Objective To study the influence factors of surgical site infection (SSI) after hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery. Methods Fifty patients suffered from SSI after hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery who treated in Feng,nan District Hospital of Tangshan City from April 2010 and April 2015 were retrospectively collected as observation group, and 102 patients who didn’t suffered from SSI after hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery at the same time period were retrospectively collected as control group. Then logistic regression was performed to explore the influence factors of SSI. Results Results of univariate analysis showed that, the ratios of patients older than 60 years, combined with cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases, had abdominal surgery history, had smoking history, suffered from the increased level of preoperative blood glucose , suffered from preoperative infection, operative time was longer than 180 minutes, American Societyof Anesthesiologists (ASA) score were 3-5, indwelled drainage tube, without dressing changes within 48 hours after surgery, and new injury severity score (NISS) were 2-3 were higher in observation group (P＜0.05). Results of logistic regression analysis showed that, patients had history of abdominal surgery (OR=1.92), without dressing changes within 48 hours after surgery (OR=2.07), and NISS were 2-3 (OR=2.27) had higher incidence of SSI (P＜0.05). Conclusion We should pay more attention on the patient with abdominal surgery history and with NISS of 2-3, and give dressing changes within 48 hours after surgery, to reduce the incidence of SSI.
Objective To summarize contents of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) and understand it’s status and prospect in application of patients with hepatolithiasis. Methods The descriptions of ERAS in recent years and applications in hepatolithiasis were reviewed. Results The ERAS programme mainly included the preoperative managements, such as the education, nutrition management, and gastrointestinal tract management; the intraoperative managements, such as the minimally invasive surgery, reasonable choice of anesthesia, infusion volume management, and maintenance of body temperature, analgesia, and preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting medication selection; the postoperative early feeding, early exercise, early extubation, multimodal analgesia, T tube management, reasonable discharge standard and follow-up management. Although the ERAS was rarely reported in patients with hepatolithiasis, it had some advantages of promoting recovery and improving patient satisfaction, and it was still effective and safe. Conclusions Application of ERAS concept in patients with hepatolithiasis has achieved precision management and individualized treatment during perioperative period. It could achieve a good short-term therapeutic effect and optimize medical management model. However, there are still some problems at the present stage in implementation and promotion of patients with hepatolithiasis, such as lacks of criteria and specifications, evidence-based medicine. It is needed to further strengthen communication and collaboration among multiple disciplinary teams so as to further improve ERAS programme and popularize it.
In 1983-1994,748 cases hepatocholelithiasis had been treated in our department, in which 372 patients underwent hepatectomy and 43 patients underwent hepatectomy of the quadrate lobe. Hepatectomy of the quadrate lobe has been performed to treat all kinds of hepatocholelithiasis, it is easy to expose 1 or 2 degree branch of biliary tree, incise the hepatobiliary stricture and perform hepatocholangiojejunostomy in the hepatic hilum.
ObjectiveTo preliminarily explore application and effectiveness of stimulation learning based on a live demonstration system in hepatobiliary surgical training, using laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) as an example. MethodsFrom March 2023 to February 2024, 60 surgical residents undergoing a 4-month standardized residency training at the Liver Transplant Center of West China Hospital, Sichuan University, were randomly assigned into an observation group (n=30) and a control group (n=30) using a random number table. The observation group received stimulation learning based on the live demonstration system, while the control group received traditional teaching methods. At the end of the training, both groups underwent an operative assessment on LC and completed a resident satisfaction questionnaire. Operative assessment used critical view of safety (CVS) scoring to evaluate surgical safety. Resident satisfaction was assessed using a self-designed questionnaire covering five domains: stimulating the learning atmosphere, increasing learning engagement, improving surgical proficiency, enhancing the understanding of surgical complications, and recognition of the teaching model. The final results were categorized as positive or negative evaluations. ResultsThe observation group had significantly higher CVS score than the control group (4.2±1.3 vs. 2.8±1.7, t=3.57, P=0.001). All 60 questionnaires were collected, and the observation group reported significantly higher positive evaluations in improving surgical proficiency, enhancing the understanding of surgical complications, and recognition of the teaching model compared to the control group (P<0.05). There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups regarding positive evaluations for stimulating the learning atmosphere and increasing learning engagement (P>0.05). ConclusionThe results of this study suggest that the stimulation learning model based on a live demonstration system demonstrates good effectiveness in hepatobiliary surgical training and can improve the quality of surgical teaching during standardized residency training for surgical residents.
