目的 观察高位结扎联合腔内激光治疗大隐静脉曲张的疗效。 方法 回顾性分析2008年4月-2009年4月采用高位结扎联合腔内激光治疗32例大隐静脉曲张患者的临床资料，并与2003年-2008年采用传统手术方法治疗的61例患者进行对照分析。 结果 采用高位结扎联合腔内激光治疗的患者1例伤口感染，1例手术后患肢疼痛，3例手术后3个月局部轻度曲张；其余患者下肢症状减轻或消失，手术后1个月复查时活动均无障碍，无下肢深静脉血栓形成，无下肢深静脉损伤发生。高位结扎联合腔内激光治疗与传统手术方法比较具有切口少、出血量小、手术时间短、恢复快、住院时间短、手术后并发症较少、复发率低等优点。 结论 高位结扎联合腔内激光治疗大隐静脉曲张是一种安全有效的治疗方法，与传统手术比较具有明显优势。
Abstract： Objective To evaluate clinical outcomes of endoscopic vein harvesting （EVH）for coronary artery bypass grafting（CABG） in diabetic patients. Methods In this prospective non-randomized control study, patients with type 2 diabetes who underwent CABG from December 2010 to Febuary 2012 in West China Hospital were enrolled. Based on different vein graft harvesting technique, these patients were divided into two groups: an EVH group and a conventional vein harvesting（CVH）group. Perioperative complications were compared between the two groups. Interventional or CT coronary angiogram was used to evaluate bypass graft patency during follow-up. Results A total of 51 patients with type 2 diabetes were enrolled in this study with 24 patients in the EVH group and 27 patients in the CVH group. There was no statistical difference in age, weight, and comorbidities between the two groups. There was no statistical difference in cardiopulmonary bypass time and aortic cross-clamping time between the two groups （67.2±9.8 min versus 68.3±14.5 min, P＞0.05; 62.4±11.3 min versus 65.2±10.3 min, P＞ 0.05）. The vein graft harvesting time （35.6±6.4 min versus 45.2±11.4 min, P＜ 0.05）and rate of delayed leg wound healing（0.0% with 0/24 versus 18.5% with 5/27, P＜0.05） of the EVH group were significantly shorter or lower than those of CVH group.There was no statistical difference in major postoperative complications with respect to venous graft failure rate and chest pain during short term follow-up（9.1 months in the CVH group and 9.4 months in the EVH group） between the two groups. Conclusion EVH is a safe, effective, minimally invasive and quick vein graft harvesting technique for CABG in diabetic patients.
ObjectiveTo explore the mid-term outcomes achieved by using the left internal mammary artery to saphenous vein composite grafts in off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery (OPCAB) for elderly patients. MethodsA total of 59 elderly patients (≥70 years old) underwent OPCAB by using left internal mammary artery (LIMA) to radial artery (RA) or saphenous vein (SV) composite grafts in Xinhua Hospital between March 2006 and October 2012. There was 37 males and 22 females at age of 72.71±1.95 years. Twenty one patients used LIMA-SV composite grafts (LIMA-SV group), and 38 patients used LIMA-RA composite grafts (LIMA-RA group). ResultsAll patients successfully underwent OPCAB with LIMA-SV or LIMA-RA composite grafts. There was one early death in the LIMA-RA group. No statistical differences in early postoperative outcomes were found between the two groups (P > 0.05). During a follow-up of 12 to 91 months, no patient occurred revascularization. There were no statistical differences in overall survival or graft patency rate, and 1 year, 3 years or 5 years survival rates between the two groups (P > 0.05). The patency rate of LIMA in each group was 100% respectively. There was also no statistical difference in overall patency rate of SV and RA between the two groups at the end of 1 year, 3 years or 5 years (P > 0.05). ConclusionAlthough artery grafts are the best choice for OPCAB, LIMA-SV composite grafts can be used as an alternative graft for elderly patients whose RA or right internal mammary artery is not possible or advisable.
Objective To compare the patency of the postoperative vessel bridge grafts between the no-touch technique and the conventional technique for saphenous vein harvest in the coronary artery bypass grafting. Methods A total of 70 patients underwent coronary artery bypass grafting from January 2014 to January 2015 in the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University. They were randomly divided into a conventional technique group (saphenous vein obtained by traditional technique) and a no-touch technique group (saphenous vein obtained by no-touch technique). There were 34 patients in the conventional technique group, including 16 males and 18 females with an average age of 61.6±6.4 years. There were 36 patients in the no-touch technique group, including 16 males and 20 females with an average age of 62.2±6.6 years. The 1-year postoperative coronary CT angiography (CTA) results were compared. Results Seventy patients underwent coronary CTA examination 1 year postoperatively. The patency rate of the conventional technique group and no-touch technique group were 83/116 (71.6%) and 113/122 (92.6%). Logistic regression analysis showed a statistical difference between the non-touch technique and the conventional technique (P<0.05). Conclusion The short-term patency rate of vessel bridge grafts is higher when the no-touch technique is used.
