Objective To explore the donor maintenance points of donor donation after brain death （DBD）. Methods From December 2011 to January 2012，two cases of organ DBD in our hospital were performed. After diagnosis of brain death，mechanical ventilation，fluid resuscitation，vasoactive drugs，inotropic drugs，and so on were used，and invasive arterial pressure， central venous pressure，heart rate，blood gas exchange，urine output，electrolyte and acid-base balance，body temperature， hematocrit，albumin level were monitored，the donors vital organ perfusion were successfully kept at acceptable level. Results The vital signs of two cases of DBD donors were stable. The livers，kidneys，and corneas were donated，and the functions were stable and normal. Case one was diagnosed for brain death 6h after ICU admitted，the period from diagnosis to organ procurement was 33h. Case two was diagnosed for brain death 8h after ICU admitted，the period from diagnosis to organ procurement was 31h. All transplanted organs，livers，kidneys，and corneas，were working well after operation. Conclusions Donor maintenance process of DBD is the cornerstone to ensuring successfully organ donation and transplantation，which is important to improve the utilization rate of donated organs，and release the severely shortage of organ.
Liver transplantation is currently the only effective curative treatment for end-stage liver disease. In recent years, with advancements in liver transplantation surgery and anti-rejection drugs, the incidence of surgical complications and organ rejection has gradually decreased. Conversely, transplant-related infections have increasingly become a major factor affecting the prognosis of transplant recipients. Furthermore, due to the progress in critical life support technologies, the time spent in the donor’s intensive care unit (ICU) has been extended, and post-transplant infections originating from the donor, especially donor-derived infection (DDI), have become one of the primary sources of infection for recipients. Studies have shown that infections in liver transplant recipients are often caused by Gram-negative pathogens, particularly carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP), which has now become the leading cause of fatal infections in liver transplant recipients. To reduce the risk of donor-derived infections, it is necessary to strengthen donor screening and evaluation, establish standardized testing processes, and adjust the use strategies of post-transplant anti-infective drugs and immunosuppressants. Monitoring the immune status of recipients is also crucial. Multidisciplinary collaboration and the application of new technologies will be key in future infection prevention and control. To promote the prevention and treatment of CRKP-related donor infections, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, in collaboration with international experiences, has organized relevant experts to develop an expert consensus on the prevention and treatment of CRKP-targeted DDI.
Objective To investigate the risk factors of early allograft dysfunction (EAD) following C-Ⅱ donation after cardiac death (DCD) liver transplantation. Methods The data of 46 donors and recipients of C-ⅡDCD liver transplantation between March 2012 and August 2015 were retrospectively analyzed. The baseline data such as democracy, death cause, donor warm ischemic time (DWIT) and cold ischemic time (CIT) in EAD group and the non-EAD group (control group) was compared, and whether these factors were risk factors of EAD was investigated by univariate and multivariate analyses. Statistical cut-off values for significant factors of the unfavorable analysis were defined by receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis. The 6-month and 1-year graft survival rate were compared. Results The EAD group had a longer DWIT compared with the group [(17.6±4.7) and (12.7±6.2) minutes, P=0.009]; meanwhile, the EAD group had a longer CIT compared with the control group [(13.7±4.7) and (11.0±3.5) hours, P=0.020]. The other factors in both groups showed no statistical significance (P>0.05). The ROC curve revealed the cut-off values of DWIT and CIT were 17.50 minutes [area under the curve (AUC)=0.713, P=0.020] and 9.85 hours (AUC=0.723, P=0.015), respectively. The multivariate logistic regression analysis showed the DWIT [odds ratios (OR)=1.340, 95% confidence interval (CI)(1.042, 1.654), P=0.008] and CIT [OR=1.396, 95% CI (1.075, 1.698), P=0.015] were all independent risk factors of EAD. The 6-month and 1-year graft survival rate of the EAD group and the control group was 85.7% vs. 92.3% (P=0.607) and 71.4% vs. 84.6% (P=0.587), respectively. Conclusions EAD may occured in C-Ⅱ donors with DWIT≥17.50 minutes or CIT≥9.85 hours in DCD liver transplantation. The livers can be used as a resource for clinical use and also have a good outcome.
The quality of a donor liver after cardiac death is closely associated with energy metabolism during preservation. Ex vivo mechanical perfusion has broad application prospects because this technique can help energy metabolism and repair ischemia injury of donors′ livers. Some core issues are presented in this review in order to provide references for propelling secure application of liver transplantation based on donation after cardiac death.
