Objective To systematically review the efficacy of low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) compared with sham therapy for the treatment of major depressive disorder. Methods The Cochrane Library, Medline, EMbase, CBMdisk, CNKI and VIP were searched through computer from 1985 to 2011. The review included RCTs comparing the treatment efficacy of low-frequency rTMS located on right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) with sham stimulation in the patients suffering major depressive disorder. The quality of the included RCTs was strictly evaluated and the data were extracted by two reviewers independently. The extracted data were analyzed by RevMan 4.2. Results Among seven double-blinded RCTs involving 234 patients included, 1 was A level in quality, 5 were B level, and 1 was C level according to the outcomes of quality evaluation. The results of Meta-analysis indicated that low frequency rTMS was superior to sham stimulation in remission rates after two weeks’ treatment (RR=3.11, 95%CI 1.56 to 6.19). Additionally, low frequency rTMS was lower than the sham stimulation in the scores of HDRS and MADRS (WMD= –6.41, 95%CI –9.32 to –3.50, and WMD= –5.27, 95%CI –9.08 to –1.46, respectively). But no significant difference in response rates between the low prequency rTMS group and the sham group was found (RR=1.72, 95%CI 0.74 to 4.01). There were no severe and intolerable side effects reported in these seven studies. Conclusion The low frequency rTMS as a non-invasive and safe technique may appear to be effective for the treatment of major depressive disorder according to the positive results but the conclusion is not definite because of negative results. This review suggests that parameters could be sited as frequency: 1 Hz, intensity: 90%-110% motor threshold (MT), location: right DLPFC and duration: 2 weeks. Nevertheless, further multicenter and high quality studies are needed before it is used as a first-line treatment for major depressive disorder.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the efficacy of different stimulation modalities of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) combined with SSRI in improving depressed mood after stroke using network meta-analysis. MethodsThe PubMed, EMbase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CNKI, VIP, CBM and WanFang Data databases were electronically searched to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) related to the objectives from inception to October 1, 2022. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of the included studies. Network meta-analysis was then performed by using R 4.2.1software. ResultsA total of 25 RCTs involving 2 152 patients were included. Four types of rTMS stimulation combined with SSRIs were included: high-frequency stimulation of the left dorsolateral prefrontal (l-DLPFC), low-frequency stimulation of l-DLPFC, low-frequency stimulation of the right dorsolateral prefrontal (r-DLPFC), and low-frequency stimulation of the bilateral DLPFC. The results of the network meta-analysis showed that the effect of combining four stimulation methods with SSRI in treating depression was better than that of SSRI alone (P<0.05). Probability sorting results showed that low-frequency stimulated bilateral DLPFC (88.9%) > low-frequency stimulated l-DLPFC (63.1%) > high-frequency stimulation l-DLPFC (57.1%) > low-frequency stimulation r-DLPFC (40.4%). There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of adverse reactions between the four stimulation methods combined with SSRI and the use of SSRI alone (P>0.05). Conclusion rTMS combined with SSRIs is better than SSRIs alone in improving depressed mood after stroke. Low-frequency rTMS stimulation of bilateral DLPFC may be the best. Meanwhile, the safety of different stimulation methods is good.
Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), a widely used neuroregulatory technique, has been proven to be effective in treating neurological and psychiatric disorders. The therapeutic effect is closely related to the intracranial electric field caused by TMS, thus accurate measurement of the intracranial electric field generated by TMS is of great significance. However, direct intracranial measurement in human brain faces various technical, safety, ethical and other limitations. Therefore, we have constructed a brain phantom that can simulate the electrical conductivity and anatomical structure of the real brain, in order to replace the clinical trial to achieve intracranial electric field measurement. We selected and prepared suitable conductive materials based on the electrical conductivity of various layers of the real brain tissue, and performed image segmentation, three-dimensional reconstruction and three-dimensional printing processes on each layer of tissue based on magnetic resonance images. The production of each layer of tissue in the brain phantom was completed, and each layer of tissue was combined to form a complete brain phantom. The induced electric field generated by the TMS coil applied to the brain phantom was measured to further verify the conductivity of the brain phantom. Our study provides an effective experimental tool for studying the distribution of intracranial electric fields caused by TMS.
In transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), the conductivity of brain tissue is obtained by using diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) data processing. However, the specific impact of different processing methods on the induced electric field in the tissue has not been thoroughly studied. In this paper, we first used magnetic resonance image (MRI) data to create a three-dimensional head model, and then estimated the conductivity of gray matter (GM) and white matter (WM) using four conductivity models, namely scalar (SC), direct mapping (DM), volume normalization (VN) and average conductivity (MC), respectively. Isotropic empirical conductivity values were used for the conductivity of other tissues such as the scalp, skull, and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), and then the TMS simulations were performed when the coil was parallel and perpendicular to the gyrus of the target. When the coil was perpendicular to the gyrus where the target was located, it was easy to get the maximum electric field in the head model. The maximum electric field in the DM model was 45.66% higher than that in the SC model. The results showed that the conductivity component along the electric field direction of which conductivity model was smaller in TMS, the induced electric field in the corresponding domain corresponding to the conductivity model was larger. This study has guiding significance for TMS precise stimulation.
