Epilepsy is one of the most common neurological disorders, and surgical intervention is usually used for drug-resistant focal epilepsy. Cortical electrical stimulation is widely used in preoperative evaluation of epilepsy to explore the anatomical-clinical electrical correlations between epileptogenic and functional networks through electrical stimulation, and the functional brain maps produced by cortical electrical stimulation depict areas of the functional cortex at an individual level, identifying the functional cortex with greater precision, as well as helping to establish epilepsy network, enabling more precise localization of seizure zones and providing a more accurate localization for surgical resection. Electrical cortical stimulation has become a standard technique for the preoperative assessment of brain region function in brain surgery. It is an indispensable part of preoperative evaluation.The main types of functional mapping by electrical stimulation include stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) and subdural electrode (SDE), SEEG-guided cortical electrical stimulation is gradually becoming more mainstream compared to subdural electrodes, and is increasingly valuable and important as a preoperative evaluation of epilepsy. It is increasingly demonstrating its value and importance because it avoids craniotomy, takes less time for surgery, has fewer associated complications and infections, and can explore deep lesions, increasing the understanding of human functional neuroanatomy and enabling more precise localization of seizure zones.This article reviews the history of the development of cortical electrical stimulation technology, the intrinsic mechanisms, the value of the application of SEEG, and also provides a comprehensive comparison between SEEG and SDE, despite the irreplaceable advantages of SEEG, attention should be paid to the unresolved clinical and scientific issues of SEEG, and the establishment of a consensus-based clinical guideline, as the application of this technology will be more widely used in both clinical and scientific work.
Objective To evaluate precise assessment methods for predicting the optimal acetabular cup size in total hip arthroplasty (THA). Methods A clinical data of 73 patients (80 hips) who underwent primary THA between December 2022 and July 2024 and met the inclusion criteria was analyzed. There were 39 males and 34 females with an average age of 66.3 years (range, 56-78 years). Among them, 66 cases were unilateral THA and 7 were bilateral THAs. There were 29 patients (34 hips) of osteoarthritis, 35 patients (35 hips) of femoral neck fractures, and 9 patients (11 hips) of osteonecrosis of the femoral head. Based on anteroposterior pelvic X-ray films, three methods were employed to predict acetabular cup size, including preoperative template planning, radiographic femoral head diameter (FHD) measurement, and intraoperative FHD measurement. The predicted acetabular cup sizes from these methods were compared with the actual implanted sizes. Results The predicted acetabular cup sizes using the preoperative template planning, radiographic FHD measurement, and intraoperative FHD measurement were (51.25±2.81), (49.72±3.11), and (49.90±2.74) mm, respectively, compared to the actual implanted cup size of (50.57±2.74) mm, with no significant difference (P>0.05). Regarding agreement with the actual implanted cup size, the preoperative template planning achieved exact matches in 35 hips (43.75%), one-size deviation in 41 hips (51.25%), and two-size deviations in 4 hips (5%); the radiographic FHD measurement achieved exact matches in 12 hips (15%), one-size deviation in 57 hips (71.25%), and two-size deviations in 11 hips (13.75%); and the intraoperative FHD measurement achieved exact matches in 26 hips (32.5%), one-size deviation in 52 hips (65%), and two-size deviations in 2 hips (2.5%). There were significant differences in agreement distributions between the three methods and the actual implanted cup sizes (H=18.579, P<0.001). Conclusion The intraoperative FHD measurement, as a simple, cost-effective, and accurate method, effectively guides acetabular cup selection, reduces the risk of prosthesis wear, enhances postoperative joint stability.
