Objective To explore the value and clinical safety of low-dose dexamethasone used after operation of anastomotic colorectal resection with fast-track surgery in patients with colorectal cancer. Methods Between January 2008 and December 2009, 470 patients undergoing anastomotic colorectal resection were analyzed retrospectively, who were divided into dexamethasone group and control group according to the use of low-dose dexamethasone treatment or not after operation. Postoperative adverse effect, complications, and early rehabilitations were studied. Results There was no statistical significance in postoperative incidence of adverse effect or complications between two groups (Pgt;0.05). In early rehabilitation, first ambulation of patients in the dexamethasone group was significantly earlier than that in the control group (Plt;0.05), while there was no statistical significance in first time of passing flatus, stool, and oral intake, the retain time of nasogastric tubes, urinary catheter, and drains, and postoperative hospital stay (Pgt;0.05). Conclusion Using low-dose dexamethasone after operation anastomotic colorectal resection in patients with colorectal cancer is safe and may have potential to enhance recovery after operation.
ObjectiveTo explain the latest concepts of colorectal surgery, and predict the future direction of it. MethodsA review and summary based on the clinical experience of our hospitals and theses over the past years and new advances on the researches in home and abroad were performed. ResultsDoctors should attach more importance to anal preserving operation; and there should be more usage of fast track in colorectal surgery. Besides, predicting low risk of postoperative complications and digitizing colorectal surgery also needed more attention. ConclusionThose aspects of colorectal surgery in the result need further development.
Objective To explore the content and scientific evidence of every element of the fast-track programmes in colorectal surgery. Methods The literatures about the applied status and opinion of the modality applied in the surgical treatment of the colorectal cancer and fundament investigation in recent years were collected and reviewed. Results The feasibility of the every fast-track’s element was based on the clinical and fundamental investigaton. Conclusion The advantage of the fast-track programmes in colorectal surgery is confirmed.
Objective To discuss the feasibility and safety of early oral feeding after colorectal cancer resection and early postoperative recovery condition.Methods Between January 2008 and June 2008, 128 patients diagnosed definitely as colorectal cancer were analyzed retrospectively. Fifty-six cases were treated with early oral feeding (EOF group), and 72 cases were treated with traditional feeding (TF group). The length of postoperative hospital stay, time of first flatus and defecation, and incidences of gastric retention, ileus, severe diarrhea, anastomotic leakage, wound infection, and pulmonary infection were studied and compared. Results The postoperative hospital stay, time of first flatus and defecation in EOF group were apparently shorter than those in TF group (Plt;0.05). As to the incidence of postoperative complications, EOF group had a higher incidence of gastric retention (Plt;0.05), while the differences of incidences of ileus, severe diarrhea, anastomotic leakage, wound infection, and pulmonary infection were not statistically significant between the two groups (Pgt;0.05). Early oral feeding can be tolerated by as much as 89.29% (50/56) patients. Conclusion Early oral feeding after colorectal cancer resection is safe and feasible, and can promote early rehabilitation of patients.
Objective To explore the impact of restrictive fluid administration for patients with colorectal cancer combined diabetes. Methods The clinical data of patients diagnosed definitely as colorectal cancer with diabetes were analyzed retrospectively from January 2007 to October 2009 in this hospital, the clinical effects on postoperative early rehabilitation were studied and the differences between restrictive fluid regimen (fluid restriction group) and tradition fluid regimen (tradition therapy group) were compared. Results The time of first aerofluxus and the first ambulation in fluid restriction group were shorter than those of tradition therapy group, the differences had statistical significances (Plt;0.05). The incidence of wound infection in fluid restriction group was lower than that in tradition therapy group (Plt;0.05). The differences of preoperative hemoglobin (Hb), white blood cell (WBC), glucose (GLU) and blood urea nitrogen (BUN) were not statistically significant between two groups, but the difference of postoperative GLU was statistically significant between two groups (Plt;0.05). Conclusion Restrictive fluid regimen can reduce the incidence of common complications after colorectal surgery for diabetic, and has a certain promoter action to the early rehabilitation after rectal surgery.
