west china medical publishers
Keyword
  • Title
  • Author
  • Keyword
  • Abstract
Advance search
Advance search

Search

find Keyword "痔" 66 results
  • Modified Technique of the External Dissection and Internal Ligation for Mixed Hemorrhoid

    目的 探讨混合痔切除外剥内扎术术式的改进方法。方法 应用该改进术式共治疗混合痔1126例,切除混合痔2489个,其中一次切除痔在3个以上乃至近环行切除仅留1 cm皮桥者450例,混合痔1461个。结果 术后创面渗血、疼痛及愈合时间均明显优于传统混合痔外剥内扎术; 术后排便通畅,随访6个月,无一例出现肛门狭窄; 创面愈合后疤痕较轻,外形美观,能最大程度恢复原肛门解剖结构和生理功能。结论 该术式方法简单、实用,克服了传统手术的不足。

    Release date:2016-08-28 04:47 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Comparative Study Between Automatic Ligation of Hemorrhoids and Procedure for Prolapsed Hemorrhoids on Elderly Patients with Hemorrhoids

    ObjectiveTo compare the efficacy and safety of automatic ligation of hemorrhoids (ALH) and procedure for prolapsed hemorrhoids (PPH) in the treatment of elderly patients with hemorrhoids. MethodsOne hundred and eighty elderly patients with hemorrhoids who were admitted into the First People's Hospital of Jining City from January 2012 to December 2014 were enrolled. According to the operative mode, the patients were divided into ALH group and PPH group, with 90 cases in each group, received ALH and PPH treatment respectively. The postoperative pain, urinary retention, edema, bleeding, infection, anal swelling and anal stenosis were observed in the two groups, and two methods of operation were evaluated in terms of operation time, intraoperative bleeding, postoperative bleeding, postoperative pain, healing time, hospitalization expenses and postoperative complications. ResultsThe VAS scores of the ALH group in the day 1-3 after operation were lower than that of the PPH group, the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05); the frequency of the use of analgesics in ALH group was less than that in PPH group (P < 0.01); the amount of blood loss and the healing time of the ALH group were significantly less or shoter than those of the PPH group (P < 0.01); the incidence of postoperative urinary retention in the ALH group was 2.22% (2/90), which was significantly lower than that of the PPH group, 27.78% (25/90), the difference was statistically significant (χ2=23.050, P=0.000); the incidence of perianal edema after operation in the ALH group was 5.56% (5/90), which was significantly lower than that of PPH group of 15.56% (14/90), the difference was statistically significant (χ2=4.766, P=0.029). There was no obvious postoperative bleeding in the ALH group(0/90), while the incidence of postoperative bleeding in the PPH group was 7.78% (7/90), and the difference between the two groups was statistically significant (Fisher's exact test, P=0.007). The efficiency of ALH group was 98.89% (89/90) and the PPH group was 97.78% (88/90), the difference between the two groups was not statistically significant (χ2=0.339, P=0.560). Conciusions There is no significant difference between ALH and PPH in the treatment of elderly patients with hemorrhoids, but ALH has the advantages of less pain, quicker recovery and fewer complications, it is worthy of popularization and application.

    Release date: Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Surgical Effect of Tissue Selecting Therapy Stapler in Treatment of Hemorrhoid

    Objective To compare the clinical effect of tissue selecting therapy stapler (TST) and procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids (PPH) in treatment of hemorrhoid in Ⅲ-Ⅳ degree. Methods Clinical data of 80 cases of hemorrhoid in Ⅲ-Ⅳ degree who treated in The First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University from May 2015 to July 2015 were retrospectively collected. All the 80 cases were divided into TST group (n=40) and PPH group (n=40) according to the surgical types. The comparison of the clinical effect of 2 groups was performed. Results The operative time, hospital stay, intraoperative blood loss, anal fall bilge feeling score, postoperative pain score at 3 time points, and the incidence of anal secretions of TST group were lower or shorter than those corresponding indexes of PPH group (P<0.05). But there was no significant difference in cure rate, the incidence of urinary retention, the incidence of anal stenosis, the incidence of intractable pain, and satisfaction situation between the 2 groups (P>0.05). All of the cases were followed up for 3 months, during the follow-up period, no one suffered from rectal vaginal fistula, fecal incontinence, and recurrence. Conclusion TST and PPH both have satisfactory effect in treatment of hemorrhoid in Ⅲ-Ⅳ degree, but TST has advan- tages of less blood loss, shorter operative time, rapid postoperative recovery, and less pain.