In order to explore effective ways to reduce non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) among female adolescents, a total of 45 female adolescent patients with NSSI in West China Hospital of Sichuan University and Guizhou Second Provincial People's Hospital from June 2021 to June 2024 were selected randomly that divided into groups A, B and C, with 15 cases in each group. Group A was treated with repeated transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and bipolar depression triple therapy, and group B was treated with bipolar depression triple therapy to compare the effectiveness and safety. Group C received bipolar depression triple therapy combined with sham stimulation which only produced stimulating sounds but no stimulating magnetic field as a control in the study. After treatment, the Hamilton Anxiety Score (HAMA), Hamilton Depression Score (HAMD) and Nurses’ Global Assessment of Suicide Risk (NGASR) in group A were significantly lower than those in group B and C (P < 0.01). rTMS combined with bipolar depression triple therapy has a definite effect on reducing NSSI in female adolescents, which can reduce the incidence rate of short-term NSSI behavior in patients.
Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for treating dysfunction in patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD). Methods We searched the Cochrane Library (Issue 1, 2010), MEDLINE, EMbase, CBMdisc, and CNKI from the date of the database establishment to April 2010. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of rTMS for patients with PD were collected. The quality of the included RCTs was critically appraised and data were extracted by two reviewers independently. Meta-analyses were conducted for the eligible RCTs. Results Eight RCTs were included. The pooled results of the first 2 RCTs showed that, there was no significant difference compared with control group about treating PD patients with clinical motor dysfunction by high-frequency rTMS 10 days later (WMD= –4.75, 95%CI –13.73 to 4.23). The pooled analysis of another 3 studies showed that, no significant difference were found about improving symptoms with treatment of low-frequency rTMS for 1 month compared with control group (WDM= –8.51, 95%CI –18.48 to 1.46). The pooled analysis of last 3 studies showed that, patient with treatment of low-frequency rTMS for 3 months, had been significantly improved in clinical symptoms such as neurological, behavior and emotional state, clinical motor function, and activities of daily living (WDM= –5.79, 95%CI –8.44 to –1.13). The frontal or motor cortex rTMS manifested as low frequency (≤1Hz), high intensity (≥90% RMT), multi-frequency (≥3 times) and long time (≥3 months) had a positive effect on the clinical symptoms of patients with PD and also had a long-term effect. Conclusions rTMS can improve clinical symptoms and dysfunction of the patients with PD.
ObjectivesTo systematically review the efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on rehabilitation of unilateral neglect in stroke patients.MethodsPubMed, The Cochrane Library, PEDro, EMbase, CNKI, WanFang Data and VIP databases were searched online for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of rTMS on rehabilitation of unilateral neglect in stroke patients from inception to March 2017. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the quality of included studies. Meta-analysis was then performed by using RevMan 5.3 software.ResultsA total of 12 RCTs involving 303 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that: the stimulate group was superior to the control group in line bisection test (MD=–5.54, 95%CI –6.79 to –4.29, P<0.000 01), line cancellation test (MD=–3.75, 95%CI –4.60 to –2.90,P<0.000 1) and star cancellation test (MD=–22.94, 95%CI –26.52 to –19.35,P<0.000 01). However, there was no significant difference in the score of the modified Barthel index between two groups (MD=3.91, 95%CI–9.52 to 17.34,P=0.57).ConclusionsrTMS appears to improve the symptoms of unilateral neglect in stroke patients. Due to limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high quality studies are needed to verify above conclusions.
Objective To observe the clinical effect of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) combined with balloon dilatation and routine swallowing training on dysphagia caused by cricopharyngeal dysfunction (CPD) after stroke. Methods Patients with dysphagia after stroke who were hospitalized at Hubei Provincial Hospital of Integrated Chinese and Western Medicine between January 2022 and February 2023 were selected. The patients were divided into the trial group and the control group by random number table method. The control group received balloon dilatation and routine swallowing training, and the trial group received rTMS based on the treatment plan of the control group. All patients were treated for 3 weeks. The videofluoroscopic swallowing study (VFSS), Penetration Aspiration Scale (PAS), and Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS) were used at pre-therapy and 3 weeks after treatment to assess the improvement of swallowing function. Results A total of 49 patients were included, including 25 in the trial group and 24 in the control group. There was no statistically significant difference in age, gender, course of disease, stroke type, and swallowing function before treatment between the two groups of patients (P>0.05). After 3 weeks of treatment, the VFSS dysphagia scores (Z=−4.465, −4.327, P<0.001) of the trial group and the control group were higher than those before treatment, and the trial group was better than that in the control group (t=2.099, P=0.041). The PAS scores (Z=−4.179, −3.729, P<0.001) and FOIS scores (Z=−4.476, −4.419, P<0.001) of the trial and control groups were improved after treatment, and the improvement of the PAS score (t=−2.088, P=0.042) and FOIS score (Z=−2.134, P=0.033) in the trial group were more significant (P<0.05). No serious adverse reactions were observed in patients during the study process. Conclusion The rTMS combined with balloon dilatation and routine swallowing training can significantly improve the swallowing function of patients with dysphagia caused by CPD after stroke, and further improve its clinical efficacy, worthy of clinical application.