A acute partial obstructive hepatocholangitis model by selective ligation and injection of E coli into left hepatic bile duct was successfully founded in rat. Using parameters including mortality, mitochondrial glutamic oxalacetic transaminase and ornithine carbamoytransferase activity, pathological observation and blood culture of bacteria, we evaluated the model. The authors emphasize that this models is superior to the wole-bile-duct-challenged cholangitis model, which is characterized by liver injury.
Objective To evaluate the clinical value of ureteroscope in cholelithiasis treated by laparoscopic surgery. Methods The clinical data of 36 patients admitted because of hepatolithus with ureteroscope combination in laparoscopic surgery from February 2007 to September 2009 in Guidong People’s Hospital of Guangxi were analyzed retrospectively. Results In 33 cases, stones were removed once by ureteroscope in laparoscopic surgery with residual stones (in 3 cases residual stone were removed secondarily through T tube) and the other 3 cases were transferred to laparotomy forcedly due to bleeding of biliary duct and vessels of porta hepatis and tearing of bile duct. During operation, blood loss was 30-280 (94.51±54.70) ml; operation time was 110-260 (147.22±48.45) min; recovery time of bowel movement was 1-3 (2.03±0.76) d; postoperative hospitalization time was 6-13 (7.12±1.65) d (some discharged with T tube); the time of patients of T tubes pulled out was 28-45 (38.92±6.52) d. Bile leakage happened in 1 case and infection of biliary tract in 1 case, no complications such as biliary stricture or bile duct bleeding were found after operation. Conclusions Treatment of intrahepatic bile duct or a single extra-hepatic sand-like stones with ureteroscopy usage in laparoscopic surgery is feasible and less invasive. It is a minimally invasive treatment for intra- or extra-hepatic stones due to rapidly postoperative rehabilitation.
【Abstract】ObjectiveTo evaluate the advances in minimally invasive surgery treatment for hepatolithiasis. MethodsLiteratures about the advances in minimally invasive surgery treatment for hepatolithiasis were collected and reviewed. ResultsHepatectomy and bile duct exploration using laparoscopy can get better effect. Fibrocholedochoscopy play an important role in the course of operation and after operation for hepatolithiasis. ConclusionThe individualization treatment program should be used for hepatolithiasis. Association application of multipathway minimally invasive operation, such as laparoscopy, fibrocholedochoscopy and so on, can increase the cure rate of hepatolithiasis.
Hepatolithiasis is a common and frequently-occurring disease in China. Its condition is complex and variable, making diagnosis and treatment challenging. To standardize the diagnosis and treatment of hepatolithiasis, experts in hepatobiliary surgery from Hunan Province jointly discussed, drafted, and published the “Comprehensive Diagnosis and Treatment Expert Consensus on Hepatolithiasis in Hunan (2024 Edition)”, providing a more solid basis and more comprehensive guidance for the standardized diagnosis and treatment of hepatolithiasis. To help hepatobiliary surgeons better understand and apply this consensus, we provide a detailed interpretation of its key points and innovations.
ObjectiveTo investigate the feasibility and safety of percutaneous transhepatic choledochoscopic lithotripsy (PTCSL) in the treatment of recurrent type Ⅱa hepatolithiasis.MethodsAll of 293 patients with recurrent type Ⅱa hepatolithiasis admitted to the Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University from December 2010 to December 2017 were collected retrospectively, 82 of whom were treated with the PTCSL (PTCSL group), 211 of whom were treated with traditional open surgery (open group). The patients were matched according to the ratio of 1∶1 by using the method of propensity score matching, then the patients were compared after matching.ResultsA total of 59 pairs were successfully matched, that was, there were 59 patients in the PTCSL group and open group, respectively. Compared with the open group, the PTCSL group had the similar conditions such as the gender, age, preoperative Child-Pugh classification, and times of previous biliary operations, etc. (P>0.050). There was no perioperative death in both groups. There were no significant differences between the two groups in the success rate, operation time, times of operations, time of T tube removal after operation, stone residual rate, and stone recurrence rate (P>0.050). Although the hospital costs of the PTCSL group was higher than that of the open group (P<0.050), the PTCSL group had various advantages, such as less intraoperative bleeding, smaller incisional scar, shorter hospital stay and postoperative ventilation time, and lower rate of total postoperative complications (P<0.050).ConclusionsAfter learning curve, PTCSL has many advantages over traditional open surgery in treatment of recurrent type Ⅱa hepatolithiasis. PTCSL is a minimally invasive surgery, which is safe and effective.