Objective To compare the effectiveness of two minimally invasive methods: minimally invasive plating osteosynthesis (MIPO) and expandable intramedullary nail ing technique in treatment of middle third humeral shaft fractures. Methods The cl inical data were retrospectively analyzed and compared from 33 cases with middle third humeral shaft fractures between May 2004 and December 2008. All the patients were divided into 2 groups: 14 patients were treated with MIPOtechnique (group A) and 19 with expandable intramedullary nail ing technique (group B). In group A, there were 10 males and 4 females with an average age of 35 years (range, 21-51 years). The disease cause was traffic accident in 5 cases, tumbl ing in 6 cases, machine related trauma in 2 cases, crushed by a heavy object in 1 case. Six fractures were classified as AO type A, 6 as type B, and 2 as type C. The time from injury to operation was 3 to 11 days with an average of 5.9 days. In group B, there were 12 males and 7 females with an average age of 40 years (range, 19-68 years). The disease cause was traffic accident in 7 cases, tumbl ing in 8 cases, fall ing from height in 3 cases, crush injury in 1 case. Ten fractures were classified as AO type A, 8 as type B, and 1 as type C. The time from injury to operation was 2 to 6 days with an average of 4.2 days. There was no significant difference in general data between 2 groups (P gt; 0.05). Results The operation time was (104.6 ± 25.8) minutes in group A and (85.0 ± 35.7) minutes in group B, showing no significant difference (P gt; 0.05). Incision healed by first intention without iatrogenic radial nerve palsy in 2 groups. The patientswere followed up 21.4 months on average (range, 12-37 months) in group A and 20.5 months on average (range, 22-35 months) in group B. The X-ray films showed bony heal ing in all patients. The fracture union time was (16.4 ± 6.1) weeks in group A and (15.0 ± 2.5) weeks in group B, showing no significant difference (P gt; 0.05). The University of Cal ifornia Los Angeles (UCLA) End- Result scores were 34.1 ± 1.1 in group A and 31.8 ± 2.6 in group B and the Mayo Elbow Performance scores were 100 in group A and 97.6 ± 3.9 in group B; all showing significant differences (P lt; 0.05). Conclusion Good cl inical outcomes could be obtained when middle third humeral shaft fractures are treated by either MIPO or expandable intramedullary nail ing techniques. However, MIPO technique could offer better shoulder and elbow functional results.
To provide the scientific theoretical basis for cl inical practice by comparing biomechanicalcharacteristics of single compressed plate with intramedullary pin, locking intramedullary nail and simple arm externalfixator with simple internal fixation devices. Methods Eighteen wet humeral bone specimens of adult cadaver were madecompl icated fracture models of humeral shaft and divided into 3 groups according to fixation methods. Fracture was fixed by single compressed plate with intramedullary pin in plate group, by locking intramedullary nail in intramedullary nail group and by external fixator with simple internal fixation devices in external fixator group. The intensity and rigidity of compl icated fracture models of humeral shaft was measured in compress test and torsion test. Results In compress test, the maximum load in plate group (6 162.09 ± 521.06) N and in intramedullary nail group (6 738.32 ± 525.89) N was significantly larger than that in external fixator group (2 753.57 ± 185.59) N (P lt; 0.05); but there was no significant difference between plate group and intramedullary nail group (P gt; 0.05). Under 600 N physiological compress load, the rigidity was (171.69 ± 6.49) N/mm in plate group, (333.04 ± 36.85) N/mm in intramedullary nail group and (132.59 ± 2.93) N/mm in external fixator group; showing no significant difference between plate group and external fixator group (P gt; 0.05), and showing significant difference between intramedullary nail group and plate, external fixator groups (P lt; 0.05). In torsion test, the maximum torque in plate group (38.24 ± 7.08) Nm was significantly larger than those in intramedullary nail group (17.12 ± 5.73) Nm and external fixator group (20.26 ± 6.42) Nm (P lt; 0.05), but there was no significant difference between intramedullary nail group and external fixator group (P gt; 0.05). Under 0.80 Nm physiological torque, the rigidity was (16.36 ± 2.07) Ncm/° in plate group and (18.79 ± 2.62) Ncm/° in external fixator group, which was significantly larger than that in intramedullary nail group (11.45 ± 0.22) Ncm/° (P lt; 0.05); but there was no significant difference between plate group and external fixator group (P gt; 0.05). Conclusion Those fracture models fixed by single compressed plate with intramedullary pin have better compress and torsion intensity, they also have better torsion rigidity but less compress rigidity. Those fracture models fixed by locking intramedullary nail have better compress intensity but less torsion intensity, they also have better compress rigidity but less torsion rigidity. Those fracture models fixed by external fixator with simple internal fixation device have less compress and torsion intensity, they also have less compress rigidity but better torsion rigidity.