    Release date: Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • The Effect of UltraShort Wave on the Healing of Wound after Operation for Hemorrhoids

    摘要:目的:观察超短波治疗对痔术后创面愈合的影响。方法:将100例混合痔术后患者分为治疗组和对照组各40例,治疗组于术后24小时给予超短波治疗和复方紫草油纱条换药,对照组仅给以复方紫草油纱条换药,观察两组创面愈合时间和创面上皮生长速度。结果:治疗组较对照组创面愈合时间更短(Plt;0.01),创面上皮生长速度更快(Plt;0.01)。结论〗:超短波治疗能够加速痔术后创面愈合时间,减少痛苦,疗效确切安全。Abstract: Objective: To observe the clinical efficacy of ultrashort wave on the healing of wound after operation for hemorrhoids. Methods: One hundred cases of disease subjected to operation were divided into the treatment group (50 cases) and the control group (50 cases).The treatment group had been given ultrashort wave 24 hours after operation and Fufangzicaoyousa ointment gauze. The control group had been give Fufangzicaoyousa ointment gauze. Results: The results showed that the woundhealing time was much shorter in the treatment group than in the control group (Plt;0.01), the epidermis growth was much faster in the treatment group than in he control group (Plt;0.01). Conclusion: Ultrashort wave can promote the healing of wound after the operation for hemorrhoids and relieve pain, and it can be externally used safely.

    Release date:2016-09-08 10:12 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • 局部麻醉下微波治疗痔的临床观察

    【摘要】 目的 探讨局部麻醉下微波治疗痔的可行性及疗效。方法 回顾云南省鲁甸县人民医院2000 年4月至2007 年4 月期间局部麻醉下微波治疗痔85 例(微波治疗组) ,硬膜外麻醉下行痔切除80 例(常规治疗组) ,并对2 组的手术时间、并发症及治疗效果进行比较分析。结果 微波治疗组: 手术时间(10 ±5) min ; 并发症中渗血4 例(4. 7 %) ,肛门狭窄1 例(1. 2 %) ,复发6 例(7. 1 %) ; 治愈74 例(87. 1 %) ,好转及无效11 例(12. 9 %) 。常规治疗组: 手术时间(40 ±5) min ; 并发症中渗血6 例(7. 5 %) ,肛门狭窄2 例(2. 5 %) ,复发7 例(8. 8 %) ; 治愈65 例(81. 3 %) ,好转及无效15 例(18. 8 %) 。2 组的手术时间、并发症总发生率及治愈率比较差异有统计学意义( P lt;0. 05) 。结论 局部麻醉下微波治疗痔安全可行,具有微创、简单、有效、并发症少及手术时间短的优点,有临床推广价值。

    Release date:2016-09-08 11:45 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Clinical Study of Curing Rectocele by Divided Plastic Tightening and Constricting Operation

    【摘要】目的 探讨分段整形提缩注射术治疗脱肛痔的临床疗效。方法 175例重度环状痔, 沿肛缘弧形切除结缔组织外痔以整形肛门, 再于结扎痔核基底及其上端黏膜下层注射消痔灵注射液,并进行疗效观察。结果 术后肛周水肿(72 h)、疼痛(24及72 h)明显减少; 术后4周临床治愈145例,好转23例,总有效率为96.0%; 所有患者均随访3~6个月,未见复发。结论 选择分段整形提缩注射术既比较彻底地去除了痔核使之不易复发,又整形了肛门,保护其大小和功能, 该术式可成为治疗脱肛痔的较理想术式。

    Release date:2016-09-08 11:54 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Hemorrhoidectomy and Circumferential Stapled Mucosectomy for Prolapse and Hemorrhoids (Report of 30 Cases)

