法将患者分为A、B两组，每组各40例。其中A组男20例、女20例，平均年龄24岁；B组男21例、女19例，平均年龄23岁。A组使用喉罩通气，B组使用单腔气管内导管，均应用小潮气量较快频率正压通气及间歇人工气胸。观察两组麻醉期间各时点心率（HR）、平均动脉压（MAP）、呼气末二氧化碳分压（PetCO2）、动脉血氧饱和度（SpO2）、心电图（ECG）的变化。同时记录喉罩/单腔导管置入时间、CO2充气时间、手术时间、术中术后不良反应和并发症。 结果两组患者手术顺利，无并发症。A组喉罩/插管置入时间和喉罩/单腔管呛咳、术后咽喉疼痛发生率低于B组，差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。B组MAP、HR水平在T2（喉罩/单腔管置入后）和T7（苏醒后拨喉罩/单腔管时）明显高于T1（麻醉诱导完成），差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）；A组MAP、HR水平在T2和T7时亦明显低于B组，差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。所有患者术中ECG、SpO2和PetCO2无明显变化。 结论喉罩或单腔气管内插管结合间歇的人工气胸都能满足胸交感神经切断术的操作需要，喉罩具有更稳定的血流动力学状态和更高的安全性。
摘要:目的:评价II代引流型喉管(LTS II)和Proseal喉罩(PLMA)在择期手术中应用效果。方法:检索了Cochrane图书馆(2009年第3期)、Pubmed(1950～2009)、EMBase(1989～2009)、CNKI(1979～2009)、VIP(1989～2009)、CBM(1978～2009)中相关II代引流型喉管(LTS II)和Proseal喉罩在择期手术中应用的随机对照试验(RCT),同时筛检纳入文献的参考文献。由2名研究者对文献质量进行严格评价和资料提取,根据指标相应异质性进行描述性分析或Meta分析(RevMan 5.0)。结果:共纳入3个RCT,共244例研究对象,文献质量均为B级。3个RCT的结果显示与PLMA相比,LTS II具有相似的首次置入成功率(P=0.45)、术毕即刻上呼吸道损伤发生率(P=1.00)、术后24 h咽痛发生率(P=0.81)、术后24 h吞咽困难发生率(P=0.12)。2个RCT的结果显示两组引流管置入均较容易。1个RCT的结果显示两组的操作者主观评价相近(OR=1.86,95%CI 0.39～ 8.99)。气道封闭效果由于采用方法学差异性较大,指标也不尽相同,尚不能得出准确结果。结论:LTS II在择期手术中用于气道管理具有较好的前景。但是现时仍不宜用于需在择期术中进行控制通气的病人。关于气道封闭效果,尚需采用更合理规范的指标、更高质量的研究设计进一步研究。Abstract: Objective: To assess the efficacy of laryngeal tube suction II (LTS II) and LMAProseal (PLMA) for airway management in elective surgery. Methods:We searched Cochrane Library (2009),Pubmed (19502009)、EMBase (19892009),CNKI (19792009),VIP (19892009),CBM (19782009). The quality of the trials was assessed by two reviewers independently. RevMan 5.0 software provided by the Cochrane Collaboration was used for statistical analysis. Results:Three studies involving 244 participants were included. Same rates of fist successful attempt (P=0.45),upper airway trauma (P=1.00),sore throat (P=0.81) and dysphagia (P=0.12) were observed in LTS II and PLMA in all studies. Two studies indicated that the insertion of gastric tube was easy in both groups. The similarity of subjective maneuverability in two groups was reported in one study (OR=1.86, 95%CI 0.39 to 8.99). The correct result of effectiveness of airway seal could not be made because of various methods and measurements. Conclusion:LTS II have a good perspective in the airway management. Otherwise, it is not safe for patient required control ventilation because of lack of evidence on the effectiveness of airway seal. More RCTs of high quality need to be undertaken in the future.