ObjectiveTo compare the effectiveness of anterior and lateral approaches of minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) in the treatment of humeral shaft fractures. MethodsThe clinical data were retrospectively analyzed and compared from 35 cases of humeral shaft fractures between January 2010 and December 2012. The patients underwent MIPO by anterior approach in 17 patients (group A) and by lateral approach in 18 patients (group B). There was no significant difference in gender, age, injury causes, type of fractures, and time from injury to operation between 2 groups (P>0.05). The operation time, fracture healing time, intra- or postoperative complications, and shoulder and elbow range of motion (ROM) values were recorded and analyzed. The functions of the affected shoulder and elbow were assessed with the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and Mayo elbow performance score system respectively. ResultsThe operation time was (91.35±8.00) minutes and (95.56±7.92) minutes in groups A and B respectively, showing no significant difference (t=-1.561, P=0.128). Incision healed by first intention in all patients of 2 groups. No iatrogenic radial nerve palsy occurred in group A, 2 cases had postoperative iatrogenic radial nerve palsy in group B, showing no significant difference (P=0.486). The patients were followed up 15.4 months on average (range, 11-24 months) in group A and 16.8 months on average (range, 10-23 months) in group B. The X-ray films showed bony healing in all patients. The fracture union time was (13.5±2.1) weeks in group A and (14.0±2.2) weeks in group B, showing no significant difference (t=-0.696, P=0.491). The UCLA scores were 33.4±1.9 in group A and 30.6±2.0 in group B, and the Mayo elbow performance scores were 100 in group A and 96.4±2.8 in group B; all showed significant differences (t=4.231, P=0.000; t=5.293, P=0.000). ConclusionGood clinical outcomes could be obtained when humeral shaft fractures are treated with MIPO either by anterior approach or by lateral apporach. However, anterior approach could offer better shoulder and elbow functional results.
ObjectiveTo compare the effectiveness of lateral approach minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) and helical plate MIPO in the treatment of proximal humeral shaft fractures. Methods The clinical data of patients with proximal humeral shaft fractures who underwent MIPO via lateral approach (group A, 25 cases) and MIPO with helical plate (group B, 30 cases) between December 2009 and April 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. There was no significant difference in gender, age, injured side, cause of injury, American Orthopaedic Trauma Association (OTA) fracture classification, and time from fracture to operation between the two groups (P>0.05). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, fluoroscopy times, and complications were compared between two groups. The angular deformity and the fracture healing were evaluated according to anteroposterior and lateral X-ray films postoperatively. The modified University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) score for shoulder and the Mayo Elbow Performance (MEP) score for elbow were analyzed at last follow-up. Results The operation time in group A was significantly shorter than that in group B (P<0.05). However, the intraoperative blood loss and fluoroscopy times presented no significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05). All patients were followed up 12-90 months, with an average of 19.4 months. There was no significant difference in follow-up time between the two groups (P>0.05). In terms of the quality of postoperative fracture reduction, there were 4 (16.0%) and 11 (36.7%) patients with angulation deformity in group A and group B, respectively, and there was no significant difference in the incidence of angulation deformity (χ2=2.936, P=0.087). All fractures achieved bony union, there was no significant difference in fracture healing time between group A and group B (P>0.05); delayed union occurred in 2 cases and 1 case in group A and group B, respectively (healing time was 30, 42, and 36 weeks after operation, respectively). In group A and group B, 1 patient had superficial infection of incision, respectively; 2 patients and 1 patient had subacromial impact after operation, respectively; and 3 patients in group A had symptoms of radial nerve paralysis of different degrees; all of them were cured after symptomatic treatment. The overall complication incidence of group A (32%) was significantly higher than that of group B (10%) (χ2=4.125, P=0.042). At last follow-up, there was no significant difference in the modified UCLA score and MEPs score between the two groups (P>0.05). Conclusion Both lateral approach MIPO and helical plate MIPO can achieve satisfied effectiveness in the treatment of proximal humeral shaft fractures. Lateral approach MIPO may be beneficial to shorten the operation time, while the overall complication incidence of helical plate MIPO is lower.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the effectiveness of minimally invasive osteosynthesis using the helical plate for complex humeral shaft fractures involved proximal metaphysis, and to explore its feasibility and security. MethodsA retrospective analysis was made on the clinical data of 16 patients with complex humeral shaft fractures involved proximal metaphysis who underwent minimally invasive osteosynthesis with the helical plate between December 2009 and May 2015. There were 11 males and 5 females, aged from 18 to 56 years (mean, 34.6 years). The causes of fracture included falling injury in 5 cases, falling injury from height in 3 cases, traffic accident injury in 4 cases, sports injury in 3 cases, and belts twisted injury in 1 case. Accroding to Orthopaedic Trauma Association (OTA) classifications, 6 cases were rated as type 12-C1, 3 cases as type 12-C2, and 7 cases as type 12-C3. The time between injury and operation was 2-13 days (mean, 7.2 days). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, complications, union time were recorded, the functional outcome of the elbow joint was evaluated by Mayo elbow performance score, and the function of the shoulder was assessed by the University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) shoulder rating scale. ResultsThe mean operation time was 92 minutes (range, 51-127 minutes), and the mean intraoperative blood loss was 212 mL (range, 100-450 mL). All incisions healed by first intention without neurologic complications or wound infection. All patients were followed up 8-28 months (mean, 16.6 months), and bony union was obtained at 13-36 weeks (mean, 19.2 weeks). No loosening or breakage of internal fixation occurred. The Mayo elbow performance score was 90-100 (mean, 99), and the UCLA shoulder rating scale was 31-35 (mean, 34.6). ConclusionThe technique of minimally invasive osteosynthesis using the helical plate is safe and feasible for humeral shaft fracture, especially for complex humeral shaft fractures involved proximal metaphysis, and it has the advantages of minimal invasion and low risk for iatrogenic nerve injury and satisfactory effectiveness.
