Objective To evaluate the primary cl inical effect of proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNAR) in treating femoral intertrochanteric fractures, to summarize operation skills and to analyze correlated curative effective influentialfactors. Methods From July 2006 to May 2007, 19 cases of intertrochanteric fractures (including 8 males, 11 females, aged45-87 years old) were treated with closed reduction and PFNAR fixation. Fractures were caused by fall ing. The locations were left sides in 10 cases and right sides in 9 cases. According to AO classification, there were 14 cases of type A2 and 5 cases of type A3. Operative time, volume of blood loss and weight bear time were analyzed, the condition of fracture union was observed and the hip function was evaluated using Harris criterion after 9 months of follow-up. Results Operative time ranged 23-78 minutes with an average time of 47 minutes, the volume of blood loss ranged 50-120 mL with an average volume of 85 mL, getting-outof- bed time ranged 2-14 days with an average time of 7.4 days; the weight bearing time ranged 10-14 weeks with an average time of 12.4 weeks. No intra-operative femoral fractures and no regional or deep infection occurred during hospital ization period. Seventeen cases were followed up from 3 months to 12 months with an average time of 9.4 months, and achieved bone heal ing within 15-18 weeks with an average time of 16.5 weeks. No compl ications such as delay heal ing, coxa vara or coxa valga, cut-out and screw extraction occurred. Fifteen cases were followed up over 9 months; according to the Harris criterion for evaluation, the results were excellent in 13 cases, good in 1 case and fair in 1 case, the excellent and good rate was 93.3%. Conclusion PFNAR has the advantages of micro invasion, easy-to-perform, less blood loss, less bone loss and stable fixation in treatment of unstable comminuted intertrochanteric fracture, especially in old patients with osteoporosis.
:目的:探讨DHS+骨水泥治疗老年股骨粗隆间骨折的疗效。方法:回顾分析2001年1月～2006年4月48例70岁以上老年股骨粗隆间骨折病例的临床资料,对其骨折类型、骨质疏松程度、合并症及临床疗效进行分析。结果:本组术后32例获得1～4年随访,无螺钉松动、髋内翻、感染或骨折延期愈合,髋关节功能评价优良率93％。结论:DHS+骨水泥治疗老年股骨粗隆间骨折具有手术时间短、创伤小、内固定牢靠、符合生物力学分配、能早期得到功能锻炼、减少术后并发症等优点;适合各种类型老年股骨粗隆间骨折的治疗。
Objective To investigate the treatment method of senile patients with femoral intertrochanteric fractures and its cl inical outcomes. Methods From January 2005 to December 2007, 192 senile patients with femoral intertrochanteric fractures were treated, including 85 males and 107 females aged 65-92 years old (average 75 years old). The injury was causedby fall on walking in 106 cases, fall when riding a bicycle in 55 cases, and traffic accidents in 31 cases. According to Evans classification, there were 12 cases of type I A, 43 cases of type I B, 29 cases of type II, 24 cases of type III A, 23 cases of type III B, 26 cases of type IV, and 35 cases of type V. One hundred and fifty patients were associated with cardio-cerebrovascular diseases, 120 patients were compl icated with chronicle hypertension, 90 cases were associated with bronchitis, and 75 cases were compl icated with diabetes. The time from injury to hospital admission was 1 hour to 14 days. Among those patients, 108 were treated with conservative treatment, 68 received dynamic hip screw (DHS) fixation, and 16 underwent proximal femoral Gamma nail fixation. Results All the patients were followed up for 12-36 months (average 18 months). The fracture all reached bone union without occurrence of nonunion and delayed union. Patients could take care of themselves, and there were no occurrences of serious pains and dysfunctions. The therapeutic effect was satisfactory. The conservative treatment group: the average hospital stay length was 48 days; the average bone heal ing time was 14 weeks; 23 cases had different degrees of coxa adducta; Harris score system was adopted to evaluate hip joint function, 45 cases were graded as excellent, 31 as good, 10 as fair, and 22 as poor, and the excellent and good rate was 70.4%. DHS internal fixation group: the average operation time was 60 minutes; the average bleeding volume during operation was 200 mL, the average hospital stay length was 24 days; the average bone heal ing time after operation was 12 weeks; Harris score system was adopted to evaluate the injured hip joint function, 38 cases were graded as excellent, 21 as good, 8 as fair, and 1 as poor, and the excellent and good rate was 86.8%. Gamma nailfixation group: the average operation time was 70 minutes; the average bleeding volume during operation was 200 mL, the average hospital stay length was 14 days; the average bone heal ing time after operation was 12 weeks; Harris score system was adopted to evaluate the injured hip joint function, 11 cases were graded as excellent, 4 as good, 1 as fair, and the excellent and good rate was 93.8%. Conclusion For geriatric femoral intertrochanteric fractures, operative treatment should be performed, the preoperative preparation should be sufficient, and individual-oriented treatment method should be selected on the basis of physical conditions of patients and the types of fractures.
