Objective To systematically review current status of Chinese DRIs, and compare the similarities and differences between Chinese and global DRIs, so as to provide references for regulating Chinese DRIs. Methods Such database as PubMed, ISI Web of knowledge, The Cochrane Library, CBM, WanFang Data, CNKI and VIP were electronically searched from inception to May 31st, 2013. The reviewers independently screened studies according to inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted data. Then, descriptive analysis was performed for basic information of literature, formulation of different DRIs, and DRIs distribution by different ages. Results Initially, a total of 588 articles were retrieved, 42 of which were finally included, involving 14 guidelines, 12 systematic reviews (SRs), and 16 original studies. The results showed that, WHO guidelines and global systematic reviews focused on iron and fat-soluble vitamins (A and D); the original studies in China focused not only on iron and vitamin A but also on protein, calcium, zinc, and selenium. The included guidelines focused mainly on population aged 3-18 years old and pregnant women; and except for those two kinds of population, SRs also paid attention to adults aged more than 18 years. The original studies of Chinese DRIs were concerned about all kinds of population, mainly focused adults aged 18-45 years and school children aged 6-12 years. Among 16 included original studies, 4 were concerned about men and 2 about women. Conclusion Chinese DRIs need urgent updates and supplement. As the largest developing country, China has different disease burdens, consumption levels, dietary patterns, nutrients’ content, and security levels, compared with developed countries and other developing countries. To develop evidence-based Chinese DRIs that are suitable for native health and Chinese local conditions, we should drawing lessons from the currently available best DRIs standards, methods and evidence based on Chinese actual conditions, disease burden, and expert opinion.
Lifestyle medicine is an emerging medical specialty of 20-year-history. It is more cost effective and environmentally friendlier in managing chronic health conditions of individuals and populations than the conventional allopathic medicine. By summarizing the development, implementation and prospects of lifestyle medicine in America, this paper aims to contribute to the advancement of lifestyle medicine in China.
Strengthening the management and evaluation of clinical pathways is one of the most important strategies of "Healthy China 2030" Strategic Plan. Evidence-based assessment and clinical guidelines can provide the best relevant evidence to develop clinical pathways. We planned to analyze the current situation of clinical pathways in China and explore how to apply evidence-based assessment on clinical pathway management. We searched PubMed, EMbase, ISI, CNKI, WanFang Data, VIP and the The Cochrane Library using "critical pathways" and "clinical guidelines" as key words or subject terms. And we conducted a comparison of their published volume, definitions, differences and connections. The management system of clinical pathway in China is fundamentally flawed, it is still a challenge to implement the clinical pathways effectively without scientific methodologies and standardized evidence-based evaluation system. In order to improve the management quality of clinical pathway in China, we should develop clinical pathways based on national situation and innovate the evaluation system to standardize the clinical pathway management according to WHO recommendations of clinical guideline and appraisal.
Medicine bears the responsibility for human health. Technical competence, service standards, professional ethics and social accountability constitute the soul of this profession. The principles of nonmaleficence, beneficence, respect for autonomy and justice help to establish good doctor-patient relationship and regulate medical services, which has been fixed by international and domestic professional norms. Besides to ensure its truth, effectiveness and safety, medical research also should require certain rendering of subject's autonomy, minimizing risks and maintaining social justice. Some procedures have established for supporting it. Modern medical education furnishes suitable human resources for medical profession, which directly affects the accessibility and outcomes of health services. Its objectives, operations and assessments are increasingly taking shape. Faced with the current issues of healthcare equity, worsening doctor-patient relationship, scandals and ethical controversies in medical research, and the failing of medical education to fully match social needs, evidence-based medical methodology is extending to policy and social sciences for identifying and creating high-quality scientific evidence to improve the quality of decision-making.
The primary principle of evidence-based medicine is that the best clinical decision-making is derived from clinical problems with combination of patient’s preferences with clinical experience and the best evidence. Evidence-based medicine by its nature, is a specific application on the evaluation of medical hypothesis. It also emphasize the importance of humanism in clinical practice. Our study explored the scientific and humanistic characteristics of evidence-based medicine from the prospective of philosophy, so as to facilitate the extensive application of evidence based practice paradigm in other fields.
The increasing deteriorative trend of doctor-patient relationship (DPR) have destroyed patient safety, doctor safety and social stability in China. DPR is a complicated social problem related to multidisciplinary and multi-factor interactions. A series of researches providing different views on how to improve DPR in China have been published in recently years. Evidence-based medicine (EBM) aims to deal with massive information by producing, synthesizing and disseminating evidence from complex interventions. We tried to explore the trait of DPR by EBM methods. We provided evidence on research trends, topics and methods by systematic database retrieval, classification by screening, and quality assessment. Through dissection, attribution, and visualization of interactions and relationships between factors, we provided an evidence-supported framework for improvement of DPR. We identified gaps, defects or deficiencies in existing research, and promoted further research. We continued to follow up the research and faced a challenge: Reflection and frustration in the process of establishing the quality evaluation system of qualitative research. We found that the study of complex humanities and social sciences by reference to evidence-based methodology might be: providing a structured, panoramic perspective for complex social problems on " de-fragmentation”, providing a framework for social governance through classification and hierarchy, and calling for a more tolerant attitude and more comprehensive application of methodologies.
Science is a system of knowledge that reflects the essential connections and laws of the objective world. Classification of disciplines is a subsystem of science, which involves the development of human cognition which evolved from the scientific category to the department of higher education, and then formation of a complex management system. Nowadays with the rapid development of science and technology which triggering numerous complex social problems, an increasing trend of scientific integration calls for multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary research and education. In the 1990s, evidence-based medicine was emerged in the self-doubting of medical science, and extended to other fields of medicine, health policy and social sciences, forming an interdisciplinary evidence-based science system. Evidence-based science is an embodiment of scientific integration, and also the carrier and mechanism of cross-disciplinary convergence. It attempts to break through barriers of disciplines and management, and promotes interdisciplinary research, during which it has encountered many difficulties due to limitations of traditional disciplines. Evidence-based science does not provide an intrusion or transformation of thinking paradigm into other disciplines, but rather an equal dialogue to promote broader discipline collaboration and a new round of self-improvement, so as to constantly explore novel methods and theories to solve emerging problems, achieve continuous improvement, and pursue excellence.