目的:探讨心脏机械瓣膜置换术后抗凝治疗中,消化道出血发生的危险因素及防治措施。方法:回顾性研究2001年3月至2008年7月我院16例机械瓣膜置换术后抗凝治疗中消化道出血患者的临床资料,分析发生的危险因素,并总结其诊治经验。结果:心脏机械瓣膜置换术后患者抗凝治疗中消化道出血发生在服用华法令后3天～5年,平均147.53±136.71天。其中,上消化道出血12例,下消化道出血4例;保守治疗11例,内窥镜治疗4例;死亡2例(DIC及多器官功能衰竭各1例),病死率12.5%(2/16)。出血组患者术中转流时间(142.73 min±49.81 min)明显长于对照组(98.27 min±39.52 min)(Plt;0.05),华法令平均用药量(2.46±0.53 mg/d)与对照组(2.38±0.69 mg/d)无明显差异(Pgt;0.05),国际标准比值(INR)均值(2.79±0.57))明显大于对照组(1.49±0.58)(P lt;0.05)。消化道出血治疗期间停用华法令5～19天,平均13±2天,所有痊愈患者消化道出血治疗期间及出院后随访3月内均无栓塞及消化道再出血事件发生。结论;⑴心脏机械瓣膜置换术后早期(3月内)抗凝治疗发生消化道出血的危险因素包括术中转流时间过长和抗凝强度过大(INR＞2.0),晚期则可能与合并使用非甾体类抗炎药有关;⑵ 消化道出血治疗期间,华法林停用2周较为安全。
Objective To explore the feasibility and safety of liver transplantation （LT） in treatment of upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage in patients with portal hypertension， and to compare the therapeutic effects with conventional operation （CO）. Methods The clinical data of 303 patients with bleeding portal hypertension from Feb. 2009 to Feb. 2012 in the department of hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery of First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University were retrospectively analyzed. One hundred and one patients received LT procedure （LT group）， whereas the other 202 patients received CO procedure （CO group）. Postoperative follow-up period was 8-44 months （average 26 months）. Results Liver function before operation in CO group was significantly better than that in LT group（P＜0.01）. The mortality of CO group and LT group were 7.4%（14/189） and 3.0%（3/101， P=1.00）， respectively. The rebleeding rate of patients underwent LT was 2.0%（2/101）， significantly lower than that of CO group 〔9.5%（18/189）， P＜0.05〕. The vanish rate of esophagogastric varice in patients underwent LT was 86.1%（87/101）， significantly lower than that of CO group 〔54.5%（86/189）， P＜0.01〕. Conclusions LT treatment for bleeding portal hypertension is feasible and safe. Patients with good liver function despite hemorrhage history may be managed satisfactorily with conventional surgery. LT is the only curative treatment for patients with portal hypertension in end-stage liver disease.
Objective To perform a systematic review on the safety (i.g. cardiovascular, mortality and gastrointestinal bleeding) of clopidogrel versus clopidogrel combined with proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) for the patients with coronary heart disease. Methods Such databases as The Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMbase, SSCI, VIP, CNKI, and CBM were searched from the date of their establishment to September 2010. The bibliographies of the retrieved articles were also checked. The data was extracted and evaluated by two reviewers independently. The RevMan 5.0 software was used for meta-analyses. Results A total of 29 studies were included. The results of meta-analyses showed that the use of clopidogrel combined with PPIs was associated with increasing the risk of cardiovascular events (RR=1.27, 95%CI 1.09 to 1.47), as well as myocardial infarction (RR=1.45, 95% CI 1.20 to 1.76), total mortality (RR=1.23, 95%CI 1.06 to 1.43), and rethrombosis (RR=1.37, 95%CI 1.01 to 1.86). However, there was no enough evidence to reach the conclusion that the combination use could benefit the situation of gastrointestinal bleeding (RR=0.84, 95%CI 0.47 to 1.50). Conclusion?Compared with clopidogrel, the combination use of clopidogrel and PPIs increases cardiovascular events, mortality, and the risks of myocardial infarction and rethrombosis. However, more clinical studies are required to assess the effect of reducing gastrointestinal bleeding.
Objective To explore how to integrate the various sources of information in designing an evidence-based nursing care plan for preventing gastrointestinal hemorrhage (GIH) after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). Method Papers and references about prevention of GIH after PD were searched between September and October 2015, and an evidence-based nursing care plan was drawn up and implemented from November 2015 to January 2016. Results A total of 79 papers were found and of which 17 were aviliable. Thirty-nine patients were cared on the basis of the effective project, of whom one was dignosed with GIH on the 3rd postoperative day and the rate of post-PD hemorrhage was 2.6%. All patients were diacharged on the 6th or 7th postoperative day. Conclusion Exploring evidences under the guidance of scientific method and applying them to clinical nursing can prevent post-PD hemorrhage and improve life quality of patients.