Objective To investigate the therapeutic effect of long PHILOS locking compression plate on the proximal humerus and humeral shaft fractures. Methods From March 2005 to December 2007, 35 cases with the proximal humerus and humeral shaft fractures were treated with long PHILOS locking compression plate, including 16 males and 19 females aged 29-68 years old (average 54.5 years old). There were 34 cases of fresh and close fracture, and the time from injury to operation was 3-9 days. One case had delayed union of fracture 5 months after receiving T-plates and internal fixation with steel plate. For the proximal humerus fracture, 7 cases had 2 parts of fracture, 19 had 3 parts of fracture, and 9 had 4 parts of fracture according to Neer classification; while for the humeral shaft fracture, 3 cases were classified as A1, 5 as A2, 10 as B1, 3 as B2, 6 as B3, 7 as C1 and 1 as C3 according to AO classification. Postoperatively, Neer scoring system was employed to evaluate the function of shoulder joint and HSS scoring system was adopted to evaluate the function of elbow joint. Results All incisions healed by first intension, and 30 cases were followed up for 12-33 months (average 18.2 months). Postoperatively, 2 cases had symptoms of radial nerve paralysis, which disappeared within 3 weeks; 1 case suffered from humeral head necrosis and received the secondary operation of humeral head replacement; humeral head was reduced evenly in 1 case, and 2 cases felt chronic sl ight pain in shoulder joints and received no further treatment. X-ray films showed 29 cases had fracture heal ing 6 months after operation, and all the patients had bone union 12 months after operation except 1 case receiving humeral head replacement. No such compl ications as screw lossening and internal fixation loosening occurred. By Neer scoring system, 6 cases were graded as excellent, 19 as good, 3 as fair, 2 as poor, and the excellent and good rate was 83.3%. By HSS scoring system, 16 cases were gradedas excellent, 14 as good, and the excellent and good rate was 100%. Conclusion Applying long PHILOS locking compression plate in the treatment of the proximal humerus and humeral shaft fractures provides a sol id fixation and high satisfactory rate with minor compl ications.
Objective To assess the effectiveness of locking compress plate and extra cortical bone bridge fixation for treating atrophic humeral nonunion. Methods Seventeen patients with atrophic humeral nonuninon were treated with locking compress plate and extra cortical bone bridge fixation between November 2006 and June 2015. Of 17 cases, 11 were male, 6 were female, aged 24-63 years (mean, 38.2 years). Fracture located at the left side in 9 cases and at the right side in 8 cases. The mechanism of injury was traffic accident in 13 cases, falling from height in 3 cases, and heavy pound injury in 1 case. The patients underwent surgery for 1 time in 7 cases, for 2 times in 5 cases, for 3 times in 4 cases, and for 4 times in 1 case. The time from fracture to hospitalization was 10-76 months (mean, 22.6 months). The shoulder function was evaluated by Neer score, and elbow function by Mayo score. Results All incisions healed by first intention. Two cases had transient radial nerve symptoms of numbness. All patients were followed up 27.3 months on average (range, 15-60 months). Radiographic examination showed signs of bone remodeling at 6-8 weeks after operation, and formation of extra cortical bone bridge. All of them achieved bone union within 10 to 41 weeks (mean, 17.6 weeks). At last follow-up, the average Neer score was 83.36 (range, 72-96); and the shoulder function was excellent in 10 cases, good in 5, and fair in 2 with an excellent and good rate of 88.24%. And the average Mayo score was 86.52 (range, 68-100); and the elbow function was excellent in 11 cases, good in 3, and fair in 3 with an excellent and good rate of 82.35%. Conclusion The bone bridging could effectively form by extra cortical grafting technique. Atrophic humeral nonunions can be successfully treated with locking compress plate and extra cortical bone bridge fixation.
