Objective To systematically review the effect of vitamin D (VitD) supplementation on cognitive function in people with cognitive impairment and non-cognitive disorders. MethodsThe PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, EMbase, CBM, CNKI, WanFang Data and VIP databases were searched to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about the effect of VitD supplementation on cognitive function of patients with cognitive impairment or non-cognitive disorders from inception to March, 2022. Two reviewers independently screened the literature, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias of the included studies. Meta-analysis was then performed using RevMan 5.4 software. Results A total of 19 articles including 8 684 cases were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that mini-mental state examination (MMSE) score (MD=1.70, 95%CI 1.20 to 2.21, P<0.01), Montreal cognitive assessment (MoCA) score (MD=1.51, 95%CI 1.00 to 2.02, P<0.01), Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised (WAIS-RC) score (MD=9.12, 95%CI 7.77 to 10.47, P<0.01) and working memory (SMD=1.87, 95%CI 1.07 to 2.67, P<0.01) in the VitD group of patients with cognitive impairment were all better than those in the control group. However, the overall cognitive function and working memory of the non-cognitive impairment population were not significantly different compared with the control group. In terms of language fluency and language memory, there was no significant difference between the VitD group and the control group. In terms of the executive functions, at the intervention time of> 6 months, the VitD and control groups were statistically significant (SMD=0.15, 95%CI 0.01 to 0.28, P=0.03). Conclusion Current evidence suggests that VitD supplementation can effectively improve the overall cognitive function and working memory of patients with cognitive impairment, and has a positive effect on executive function at an intervention time of >6 months. Due to the limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high-quality studies are needed to verify the above conclusion.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the relationship between Cadmium (Cd) level and Alzheimer's disease (AD). MethodWe searched PubMed, EMbase, CNKI, WanFang Data and CBM databases from inception to December 2014 to collect case-control studies about the relationship between Cd level and AD. Two reviewers screened literature, extracted data and evaluated the risk of bias of included studies, and then meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 5.3 software. ResultsA total of 11 studies were included, among them 8 studies were included into final meta-analysis. Three studies including 154 patients and 141 controls reported the relationship of serum Cd concentrations and AD, and the result of meta-analysis showed that the higher serum Cd level was found in the AD group than the control group (SMD=0.36, 95%CI 0.12 to 0.59, P=0.003). Six studies including 358 patients and 423 controls reported the relationship of blood Cd concentrations and AD, and the result of meta-analysis showed that there was no significant difference of blood Cd levels between both groups (SMD=0.35, 95%CI -0.14 to 0.84, P=0.16). ConclusionSerum Cd concentrations may be associated with AD, but blood Cd concentrations not. Due to the limitation of quality and quantity of the included studies, more high quality studies are needed to verify the above conclusion.
ObjectivesTo systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of butylphthalide soft capsule in the treatment of vascular dementia (VaD).MethodsDatabases including CNKI, WanFang Data, VIP, CBM, PubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library were electronically searched to collect randomized controlled trials of butylphthalide soft capsule in the treatment of vascular dementia published from September 2002 to July 2018. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed risk of bias of included studies. Then, meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 software.ResultsA total of 15 studies involving 1 149 patients were included. The butylphthalide soft capsule treatment group included 578 patients and the control group included 571 patients. The results of meta-analysis showed that compared with the control group (donepezil hydrochloride tablets or memantine hydrochloride tablets or EGb761 or negative control), the butylphthalide soft capsule treatment group improved the MMSE score of patients with VaD (MD=3.52, 95%CI 2.59 to 4.46, P<0.01), CDR score (MD=−0.72, 95%CI −0.80 to −0.65, P<0.01), and treatment efficiency (RR=1.31, 95%CI 1.20 to 1.43, P<0.01). However, there was no statistical difference in the number of adverse reactions between the treatment and control groups.ConclusionsButylphthalide soft capsule can be used in the treatment of patients with mild to moderate VaD. It can improve the cognitive function, raking of clinical dementia, and increase the effect rate of treatment. It can also work in conjunction with other drugs that improve cognitive function and no increase in adverse reactions has been found. However, due to the low quality of the included studies and small sample size, the actual efficacy strength is uncertain and the above conclusions are still required to be verified by more high-quality randomized controlled trials.
Post-stroke cognitive impairment (PSCI) is the most common dysfunction after stroke, which seriously affects patients’ quality of life and survival time. To strengthen the management and prevention of PSCI, the European Stroke Organization and the European Academy of Neurology jointly developed the guidelines for PSCI in 2021. This paper introduces the background, compilation method and structure, management suggestions and expert consensus of PSCI, the next research direction, etc. Compared with the current prevention and treatment measures of PSCI in China, it aims to provide methodological reference for Chinese scholars to develope PSCI guidelines and reference evidence for clinical prevention and treatment of PSCI.