目的:观察经喉罩全凭七氟醚吸入麻醉在小儿腹股沟疝手术中的临床应用效果。方法：60例ASAⅠⅡ级择期行腹股沟疝囊高位结扎术的患儿随机分成喉罩七氟醚组（实验组）和氯胺酮组（对照组）。实验组以七氟醚诱导后置入喉罩，经喉罩全凭七氟醚吸入维持麻醉，对照组以氯胺酮和异丙酚诱导和维持麻醉。比较两组血流动力学、呼气末CO2分压（PETCO2）、手术时间、苏醒时间、出室时间（在恢复室内停留时间）。记录术中和术后不良反应如体动反应、嗜睡、恶心呕吐等发生情况。结果：对照组在T3、T4、T5时点HR、BP均明显高于实验组相应时点（Plt;0.05）。实验组患儿苏醒时间和出室时间均明显低于对照组（Plt;0.05）。对照组体动反应和嗜睡发生率明显高于实验组（Plt;0.05）。实验组术后恶心发生率明显高于对照组（Plt;0.05）。结论：经喉罩全凭七氟醚吸入麻醉用于小儿腹股沟疝手术，术中经过更平稳，麻醉恢复更快，术中及术后不良反应少。
Objective To investigate the effective dose of remimazolam benzenesulfonate to suppress cardiovascular responses to laryngeal mask placement in elderly patients. Methods Elderly patients undergoing laryngeal mask anesthesia between March and June 2023 were selected. Combined with sulfentanil 0.2 μg/kg, remimazolam was used as induction hypnotic. The first patient was given remizolam benzenesulfonate 0.16 mg/kg infused by pump for 1 min. The dose of remimazolam for the next patient was determined by the biased coin up-and-down method based on the patient’s response to the laryngeal mask placement. The score of Modified Observer’s Assessment of Alert/Sedation, vital signs and anesthesia depth index (AI) were recorded during induction. Probit analysis was used to calculate the half effective dose (ED50), 95% effective dose (ED95) and half effective AI (AI50). According to the statistical requirements, at least 45 negative patients were required. Results A total of 53 elderly patients were enrolled in the study until the end of the trial. The ED50 and ED95 of remimazolam benzenesulfonate for inhibiting cardiovascular responses to laryngeal mask insertion were 0.154 mg/kg [95% confidence interval (CI) (0.034, 0.170) mg/kg] and 0.207 mg/kg [95%CI (0.190, 0.614) mg/kg], respectively. AI decreased during induction, with an AI50 of 64.119 [95%CI (60.609, 69.984)]. Conclusion When combined with 0.2 μg/kg sufentanil, infusing 0.2 mg/kg remimazolam benzenesulfonate for 1 min is effective and safe for laryngeal mask anesthesia induction in elderly patients.
Objective To systematically assess the effectiveness and safety of ProSeal laryngeal mask (PLMA) compared to endotracheal tube (TT) for airway management in the patients undergoing laparoscopic biliary tract surgery.Methods Using the Cochrane systematic review methods, we searched the Cochrane Controlled Trial Registers (CCTR) of The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, VIP, and CNKI databases through May 2008. We also handsearched relevant journals and conference proceedings. Two reviewers independently selected studies and assessed the quality of the trials. Disagreements were resolved by discussion, in consultation with a third reviewer. RevMan 4.2 software provided by the Cochrane Collaboration was used for meta-analysis which was performed for combining the results of homogeneitystudies. Results Seven studies involving 493 patients undergoing laparoscopic biliary tract surgery were included. Meta analysis results showed that: ① Side effects: none of the patients experienced regurgitation or hypoventilation. ② PLMA was superior to TT in terms of less postoperative sore throat (OR=0.27, 95%CI 0.13 to 0.53, P=0.0002) and response during extubation (OR=0.01, 95%CI 0.00 to 0.03, Plt;0.00001). ③ PLMA was similar to TT in terms of effective ventilation during peritoneal insufflation (Ppeak: WMD=0.01, 95%CI -0.66 to 0.68, P=0.98; PetCO2: WMD=0.01, 95%CI -0.58 to 0.59, P=0.99) and ease of insertion (OR=0.58, 95%CI 0.23 to 1.47, P=0.25). ④ Hemodymatics changed during the procedure: PLMA was more stable than TT. Conclusion It is safe to use PLMA for ventilation in laparoscopic biliary tract surgery. However, up to now, we still cannot draw a definite conclusion due to the low quality of the included studies, and more high quality trials of PLMA airway management for laporoscopic surgery are needed.