目的:探讨输尿管镜技术在泌尿外科疾病诊治中的临床应用价值。方法: 2002年9月至2008年9月应用经尿道输尿管镜技术诊断和治疗泌尿系疾病患者1333例。其中行输尿管镜治疗者1200例, 包括输尿管结石1010例,其中上段结石146例、中段344例、下段520例;输尿管狭窄18例;医源性双J管滞留38例;男性尿道狭窄38例;膀胱尿道结石41例;肾盂结石8例;输尿管阴道漏5例;小儿逆行输尿管插管20例;内支架管置入22例。其中用于诊断的患者133例。结果:治疗1010例输尿管结石,成功865例,成功率为85.6%,其中治疗输尿管上、中、下段结石的成功率分别为68.5%、81.7%及93.1%;输尿管狭窄、尿道狭窄、膀胱尿道结石、输尿管阴道漏及小儿逆行输尿管插管均疗效满意。用于诊断的133例患者中,发现肿瘤4例,阴性结石48例,息肉8例,输尿管结核9例,输尿管狭窄30例,无阳性发现34例。手术失败24例。发生严重手术并发症37例,其中死亡1例,感染性休克2例,黏膜撕脱4例,穿孔15例、假道12例,严重出血3例。结论:输尿管镜技术由于其适应于泌尿系统腔道的独特特点,可应用于泌尿外科的许多疾病的诊治,尤其对输尿管下段结石可作为首选治疗措施;只要仔细操作,随着经验的积累,并发症发生率会越来越低。
摘要:目的:探讨后腹腔镜输尿管切开取石术治疗嵌顿性输尿管结石的临床价值和技术要点。 方法:2006年12月至 2009年3月,对58例嵌顿性输尿管中上段结石采用后腹腔镜输尿管切开取石术,术中取石后于镜下直接置入双J管,间段缝合输尿管切口。 结果:58例手术均获成功,无中转开放手术,结石清除率100%。术后创腔引流液量少,3~5d拔除引流管,1周出院,术后3周膀胱镜下拔除双J管。随访1~27个月,B超复查显示肾积水明显好转或消失,无结石复发。 结论:后腹腔镜输尿管切开取石术治疗嵌顿性输尿管结石具有创伤小\疗效好、术后恢复快等特点,明显优于开放手术及其它手术,值得推广应用。Abstract: Objective: To summarize our experience and evaluate the outcome of retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy of the upper ureter impacted stone. Methods: Between December 2006 and March 2009, 58 patients underwent retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy of the upper ureter. After removal of the stones, the double J was put in and interrupted suture was performed for upper ureter. Results: Retroperitoneoscopic ureterolithotomy was successful in all patients, there was neither ureteral stricture nor recurrent calculus, the blood loss ranged from 510 mL, without urine leakage occurred.The mean hospital stay was 7 days, after 3 weeks double J was removed by cystoscopy. With 127 months followup, the hydronephrosis relieved and no recurrence of ureter calculus founded. Conclusion:Retroperitoneoscopic ureterolithotomy is a safe and effective minimally invasive operation, and worth to generalization.
Objective To investigate cost-effectiveness of no indwelling urinary catheter in pulmonary lobectomy patients and to confirm the advances of no indwelling urinary catheter. Methods We recruited 148 lung cancer patients who were scheduled for pulmonary lobectomy under general anesthesia in West China Hospital from July through December 2015. These patients were divided into two groups including an indwelling urinary catheter group (74 patients, 45 males and 29 females, at age of 52.55±19.87 years) and a no indwelling urinary catheter group (74 patients, 42 males and 32 females, at age of 54.03±16.66 years). Indexes of cost-effectiveness of the two groups were compared. Results There was no statistical difference between the two groups in duration of indwelling catheter (1.56±0.0.65 d versus 1.68±0.91 d, P=0.077). Material expense(4 811.48 yuan versus 296.74 yuan, P=0.045), cost of nursing care (7 413.32 yuan versus 457.32 yuan, P=0.013), and total expense (12 224.8 yuan versus 754.06 yuan, P=0.000) in the indwelling catheter group were higher than those in the no indwelling catheter group. Material expense per patient (65.02±5.62 yuan/patient-time versus 4.01±0.00 yuan/patient-time, P=0.000), cost of nursing care per patient (100.18±7.19 yuan/patient-time versus 6.18±1.22 yuan/patient-time, P=0.000), and total cost per patient (165.20±12.81 yuan/patienttime versus 10.19±1.22 yuan/patient-time, P=0.000) in the indwelling catheter group were higher than those in the no indwelling catheter group. Conclusion Both costs and labor of nurse can be cut down for appropriate lung cancer patients undergoing lobectomy without routine indwelling urinary catheter.
