Objective To evaluate the application effect of epilepsy prevention and management project in rural areas of Neijiang City. MethodsAccording to the requirements of the "Rural Epilepsy Prevention and Management Project Work Manual" (2021 edition) of the National Epilepsy Prevention and Management Project Office, the follow-up data of patients in rural areas of Neijiang City from the beginning of the epilepsy prevention and management project to December 2023 were collected, and the patient treatment effect of the project was evaluated. Results The total effective rate was more than 70% after 3 months of treatment, As the treatment time is extended, the total efficiency is upward. Adverse drug reactions occurred mainly in the first 3 months of treatment.The patients dropped out of the group because they did not achieve the expected effect, poor treatment compliance and could not tolerate serious adverse reactions. Conclusion The prevention and treatment of epilepsy in rural areas of our city has a good effect of promotion.The follow-up management of patients in the first 3 months of treatment should be strengthened to ensure the continuity and standardization of treatment.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the reliability and validity of Guideline Implementation Success Assessment Tool (A-GIST). MethodsWith the guideline for the prevention and treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus in China (2020 edition) as the target guideline, health care providers and patients from different hospitals across the country were investigated by questionnaire using A-GIST. Spearman-Brown coefficient and Cronbach's α coefficient were used to evaluate the split-half reliability and internal consistency reliability, while the structural validity, convergent validity and discriminant validity were investigated by confirmatory factor analysis based on structural equation. ResultsThe internal consistency reliability and split half reliability coefficients of the whole tool and each dimension ranged from 0.650 to 0.986. The scale-level content validity index (S-CVI/Ave) of content validity was 0.846. Confirmatory factor analysis showed that, the χ2/df of two sections of the tool were 8.695 and 6.123, respectively. The root mean square residual (RMR), the standard root mean square residual (SRMR) and the root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) were under or almost under the threshold. Besides, the goodness-of-fit index (GFI) of them were 0.901 and 0.822, the adjusted goodness-of-fit index (AGFI) were 0.836 and 0.787, and the parsimonious normed fit index (PNFI) were 0.545 and 0.788, respectively. ConclusionGuideline Implementation Success Assessment Tool (A-GIST) was proved to be valid and reliable, and it shows that it is necessary to optimize the items under the dimensions of maintenance and evaluation of diagnosis and treatment effect in the future.
With the establishment and development of regional healthcare big data platforms, regional healthcare big data is playing an increasingly important role in health policy program evaluations. Regional healthcare big data is usually structured hierarchically. Traditional statistical models have limitations in analyzing hierarchical data, and multilevel models are powerful statistical analysis tools for processing hierarchical data. This method has frequently been used by healthcare researchers overseas, however, it lacks application in China. This paper aimed to introduce the multilevel model and several common application scenarios in medicine policy evaluations. We expected to provide a methodological framework for medicine policy evaluation using regional healthcare big data or hierarchical data.
Objective To explore the efficacy of multidisciplinary nutritional support model in the perioperative management of elderly patients with nutritional risks undergoing joint replacement. Methods Between March 1, 2014 and May 31, 2015, 342 elderly patients who underwent joint replacement due to osteoarthritis were screened with nutritional risk screening 2002 (NRS2002). For patients who got a NRS2002 score of equal to 3 points or higher, nutritional treatment and intervention was carried out by doctor-nurse-rehabilitation therapist-dietitian collaboration and hospital departments related to patients’ complications. Results Among all the 342 patients, 225 (65.79%) had a NRS2002 score of equal to 3 points or higher on the admission day, in which 117 (52.00%) were male and 108 (48.00%) were female, 168 (74.67%) were at the age between 60 and 70 years old and 57 (25.33%) were at the age between 71 and 87. One day before surgery, the number of patients with a NRS2002 score equal to 3 points or higher decreased to 10 (2.92%), and the number became 68 (19.88%) after surgery. The difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). In those 68 elderly patients, 10 had a preoperative NRS2002 score equal to 3 points or higher, and 58 had newly developed nutritional risks after surgery; there were 23 patients with an age over 75, and 7 over 80. The NRS2002 score of all the 342 patients was below 3 points before discharge. For patients with nutritional risks at different periods before and after surgery, their serum albumin and hemoglobin levels were both improved after the treatment of nutritional support (P<0.05). Conclusion Multidis- ciplinary nutritional support for elderly perioperative patients undergoing joint replacement can reduce the incidence of postoperative complications, providing favorable conditions for the patients to undergo joint replacement surgery.
Methodological quality and transferability will be important issues for the credibility and usefulness of both published studies and administrative methods for evaluating the socio-economic value of marketed medicines in China. This paper critically examines factors commonly contributing to, or inhibiting, the quality and transferability of socio-economic evidence of the value of medicines, with specific reference to the Chinese community. It discusses appropriate approaches to design, performance, and reporting of published economic evaluation studies, as well as guides on assessment of quality of economic evaluations and recommends two internationally established methods that may be suitable for training in this setting.
ObjectiveTo explore the clinical effectiveness of two kinds of treatment methods to nurse wound after tracheotomy. MethodsWe collected 108 cases and randomly divided them into two groups between March 2012 and May 2013. The experimental group (n=52) received tracheotomy care with PermaFoam dressing, while the control group (n=56) was treated with traditional sterile absorbent gauze. We analyzed the differences in terms of infection of wound, errhysis and frequency of dressing changes between the two groups. ResultsThe experimental group had a lower rate of wound infection than the control group (P<0.05). Moreover, the experimental group was superior to the control group in the total number of dressing changes, wound redness and oozing (P<0.05). ConclusionPermaFoam dressing can reduce wound complications and frequency of dressing changes effectively. It is easy to operate, and can reduce the workload of clinical nursing, and deserves clinical application.