Agedness; Intertrochanteric fracture; Replacement of artificial femoral head
ObjectiveTo summarize the evolving concept in treatment of intertrochanteric fractures and the development of internal fixation devices. MethodsRelated literature concerning the implant devices to treat intertrochanteric fractures was reviewed and analyzed in terms of the biomechanical characteristics, clinical application, and complications. ResultsThe treatment of intertrochanteric fractures has undergone an evolving concept from conservative treatment to surgical treatment. Surgery strategies include extramedullary fixation and intramedullary fixation. Intramedullary fixation has gradually become the main treatment of intertrochanteric fractures due to its minimally invasive and biomechanical advantages. However, the current intramedullary fixation system still can not reconstruct the medial cortical support of the proximal femur, which leads to some failures in the treatment of unstable fractures. ConclusionThe development of internal fixation of intertrochanteric fractures is based on the deep understanding and biomechanical theory of intertrochanteric fractures in clinical practice. In the future, the updated design of internal fixation devices will depend on the treatment principle of reconstruction of medial support and secondary stabilization of intertrochanteric fractures, and finally the purpose of improving success rate and reducing postoperative complications of intertrochanteric fracture will achieved.
Objective To compare the effectiveness of the proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) and dynamic hip screw (DHS) in the treatment of elderly patients with intertrochanteric fractures. Methods Between May 2007 and May 2010, 63 elderly patients with intertrochanteric fractures were treated, and fractures were fixed with PFNA in 31 patients (PFNA group) and with DHS in 32 patients (DHS group). There was no significant difference in gender, age, injury cause, disease duration, and fracture type between 2 groups (P gt; 0.05). Results All incisions healed by first intention. The incision length, operation time, and blood loss in PFNA group were significantly less than those in DHS group (P lt; 0.05). The averagefollow-up time was 13.6 months in PFNA group and was 13.8 months in DHS group. The fracture heal ing time was (11.80 ± 1.32) weeks in PFNA group and was (12.21 ± 1.26) weeks in DHS group, showing no significant difference (t=1.23, P=0.29). The complication rate was 0 in PFNA group and was 12.5% (4/32) in DHS group, showing no significant difference (P=0.06). After 1 year, Harris hip score of PFNA group (86.55 ± 10.32) was higher than that of DHS group (80.36 ±11.18) (t=2.28, P=0.03). Conclusion There are two surgical methods to treat intertrochanteric fractures in the elderly patient: PFNA and DHS, and each has advantages; for unstable intertrochanteric fractures, PFNA treatment is the first choice.
目的 回顾分析不同内固定方式对老年股骨粗隆间骨折的临床疗效。 方法 1999年3月－2009年5月采用内固定手术治疗121例股骨粗隆间骨折患者，根据内固定方式不同分为4组：动力髋螺钉（DHS；A组43例）、经皮加压钢板（PCCP；B组19例）、股骨近端髓内钉（PFN；C组27例）、Gamma钉（D组32例）。4组患者年龄、骨折类型（Tronzo-Evans分型）等一般资料比较差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05），具有可比性。记录手术时间、术中出血量及术后引流量、术中术后并发症、骨折临床愈合时间、术后髋关节功能恢复程度，比较评价各组临床疗效。 结果 术后各组患者切口均Ⅰ期愈合，无伤口感染等早期并发症发生。患者均获随访，随访时间18～108个月，平均56.4个月。与A组比较，B、C、D组手术时间明显缩短，术中出血量及术后引流量减少，骨折愈合时间缩短，差异均有统计学意义（P＜0.01），A组较差；B、C、D各组间两两比较差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）。术后并发症发生率A组较高，与其余各组比较差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。末次随访时各组髋关节功能Harris评分比较差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）。 结论 B、D组及C组3种手术方法在治疗老年患者股骨粗隆间骨折具有创伤小、并发症少等优势，与A组法比较更有利于老年患者术后康复，但应注意骨折的良好复位及内固定物位置。