Objective To evaluate the clinical value of ureteroscope in cholelithiasis treated by laparoscopic surgery. Methods The clinical data of 36 patients admitted because of hepatolithus with ureteroscope combination in laparoscopic surgery from February 2007 to September 2009 in Guidong People’s Hospital of Guangxi were analyzed retrospectively. Results In 33 cases, stones were removed once by ureteroscope in laparoscopic surgery with residual stones (in 3 cases residual stone were removed secondarily through T tube) and the other 3 cases were transferred to laparotomy forcedly due to bleeding of biliary duct and vessels of porta hepatis and tearing of bile duct. During operation, blood loss was 30-280 (94.51±54.70) ml; operation time was 110-260 (147.22±48.45) min; recovery time of bowel movement was 1-3 (2.03±0.76) d; postoperative hospitalization time was 6-13 (7.12±1.65) d (some discharged with T tube); the time of patients of T tubes pulled out was 28-45 (38.92±6.52) d. Bile leakage happened in 1 case and infection of biliary tract in 1 case, no complications such as biliary stricture or bile duct bleeding were found after operation. Conclusions Treatment of intrahepatic bile duct or a single extra-hepatic sand-like stones with ureteroscopy usage in laparoscopic surgery is feasible and less invasive. It is a minimally invasive treatment for intra- or extra-hepatic stones due to rapidly postoperative rehabilitation.
目的:探讨经尿道输尿管镜腔内气压弹道碎石治疗肾盂结石的疗效。方法:回顾分析7例肾盂结石经尿道输尿管镜腔内气压弹道碎石术式治疗的临床资料。结果:5例术后复查出现大小不等上尿路残余结石,分别予经皮肾镜碎石,经尿道输尿管镜碎石,体外振波碎石治疗后复查无残余结石。结论:肾盂结石经尿道输尿管镜腔内气压弹道碎石治疗需要根据结石的大小、形态及位置严格掌握适应症。
Objective To compare the therapeutic effect of new “One-Stitch” ureterovesical anastomosis to that of the classic Lich-Gregoir method. Methods From January 2002 to December 2004, 445 patients suffering from uremia due to chronic nephritis were treated with renal transplantation. Among them, 121 patients were operated with our new modified ureteroneocystostomy technique (the new One-Stitch group), and 324 patients were operated with Lich-Gregoir technique (the Lich-Gregoir group). In the new One-Stitch group, there were 79 males and 42 females, aged 20-62 years (35.7 years on average). The course of the disease was 2-11 years (2.7 years on average). In the Lich-Gregoir group, there were 211 males and 113 females, aged 19-65 years (33.9 years on average). The disease course was 1-14 years (2.3 years on average). There was no significant difference between the two groups in age, proportion of genders, primary diseases and course of the disease (P gt; 0.05). The operative time, the ureteral compl ications and non-ureteral compl ications were compared between the two groups after the renal transplantation. Results The operative time for the new One-Stitch and Lich-Gregoir techniques was (8.7 ± 1.1) minutes and (22.4 ± 5.1) minutes, indicating the difference was significant (P lt; 0.05). All recipients were followed up for 3-5 years. In the new One-Stitch group, there were 5 patients with leakage of urine, 15 with gross hematuria, 4 with ureteral obstruction and 28 with urinary system infection. Symptomatic vesicoureteral reflux and stone formation were not observed in this group. In the Lich-Gregoir group, there were 17 patients with leakage of urine, 12 with gross hematuria, 13 with ureteral obstruction, 86 with urinary system infection, 6 with symptomatic vesicoureteral reflux and 2 with stones. In the new One-Stitch group, the incidence rate of compl ications of gross hematuria was 12.4%, which was significantly different from 3.7% in the Lich-Gregoir group (P lt; 0.05). The incidence rates of ureteral compl ications in the Lich-Gregoir and the new One-Stitch groups were 19.8% and 15.4%, respectively. The difference was not significant (P gt; 0.05). There was no significant difference between the two groupsin incidence rate of urinary system infection, delayed recovery of kidney function after kidney transplantation and rejectionreaction (P gt; 0.05). Conclusion The new One-Stitch group has no significant difference in ureteral compl ications ompared with the Lich-Gregoir group, and has become a preferential ureterovesical reimplantation technique because of its simple and has convenient operation.
Objective To understand the urination of orthopedic patients after the catheter is removed, and to explore the influencing factors of urodynia. Methods Convenient sampling was used to select 160 patients who underwent surgical treatment in the Department of Orthopedics of West China Hospital of Sichuan University from May to July 2020. Questionnaires were used to investigate the patients’ urination, and a logistic regression model was used to analyze the factors affecting the patients’ urodynia. Results A total of 157 patients urinated by themselves after the catheter was removed, with 102 cases of dysuria. Logistic regression results showed that male [odds ratio (OR)=0.282, 95% confidence interval (CI) (0.092, 0.863), P=0.027], Huaxi Emotional-Distress Index score [OR=1.407, 95%CI (1.124, 1.760), P=0.003] and intraoperative fluid infusion [OR=1.001, 95%CI (1.000, 1.002), P=0.014] were the influencing factors of urodynia. Conclusion Most orthopedic patients can urinate on their own after the catheter is removed, but more than half of the patients experience urodynia during the first urination. Gender, mental status and intraoperative fluid infusion are the influencing factors of urodynia after urinary catheter removal after surgery. Clinical nursing staff should identify these influencing factors as soon as possible and carry out targeted interventions to improve the success rate of patients with urination after removing the catheter, reduce the incidence of urodynia, and promote the recovery of patients.