ObjectiveTo explore the feasibility of radiofrequency ablation of great saphenous varicose veins in ambulatory surgery.MethodsPatients who underwent radiofrequency ablation of great saphenous varicose veins between May 2018 and June 2019 in General Hospital of Northen Theater Command were prospectively selected. According to their choices of treatment modes, patients were divided into two groups, day surgery group and routine inpatient group. The preoperative waiting time, length of hospital stay, and hospitalization expenses of the two groups were compared. The postoperative pain, tenderness, and complications were followed up on the first day (the next day after operation), the third day, and the fourteenth day after operation, and the time of return to normal life and work and patients’ satisfaction in two groups were recorded.ResultsA total of 95 patients were enrolled, including 52 in the day surgery group and 43 in the routine inpatient group. There was no significantly difference in age, gender, heart rate, mean arterial pressure, or operation time between the two groups (P>0.05). Compared with the routine inpatient group, the day surgery group had shorter preoperative waiting time, shorter length of hospital stay, and lower hospitalization expenses (P<0.05). In the day surgery group, the time of return to normal life and the time of return to work were shorter and patients’ satisfaction was significantly higher than those in the routine inpatient group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in pain, tenderness, or paresthesia scores between the two groups after surgery according to the follow-up assessment (P>0.05); the pain, tenderness, and paresthesia scores on the first day and the third day were significantly different from those on the fourteenth day after surgery, indicating that the longer the postoperative time of the two groups, the less pain, tenderness, and paresthesia scores were.ConclusionRadiofrequency ablation of great saphenous varicose veins in ambulatory surgery has a short hospital stay, low medical cost, high patient satisfaction, and can ensure the safety of treatment at the same time, which is worthy of clinical promotion
ObjectiveTo explore the outcomes achieved by using left internal mammary artery (LIMA) to radial artery (RA) or saphenous vein (SV) Y-composite grafts in minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting (MIDCAB) for patients with multiple vessel disease. MethodsFrom January 2009 through May 2015, 56 patients (36 males and 20 females) with multiple vessel disease underwent MIDCAB with LIMA-RA or LIMA-SV Y-composite grafts without cardiopulmonary bypass in our hospital. MIDCAB was performed through a left anterior minithoracotomy. Thirty four patients used LIMA-RA grafts, and twenty two patients used LIMA-SV grafts. ResultsAll patients success-fully underwent MIDCAB with LIMA-SV or LIMA-RA Y-composite grafts. No patient required to convert to sternotomy during the surgery. Revascularization was performed for 2 target vessels in 12 patients, 3 target vessels in 41 patients and 4 target vessels in 3 patients. Mean postoperative ventilation time was 27.14±31.35 h. Mean ICU time was 3.16±2.53 d, and mean postoperative inhosptial time was 11.89±3.91 d. Thirty-day mortality was 1.79% (1/56). At a follow-up of 1 to 77 months, no patients received revascularization. The overall survival at 2 years postoperatively was 94.4%±5.4% in the LIMA-RA group and 86.8%±9.2% in the LIMA-SV group (P=0.299). The patency rate of LIMA was 100.0%. The overall patency rate of RA or SV grafts at 2 years postoperatively was 90.3%±5.3% or 86.7%±6.3% with no statistical difference (P=0.265). ConclusionMIDCAB with LIMA-RA or LIMA-SV Y-composite grafts is a safe and an effective procedure with favorable early and mid-term outcomes for patients with multiple vessel disease. LIMA-SV composite graft can be used as an alternative graft for patient whose RA is not possible or advisable.
The choice of the graft conduit for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) has significant implications both in the short-and long-term. The patency of a coronary conduit is closely associated with an uneventful postoperative course, better long-term patient survival and superior freedom from re-intervention. The internal mammary artery is regarded as the primary conduit for CABG patients, given its association with long-term patency and survival. However, long saphenous vein (LSV) continues to be utilized universally as patients presenting for CABG often have multiple coronary territories requiring revascularization. Traditionally, the LSV has been harvested by creating incisions from the ankle up to the groin termed open vein harvesting (OVH). However, such harvesting methods are associated with incisional pain and leg wound infections. In addition, patients find such large incisions to be cosmetically unappealing. These concerns regarding wound morbidity and patient satisfaction led to the emergence of endoscopic vein harvesting (EVH). Published experience comparing OVH with EVH suggests decreased wound related complications, improved patient satisfaction, shorter hospital stay, and reduced postoperative pain at the harvest site following EVH. Despite these reported advantages concerns regarding risk of injury at the time of harvest with its potential detrimental effect on vein graft patency and clinical outcomes have prevented universal adoption of EVH. This review article provides a detailed insight into the technical aspects, outcomes, concerns, and controversies associated with EVH.