ObjectiveTo provide the best evidence for an old diabetic patient who combined with frailty syndrome with the goal of glycemic control, treatment strategy and their prognosis. MethodsPubMed, MEDLINE (Ovid), EMbase, The Cochrane Library (Issue 11, 2015) and CNKI were searched from their inception to Nov. 2015, to collect evidence about the management of glycemic control. Evidences were analyzed by the way of evidenced-based criterions. ResultsOne clinical guideline, one meta-analysis, three RCTs, seven cohort studies and four case-control studies were included. Evidence showed that compared with patient uncombined with frailty, old diabetic patients with frailty had a higher prevalence of dementia, cardiovascular diseases and death; Aggressive glycemic control could not reduce the prevalence of cardiovascular events and the risk of death, while it could increase the risk of falling. Glycemic control was more comprehensive which would be taken frailty into consideration. Diet rich in protein (especially leucine), resistance exercise and reasonable medications based on comprehensive geriatric assessment were proved benefit for the old diabetic patient. ConclusionThe incidence of cardiovascular events, hypoglycemia and mortality are increased in this old diabetic patient who combined with frailty. Maintaining HbA1c around 7.5% is reasonable and diet with enough calorie and rich in protein (especially leucine), resistance exercises should be recommended for the person.
Objective To analyze the characteristic and temporal trend in mortality and disease burden of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and other forms of dementia in Guangzhou from 2008 to 2019, and estimate the disease burden attributable to smoking to provide evidence for promoting local health policy of prevention and intervention of dementia. Methods Based on the data of Guangzhou surveillance point of the National Mortality Surveillance System (NMSS), the crude mortality, standardized mortality, years of life lost (YLL) of AD and other dementia were calculated. The indirect method was used to estimate years lived with disability (YLD) and disability-adjusted life years (DALY).The distribution and changing trends of the index rates were compared from 2008 to 2019 using Joinpoint Regression Program. Based on the data of Guangzhou Chronic Disease and Risk Factors Monitoring System in 2013, the indexes of disease burden of AD and other forms of dementia attributable to smoking in 2018 was calculated. Results The standardized mortality rate, YLL rate, YLD rate and DALY rate of AD and other forms of dementia in Guangzhou increased from 0.45/100 000, 0.05‰, 0.02‰ and 0.07 ‰ in 2008 to 1.28/100 000, 0.15‰, 0.07‰ and 0.22‰ in 2019, respectively. The average annual changing trend was statistically significant (AAPC=11.30%, 13.09%, 13.09%, 13.09%, P<0.001）. In most years, the mortality and disease burden of women were higher than those of men, but men had higher growing trend than women in standardized mortality rate, YLL rate, YLD rate and DALY rate from 2008 to 2019, with a slower growing speed after the year 2012.The disease burden of dementia attributable to smoking in men was significantly higher than that in women. Conclusion The mortality and disease burden of AD and other forms of dementia in Guangzhou have dramatically increased over the past twelve years. Intervention against modifiable factors such as smoking, and prevention and screening for dementia in key populations should be strengthened. Support policies for dementia care management should be adopted to reduce the disease burden caused by premature death and disability.
