In February 2020, the American College of Gastroenterology (ACG) published the latest guideline on chronic pancreatitis, and put forward practical recommendations on the etiology, natural history, diagnosis, treatment, prognosis and follow-up of chronic pancreatitis. This paper aims to provide references for the diagnosis and treatment of chronic pancreatitis in China by interpreting the main content of the guideline and comparing it with related guidelines or consensuses domestically and abroad.
Duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection (DPPHR) is a surgical approach indicated for benign or low-grade malignant tumors of the pancreatic head, pancreatic duct stones in the pancreatic head, chronic pancreatitis, and related pathologies. Compared to traditional pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD), its core principle lies in preserving the integrity of the stomach, duodenum, and biliary tract, thereby reducing postoperative digestive dysfunction and metabolic complications to improve patients’ quality of life. With the continuous advancement of laparoscopic techniques, laparoscopic duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection (LDPPHR) has emerged as a significant refinement of conventional PD, achieving an optimal integration of minimally invasive laparoscopy and organ function preservation. This article synthesizes recent Chinese and English literature to provide a systematic review of surgical indications, technical nuances, complication management, and clinical outcomes of LDPPHR.
ObjectiveTo explore the advantages and disadvantages of duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection (DPPHR) in the clinical application of pancreatic surgical diseases, and to summarize the progress of minimally invasive application of DPPHR combined with the current application of laparoscopy and robot surgery in pancreatic surgery. MethodThe related research literatures about DPPHR at home and abroad in recent years were searched and reviewed. ResultsThe effect of DPPHR compared with traditional pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) for treatment of benign pancreatic diseases was still controversial, and the postoperative remission effect, perioperative period, occurrence of long-term complications and improvement of quality of life were not very advantageous compared with PD, and the prognosis of minimally invasive surgery was poor. ConclusionDPPHR remains highly controversial for surgical intervention in benign pancreatic disease and has enormous scope for advances in minimally invasive surgical applications in pancreatic surgery, but more clinical studies are needed to verify its clinical efficacy.
ObjectiveTo summarize of clinical application and progress of duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection (DPPHR).MethodThe relevant literatures published recently at domestic and abroad about the clinical application and progress of DPPHR were collected and reviewed.ResultsFor the benign lesions, low-grade malignancies and borderline tumors of the head of pancreas, the DPPHR could achieve the same expected therapeutic effect as the classical pancreatoduodenectomy. The DPPHR could reserve the continuity of stomach and duodenum while resecting lesions and improve the symptoms of patients, reduce the reconstruction of digestive tract and the resection of pancreas and surrounding tissues as much as possible, and retain the pancreas-intestinal axis, which was more in line with the physiology of human beings.ConclusionsAt present, DPPHR is worthy of further development and promotion in department of pancreas surgery, but current studies only focus on occurrence of short-term complications after operation. Because patients with benign diseases of pancreatic head have better prognosis and longer survival time after operation, we should pay attention to the long-term complications such as diarrhea, anemia and reflux cholangitis. More clinical studies need in future to be demonstrated superiority of DPPHR in clinical efficacy and to evaluate occurrence of long-term complications and their impact on quality of life of patients with DPPHR by comprehensive analysis of multiple evaluation indicators.
ObjectiveTo summarize and analyze the long-term clinical effect of duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection (DPPHR) versus pancreaticoduodenectomy.MethodsThe clinical data of 102 patients who underwent DPPHR (n=35) or pancreaticoduodenectomy (n=67) from January 2014 to December 2019 in The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University were analyzed retrospectively.ResultsThe operations of patients in the DPPHR group and the PD group were successfully complete, no one died during operation or perioperative period. The weight gain in one year after operation and incidences of exocrine dysfunction in the DPPHR group were all better than those of the PD group (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference on the other complications between the two groups (P>0.05). The pain score, diarrhea score, and the overall health status score in one year after operation significantly improved in the DPPHR group than those in the PD group (P<0.05).ConclusionDPPHR is more beneficial to improve the quality of life after operation, and is a better surgical procedure for benign and low-grade malignant diseases of pancreatic head.
