目的:比较两种胸腔积液引流方法的效果。方法:统计210例(A组)使用中心静脉导管引流胸腔积液患者的引流胸水量、胸水消失天数、胸水完全吸收率,并与182例(B组)使用传统抽液引流胸腔积液患者进行对比研究。结果:平均胸水量A组(4682±1235)mL,B组(2470±1040)mL;胸水消失天数:A组(6.5±2.6)d,B组(23.6±9.3)d;胸水完全吸收率:A组73.8%,B组25.8%,两组各指标均具有显著性差异(Plt;0.01)。结论:中心静脉导管引流胸腔积液较传统穿刺方法安全有效。
ObjectiveTo evaluate the diagnostic value of BRAFV600E mutation test in high-risk thyroid nodules with easily underdiagnosed fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) results.MethodsRetrospectively collected 122 cases of thyroid nodule who treated in the Hebei Petrochina Central Hospital between January 2017 and December 2018, all the cases admitted preoperative ultrasound and FNAB detection. All of the patients had the non-positive cytological results of FNAB and the high-risk features of ultrasound. Contrasted the postoperative pathological coincidence rate of combination of FNAB and BRAFV600E test with FNAB alone.ResultsThe BRAFV600E mutation rate was 27.0% (33/122). The positive rate of BRAFV600E mutation increased with the increase of ultrasound thyroid imaging reporting and data system(TI-RADS) grade (P<0.05), which was independent of patients’ age, gender, number of nodules, diameter of nodules, and FNAB results (P>0.05). The coincidence rate of FNAB combined with BRAFV600E mutation detection was higher than that of FNAB alone ［86.9% (106/122) vs. 69.7% (85/122), P<0.05).ConclusionsThe BRAFV600E mutation test can detect papillary thyroid carcinoma that might be missed by FNAB. We recommend that FNAB should be routinely accompanied by the BRAFV600E mutation test in the high-risk thyroid nodules.
Objective To systematically evaluate the influence of PICC (peripherally inserted central catheter) ultrasound guidance on success rates and incidences of complications of elbow catheterization. Methods The Cochrane Library (Issue 3, 2012), Library of JBI evidence-based nursing center, MEDLINE, EMbase, CBM, VIP, CNKI and WanFang Data were searched for relevant studies to influence on success rates of puncture and catheterization and complications from upper arm placement of PICC ultrasound guidance as well as conventional PICC placement from inception to March, 2012. The data were extracted according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria by two reviewers, the quality of included studies was also evaluated. Meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.1, or only descriptive analysis was conducted instead. Results Eleven randomized controlled trials, five clinical controlled trials and four cohort studies were included, involving 4 052 patients. The results of meta-analysis showed that, upper arm placement of PICC ultrasound guidance combined with modified Seldinger technique was associated with significantly higher one-time success rates of puncture and catheterization than conventional PICC placement below the elbow, with significant differences (OR=4.71, 95%CI 1.97 to 11.28, P=0.000 5; OR=8.63, 95%CI 1.92 to 38.82, P=0.005). Conventional elbow catheterization had a significantly higher incidence of phlebitis than catheterization on the elbow that under the guidance of PICC ultrasound and modified Seldinger technique (OR=0.13, 95%CI 0.08 to 0.21, Plt;0.000 01). Conclusion Elbow catheterization under the guidance of PICC ultrasound combined with modified Seldinger technique has an obvious advantage in improving the success rates of puncture and catheterization and reducing the incidence of complications, compared with conventional elbow catheterization.
目的：探讨微创经皮肾穿刺取石术(MPCNL)治疗肾结石的疗效。方法：采用MPCNL治疗41例肾结石患者，其中肾石30例(结石直径gt;2.0 cm)，输尿管上段结石11例(结石直径1.0～2.0 cm)；单侧结石37例，双侧结石4例。结果：41例手术均获成功。手术时间45～120 min，平均52.7 min，无一例改开放手术。本组肾结石病例单次结石清除26例(86.7%)，4例残余结石行二期手术取净；输尿管上段单次结石清除率100%。结论：MPCNL 是一种有效的治疗肾结石的方法，并具有创伤小、取石率高、恢复快等优点。
目的 总结腹部闭合性损伤的诊治体会。方法 回顾性分析我院78例腹部闭合性损伤患者的临床资料。结果 78例中67例手术治疗，4例行肾动脉栓塞术，7例保守治疗； 除1例死亡外，余均治愈。结论 及时诊断和治疗是救治腹部闭合性损伤患者的关键，腹腔穿刺、B超、CT及X线检查的合理应用对诊断有重要价值。
ObjectiveTo summarize the various treatment methods for reducing jaundice in the elderly patients with malignant obstructive jaundice (MOJ), and provide reference for the treatment of elderly MOJ.MethodUsing “malignant obstructive jaundice” as the Chinese keyword and the English keyword, a computer search of the literatures on the treatment of elderly MOJ patients was conducted and reviewed.ResultsThe treatment methods of reducing jaundice in elderly MOJ included radical surgery, cholangiojejunostomy, endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage, endoscopic biliary stent implantation, percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage and stent implantation. Radical surgery was the most effective, but it was traumatic and had many complications for elderly patients. Cholangiojejunostomy was effective and suitable for elderly patients who cannot tolerate major surgery. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage was less traumatic to elderly patients, but technical difficulty. Endoscopic biliary stent implantation was currently the first-line choice for the treatment of elderly patients with advanced MOJ. Percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage and stent implantation were suitable for elderly and frail patients with high obstruction.ConclusionThe treatment of elderly MOJ needs to be individualized and regionalized, and appropriate treatment methods should be selected according to the patient’s condition and the medical level of the medical center.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the effectiveness and safety of anatomic landmarks positioning method (ALM) and real-time two-dimensional ultrasound (RTUS) guidance in the internal jugular vein cannulation. MethodsWe searched PubMed, EMbase, Web of Knowledge, CBM, WanFang Data and CNKI for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) concerning the effectiveness and safety of ALM and RTUS in the internal jugular vein catheterization up to May 1st, 2014. According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data, and assess methodological quality of included studies. Then meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 software. ResultsA total of 10 RCTs involving 1 973 cases were included in the metaanalysis. The results of meta-analysis showed that, compared with the ALM method, the RTUS method reduced puncture failure rate (OR=0.08, 95%CI 0.05 to 0.15, P<0.000 01). For safety, compared with the ALM method, the RTUS method was significantly lower in arterial injury rate (peto-OR=0.22, 95%CI 0.14 to 0.37, P<0.000 01), and the incidence of pneumothorax (peto-OR=0.13, 95%CI 0.04 to 0.40, P=0.000 3). ConclusionCompared to the ALM method, the RTUS method has characteristics such as causing fewer traumas, and having higher success rate and fewer complications. Due to limited quantity and quality of the included studies, the above conclusion still needs to be verified by conducting more studies.