目的:探讨被误诊为功能性精神障碍的麻痹性痴呆患者的临床特点和诊治要点。方法:回顾性分析10例被误诊为功能性精神障碍的麻痹性痴呆患者的临床资料。结果:被误诊为功能性精神障碍的麻痹性痴呆均以精神症状为首发，多表现为精神病性症状、类躁狂、抑郁、类神经症、人格的改变及进行性痴呆等不典型症状群，本研究显示误诊率高达71.4%，误诊例次率以精神分裂症最高（47.3%），其次为躁狂症或躁狂状态（37.5%）。抗精神病药物能有效改善精神症状，青霉素驱梅能阻止病情进展使病情得到缓解，两者缺一不可。结论:被误诊为功能性精神障碍的麻痹性痴呆均以精神症状为首发且症状不典型而易被误诊，早期鉴别诊断十分重要，抗精神病药物和青霉素治疗可以有效控制症状。
【摘要】 目的 了解老年门诊患者痴呆症的发生率及其相关危险因素。方法 对2007年7月—2009年5月,年龄≥60岁644例门诊患者进行简易智能表(MMSE简易评分)评价,并收集患者文化程度、吸烟、基础疾病、用药史进行危险因素相关分析。结果 样本人群老年痴呆症的发病率为16.0%。与老年性痴呆密切相龄、高血压、脑卒中史、听力受损和视力受损。结论 高龄、高血压、脑卒中是老年性痴呆主要的危险因素,当前的医疗卫生机构应该积极有效地采取措施,控制可变因素,减少老年性痴呆的发生。
Objective To assess the efficacy and safety of Zhiling decoction for vascular dementia. Methods The Specialized Register of the Cochrane Dementia and Cognitive Improvement Group was searched in Feb. 2004 using the term Zhiling. In addition, we handsearched 83 traditional Chinese medicine journals （1993 to 2004 ）. We included all randomized controlled trials（RCTs）of Zhiling decoction treating people with vascular dementia. We also evaluated the internal validity of the RCTs . If all included RCTs were of high quality and homogeneity, then the meta-analysis was conducted. Results Only one RCT was identified. The outcomes were listed as the followings ： ① The Hasegawa＇ s dementia scale scoring （ HDS ） scores of the patients in Zhiling decoction group were improved significantly from baseline after 8 weeks course of treatment and there was no significant difference in the control group. The HDS scores improvement was greater than control group（P 〈0.01 ）o ② The latency of P3 was shorter in both groups after treatment, and there was a significant treatment effect in Zhiling group （t = -52. 09, 95% CI -69.79 to -34.39, P 〈0. 000 01 ）. The amplitude of 173 increased in both groups after treatment, and there was a non-sigmficant treatment effect in Zhiling group for change from baseline （t =1.40, 95% CI -0.02 to 2.82, P =0.05）. ③ Brain electrical activity monitoring （BEAM） showed that benefits in those treated by Zhiling decoction were higher than those treated by Naofukang with OR9.90 （ 95% CI 3.34 to 29.38）. ④In the Zhiling group serum cholesterol （P 〈0.01 ） , serum triglyceride （P 〈0.01 ） and LPO（P 〉0. 01 ） decreased after treatment. There was an increase in the level of high density lipoprotein （HDL） and superoxide dismutase （SOD） in red blood cells compared with baseline for Zhiling groups （P 〈0.01 ）. ⑤ The cerebral blood flow decreased in both groups after treatment, and there was a significant treatment effect in favour of Zhiling （treatment effect t = -1.03, 95% CI -1.26 to -0.80, P 〈0. 00001 ）.⑥ No side effects on heart, liver or renal function were reported in Zhiling decoction group. Conclusions The currendy available evidence is insufficient to assess the potential efficacy for Zhiling decoction in the treatment of vascular dementia. Just one RCT concerning the management of Zhifing decoction versus Naofukang suggests that Zhiling decoction may be effective in treating vascular dementia. Further randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials are urgendy needed .
ObjectiveTo systematically review the efficacy and safety of non-pharmacological interventions for sleep disturbance in dementia, and to provide evidence for clinical practice.MethodsDatabases including CNKI, WanFang Data, VIP, PubMed, EMbase and The Cochrane Library were searched to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on non-pharmacological interventions for sleep disturbance in dementia from inception to May 2020. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias of included studies. Meta-analysis was then performed using RevMan 5.3 software.ResultsA total of 9 RCTs were included, involving 720 patients. Light therapy was the most commonly used treatment, followed by special activity and sleep education program. The results of meta-analysis showed that compared with the control intervention, light therapy could improve sleep efficiency (MD=2.21, 95%CI 1.09 to 3.33, P=0.0001) and the night-time sleep (MD=14.27, 95%CI 5.01 to 23.53, P=0.003) of patients with dementia in the community and nursing institutions, special activity could increase the night-time sleep (MD=29.74, 95%CI 20.44 to 39.04, P<0.00001), and sleep education program could also improve sleep efficiency (MD=6.19, 95%CI 5.22 to 7.16, P<0.00001) and night-time sleep (MD=33.95, 95%CI 25.40 to 42.50, P<0.00001). In addition, it was superior to obtain 120 or 60 minutes of light exposure than 30 minutes to improve the quality of sleep (RR=−2.62, 95%CI −3.56 to −1.68, P<0.001) and reduce daytime sleep (RR=−4.75, 95%CI −5.71 to −3.42, P<0.001). However, there was significant difference in incidence of adverse reactions between groups of 120 minutes and 30 minutes of light exposure (RR=2.57, 95%CI 1.44 to 4.58, P=0.001).ConclusionsThe current evidence shows that non-pharmacological intervention can improve sleep efficiency and night-time sleep in patients with dementia. Due to limited quantity and quality of the included studies, more high quality studies are required to verify above conclusions.