Objective To summarize the principle and application of functional MR imaging of pancreatic carcinoma and chronic mass-forming type pancreatitis. Methods Articles about diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), magnetic resonance spectrum imaging (MRSI) and dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging of pancreatic carcinoma and chronic pancreatitis were reviewed and analyzed. Results Functional MR imaging could reflected the differences in molecules diffusion, metabolism and tissue perfusion between pancreatic carcinoma and chronic pancreatitis. Conclusion As a non-invasive protocol, functional MR imaging can provide useful information in differential diagnosis between chronic mass-forming type pancreatitis and pancreatic carcinoma.
Objective To summarize current research advances of mechanism and treatment of pancreatic endocrine and exocrine insufficiency in chronic pancreatitis. Method The related literatures about the research progress of the pancreatic endocrine and exocrine insufficiency in the chronic pancreatitis in recent years were retrieved and reviewed. Results In recent years, it had many new studies and discoveries on the pancreatic endocrine and exocrine insufficiency in the chronic pancreatitis. The mechanism of the pancreatic exocrine dysfunction was mainly due to the decrease of the pancreatin secretion in the patients with chronic pancreatitis. The mechanism of the pancreatic endocrine insufficiency was mainly due to the damage of the pancreatic exocrine gland and islet tissue in the chronic pancreas, which leaded to the destruction of the pancreatic endocrine cells, the other endocrine cells, and the disturbance of the intestine-islet axis, followed by the disorder of the various hormones (insulin, glucagon, pancreatic polypeptide, etc.), and eventually manifested the glucose tolerance or dominant diabetes. Conclusions At present, although there is a certain degree understanding for pancreatic endocrine and exocrine insufficiency in chronic pancreatitis, there are no breakthroughs in its mechanism and treatment, and effect is lack of large sample and multicenter clinical control study. Exploring more optimized detection methods and establishing a perfect treatment system is goal of future development and research.
ObjectiveTo investigate the differential diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis with mass of pancreatic head and pancreatic carcinoma, and choose the effective treatment of chronic pancreatitis with mass of pancreatic head. MethodsEighty cases of chronic pancreatitis with mass of pancreatic head from January 2008 to January 2014 in this hospital were retrospectively analyzed.The preoperative blood tumor markers, hepatobiliary and pancreatic color Doppler ultrasound, CT strengthen, MRI, MRCP, or other imaging studies were tested for all the patients. ResultsThere were 4 cases of long-term drinking or excessive drinking history in 8 cases of chronic pancreatitis with mass of pancreatic head.The past medical history included 5 patients with acute pancreatitis, 3 patients with chronic cholecystitis, 2 patients with cholecystolithiasis.Six patients had varying degree of jaundice and 5 patients had left upper abdominal pain.There were 4 patients with high blood sugar, 6 patients with serum hyperbilirubin, 5 patients with elevated CA19-9 and 2 patients with elevated CEA by serum assay.The imaging revealed that a mass was in the head of the pancreas.The standard pancreaticoduodenectomy was performed in 6 cases, duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection was performed in 2 cases.These 8 patients underwent the intraoperative fine needle aspiration cytological examination revealed the changes of chronic pancreatitis by postoperative pathology.The levels of CA19-9 and CEA on 1 week after operation were reduced to normal levels in patients with elevated CA19-9 and CEA alone or together.There was no case of serious complications such as postoperative pancreatic leakage and bile leakage.The intermittent vomiting appeared in 3 months after duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection, the upper gastrointestinal radiography showed the stenosis of duodenum, the contrac-tures of the duodenum, especial the descending duodenum, was found through reoperation, the symptom was relief after gastrojejunal anastomosis.The recurrence was not seen in all these 8 patients with follow-up of 1-6 years. ConclusionsThe jaundice and abdominal for the patients with pancreatic head mass of chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer pain are the main symptoms, but their characteristics are different, the former is minor, volatility, and intermittent; the latter is sustained and progressively aggravated.Understanding of past medical history for the identification of both is some significances.CA19-9 and CEA as the identification of the pancreatic head mass in chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer is not meaningful.Patients with chronic pancreatitis of pancreatic mass are finished by multi-needle biopsy for pancreatic head mass, duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection is preferred.Patients with invasive pancreatic mass and peripheral vascular adhesion must undergo standard pancreaticoduodenectomy.