Objective To summarize the outcomes and clinical features for surgical treatment of nonischemic heart valve disease(HVD) combined with coronary artery disease(CAD), so that to get better surgical result. Methods From January 2000 to June 2007, 105 patients with the mean age of 61.96±7.61 years (range 36-79 years), underwent the combined procedures.The etiology of HVD included: 59 rheumatic valve disease, 24 degenerative mitral lesion, 13 calcified aortic valve lesion, and 9 other aortic valve disease. CAD was preoperatively diagnosed by coronary arteriongraphy in 98 patients, and intraoperatively identified in 7 patients. Left ventricular ejection fraction was 50% or less in 45 patients. The total number of bypass grafts was 216 with the mean of 2.06 grafts per patient. Valve procedures included: 36 mitral valve valve replacement, 15 mitral repair,43 aortic valve replacement, 11 mitral valve and aortic valve replacement. Results There were 6 postoperative deaths with the mortality of 5.7%. The causes of death were 3 low cardiac output syndrome, 2 renal failure, and 1 heart arrest resulting in multiple organs failure. Ninety-three survivals were followed up from 1 month to 7 years, 6 patients were missed on follow-up. There were no late death. New York Heart Association class Ⅰ was observed in 25 patients, class Ⅱ53, class Ⅲ 10 and class Ⅳ 5. One patient still had existential chest pain. Conclusion There were no typical angina in majority of patients with nonischemic HVD combined with CAD, coronary arteriongraphy must be taken in patients with the age of 50 years and more, or with the risk factors for CAD.Intraoperative myocardial protection is very important because CAD further deteriorates myocardial dysfunction caused by HVD.The decreased left ventricular function is the important factor affecting the surgical results and it is hard to evaluate the underlying cause before the operation.
Objective To summarize safety and effectiveness of cryomaze ablation procedure concomitant with valve surgery. Methods We retrospectively investigated the clinical data of 62 patients (24 males and 38 females) with mean age of 49.4±14.2 years who underwent cryomaze ablation procedure concomitant with valve surgery in our hospital from August 2013 through July 2015. The heart rhythm of the patients after surgery was supervised by 12-leads electrical cardiogram respectively. Results The rate of sinus rhythm restored right after surgery was 98.4%. The rate of sinus rhythm restored at the time of discharge was 93.4%. The rate of sinus rhythm restored 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months after surgery was 90.2%, 87.3%, 85.0%, 83.3% respectively. The one-year post-operation rate of sinus rhythm restored for the group of right minimal invasive thoracoscopic assisted mitral valve surgery was 90.5%. Longer duration for atrial fibrillation (>7 years) was a risk factor for the reoccurrence of atrial fibrillation 1 year after surgery (P<0.05). Conclusion Cryomaze ablation procedure concomitant with valve surgery is quite effective in treatment of rheumatic valve disease and atrial fibrillation. This approach is associated with fewer complications, comparable atrial fibrillation reoccurrence for short-term follow-up.
Objective To retrospectively review the clinical experience and early surgical results of combined cardiac valve surgery and coronary artery bypass grafting （CABG）. Methods From Jan. 2000 to Dec. 2005, combined valve surgery and CABG was performed in 81 patients. 37 patients were rheumatic heart disease with coronary stenosis, and 44 patients were coronary artery disease with valvular dysfunction. Single vessel disease was in 18 patients, two vessels disease in 9 and triple-vessel disease in 54. All the patients received sternotomy and combined valve surgery and CABG under cardiopulmonary bypass. Mitral valve repair and CABG were done in 26 patients. Valve replacement and CABG were done in 55 patients with 49 mechanical valves and 16 tissue valves. Four patients had left ventricular aneurysm resection concomitantly. The number of distal anastomosis was 3.12 5= 1.51 with 66 left internal mammary arteries bypassed to left anterior descending. Post-operative intra-aortic balloon pump was required in 4 cases for low cardiac output syndrome. Results Two patients died of low cardiac output syndrome with multiple organs failure. 79 patients had smooth recovery and discharged from hospital with improved heart function. 64 patients had completed follow-up with 5 late non cardiac related death in a mean follow-up period of 14.2 months. Conclusion Combined one stage valve surgery and CABG is effective with acceptable morbidity and mortality.
