ObjectiveTo analyze the global status, hotspots, and trends in atrial fibrillation anticoagulation research.MethodsWe searched Web of Science Core Collection to collect relevant literature on atrial fibrillation anticoagulation from 2006 to 2020. The visualization software CiteSpace and VOSviewer were used to analyze co-citation, co-occurrence, and emergence analysis on publishing organizations, journals, and keywords and to explore the research hotspots and frontiers.ResultsA total of 11764 related studies were retrieved. In recent years, research on anticoagulation of atrial fibrillation has become increasingly popular. Most of the published researches were from North America, and the primary institution was the University of Birmingham. Research hotspots mainly focused on warfarin, stroke prevention, new oral anticoagulants, antithrombotic and anticoagulants, and complicating diseases. The research frontiers were the new oral anticoagulants, and the antithrombotic management of atrial fibrillation with coronary heart disease.ConclusionsThe global hotspot in atrial fibrillation anticoagulant research is warfarin, stroke prevention, new oral anticoagulants, antithrombotic and antiplatelet therapy, and complicated diseases. The research focuses on the study of novel oral anticoagulants and the antithrombotic management of atrial fibrillation complicated with coronary heart disease.
Objective To investigate the prethrombotic state and effect of anticoagulation therapy in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease(COPD) and ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP)．Methods Forty-six COPD patients were divided into VAP group(25 cases)and non-VAP group (21 cases)．The VAP group were randomly subdivided into two groups：group A(conventional therapy group，n=13)，group B(conventional therapy+anticoagulation therapy group，n=12)．The D-dimer (DD)，fibfinogen(FIB)，pulmonary artery pressure(PAP)and the time of weaning were compared between these groups．Results In the COPD patients，the levels of DD，FIB and PAP were significantly increased in VAP group compared with non-VAP group[(0．50±0．26)mg／L，(3．67 ±0．88) L，(31．71 ± 5．66)mm Hg vs(0．23±0．12)mg／L，(1．56±0．45) L，(15．28 ±2．84)mm Hg，respectively，all Plt; 0．05]．In the COPD patients with VAP，the levels of DD，the content of FIB，PAP and mortality were significantly lower in group B with shorter time of weaning compared with group A[(0．22±0．16)mg／L， (1．56±1．17)g／L，(16．00±2．48)him Hg，8．33％ and(4．00±1．41)d vs(O／41±0．09)mg／L，(3．66± 1．03) L，(28．00±0．85)mm Hg，15．4％ and(10．76±3．35)d，respectively，all Plt;0．05]． Conclusions Prethrombotic state exists in COPD patients with VAP．Aggressive anticoagulation on base of routine therapy，by ameliorating microcireulation，call shorten the time of weaning and reduce the mortalit in these patient
Objective To explore the safety and efficacy of mobile APP in telemanagement for patients who received oral warfarin anticoagulant therapy after mechanical heart valve replacement. Methods A prospective cohort study was performed. According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, a total of 80 patients who underwent mechanical heart valve replacement for more than half a year and received oral warfarin anticoagulant therapy in outpatient department were included in our hospital from January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2017. These patients were divided into a telemanagement group (40 paitents, telemanagement using mobile APP) and a control group (40 patients, anticoagulant management in outpatient clinics) according to patients' wishes and local hospital international normalized ratio (INR) monitoring conditions. After 12-month follow-up, clinical effect of the two groups was compared. The INR, time in therapeutic range (TTR), fraction in therapeutic range (FTTR), anticoagulation-related complications and patient satisfaction were analyzed. Results During the follow-up period of anticoagulation, there was no significant difference in INR between the two groups (P=0.732). The average interval of INR monitoring in the telemanagement group was 3-65 (21.4 ± 12.5) days, while that in the control group was 7-93 (39.6 ± 14.7) days (P=0.012). TTR was 42.7% (6 027.6 d/14 116.0 d) in the control group and 67.9% (10 168.6 d/14 972.0 d) in the telemanagement group (P=0.018). And FTTR in the two groups was 45.6% (144/316) and 67.1% (432/644), respectively (P=0.015). No serious thromboembolism or hemorrhage events occurred in the 80 patients during the 12-month follow-up period. There was no significant difference in the incidence of anticoagulation-related complications, general bleeding and embolism between the two groups (P>0.05). Conclusion For patients with stable anticoagulation after cardiac mechanical valve replacement, it is safe and effective to telemanagement by mobile APP. Telemanagement can increase the frequency of anticoagulation monitoring without increasing anticoagulation risk, meanwhile, it also could obtain more convenient and rapid consultation, save time and economic costs,and improve the quality of life and patient satisfaction.
