ObjectiveTo summarize the research progress and clinical efficacy of hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy in the treatment of colorectal cancer liver metastasis.MethodThe literatures of hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy for colorectal cancer liver metastasis were collected and reviewed.ResultsThe incidence of colorectal cancer liver metastasis was high, which affected the prognosis of patients. Surgical treatment was the preferred treatment for colorectal cancer liver metastasis. Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy could be used for preoperative neoadjuvant therapy and postoperative adjuvant therapy.ConclusionsHepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy is an effective local treatment for colorectal cancer liver metastasis and can be used as a supplement to surgical treatment. Compared with systemic chemotherapy, hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy combined with systemic chemotherapy can improve the overall survival and disease-free survival, reduce the risk of intrahepatic recurrence, and improve the prognosis of patients.
ObjectiveTo investigate the significance of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC value) for pretrea-tment prediction of short-term treatment effect in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who underwent transca-theter arterial chemoembolization (TACE). MethodsA total of twelve HCC patients with twenty-three HCC lesions who underwent TACE in our hospital from May. 2014 to May. 2015 were enrolled prospectively, to explore the difference between pre-and post-TACE in diameter of tumor, ADC value of HCC lesions, ADC value of liver parenchyma, and analyze the predictive significance of ADC value of HCC lesions for TACE in treatment of HCC. ResultsThere were no statistical difference between pre-and post-TACE in diameter of HCC lesions and ADC value of liver parenchyma (P=0.635, P=0.473), but the ADC value of HCC lesions was higher after TACE than pre-TACE (P=0.003). After TACE, the area of necrosis in HCC lesions was≥50% in 17 lesions (73.9%, good effect group), and <50% in 6 lesions (26.1%, poor effect group). Compared with poor effect group, ADC values of HCC lesions in good effect group were both higher before and after TACE (P<0.050). Area under ROC curve (AUC value) of ADC value in HCC lesions before TACE for predicting the effect of TACE was 0.690 (95% CI:0.510-0.879), with the sensitivity and specificity of 82.3% (95% CI:65.5%-93.2%) and 53.8% (95% CI:25.1%-80.8%) respectively, and the demarcation point for good effect and poor effect was 1.24×103 mm2/s. ConclusionThis preliminary study demonstrates that the ADC value of HCC lesions before TACE may be a useful indicator to predict early response of TACE in treatment of HCC.
Objective To systematically review the efficacy and safety of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) and sorafenib (SORF) separately or combined in the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). MethodsWe searched the PubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, CNKI, WanFang Data and VIP databases for studies on HAIC and SORA separately or in combination in the treatment of advanced HCC from inception to November 1, 2021. Two reviewers independently screened the literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of the included studies. Meta-analysis was then performed using RevMan 5.3 software. ResultsA total of 21 studies involving 2 501 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that the overall survival (OS) (HR=0.46, 95% CI 0.25 to 0.87, P=0.02), objective response rate (ORR) (OR=4.00, 95%CI 2.74 to 5.85, P<0.000 01) and disease control rate (DCR) (OR=2.20, 95%CI 1.30 to 3.75, P=0.004) were higher in the HAIC group than the SORF group, while the incidence of adverse reactions was not increased. However, HAIC combined with SORF showed no significant difference in OS, ORR, DCR or progression-free survival (PFS) compared with SORF alone. Moreover, combined treatment increased the adverse reactions of blood system. Conclusion The current study suggests that HAIC can improve OS, ORR and DCR in patients with advanced HCC; however, there is no additional benefit when combining SORF with HAIC. Due to the limited quantity and quality of the included studies, more high-quality studies are needed to verify the above conclusion.