ObjectiveTo investigate the effect of fasttrack (FT) and traditional care (TC) on patients with rectal cancer underwent different surgical strategies in perioperative period. MethodsThe clinical data of 285 patients with rectal cancer from January 2009 to January 2010 in this hospital were retrospectively analyzed. These patients underwent high anterior resection (HAR) or lower/super lower anterior resection (LAR) under FT and TC were divided into four groups: FT+HAR (n=39), FT+LAR (n=17), TC+HAR (n=151), and TC+LAR (n=78), and intraoperative conditions and postoperative rehabilitation were analyzed. ResultsThe baselines characteristics of four groups were basically identical (Pgt;0.05). ①The operative time and blood loss of patients in four groups were not statistically significant (Pgt;0.05). ②Anastomotic leakage occurred in three cases, wound infection in 13 cases, and intestinal obstruction in four cases after operation, and the difference was not significant in four groups (Pgt;0.05). ③The time of first defecation and first flatus of four groups were not statistically significant (Pgt;0.05), but there were significant differences in the time with drainage tube, nasogastric tube, and catheter tube, the time of first intake and first ambulation, and length of stay among four groups (Plt;0.05). Compared with TC+HAR and TC+LAR group, the time with drainage tube, nasogastric tube, and catheter tube, and the time of first intake and first ambulation of patients were shorter in FT+HAR and FT+LAR group, and the length of stay of patients in FT+LAR group was shorter than that in TC+HAR group and TC+LAR group (Plt;0.05). ConclusionsFT can promote postoperative rehabilitation of rectal cancer patients underwent different surgical strategies, but which does not demonstrate the superiority of reducing postoperative complications.
Objective To compare the clinical effect of different strategies for surgical treatment combined with restrict rehydration on rehabilitation of rectal cancer patients in fast-track. Methods From January 2008 to January 2009, the patients diagnosed definitely as rectal cancer were analyzed retrospectively. The postoperative early rehabilitations were studied and compared in different fluid therapy with different surgical programs 〔high anterior resection (HAR), low anterior resection (LAR)〕. Results The difference of first aerofluxus, first defecation, postoperative first eating and first ambulation between fluid restriction group and tradition therapy group was statistically significant (Plt;0.05). And the difference of first aerofluxus, first defecation and post-operative first eating between HAR group and LAR group in tradition therapy group was statistically significant (Plt;0.05). Regarding to the overall incidence of postoperative complications, the incidence of pulmonary infection, wound infection and intestinal obstruction in tradition therapy group were higher than that in fluid restriction group (Plt;0.05). And in tradition therapy group, the difference in the incidence of intestinal obstruction between LAR group and HAR group was not statistically significant (Pgt;0.05). The difference of early recovery and postoperative complications between HAR group and LAR group in fluid restriction group had no statistical significance (Pgt;0.05). Conclusion Different strategies for surgical treatment of rectal cancer patients combined with restrict rehydration in fasttrack is feasible and can promote early rehabilitation of patients.
Objective To explore the clinical effects of postoperative restrict rehydration on different body mass index (BMI) of patients with colorectal cancer. Methods From January 2008 to January 2009, the patients diagnosed definitely as colorectal cancer were analyzed retrospectively. The postoperative early rehabilitations were studied and compared in different fluid therapy with different BMI (underweight group, normal group, overweight group).Results The first defecation time, aerofluxus time and ambulation time of the fluid restriction group were significantly earlier than those of the tradition therapy group (Plt;0.05), and postoperative in-hospital time was also less (Plt;0.05). However, the differences of early postoperative rehabilitation among underweight group, normal group and overweight group in the tradition therapy group and fluid restriction group had no statistical significance (Pgt;0.05). The complications such as pulmonary infection, anastomotic leakage, intestinal obstruction and wound dehiscence in the fluid restriction group were significantly lower than those in the tradition therapy group (Plt;0.05). In the tradition therapy group, the incidences of anastomotic leakage and wound dehiscence in overweight group were significantly higher than those in the underweight and normal group (Plt;0.05). The rate of postoperative complications among underweight group, normal group and overweight group in the fluid restriction group had no statistical significance (Pgt;0.05). Conclusion Postoperative restrict rehydration for overweight colorectal cancer patients has a good clinical effect, which can promote the early postoperative rehabilitation.