ObjectiveTo compare the clinical effect of single mediastinal drainage tube and both mediastinal drainage tube and closed thoracic drainage tube for the patients who received thoracoscopic radical resection of esophageal carcinoma.MethodsWe enrolled 96 esophageal carcinoma patients who received thoracoscopic radical resection from June 2016 to October 2018. Of them, 49 patients were indwelt with both mediastinal drainage tube and closed thoracic drainage tube (a chest & mediastinal drainage group, a CMD group) while the other 47 patients were indwelt with single mediastinal drainage tube (a single mediastinal drainage group, a SMD group). The total drainage volume, intubation time and incidence of postoperative complications (postoperative atelectasis, pulmonary infection, pleural effusion and anastomotic leakage) between the two groups were compared. The pain score and comfort score were also compared between the two groups.ResultsThe total drainage volume and intubation time in the SMD group were not significantly different from those in the CMD group (1 321±421 mL vs. 1 204±545 mL, P=0.541; 6.1±3.7 d vs. 6.4 ±5.1 d, P=0.321). The incidence of postoperative complications (postoperative atelectasis, pulmonary infection, pleural effusion and anastomotic leakage) in the SMD group was not significantly different from that in the CMD group (10.6% vs. 6.1%, P=0.712; 4.3% vs. 10.2%, P=0.656; 6.4% vs. 12.2%, P=0.121; 2.1% vs. 4.1%, P=0.526). The numerical rating scale (NRS) pain scores on the first to the fifth day after surgery and during extubation in the SMD group were significantly lower than those in the CMD group (3.2±2.1 vs. 5.1±2.4, P=0.041; 2.8±0.6 vs. 4.8±1.4, P=0.015; 2.1±0.4 vs. 4.5±0.4, P=0.019; 1.7±0.7 vs. 4.0±0.8, P=0.004; 1.8±0.7 vs. 3.2±1.2, P=0.006; 1.4±0.2 vs. 2.5±3.4, P=0.012). The VAS comfort scores in the SMD group were significantly lower than those in the CMD group (3.6±1.7 vs. 6.6±3.7, P=0.018; 2.9±2.0 vs. 5.1±3.4, P=0.007; 2.1±1.4 vs. 5.5±2.4, P=0.004; 3.0±0.9 vs. 4.6±3.8, P=0.012; 1.8±1.1 vs. 4.2±2.7, P=0.003; 2.4±3.2 vs. 5.3±1.7, P=0.020).ConclusionThe clinical effect of single mediastinal drainage tube in thoracoscopic resection of esophageal carcinoma is similar to that of both mediastinal drainage tube and closed thoracic drainage tube, but it can significantly improve the comfort of the patients.
目的 探讨急性胰腺炎继发感染的治疗方法。方法 分析总结我院1998～1999年收治的20例胰腺感染患者，采用经后上腰腹膜后引流及灌洗方法治疗的资料。结果 术后并发症： 残余脓肿2例，消化道出血1例，肠瘘4例，胰瘘6例，经治疗后患者全部治愈。结论 该治疗方法残余感染及死亡率低。
目的:研究微创侧脑室穿刺联合置管外引流术治疗脑室出血的疗效。方法:将我院48例脑室出血患者随机分为治疗组及对照组,对照组采用常规内科药物治疗,治疗组在对照组基础上采用微创侧脑室穿刺联合置管外引流术。结果:治疗组的总有效率为83.33%,显著高于对照组的50.0%,死亡率显著低于对照组,以上差异有统计学意义(Plt;0.05)。结论:微创侧脑室穿刺联合置管外引流术治疗脑室出血效果好,损伤小、操作简便易行,缩短了病程,显著降低了患者致残率及死亡率,及早手术,可提高治愈率和生存质量,值得推广。
Objective To explore the influencing factors of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD), and to compare the incidence of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy with internal drainage of main pancreatic duct and external drainage according to the pancreatic fistula risk score (FRS) system, to provide the basis for the best drainage scheme in clinic. Methods The clinical data of 76 patients with PD who treated in the Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University from January 2016 to December 2017 were analyzed retrospectively, to explore the risk factors of pancreatic fistula. Single factor analysis was based on group chi-square test or Fisher exact probability method, and multivariate analysis was based on unconditioned logistic regression model. According to the results of FRS, the difference of pancreatic fistula in different risk groups was explored. The statistical method was chi-square test. Results The incidence of pancreatic fistula after PD was 31. 5% in 76 patients.Univariate analysis showed that the diameter of the main pancreatic duct and the texture of the pancreas were the related factors affecting the occurrence of pancreatic fistula after PD (P<0.05), and the soft pancreas was the independent risk factor for the occurrence of pancreatic fistula after PD (OR=3.886, P=0.011). There was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative pancreatic fistula between the internal drainage group and the external drainage group (P>0.05). There was no pancreatic fistula occurred in the patients with negligible risk. The incidence of postoperative pancreatic fistula in patients with high risk of external drainage group was only 12.5%, comparing with patients in internal drainage group (63.6%), the difference was statistically significant (P=0.026). There was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative pancreatic fistula between patients in the external drainage group with moderate risk and low risk compared with the corresponding patients in the internal drainage group (P>0.05). Conclusions Pancreatic texture was an independent risk factor for pancreatic fistula after PD. External drainage maybe more effective than internal drainage in preventing pancreatic fistula after PD in patients with high risk of FRS.
