Objective To summarize the research progression of video-assisted anal fistula treatment (VAAFT). Methods The related literatures in recent years were reviewed, and then the operation principle, operation process, advantages and disadvantages, matters needing attention, and clinical application of VAAFT were summarized. Results VAAFT is the treatment of fistulas by endoscopy. It don’t require the incision or resection of the fistula. It has the advantages of less surgical trauma, faster postoperative recovery, and less impact on the anal sphincter. The disadvantage of this method is relatively strict indications, fistula bending or horseshoe fistula is not suitable for this method. In addition, the endoscope using during the operation is a rigid mirror tube, and the operation is not convenient enough, so technical improvement is needed in the future. We should pay attention to distinguish true fistula and false fistula in clinical practice; the wall of the fistula should be adequately burned and the necrotic tissue should be cleaned; the treatment of the internal opening of anal fistula must be exact; the time of the first defecation should be appropriately delayed, and the incidence of infection should be reduced after operation. At present, the clinical reports of VAAFT are increasing gradually in foreign countries, and these reports have achieved good therapeutic effect. It is considered that this method maybe a safe and effective minimally invasive surgical treatment for anal fistula. However, there is few clinical reports on VAAFT in China, and it is still in the preliminary stage of exploration. Conclusion VAAFT is a new technology in the treatment of anal fistula, and it has advantages of minimally invasive, sphincter preservation, and so on, which is worthy of clinical application.
ObjectiveTo explore the superiority of pleural tenting in Ivor-Lewis esophagogastrectomy. MethodsWe prospectively included 200 esophagus cancer patients with Ivor-Lewis esophagogastrectomy in our hospital between 2013 and 2015 year. The patients were allocated into two groups including a trial group and a control group with 100 patients in each group. There were 72 males and 28 females at an average age of 54.76±6.62 years in the trial group and 66 males and 34 females at an average age of 55.72±6.38 years in the control group. In the trial group pleural tenting was used to cover the anastomotic stoma and gastric tube, while in the control group pleural tenting was not used. Postoperative complications after one year, pressure on the level of the anastomotic stoma, and the grade of quality of life were compared between the two groups. ResultNo statistically significant differences were found in preoperative epidemiological and postoperative pathological characteristics, as well as the postoperative complications and the one-year survival rate (P > 0.05). Quality of life was better in the trial group than that of the control group. ConclusionPleural tenting is a simple, safe, and effective technique for improving quality of life of the patients.
目的探讨如何降低胰十二指肠切除术后胰空肠吻合口漏的发生。方法采用胰管空肠吻合胰腺残端套入法行胰肠吻合，按胰、胆、胃顺序与空肠重建消化道。结果27例胰十二指肠切除术中，手术并发症7例（25.93%），其中应激性溃疡出血3例，胃排空延迟2例，腹腔及腹壁创口感染各1例，均经非手术治愈。全组无围手术期死亡，亦无一例发生胰瘘。结论胰瘘的发生同术式和操作技术密切相关，亦与吻合口部位血供和张力以及吻合口远端通畅与否有关。本术式增加了胰空肠吻合的严密性，对预防胰瘘的发生起到了积极的效果，且操作简便，易于掌握，效果可靠。
目的总结腔内封堵技术治疗食管癌术后吻合口瘘的应用经验。 方法回顾性分析2006年8月至2011年12月上海中医药大学附属曙光医院应用腔内封堵技术治疗食管癌术后吻合口瘘15例患者的临床资料，其中男12例、女3例，年龄47～73岁。分析其临床效果。 结果窦道造影证实于瘘口附近有窦道形成者，瘘口直径＜0.5 cm者10例一次堵漏成功；瘘口直径大于0.5 cm者1例，堵漏二次后成功。瘘口附近窦道形成不明显者4例，堵漏均失败。 结论腔内封堵技术治疗食管癌术后吻合口瘘有相当的临床效果。瘘口附近有窦道形成是堵瘘成功的关键。