ObjectiveTo assess the safety of the removal of pericardial and mediastinal drain within different drainage volume after cardiac valvular replacement surgery.MethodsBetween July 2013 and July 2017, 201 patients with rheumatic heart disease (CHD) were treated with valve replacement in our hospital, including 57 males and 144 females, aged 15 to 72 years. They were divided into two groups according to the amount of 24-h drainage before the drain removal: a group one with 24-h drainage volume≤50 ml (n=127) and a group two with 24-h drainage volume>50 ml (n=74). The postoperative hospital stay and the incidence of severe complications between the two groups were compared.ResultsThere was no difference between the two groups in the baseline information or the incidence of severe pericardial effusion and tamponade, while the group two tended to have a shorter length of hospital stay after surgery (8.0 d vs. 7.5 d, P=0.013).ConclusionIn CHD patients undergoing valvular surgery, compared with a relatively low amount of drainage before the drain removal, drawing the tube at a greater amount of drainage (24-h drainage volume>50 ml) will shorten the length of hospital stay after cardiac surgery while incidence of severe complications remains the same.
ObjectiveTo analyze the perioperative outcomes of cardiac valve surgery in patients with asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection. MethodsThe perioperative clinical data of patients receiving heart valve replacement in the Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of University of Science and Technology of China from November 2022 to February 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. According to whether the patients were infected with SARS-CoV-2, they were divided into a non-infected group and an asymptomatic group. The perioperative data of the patients were compared between the two groups, and the effect of asymptomatic infection on the result of heart valve replacement surgery was analyzed. ResultsA total of 66 patients were enrolled including 36 males and 30 females with a mean age of 58.0±11.1 years. There were 51 patients in the non-infected group and 15 patients in the asymtomatic group. There were 2 patients of mitral valve replacement, 20 patients of aortic valve replacement, 1 patient of double valve replacement, 3 patients of aortic valve replacement with tricuspid valvoplasty, 22 patients of mitral valve replacement and tricuspid valvoplasty, 18 patients of double valve replacement and tricuspid valvoplasty. Asymptomatic infected patients received more emergency surgery than uninfected patients (26.7% vs. 0.0%, P<0.01). There was no statistical difference in the duration of extracorporeal circulation, aortic occlusion, mechanical ventilation time after the surgery, ICU stay, postoperative drainage volume, or postoperative complications between the two groups. ConclusionPerioperative results of cardiac valve surgery in patients with asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection and non-infection are almost the same.
Objective To analyze and explore the risk factors of secondary tricuspid regurgitation (TR) after left-sided valve surgery (left cardiac valve replacement or valvuloplasty) using meta-analysis, so as to provide evidence for clinical diagnosis and treatment of secondary TR. Methods We electronically searched databases including PubMed, MEDLINE, CBM, CNKI, VIP, for literature on the risk factors of secondary TR after left-sided valve surgery from 1995 to 2012. According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, we screened literature, extracted data, and assessed methodological quality. Then, meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.0 software. Results A total of 6 case-control studies were included, involving 437 patients and 2 102 controls. The results of meta-analysis showed that, the risk factors of progressive exacerbation of secondary TR after left-sided valve surgery included preoperative atrial fibrillation (OR=3.90, 95%CI 3.00 to 5.07; adjusted OR=3.04, 95%CI 2.21 to 4.16), age (MD=5.36, 95%CI 3.49 to 7.23), huge left atrium (OR=5.17, 95%CI 3.12 to 8.57; adjusted OR=1.91, 95%CI 1.49 to 2.44) or left atrium diameter (MD=4.85, 95%CI 3.18 to 6.53), degradation of left heart function (OR=2.97, 95%CI 1.73 to 5.08), rheumatic pathological change (OR=3.06, 95%CI 1.66 to 4.68), preoperative TR no less than 2+ (OR=3.52, 95%CI 1.26 to 9.89), and mitral valve replacement (MVR) (OR=2.35, 95%CI 1.68 to 3.30). Sex (OR=1.54, 95%CI 0.94 to 2.52) and preoperative pulmonary arterial hypertension (OR=1.28, 95%CI 0.77 to 2.12) were not associated with secondary TR after left-sided valve surgery. Conclusion The risk factors of progressive exacerbation of secondary TR after left-sided valve surgery include preoperative atrial fibrillation, age, huge left atrium or left atrium diameter, degradation of left heart function, rheumatic pathological change, preoperative TR no less than 2+, and MVR. Understanding these risk factors helps us to improve the long-time effectiveness of preventing and treating TR after left-sided valve surgery.