目的总结彩超引导下经皮穿刺置管冲洗引流治疗腹腔脓肿的临床疗效。 方法回顾性分析我院2003年1月至2013年3月期间对124例腹腔脓肿患者采取彩超引导下经皮穿刺置管冲洗引流治疗的临床资料。 结果124例腹腔脓肿患者中治愈118例（95.2%）；6例未治愈（4.8%），经手术治疗后痊愈。全组置管均顺利，未发生出血、腹腔脏器受损等严重并发症。间隔1～3个月来院复查B超，随访患者106例（85.5%），随访（7±2.43）个月未见复发。 结论选择性采用彩超引导下经皮穿刺置管冲洗引流治疗腹腔脓肿微创、安全及有效。
ObjectiveTo compare the short-term effectiveness between arthroscopic cystectomy and internal drainage combined with cystectomy in popliteal cyst.MethodsBetween March 2014 and March 2017, 56 patients with symptomatic popliteal cyst were enrolled in the study, randomized block design was used to divided the patients into trial group (arthroscopic cystectomy combined with internal drainage group, n=28) and control group (arthroscopic internal drainage group, n=28). Excluding those who had incomplete follow-up and received surgery for other diseases postoperatively, 26 patients in the experimental group and 27 patients in the control group were finally enrolled in the study. There was no significant difference in gender, age, side, course of disease, maximum diameter and grade of popliteal cyst, and associated diseases between two groups (P>0.05). The operation time, duration of popliteal ecchymosis and the middle back of calf tenderness were observed postoperatively. The circumference of calf at 1 day, 1 week, and 2 weeks after operation were measured and the differences were calculated with the measurement before operation. Lower extremity venous thrombosis was observed by color doppler ultrasonography at 1 week after operation. The effectiveness was evaluated by Rauschning and Lindgren grading criteria. And MRI was used to observe whether the popliteal cyst disappeared or decreased and measured its maximum diameter at 1 year after operation.ResultsPatients in both groups were followed up 12-14 months, with an average of 12.5 months. The operation time, duration of popliteal ecchymosis, and the middle back of calf tenderness of the trial group were all longer than those in the control group (P<0.05), the differences of circumference of calf at 1 day, 1 week, and 2 weeks after operation of the trial group were greater than those in the control group (P<0.05). Color doppler ultrasonography of the lower extremity at 1 week after operation found that the intermuscular venous thrombosis occurred in 2 cases of the trial group, while no lower extremity thrombosis was found in the control group; and the difference between two groups was not significant (P=0.236). According to the Rauschning and Lindgren grading criteria, there were 16 cases of grade 0, 6 cases of grade 1, and 4 cases of grade 2 in the trial group, and 17 cases of grade 0, 4 cases of grade 1, and 6 cases of grade 2 in the control group at 1 year after operation. There was no significant difference between 2 groups (Z=–1.872, P=0.078). Nine cases (34.62%) of the trial group and 13 cases (48.15%) of the control group still have residual cysts by MRI, the maximum diameter of which was less than 2 cm. The cysts disappeared in the remaining patients in both groups, and there was no recurrence during the follow-up. There was no significant difference in cyst residual rate between 2 groups (χ2=2.293, P=0.852).ConclusionCompared with arthroscopic internal drainage, the short-term effectiveness of the arthroscopic internal drainage combined with cystectomy had no significant improvement, and the operation time was prolonged, the postoperative complications were obviously increased.