Objective To compare the cl inical results of two plating osteosynthesis techniques, open reduction and plating ostosynthesis (ORPO) and minimal invasive plating osteosynthesis (MIPO), in surgical treatment of mid-distal humeralshaft fractures. Methods From March 2004 to October 2006, 40 cases of closed unilateral mid-distal humeral shaft fractures were surgically treated with MIPO or ORPO. In the MIPO treated group (n=19), there were 14 males and 5 females, with a mean age of 39.05 years. Fractures involved in middle humeral shaft in 10 cases and distal fragment in 9 cases. According to OTA classification, there were 3 cases of type A, 13 cases of type B and 3 cases of type C. Four cases compl icated by radial nerve palsies. In the ORPO treated group (n=21), there were 13 males and 8 females with a mean age of 39.05 years, including 14 cases of type A and 7 cases of type B fractures according to OTA classification. The fractures involved in middle humeral shaft in 13 cases and distal fragment in 8 cases. Five cases compl icated by radial nerve palsies. The time from injury to operation in both groups were 2 to 14 days. For patients in the MIPO group, fractures were closely reduced and fixated with an anterior placed plate inserted through two small incisions made at the anterior side of arm, away from fracture sites. The radial nerves were not exposed. For patients in the ORPO group, fractures were exposed, reduced, and fixated with an anterolateral or a posterior positioned plate after careful dissection and protection of radial nerve through an anterolateral or a posterior approach. The operation time, the occurrence of iatrogenic radial nerve palsy and the bone heal ing time were recorded. The functions of the affected shouldersand elbows were evaluated with UCLA end-result score and Mayo elbow perform index (MEPI), respectively. Results All the wounds in both groups healed primarily. There was no iatrogenic radial nerve palsies in the MIPO group after surgery; however, 5 cases of transient iatrogenic radial nerve palsies were identified in the ORPO group after surgery, and the function of radial nerve recovered in these cases at the last follow-up. Eighteen cases were followed up 14-44 months (mean 25.44 months) in MIPO group, and 19 cases were followed up 13-48 months (mean 32.11 months) in ORPO group. The mean bone heal ing time was 17.06 (12-32) weeks in MIPO group and 16.11 (8-58) weeks in ORPO group, showing no significant difference between two groups (P gt; 0.05). There was no nonunion and hardware failure in both groups. The mean forward flexion of the shoulder was 166.94° (150-170°) in MIPO group and 164.74° (130-170°) in ORPO group. The mean UCLA shoulder score was 34.78 (33-35) points in MIPO group and 34.42 (30-35) points in ORPO group. The mean range of motion of the elbow in MIPO and ORPO groups was 133.33° (120-140°) and 136.7° (120-140°), respectively. The MEPI in these two groups was 99.44 (90-100) and 99.74 (95-100) points, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between two groups in all indexes mentioned above. Conclusion The good results could be obtained when ORPO and MIPO technique are appl ied to treat mid-distal humeral shaft fractures. MIPO technique has advantages to not expose the radial nerve and to decrease the occurrence of iatrogenic radial nerve palsies.
Objective To evaluate the cl inical and radiological outcomes of minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) with locking compression plate (LCP) in the treatment of proximal humeral shaft fracture. Methods From July 2004 to April 2008, 26 patients with displaced fractures of the proximal humeral shaft were recruited, including 8 males and 18 females. Age of patients averaged 66 years old (range, 34-82 years old). According to AO classification, there were 4 cases of type A1, 2 cases of type A2, 8 cases of type B1, 4 cases of type B2, 2 cases of type B3, 4 cases of type C1 and 2 cases of type C2. The time from injury to surgery averaged 2 days (range, 1-5 days). There were 8 osteoporotic fractures. Results All surgical wound healed primarily, and there was no wound infection. Three patients had postoperative radial nerve neurapraxia, which recovered at 4, 6, 8 months respectively. All patients were followed up for 6-24 months with an average of 14.1 months. Radiological examination revealed bony union within 6 months in 25 cases. There was 1 delayed union which remained asymptomatic and eventually healed at 8 months with acceptable Constant-Murley score. There were 3 cases of shoulder impingement syndrome diagnosed at 3 months post-operatively. After implant removal, they all achieved an acceptable Constant-Murley score. According to Constant-Murley scoring system, there were 11 excellent, 10 good and 5 acceptable results. The excellent or good rate was 80.8%. Conclusion MIPO technique using LCP is an effective method to treat proximal humeral shaft fractures, which facil itates functional recovery of the shoulder joint. During the surgery, it is important to achieve a good fracture reduction and to avoid compl ications.