Abstract： Objective To analyze risk factors associated with postoperative respiratory failure in patients with valvular surgery. Methods Between January 2001 and November 2010, clinical data of 618 patients with 339 males and 279 fameles at age of 10-74（44.01±13.95）years,undergoing valvular operations were investigated retrospectively. We divided the patients into two groups according to the presence （74 patients）or absence（544 patients）of postoperative respiratory failure. Its risk factors were evaluated by univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis. Results The hospital mortality rate of valvular surgery was 6.1%（38/618）.The morbidity rate of respiratory failure was 12.0%（74/618） with hospital mortality rate at 17.6%（13/74） which was significantly higher than those patients without postoperative respiratory failure at 4.6%（25/544, χ2=18.994, P=0.000）. Univariate analysis showed age＞ 65 years（P=0.005）, New York Heart Association（NYHA）classⅣ（P=0.014）, election fraction＜ 50.0%（P=0.003）, cardiopulmonary bypass time＞ 3 h（P=0.001）, aortic cross clamping time＞ 2 h（P=0.008）, concomitant operation（ valvular operation with coronary artery bypass grafting, Bentall or radiofrequency ablation maze operation（P=0.000）, reoperation（P=0.012）, postoperative complications （P=0.000）, and blood transfusion＞ 2 000 ml（P=0.000） were important risk factors for postoperative respiratory failure. Multivariate logistic regression showed that concomitant operation（P=0.003）, reoperation（P=0.010）, postoperative complications（P=0.000）, and blood transfusion＞2 000 ml（P=0.012）were significant independent predictive risk factors. Conclusion This study suggest that patients with predictive risk factors of postoperative respiratory failure need more carefully treated. The morbidity of these patients would be reduced through improving perioperative management, shortening cardiopulmonary bypass time and reducing postoperative complications.
Objective Explore the effect of remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) on preoperative heart rate variability in patients with heart valves. Methods From January 2022 to July 2022, screening was conducted among 118 patients based on inclusion/exclusion criteria. Fifty-eight patients were excluded, and 60 patients participated in this trial with informed consent and were randomly divided into a RIPC group (n=30) and a control group (n=30). Due to the cancellation of surgery, HRV data was missing. 7 patients in the control group were excluded, and 5 patients in the RIPC group were excluded, 23 patients in the final control group and 25 patients in the RIPC group were included in the analysis. Comparison of relevant indicators of heart rate variability (standard deviation of NN interval (SDNN), standard deviation of mean value of NN interval in every five minutes (SDANN), mean square root of difference between consecutive NN intervals (RMSSD), percentage of adjacent RR interval>50 ms (PNN50), low frequency component (LF), high frequency component (HF) and LF/HF) at 8 hours in the morning on the surgical day between two groups of patients. Results There was no statistical difference in baseline characteristics between the two groups, and there was no significant difference in heart rate variability 24 hours before intervention (P>0.05). After the intervention measures were taken, the comparison of the results of heart rate variability at 8 hours on the day of operation showed that SDNN and SDANN of patients in the RIPC group were higher than those in the control group, with statistical differences (P<0.05). Conclusion RIPC can stabilize the preoperative heart rate variability of patients undergoing cardiac valve surgery.