目的总结截肋引流术在脓胸治疗中的应用价值 方法回顾性分析2008年1月至2013年1月于九原区医院胸外科及大连医科大学附属第二医院胸外科21例脓胸患者的临床资料，其中男15例、女6例，年龄33～65（42.5± 4.5）岁。脓胸位于左侧胸腔9例，右侧胸腔12例。患者均采用截肋引流术进行治疗。 结果21例截肋引流术均获得成功，无围术期死亡病例。术后应用抗菌素7～10 d。术后3～7 d拔除上胸腔引流管。术后10～21 d当胸腔引流液少于20 ml时，将脓腔内引流管引流改为开放引流，23～40 d完全拔出脓腔引流管。术后胸部X线片示18例患者肺膨胀良好，无残腔；3例患者有少量包裹性积液。21例患者均顺利出院。随访6个月至5年，患者症状消失，胸部X线片示肺膨胀良好，无残腔，无复发。 结论截肋引流术是一项安全有效的治疗技术，对于急慢性脓胸均有一定的临床应用价值。
Objective To investigate the clinical value of " O”continuous biliary-enteric anastomosis combined with percutaneous transhepatic cholangial drainage (PTCD) in pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). Methods The clinical data of 35 patients with PD who were admitted to Xinyang Central Hospital from June 2015 to June 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. Results All patients completed the " O” continuous biliary-enteric anastomosis combined with PTCD without perioperative death. ① The preoperative indwelling time of PTCD tube was (13.24±3.39) d, total bilirubin (TBIL) was (363.67±12.26) μmol/L on admission and (155.59±17.63) μmol/L on preoperative after PTCD, respectively. ② The operative time was (231.46±18.69) min, the intraoperative blood loss was (158.30±31.33) mL, the diameter of the hepatic ductal segment was (1.3±0.2) cm, and the duration of the " O” continuous biliary-enteric anastomosis was (7.31±1.52) min. ③ After surgery, the indwelling time of PTCD tube was (8.13±1.49) d, the hospitalization time was (27.31±5.49) d. Biliary leakage occurred in 1 case, pancreatic fistula occurred in 5 cases (3 cases of biochemical sputum and 2 cases of B-stage pancreatic fistula), abdominal infection occurred in 2 cases, pneumonia occurred in 3 cases, wound infection occurred in 2 cases. No postoperative biliary-enteric anastomosis stenosis, biliary tract infection, and intra-abdominal hemorrhage occurred. There was no laparotomy patients in this group and all patients were discharged. ④ All patients were followed-up for 180 days after surgery. No death, bile leakage, biliary-enteric anastomotic stenosis, biliary tract infection, pancreatic fistula, gastro-intestinal leakage, and abdominal infection occurred. One case of delayed gastric emptying and 2 cases of alkaline reflux gastritis were cured after outpatient treatment. Conclusions The preoperative PTCD can improve the preoperative liver function and increase the security of PD. " O” continuous biliary-enteric anastomosis is simple, safe, feasible, and has the function of preventing biliary-enteric anastomosis stenosis. For severe jaundice patients with blood TBIL >170 μmol/L, the " O” continuous biliary-enteric anastomosis combined with PTCD is an alternative surgical procedure for PD.
目的 探讨一期后位切开挂线左右侧切开引流手术治疗高位马蹄型肛周脓肿的临床效果。方法 前瞻性纳入2008年10月至2010年10月期间庆阳市人民医院收治的60例高位马蹄型肛周脓肿患者，将其随机分成2组，其中观察组30例，行一期后位切开挂线左右侧切开引流术；对照组30例，行一期切开挂线术。比较2组患者的临床疗效。结果 临床疗效观察组为优11例（36.67%），良17例（56.66%），差2例（6.67%），优良率为93.33%（28/30）；对照组为优5例（16.67%），良16例（53.33%），差9例（30.00%），优良率为70.00%（21/30）。观察组的临床疗效优于对照组（P＜0.05）。观察组患者术后肛缘水肿、肛门前移和肛门内陷的发生率以及创面愈合时间均低于或短于对照组（P＜0.05）。2组患者术后均获访1年，均无复发，肛门功能均正常，无畸形。结论 一期后位切开挂线左右侧切开引流术治疗高位马蹄型肛周脓肿的临床疗效确切，患者术后恢复良好，值得临床推广应用。
ObjectiveTo evaluate the effectiveness of the nose ring drain (NRD) in treatment of severe diabetic foot infection.MethodsThe clinical data of 35 patients with severe diabetic foot infection who were treated with NRD between June 2017 and June 2019 were analyzed retrospectively. There were 24 males and 11 females with an average age of 54.5 years (range, 28-82 years). All of them were type 2 diabetic patients. The diabetes duration was 3-20 years, with an average of 9.4 years. The diabetic foot duration was 4 months to 2 years, with an average of 1.16 years. There were 16 cases of left foot and 19 cases of right foot. According to Wagner’s grading, there were 11 cases of grade 2, 20 cases of grade 3, and 4 cases of grade 4, all of which were moderate and severe infection of diabetic foot wound. Postoperative wounds were treated with “nibble-like” debridement until the patient’s epidermis regenerated and healed. During the treatment process, the indexes of bacterial culture type of wound secretions, duration of antibiotic therapy, wound healing method, healing time, amputation rate, and other indicators were analyzed and summarized.ResultsAll 35 patients were followed up 3-6 months, with an average of 4.5 months. Postoperative bacterial culture of wounds showed that 5 cases of Staphylococcus aureus, 4 cases of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, 5 cases of Escherichia coli, 3 cases of Enterobacter cloacae, 3 cases of coagulase-negative Staphylococcus, and 15 cases of other types were detected. The duration of antibiotic therapy ranged from 3 to 15 days, with an average of 9.1 days. The wound was autolytically healed without skin grafting, and the healing time was 62-82 days, with an average of 72.3 days. During the follow-up, 3 cases (8.6%) had amputation due to the patient’s poor blood glucose control, which led to a large spread of infection. In addition, among the other patients with wound healing, there was no recurrence of wound infection or new ulcer on the original surface.ConclusionThe NRD is a simple operation for treatment of severe diabetic foot infection, which can effectively control wound infections and promote wound healing and regeneration without skin grafting.