ObjectiveTo construct a rapid screening tool for the donor of heart dead organ donation (donation after circulatory death, DCD) in the background of novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) infection.MethodsBased on literature analysis and core group discussion, two rounds of expert consultation were carried out by Delphi method to establish dimension and index.ResultsThe screening tool included 3 dimensions, including epidemiological history, hospital exposure history, and clinical manifestations, with 15 entries. The mean of the two rounds of expert authority coefficient was 0.757 and 0.768, and the effective recovery rate of the expert consultation questionnaire was 88% and 100%, respectively. The second round dimension and index coordination coefficients was 0.417 and 0.319, respectively. The content validity of the questionnaire was 0.91.ConclusionsThe DCD liver transplant donor's new rapid screening tool for SARS-CoV-2 infection is scientific and reliable. During the epidemic period, the DCD liver transplant donor risk screening tool is of great significance to the prevention and control of liver transplantation risk.
Objective To get the information about the cognition and attitude towards organ transplantation and donation in inpatients. Methods The inpatients were investigated by using a self-designed questionnaire，including general data，cognition and attitude towards organ transplantation and donation. The influence factors of organ transplantation and donation were analyzed by SPSS 18.0. Results A total of 1 000 questionnaires were delivered，973 returned，the effective questionnaire was 906，and the effective rate was 93.1%. In 906 valid questionnaires，788 （87.0%） patients knew organ transplantation；189 （20.9%） patients had transplanted relatives；511 （56.4%） patients were willing to accept the organ transplant surgery，226 （24.9%） patients did not want，169 （18.7%） patients did not know；490 （54.1%） patients agreed to donate organ，173 （19.1%） patients disagreed，243 （26.8%） patients did not know. The age，education，occupation，knowing organ transplants，and with organ transplanted relatives or not had significant influences to the willingness towards organ transplantation and donation （P＜0.01）. The gender had no effect on organ transplantation （P=0.727） and donation （P=0.935） concerned issues，but the age，education，knowing organ transplantation，and with organ transplanted relatives or not had significant influences on it （P＜0.01）. Most concerned factors about organ transplantation were as follows：with an available organ for transplantation 〔28.7% （260/906）〕，postoperative quality of life 〔23.0% （208/906）〕，risk of surgery 〔21.5%（195/906）〕，surgery costs 〔19.5% （177/906）〕，and postoperative rejection 〔7.3% （66/906）〕. Most concerned factors about organ donation were as follows：the reasonable usage of donated organs 〔57.4% （520/906）〕，attitude of relatives 〔23.8% （216/906）〕，and donation compensation 〔17.6% （159/906）〕，and others 〔1.2% （11/906）〕. According to the way of organ donation，403 （44.4%） patients were willing to accept donation after cardiac death （DCD），257 （28.4%） patients accept donation after brain death，246 （27.2%） patients accept living organ donation. The gender，education，and occupation had significant influences on the way of organ donation （P＜0.05），but age，knowing organ transplantation，and with organ transplanted relatives or not had no effects on it （P＞0.05）. Conclusions The lack of propaganda and the high costs of transplantation surgery are the main factors restricting the acceptance rate of organ transplantation. Over time，with continuous improvement of universal education and strengthening the publicity of organ transplantation，the acceptance rate will show a constant increase in the trend. By now，the most accepted way of organ donation is DCD in inpatients. The establishment of a reasonable organ allocation and compensation system is a corner stone to promote organ donation.
Living donor liver transplantation is one of the main solutions to the organ supply-demand discrepancy at present. However, there was a risk of the recipient developing small-for-size syndrome due to insufficient graft volume, while an excessively large graft volume for donation might lead to postoperative liver failure for the donor. In this context, the dual-graft liver transplantation had emerged, which could minimize the volume of liver resection from the each donor to ensure the donor’s safety and provide the adequate volume of liver for the recipient. Yet, this procedure is less commonly performed in our country. In order to promote the steady implementation of dual-graft liver transplantation in China and serve as an important supplement to the donor pool, the West China Hospital of Sichuan University organized relevant experts and draw on the mature experiences of advanced countries in the field of transplantation jointly formulated the “Expert consensus on dual-graft liver transplantation”. The consensus had been developed around aspects such as donor evaluation and selection, surgical methods, and postoperative complications.