Objective To investigate the risk factors and the prevention and cure methods of ischemic stroke during low intensity anticoagulation therapy after mechanical heart valve replacement. Methods From March 2004 to July 2008，twentythree patients with ischemic stroke after mechanical heart valve replacement had been researched(ischemic stroke group). One hundred and twenty patients who had undergone mechanical heart valve replacement were randomly chosen in the same period as control group. Gender, age, the dose of warfarin , anticoagulation intensity(INR), INR review interval, left atrial diameter and heart rhythm were compared between the two groups, and the risk factors of ischemic stroke were analyzed by logistic regression analysis. Results (1) Patients in ischemic stroke group all discharged from hospital after treatment, and they were followed up for 1 month-3 years after discharged. All the patients’ neurological complications improved obviously, and no recurrent embolism and severe hemorrhage was found. (2) There was no statistical significance between two groups in gender, age and the dose of warfarin（Pgt;0.05）. (3) Nonconditional logistic regression analysis on influence factors showed that atrial fibrillation（P=0.000）, left atrial enlargement（P=0.002）, low anticoagulation intensity（P=0.012） and longtime INR review interval（P=0.047）were the risk factors of ischemic stroke during low intensity anticoagulation therapy after mechanical heart valve replacement. Conclusions (1)The prognosis of ischemic stroke during low intensity anticoagulation therapy after mechanical heart valve replacement is better than that of intracranial hemorrhage, and the occurrence of ischemic stroke is related to many risk factors. (2)The influences of risk factors should be minimized in order to avoid ischemic stroke. (3) Early low intensity anticoagulation therapy is safe and effective for patients with ischemic stroke after heart valve replacement.
目的:探讨心脏机械瓣膜置换术后抗凝治疗中,消化道出血发生的危险因素及防治措施。方法:回顾性研究2001年3月至2008年7月我院16例机械瓣膜置换术后抗凝治疗中消化道出血患者的临床资料,分析发生的危险因素,并总结其诊治经验。结果:心脏机械瓣膜置换术后患者抗凝治疗中消化道出血发生在服用华法令后3天～5年,平均147.53±136.71天。其中,上消化道出血12例,下消化道出血4例;保守治疗11例,内窥镜治疗4例;死亡2例(DIC及多器官功能衰竭各1例),病死率12.5%(2/16)。出血组患者术中转流时间(142.73 min±49.81 min)明显长于对照组(98.27 min±39.52 min)(Plt;0.05),华法令平均用药量(2.46±0.53 mg/d)与对照组(2.38±0.69 mg/d)无明显差异(Pgt;0.05),国际标准比值(INR)均值(2.79±0.57))明显大于对照组(1.49±0.58)(P lt;0.05)。消化道出血治疗期间停用华法令5～19天,平均13±2天,所有痊愈患者消化道出血治疗期间及出院后随访3月内均无栓塞及消化道再出血事件发生。结论;⑴心脏机械瓣膜置换术后早期(3月内)抗凝治疗发生消化道出血的危险因素包括术中转流时间过长和抗凝强度过大(INR＞2.0),晚期则可能与合并使用非甾体类抗炎药有关;⑵ 消化道出血治疗期间,华法林停用2周较为安全。
ObjectiveTo summarize the effectiveness and safety of antiplatelet combined with anticoagulant therapy for peripheral arterial disease (PAD). MethodUsing the search strategy developed by Cochrane Collaborative Network, the relevant literature from domestic and foreign databases as of November 1, 2023 was searched and a meta-analysis of outcome indicators was conducted using Stata 14.0 software and Review Manager 5.4.1 software provided by Cochrane Collaboration Network. ResultsA total of 15 eligible literature and 15 383 patients were included, including 7 692 in the antiplatelet combined with anticoagulant therapy group (study group) and 7 691 in the control group (only antiplatelet drug therapy). The meta-analysis results showed that: ① Symptoms: The ankle brachial index [mean difference (MD) and 95% confidence interval (95%CI)=0.04(0.02, 0.06)] and the minimum lumen diameter [MD (95%CI)=0.48(0.40, 0.55)] of the study group were greater than those of the control group; The plasma D-2 dimer level of the study group was lower than that of the control group [MD (95%CI)=–0.55(–0.57, –0.52)], and the probability of the limb ischemia risk of the study group was lower than that of the control group [risk ratio (RR) and 95%CI=0.67(0.56, 0.80)]. ② Vascular