Objective To establish the optimal morphological criteria combined with fibrinogen level for evaluation of lymph node metastasis in colorectal cancer. Methods A consecutive series of 690 patients who underwent curative surgery for colorectal cancer, were examined by abdominopelvic enhanced multi-slice spiral computed tomography (MSCT) scan. If regional lymph nodes appeared, the maximal long-axis diameter (MLAD), maximal short-axis diameter (MSAD), and axial ratio (MSAD/MLAD) were recorded. At each lymph node size cut-off value, the following were calculated: accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV). Moreover, preoperative plasma level of fibrinogen was retrospectively examined to identify metastatic or inflammatory lymph node combined with MSCT image. Both modalities, MSCT plus fibrinogen and MSCT alone, were compared based on the pathologic findings. Results The study population consisted of 100 patients with regional lymph nodes show. No significant difference was found between metastatic and inflammatory lymph nodes in imaging characteristics (Pgt;0.05). The best cut-off value of MSAD was 6 mm for lymph node metastasis with the sensitivity of 46.8%, specificity of 68.4%, accuracy of 55.0%, PPV of 70.7% and NPV of 44.1%. The best cut-off value of MLAD was 8 mm with the sensitivity of 43.5%, specificity of 63.2%, accuracy of 51.0%, PPV of 65.9% and NPV of 40.7%. Using hyperfibrinogenemia (FIB ≥3.5 g/L) to identify small metastatic lymph node, of which MSAD lt;6 mm or MLAD lt;8 mm, showed statistical diagnostic value (Kappa=0.256, P=0.047). Compared with MSAD (6 mm) alone, MSAD (6 mm) combined with hyperfibrinogenemia had a higher sensitivity (79.0% vs. 46.8%, Plt;0.001), but a similar accuracy (66.0% vs. 55.0%, Pgt;0.05) and a lower specificity (44.7% vs. 68.4%, P=0.037). MLAD (8 mm) combined with hyperfibrinogenemia led to a greater diagnostic value in sensitivity (80.6% vs. 43.5%, Plt;0.001) and accuracy (66.0% vs. 51.0%, P=0.031) than MLAD (8 mm) alone, with a no-significantly decreasing specificity (42.1% vs. 63.2%, Pgt;0.05). Conclusions This present study recommend MSAD ≥6 mm or MLAD ≥8 mm as the optimal criteria for preoperative N staging in colorectal cancer. Moreover, the sensitivity and even accuracy could be improved by combining hyperfibrinogenemia for lymph node metastasis identification.
Aortic valve disease is one of the major diseases threatening human health. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is a new treatment for aortic disease. Preoperative evaluation is of great significance to the successful operation and the long-term quality of life of patients. The 3D printing technology can fully simulate the cardiac anatomy of patients, create personalized molds for patients, improve surgical efficiency, reduce surgical time and surgical trauma, and thus achieve better surgical results. In this review, the relevant literatures were searched, and the evaluation effect of 3D printing technology on the operation of TAVR was reviewed, so as to provide clinical reference.
Objective To investigate the influence of preoperative assessment by transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) on the development of operative procedures for rectal cancer. Methods A total of 110 patients with pathologically proven rectal cancer and distance between tumor to dentate line ≤10 cm were enrolled and randomized into group A (n=55) and group B (n=55) according to a computer-generated random sequence. Both TRUS staging and Clinical Staging System (CS staging) were performed preoperatively in group A, while only CS staging was conducted in group B. Preoperative TRUS stage, CS stage, and proposed operative procedures were recorded to compare with the postoperative pathological stage and practical operative procedures. Results A total of 99 patients were assessed. They were randomized into group A (n=49) and B (n=50), and there were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between the two groups. The difference in staging accuracy was statistically significant (P=0.000) between group A (91.8%) and group B (48.0%). Statistically significant improvement (P=0.013) in the accuracy of proposing operative procedures for rectal cancer was observed in group A (93.9%) compared with group B (76.0%). Conclusion TRUS is evidently superior to CS staging in preoperative assessment for rectal cancer, and may remarkably enhance the accuracy of proposing operative procedures. Therefore, TRUS is valuable in preoperative assessment which may help to guide the selection of operative procedures for rectal cancer surgery.
结直肠癌是一种严重威胁我国国民生命的恶性肿瘤，近年来其发病率呈不断上升的趋势。根据WHO报告的资料［1］显示，我国结直肠癌死亡率2005年比1991年增加70.7%，年均增加4.71%。尽管对结直肠癌的病因学研究和以手术切除、放射治疗和化学药物治疗为主的综合治疗取得了一定进展，但结直肠癌的治疗仍然面临巨大挑战。对不同个体采用相同的治疗方案不仅不能提高治疗效果，而且造成医疗资源的浪费，甚至给患者带来伤害。目前，个体差异与疗效的关系越来越受到临床医生和研究者的重视。随着循证医学的不断发展，结直肠癌的个体化治疗日益成为临床治疗及基础研究的重点。结直肠肿瘤多学科协作(multidisciplinary team，MDT)诊治模式的运用为结直肠癌个体化诊治提供了新的平台［2］。....................