ObjectiveTo screen compounds or drugs can affect the hypoxia induced-gene expression of retinal vascular endothelial cell based on gene expression microarrays and connectivity map (CMAP) technology. MethodsTotally 326 up-regulated and down-regulated genes of hypoxic human embryonic retinal microvascular endothelial cells minduced by cobalt chloride in the previous study were converted into query signature format documents. Gene profile of the disease characteristics was then compared with that of control in CMAP website database, positive and negative compounds related to retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) were finally screened out. Results44 and 18 compounds or drugs have positive and negative relationship with ROP respectively by searching CMAP database with differentially expressed genes. Ciclopirox, cobalt chloride, gossypol and withaferin A have positive relationship with ROP. Cyclic adenosine monophosphate, harmalol, naringin and probenecid have a negative effect on ROP. ConclusionsCiclopirox, cobalt chloride, gossypol and withaferin A have a positive effect on ROP. However, cyclic adenosine monophosphate, harmalol, naringin and probenecid have a negative effect.
ObjectiveTo observe the effect of retinal hemorrhage on the treatment of retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) by laser photocoagulation.MethodsRetrospective case analysis. Screening and diagnosis of 134 eyes in 67 patients with ROP in Zone Ⅱ Stage 3+ were included in the study. Among them, 32 patients were male and 35 patients were female. The average birth gestational age was 27.80±2.55 weeks. The average birth weight was 1060±320 g. All children underwent binocular indirect ophthalmoscopy and RetCam Ⅲ. Of the 134 eyes, 38 eyes (28%) with anterior, ridge or vitreous hemorrhage (group A); 96 eyes (72%) without hemorrhage. Retinal avascular photocoagulation was performed within 72 hours after diagnosis by intravenous sedative combined with ocular surface anesthesia with 810 nm laser. Follow-up was performed at 1, 4, 8 and 12 weeks after treatment, and then every 6 months thereafter. The same equipment and methods before treatment were used to examine and document the regression and progression of ROP. The number of eyes with lesions after photocoagulation in the two groups was compared by χ2 test. The t-test was used to compare the gestational age and birth weight.ResultsAmong 134 eyes, lesions completely resolved in 125 eyes (93.3%), progressed in 9 eyes (6.7%). In group A, 7 eyes were progressive (18.4%). In group B, 2 eyes were progressive (2.1%). There was a statistically significant difference in the number of eyes with lesions after laser treatment in group A and B (χ2=9.14, P=0.003). There was no significant difference in birth gestational age and birth weight (t=0.85, 0.25; P=0.40, 0.80).ConclusionThe laser photocoagulation is safe and effective in the treatment of ROP. The preretinal, ridge or vitreous hemorrhage is related to the progression of the lesion after laser photocoagulation.
Objective To observe visual field outcome and refractive status of patients with retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) treated by laser photocoagulation. Method The data of 39 ROP patients (73 eyes) who received laser photocoagulation were retrospectively analyzed and compared with 13 normal control subjects (25 eyes) whose age and sex were matched with ROP group. There were 24 males (45 eyes) and 15 females (28 eyes) in ROP group, with an average age of (7.0±1.28) years. The first laser treatment was carried out at postnatal age (PA) of (38.74±3.82) weeks, the birth weight (BW) of (1402.33±369.61) g and the number of laser burns was (517.86±277.40). The control group included 7 females (13 eyes) and 6 males (12 eyes), with an average age of (7.17±0.96) years. The age (t=0.691) and gender (χ2=1.425) were comparable between the two groups (P=0.491, 0.233). The data of patients and controls were retrospectively analyzed including best corrected visual acuity, refractive examination, automated perimetry test. The differences of the mean deviation (MD) of visual field and the spherical equivalent (SE) between these two groups were comparatively observed. ROP patients were divided into no VF loss group (MD≤2 dB) and VF loss group (MD＞2 dB), mild VF loss group (MD≤6 dB) and moderate VF loss group (MD＞6 dB) according to the results of automated perimetry test, the differences of gestational age (GA), PA, BW, number of laser burns and SE between these groups were comparatively observed. Results The MD in ROP group and control group were 4.87±5.12 dB and 1.27±3.34 dB, respectively; the difference between the two groups was statistically significant (t=–4.01,P＜0.001). The subgroup analysis showed that BW, number of laser burns, and SE were significantly different between no VF loss group and VF loss group (t=2.074, –1.996, –2.162;P=0.042, 0.026, 0.034); while the GA was not significantly different between these two groups (t=1.973,P=0.052). The difference of PA was not statistical significant different between mild VF loss group and moderate VF loss group (t=2.03,P=0.051) and SE was significantly different between the above two groups (t=3.283,P=0.002). For refractive outcomes, the BW and ROP stage correlated with SE significantly (r=–0.304, –0.387;P=0.015, 0.002). The mean BCVA in ROP group was 0.84±0.23, and 59 eyes (91.2%) with BCVA better than 0.5. Conclusion Laser treatment for ROP tends to have less effect on long term refractive status and VF loss, with good visual outcome.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of intravitreal ranibizumab (IVR) for the treatment of retinopathy of prematurity(ROP). MethodsA total of 57 eyes of 29 premature infants with diagnosis of high-risk pre-threshold, threshold ROP, or aggressive posterior ROP were reviewed and analyzed in the study. The lesions of 18 eyes were located in zoneⅠ, 39 eyes were located in zoneⅡ. All infants in the study received IVR (10 mg/ml, 0.025 ml) as the initial treatment within 24 hours after diagnosis. Follow-up examinations were performed after treatment, every week at the first month, every 2 weeks at the second and third month, every month afterward, until vascularization of zoneⅢwas observed. Follow-up ranged from 16 weeks to 52 weeks, and the average follow-up time was (28.1±11.7) weeks. If the infants didn't respond positively to the treatment or the disease recurred, the additional treatments were applied. 36 eyes (63.2%) received a single injection, whereas 21 eyes (36.8%) received additional treatments. The follow-up examinations included the development of retinal vessels, the ocular or systemic adverse events. ResultsAmong the eyes, the development of peripheral retinal vessels could be observed in 36 eyes (63.2%) which received a single injection; clinical improvement in 11 eye (19.3%) which received repeat injection; stable disease in 10 eyes (17.5%) which received laser therapy. Among the eyes, 18 eyes (31.6%) recurred, including ggressive posterior ROP (14 eyes), threshold ROP (2 eyes) and high-risk pre-threshold ROP (2 eyes). The mean time of recurrence was (5.7±2.1) weeks (range 2.0-8.0 weeks). Three eyes (5.3%) of high-risk pre-threshold, threshold ROP lacked a positive response to the treatment. The lesions were controlled after additional laser given in these eyes. No serious ocular or systemic adverse events associated with the drug or the injection was observed during the follow-up period. ConclusionIVR is safe and effective for most ROP infants. In cases of recurrence or no response, conventional laser treatment or an additional IVR injection were needed.
Retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) is a retinal angioproliferative disease that occurs in premature and low birth weight infants, and is the most common eye disease that causes blindness and low vision in infants. However, there is no systematic standardized guidance on the overall treatment strategy for ROP. Therefore, in order to standardize the treatment of ROP, the Ophthalmology Group of Pediatrics Society of Chinese Medical Association organized relevant domestic experts to put forward standardized opinions on the treatment of ROP in China after repeated discussion, so as to provide clinicians with reference and application in clinical practice.