patency: The probability of the vascular patency of the study group was higher than that of the control group [RR (95%CI)=1.13(1.08, 1.17)]; The subgroup analysis results: the vascular patency rate of the two antiplatelet drugs combined with anticoagulation therapy was highest among the different treatment regimens [effect size (ES) and 95%CI=0.90(0.86, 0.94)], which of the other measures in descending order was only one antiplatelet drug combined with anticoagulation therapy [ES(95%CI)=0.82(0.76, 0.89)], two antiplatelet drugs therapy [ES(95%CI)=0.79(0.72, 0.85)], and only one antiplatelet drug therapy [ES(95%CI)=0.71(0.54, 0.87)]; The probability of the vascular patency using vitamin K antagonists in the study group was higher than that in the control group [RR(95%CI)=1.15(1.10, 1.20)], which had no statistical difference using Ⅹa inhibitor between the study group and the control group [RR(95%CI)=1.04 (0.95, 1.15)]. ③ Bleeding risk: The risk of bleeding of the study group was higher than that of the control group [RR(95%CI)=1.55(1.27, 1.89)]; The subgroup analysis results: The bleeding rate of the only one antiplatelet drug therapy among the different intervention measures was the lowest [ES(95%CI)=0.02(0.01, 0.02)], which of the other measures in ascending order was only one antiplatelet drug combined with anticoagulant therapy [ES(95%CI)=0.04(0.03, 0.06)], two antiplatelet drugs therapy [ES(95%CI)= 0.08(0.06, 0.10)], and two antiplatelet drugs combined with anticoagulant [ES(95%CI)=0.12(0.06, 0.18)]; The probabilities of the bleeding occurring using the vitamin K antagonists and Ⅹa inhibitor in the study group were higher than those in the control group [RR(95%CI)=1.76(1.28, 2.42); RR(95%CI)=1.44(1.12, 1.84)]. ConclusionsFrom the results of this meta-analysis, it can be seen that the combination of antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapy can effectively improve symptoms of patients with PAD, increase vascular patency rate, but it has a certain risk of bleeding. The combination of only one antiplatelet drug combined with anticoagulant therapy might achieve an optimum clinical effect and lower bleeding risk.
The body is at a hypo-coagulation status after the heart mechanic valve prosthesis replacement operation, and the incidence of anticoagulation complications is rather high because of that administration of warfarin may result in “anticoagulation vacuum” at an early stage. Moreover, the necessary application of other anticoagulation methods assisting the employment of warfarin have still not been scientifically normalized. Blood coagulation factor Ⅱ,Ⅶ, prothrombin fragment1+2 (F1+2 ), urine fibrimopeptide A (UFPA) , and International Normalized Ratio(INR), could exactly reflect the anticoagulation intensity 48-72 hours after the replacement operation,reasonable use of anticoagulant therapy as well as accurate and in-time monitoring methods is significant to reduce complications,elevate survival rate, and improve quality of life.
ObjectiveTo retrieve currently-available best evidence to select the treatment plan of antithrombotic therapy for a gerontal patient lately admitted because of atrial fibrillation (AF) and coronary artery disease (CAD), and to provide references for clinical treatment. MethodsWe comprehensively searched PubMed, MEDLINE (Ovid), EMbase and The Cochrane Library (Issue 5, 2014) up to May 2014, for relevant evidence about antithrombotic therapy for patients with AF and CAD. After analysis and assessment, we developed the plan of the patient's antithrombotic therapy. ResultsCurrent evidence showed no best treatment plan of antithrombotic therapy for patients with AF and CAD. ConclusionCorrect evaluation of the risks of thrombosis and bleeding is the key point of beneficial antithrombotic therapy for patients with AF and CAD.