    目的探讨痔切除吻合器痔上粘膜环切术(PPH)的临床应用价值。方法采用33 mm痔切除吻合器痔上粘膜切除术对严重脱垂性痔30例进行治疗。结果全组病例平均手术时间10分钟,术后住院时间1~3天,脱出痔块均回缩,切除直肠粘膜完整率达98%,术后90%的患者无肛门疼痛,随访3个月,28例满意,2例基本满意。结论采用痔切除吻合器痔上粘膜环切术治疗严重脱垂性痔是一种新技术,其手术操作简单,具有安全、有效、手术时间短、术后疼痛轻、恢复快等特点,有望替代传统的治疗方法。

    Release date:2016-08-28 04:49 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Effectiveness of PPH in Treatment for Constipation Caused by Rectocele in 104 Cases

    目的 观察吻合器痔上黏膜环形切除钉合术(PPH)治疗直肠前突所致便秘的临床疗效。方法 回顾性分析我科2008年1月至2012年1月期间经PPH治疗的104例女性直肠前突致便秘患者的手术经过及术后疗效。结果 本组104例均手术顺利,手术时间13~35min,平均21min;住院时间3~7d,平均4.5d;无直肠阴道瘘、肛周脓肿、肛门狭窄等并发症发生。术后2周均常规行肛门指检,3例局部轻度炎症,给予抗炎对症治疗后症状消失。5例吻合口局部吻合钉未完全脱落,给予取出后不适症状消失。术后随访1~5年(平均3年),随访率为97.12%(101/104),临床症状完全消失99例,治愈率为95.19%;症状好转5例,该5例行排粪造影检查,直肠前突均明显减轻,且便秘症状明显缓解。结论 PPH治疗女性直肠前突所致便秘安全、有效,便秘症状缓解明显,是一种适合临床应用的手术方式。

    Release date:2016-09-08 10:35 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • 吻合器痔上黏膜环形切除术辅助剪口结扎治疗357例混合痔患者的长期疗效评价

    目的研究吻合器痔上黏膜环形切除术(PPH)辅助剪口结扎治疗357例混合痔的长期疗效。 方法回顾性分析2007年1月至2009年1月期间在中国医科大学附属第四医院肛肠外科行PPH辅助剪口结扎治疗的369例混合痔患者的临床资料。观察混合痔患者术后的排便疼痛、出血、肛门瘙痒等症状,随访至少5年并记录痔复发、肛门狭窄、吻合口狭窄、肛门控便能力等情况。 结果最终完成随访患者有357例,所有患者均未发生阴道直肠瘘、阴道尿道瘘、排便失禁、吻合口大出血及吻合口感染并发症,患者术后疼痛、出血、肛门瘙痒症状人数早期(术后6个月)与术前比较有明显减少(P<0.05),中长期(术后5年与术后1年)比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),其5年随访改善率分别为94.9%、96.1%、96.6%。随访5年内痔复发患者12例(3.4%),外痔复发11例(3.1%),吻合口狭窄2例(0.6%),无肛门狭窄患者,无排便失禁患者。 结论PPH辅助剪口结扎治疗混合痔安全、有效,长期复发率低。

    Release date: Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Clinical Observation of MilliganMorgan Operation Combined with Injection and Fenestration for Treatment of Circular Mixed Hemorrhoid

    目的比较外剥内扎(注射)加开窗治疗环状混合痔和传统外剥内扎法治疗环状混合痔的临床疗效。方法80例环状混合痔患者分别接受外剥内扎(注射)加开窗治疗和传统外剥内扎法治疗,对两种术式的疗效进行比较。结果2组患者术后均未发生肛门失禁症状,肛门功能的差异无统计学意义(Pgt;0.05),而治疗组患者肛门狭窄、肛门水肿和疼痛明显轻于对照组(Plt;0.05),尿潴留、切口愈合时间以及复发也明显少于对照组(Plt;0.05)。结论外剥内扎(注射)加开窗术是环状混合痔的较好治疗方案。

    Release date:2016-09-08 10:45 Export PDF Favorites Scan
7 pages Previous 1 2 3 ... 7 Next

Format

Content