【摘要】目的 探讨护理干预对无创正压通气(NIPPV)治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)急性加重期合并呼吸衰竭的影响。方法 2006年1月〖CD3/5〗2008年1月将47例患者随机分为干预组和对照组,两组均给予常规药物加NIPPV治疗。干预组24例应用NIPPV治疗期间,专人给予护理干预,与对照组(给予常规护理)23例比较,观察两组2、24、48、72 h血气变化及病情转归。结果 两组动脉血气分析差异有统计学意义(Plt;0.01)。干预组24例中仅1例改换为有创机械通气,余23例顺利完成治疗。对照组12例顺利完成治疗,3例勉强完成治疗,5例于治疗中改换为有创机械通气,2例上机后1 h内不能耐受而拒绝NIPPV,放弃抢救自动出院,1例因急性消化道大出血抢救无效死亡。结论 专人护理干预提高了双水平NIPPV治疗COPD急性加重期合并呼吸衰竭的临床疗效,减少气管插管有创机械通气给患者带来的痛苦及相关并发症,节约了费用,提高了生活质量。
【摘要】 目的 探讨降低冠状动脉支架植入术后拔管所致血管迷走神经反射（vasovagal reflexs，VVR）的护理干预措施及效果。 方法 将2011年1-3月冠状动脉支架植入患者120例随机分为两组，对照组58例，试验组62例，对照组按常规方法拔管，试验组除常规方法外根据患者不同情况予针对性护理干预。 结果 120例患者中共发生VVR 10例，其中对照组发生8例，试验组发生2例。两组比较差异有统计学意义（Plt;0.05）。 结论 冠状动脉支架植入手术患者实施针对性的护理干预可有效降低血管迷走神经反射的发生，提高手术成功率。【Abstract】 Objective To investigate the nursing intervention measures and effects on reducing the vasovagal reflexs (VVRs) after the coronary stent extubation. Methods The clinical data of 120 patients who underwent coronary stenting between January and March 2011 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were randomly divided into control group (n=58) treated with conventional coronary stent extubation and experiment group (n=62) treated with conventional coronary stent extubation and professional nursing intervention care. Results In 120 patients, VVRs occurred in 10 including 8 in the control group and 2 in the experiment group. The difference between the two groups was significant (Plt;0.05). Conclusion The coronary stent implantation with specific nursing interventions can effectively reduce the vascular vagal reflex, and leads to a higher success rate of the surgery.
目的:观察护理干预对脑瘫患儿生活自理能力训练的影响。方法:80例脑瘫患儿随机分为2组,常规组40例,实施常规护理;观察组40例,在常规护理基础上对患儿和家长给予护理干预,两组患儿治疗前后均进行日常生活自理动作评定。结果:治疗后,2组患儿ADL评分较治疗前有明显提高(Plt;0.05),与常规组比较,观察组患儿改善更明显(Plt;0.01)。结论:护理干预对脑瘫患儿生活自理能力的训练有促进作用。
ObjectiveTo observe the impact of perioperative nursing intervention on pulmonary tuberculosis patients undergoing lung resection. MethodThirty-six pulmonary tuberculosis patients going to undergo lung resection hospitalized between January and December 2013 were randomly divided into intervention group and control group with 18 in each. Patients in the intervention group received routine perioperative care plus nursing intervention including preoperative, environmental, dieting and pain intervention. Then, complications, hospitalization time and costs, as well as patients' satisfaction with the nursing work were compared between the two groups. ResultsAfter nursing intervention, complications, hospitalization time, hospital costs of patients in the intervention group were significantly less than the control group (P<0.05), and patients' satisfaction was significantly higher (P<0.05). ConclusionsPerioperative nursing intervention on lung resection treatment and rehabilitation of patients play an active and effective role, which can reduce complications, shorten hospitalization time, reduce hospital costs and improve patients' satisfaction.