The American Heart Association (AHA) released the 2017 American Heart Association Focused Update on Adult Basic Life Support and Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Quality (2017 AHA guidelines update) in November 2017. The 2017 AHA guidelines update was updated according to the rules named " the update of the guideline is no longer released every five years, but whenever new evidence is available” in the 2015 American Heart Association Guidelines Update for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. The updated content in this guideline included five parts: dispatch-assisted cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), bystander CPR, emergency medical services - delivered CRP, CRP for cardiac arrest, and chest compression - to - ventilation ratio. This review will interpret the 2017 AHA guidelines update in detail.
Sepsis is a critical condition. The key factor affecting the survival of patient is whether standard treatment can be obtained timely. Because of the complexity of its pathogenesis and high heterogeneity, there is no special diagnosis method currently. Early identification is difficult. Delayed diagnosis and treatment is closely related to the mortality of patients. With the continuous updating of the guidelines, sepsis has been included in the “time window” disease, putting forward a great challenge to the early screening and evaluation of sepsis. This article aims to review the application of Sepsis-Related Organ Failure Assessment, sepsis biomarkers and artificial intelligence algorithms in early screening and evaluation of sepsis, so as to provide guidance tools for timely starting standardized treatment of sepsis.
With the in-depth understanding of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, it has been found that the virus not only causes serious damage to the human respiratory system, but also damages the kidney system, which can be manifested as acute kidney injury, and in severe cases, renal failure can occur. Patients with coronavirus disease 2019 and chronic kidney disease are at higher risk of worsening their condition and even death. Therefore, early recognition and intervention of renal injury is particularly important for prognosis. In this paper, the clinical data of renal injury in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 were reviewed, and the possible pathogenesis, incidence, clinical features, diagnosis and treatment were proposed for reference in clinical decision-making.
ObjectiveTo investigate the correlation between rapid emergency medicine score (REMS) and therapeutic intervention scoring system (TISS-28) score and analyze the feasibility of assessing the nursing workload by REMS score for critically wounded earthquake victims, in order to provide reference for rapid and effective resource allocation for earthquake victims. MethodsA retrospective analysis was carried out on 39 Lushan earthquake victims with their acute plysiology and chronic health evaluationⅡ scores higher than 25, who were directly transferred from the earthquake site to the Emergency Department of West China Hospital between April 20 and 27, 2013. Among them, there were 24 males and 15 females aged between 5 and 90 years old averaging (57.1±19.8) years. REMS score and TISS-28 score were calculated for each victim. The relationship between REMS score and TISS-28 score was analyzed by correlation analysis and curve estimation including linear model, quadratic model, composite model, growth model, logarithm model, cubic model and exponential model. Then, we tried to find out the most suitable description for the relationship between REMS score and TISS-28 score. ResultsThe Spearman correlation coefficient between the two score systems was 0.710 and the most suitable description for the relationship between REMS score and TISS-28 score was logarithmic curve model. The formula was TISS=-5.946+4.467lnREMS. ConclusionREMS score can be applied as a nursing workload predicting tool for critically wounded victims in Lushan earthquake and it provides a guidance for rational allocation of health resources.
ObjectiveTo analyze the choice of initial antibiotic treatment for health care-associated pneumonia (HCAP). MethodA retrospective study was conducted in patients with HCAP hospitalized in the Emergency Department of West China Hospital from January 1st to December 31st, 2014. A total of 156 HCAP patients were divided into anti-multidrug-resistant treatment group (group A, n=72) and quinolone monotherapy group (group B, n=84). The baseline characteristics, comorbidities, severity, pathogen distribution, antibiotics and clinical outcomes were compared between the two groups. ResultsIn group B, there were 46 males and 38 females with the age of (59.9±10.9) years, and the pneumonia severity index (PSI) score was 89.5±22.7; in group A, there were 44 males and 28 females with the age of (62.2±12.2) years, and the PSI score was 94.4±23.6. The differeces between the two groups were not significant (P>0.05). The duration of using antibiotics in group B was (14.5±3.7) days, which was longer than that in group A[(12.8±3.8) days, P=0.005]. The detection rate of multidrug-resistant bacteria, the proportion of changing antibiotics, the average length of hospitalization, the proportion of using mechanical ventilation, the proportion of patients transferred into Intensive Care Unit and 30 days mortality in group B was 17.9%, 34.5%, (16.9±3.6) days, 11.9%, 9.5%, and 4.8%, respectively; which were similar to those in group A[15.3%, 22.2%, (17.3±3.9) days, 16.8%, 12.5%, and 4.2%, respectively] (P>0.05). ConclusionsIt is unnecessary for all HCAP patients to receive anti-multidrug-resistant treatment. We should regard the risk factors and the popular local features of microbiology to determine the choice of antibiotic treatment.