ObjectiveTo evaluate the 3-year efficacy of photodynamic therapy (PDT) in patients with polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV). MethodsThis is a retrospective, uncontrolled case series study. Thirty-two eyes of 29 patients with PCV were enrolled. All patients were primarily treated with the first conventional PDT. For the eye with active polypoida, residual or exudative lesions in 6 month after PDT, PDT combined with intravitreal anti vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)or simple vitreous injection of anti VEGF therapy were used. All the patients were followed up for at least 3 years with the mean follow-up duration of 43.64±10.84 months. The best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in 1, 3, 6, 12, 24 and 36 months after the primary PDT, PCV recurrence rates and number of treatments were followed and analyzed. The BCVA was converted into a logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution (logMAR) for statistical analysis. ResultsDuring the 1, 3, 6, 12 months after the primary PDT, the mean BCVA were all improved with statistically significant difference(t=2.27, 4.57, 3.77, 2.37; P<0.05). During the 24 and 36 months after PDT, the mean BCVA was decreased without statistically significant difference(t=-1.29, -0.81; P>0.05). On the final evaluation at 36 months, the mean BCVA was improved in 6 eyes(18.75%), stable in 14 eyes(43.75%), and decreased in 12 eyes(37.50%). During the follow-up time, recurrence of PCV in 24 eyes (75.00%), no recurrence in 8 eyes (25.00%). There was 1 recurrence in 12 eyes (50.00%), 2 recurrences in 9 eyes (37.50%), 3 recurrences in 3 eyes (12.50%). Initial recurrences were noted in 4 eyes (16.67%) within 12 months of baseline PDT treatment; in 11 eyes (45.83%) between 13 and 24 months; in 9 eyes (37.50%) between 25 and 36 months. The mean number of PDT and anti-VEGF was 1.86±1.04 and 4.95±3.92 in all patients, respectively. ConclusionThe 3-year efficacy of PDT in patients with PCV was poor with low improvement of visual acuity and high recurrence rate of PCV.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of half-dose verteporfin photodynamic therapy (PDT) for chronic central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC). Methods35 eyes (35 patients) with chronic (or recurrent) CSC treated with half-dose verteporfin PDT. Best-corrected visual acuity(BCVA), central macular thickness (CMT) were measured before and after treatment (1, 3 and 6 months). The mean BCVA was 0.28±0.22, mean CMT was(384.5±85.0)μm. The situation of subretinal fluids (SRF) absorption was observed. ResultsIn 35 eyes, SRF of 29 eyes (82.9%) completely absorbed and 6 eyes (17.1%) not completely absorbed after one month of treatment. SRF of all eyes (100.0%) completely absorbed after three months of treatment. After 6 months of treatment, SRF of 3 eyes (8.6%) were recurrence, which might be completely absorbed when a half-dose maintenance therapy PDT was used again. The mean BCVA significantly improved to 0.14±0.13 at 1 months, 0.05±0.11 at 3 months and 0.05±0.12 at 6 months after PDT (t=5.410, 7.830, 7.758; P < 0.05). The mean CMT decreased to (224.3±61.4) μm at 1 months, (199.6±32.7) μm at 3 months and (205.3±39.6) μm at 6 months after PDT (t=11.856, 11.781, 11.900; P < 0.05). The mean CMT of controlled 32 eyes after treatment was (198.5±33.9) μm, much lower than the fellow eyes(232.3±17.5) μm (t=-3.988, P < 0.05). ConclusionsHalf-dose verteporfin PDT was safe and effective in treating chronic CSC, but may cause thinning of CMT.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the efficacy and safety of photodynamic therapy (PDT) and intravitreal vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitors in the treatment of polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV), and to investigate the primary treatment tentatively. MethodsA systematic search of Pubmed, Embase, the Cochrane Library and the Wanfang Data was performed to identify all comparative studies that compared the outcomes of PDT alone, intravitreal VEGF inhibitors alone and combined intravitreal VEGF inhibitors and photodynamic therapy. Outcomes of interest included the regression and recurrence rate of polypoidal lesions, best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central retinal thickness (CRT), therapeutic times, and the occurrence rate of adverse events. 2 randomized controlled trials (RCT) and 19 non-RTCs were identified. According to treatment methods, the data extracted was classified to 3 groups, analyzed with odds ratio (OR), weighted mean difference (WMD) and 95%confidence interval (95%CI). ResultsMeta-analysis suggests that the regression rate of polypoidal lesions (OR=0.34, 0.07; 95%CI=0.13-0.88, 0.02-0.36) and BCVA (WMD=0.25, 0.11; 95%CI=0.14-0.36, 0.01-0.21) in combined therapy group were significantly better than those in PDT group and intravitreal VEGF inhibitors group (P < 0.05). The recurrence rate of polypoidal lesions in PDT group was significantly lower than intravitreal VEGF inhibitors group (OR=0.35, 95%CI=0.16-0.74, P=0.006). BCVA (P=0.025) and the occurrence rate of adverse events (OR=60.36, 95%CI=6.04-603.50, P=0.000 5) in intravitreal VEGF inhibitors group were significant better than PDT group. ConclusionsCombined treatment appeared to be superior to PDT alone or intravitreal VEGF inhibitors alone. Combined treatment takes priority over all others in the primary treatment of PCV.
ObjectiveTo compare the fast blood flow density (FBFD) of intermediate choroid between endogenous Cushing syndrome (ECS) patients and healthy control subjects.MethodsThirteen eyes of 7 eligible ECS patients (ECS group) and 13 eyes of 7 gender, age, axial length matched healthy volunteers (control group) were enrolled in this study. For each subject, macular radial scan with swept source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) was performed and subfoveal choroidal thickness (SCT) was measured. Then 3.0 mm×3.0 mm macular scan with SS-OCT angiography was performed, and selected blood flow image at intermediate choroid level or 1/2 SCT beneath Bruch membrane. The grayscale images were then binarized for the analysis of FBFD.ResultsThe SCT in ECS group was (394.7±77.7) μm, which was significantly thicker than (332.1±68.1) μm in control group (t=2.923, P=0.008). The FBFD of intermediate choroid in ECS group were (76.35±14.46)%, which were significantly greater than (63.57±13.42)% in control group (t=2.775, P=0.01).ConclusionECS patients had increased FBFD at intermediate choroid level compared with healthy controls.