ObjectiveTo investigate clinical efficacy of percutaneous nephroscope in treatment of patients with severe acute pancreatitis (SAP). MethodsEighty-six patients with SAP in this hospital from August 2012 to November 2015 were selected, which were divided into percutaneous nephroscope treatment group (43 cases) and laparotomy treat-ment group (43 cases) according to the difference of therapy modality. The conventional drug therapy was performed for all of them. The postoperative recovery, content of serum C reactive protein (CRP) on day 14 after operation, and post-operative complications were observed in these two groups. Results① The abdominal pain relief time, postoperative bowel sounds recovery time, normal body temperature recovery time, and postoperative hospitalization time in the percu-taneous nephroscope treatment group were significantly shorter than those in the laparotomy treatment group (P<0.05). ② The contents of serum CRP in the percutaneous nephroscope treatment group and in the laparotomy treatment group on day 14 after operation were significantly lower than those on day 1 before operation[(8.35±2.13) mg/L versus (31.44±3.45) mg/L, P<0.05; (16.42±2.44) mg/L versus (32.09±2.98) mg/L, P<0.05]. On day 14 after operation, the content of serum CRP in the percutaneous nephroscope treatment group was significantly lower than that in the laparotomy treat-ment group[(8.35±2.13) mg/L versus (16.42±2.44) mg/L, P<0.05]. ③ The incidence rate of postoperative complications in the percutaneous nephroscope treatment group was significantly lower than that in the laparotomy treatment group[14.0% (6/43) versus 32.6% (14/43), P<0.05]. ConclusionPercutaneous nephroscope in treatment of patients with SAP is effect, it has advantages of shorter hospital stay and early recovery, which could reduce incidence of postoperative complications, and it's mechanism might be related to systemic inflammatory response.
Objective To compare clinical outcomes of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in patients who initially presented with and without urosepsis. Methods The study included patients who underwent PCNL for renal and ureter urolithiasis removal from January 2010 to December 2014 in our hospital. A 1∶1 matched-pair analysis was performed to compare outcomes and complications of patients who had obstructive urolithiasis with urosepsis initially (OUU) with patients who had obstructive urolithiasis with no urosepsis initially (NOUU) before PCNL. Results A total of 172 patients were included involving 122 (71%) males and 50 (29%) females with a mean age of 46.2 years (range 32 to 65 years). There were no significant differences between two groups in age, gender, BMI, complications, the size of the stones, stone's number and stone location (P>0.05). OUU groups had the similar stone-free rates (86.0%vs. 84.8%, P=0.829) as the NOUU group. OUU group had higher overall complications rate, longer duration of nephrostomy tube (NT), longer hospital length of stay (LOS), longer courses of postoperative antibiotics and higher grade of antibiotics after PCNL (all P<0.05). Higher fever developed postoperatively (11.6%vs. 3.5%, P=0.043), higher asymptomatic bacteriuria (11.6% vs. 3.5%, P=0.043) and symptomatic urinary tract infections (10.5% vs. 2.3%, P=0.029) were also found in OUU groups. There was no significant difference between two groups in sepsis (2.3% vs. 1.2%, P=0.560). Conclusion PCNL after decompression for urolithiasis-related urosepsis has similar success but higher complication rates than obstructive urolithiasis with no urosepsis initially.
【摘要】 目的 探讨微创经皮肾镜碎石术后并发感染性休克的原因和防治措施。 方法 回顾性分析2005年1月-2010年12月5例经皮肾镜术300例，其中术后并发感染性休克5例的临床资料。男1例，女4例，均表现为术后2~8 h内出现寒战、高热、烦燥不安，血压降至80/50 mm Hg（1 mm Hg=0.133 kPa）以下，心率超过120次/min。所有患者均行抗感染和抗休克治疗。 结果 所有患者均在72 h内停用升压药，1周内体温及血常规恢复正常，术后15 d治愈出院。 结论 感染性休克是微创经皮肾镜碎石术严重的并发症之一，术前有效抗感染、术中低压灌注、术后加强生命体征的监测、早期发现并合理处理，可有效防治感染性休克的发生。【Abstract】 Objective To explore the etiology and treatment of septic shock after percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Methods From Janurary 2005 to December 2010, the clinical data of five patients with septic shock after percutaneous nephrolithotomy in our hospital were retrospectively analyzed. The patients, including one male and four females, had chillness and high temperature after the nephrolithotomy. The blood pressure decreased to under 80/50 mm Hg （1 mm Hg=0.133 kPa）, and the heart rate was more than 120 per minute. All patients underwent anti-shock and anti-infection therapies rapidly. Results Five patients were cured in the end, their temperature and blood routine tests returned to normal within one week. Conclusions Septic shock is one of the serious complications after percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Effective preoperative preparation, low pressure irrigation during operation, early diagnosis and treatment postoperatively are the effective ways to prevent the septic shock.
ObjectiveTo explore the impact of different tracts on the effectiveness and safety of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) on complete staghorn calculus.MethodsPatients with complete staghorn calculus who underwent single channel PCNL by the same surgeon in West China Hospital of Sichuan University from October 2009 to August 2019 were included. The removing time, the rate of immediate stone removal, the average extubating time, and the incidences of postoperate complications such as fever and bleeding were analyzed statistically.ResultsA total of 379 patients were included. There were 146 cases in the upper tract group, 170 cases in the lower tract group and 63 cases in the middle tract group. Compared with the upper and middle tract groups, the lower tract group had shorter stone removing time [(50.34±18.52) vs. (53.41±22.75) vs. (41.79±17.45) min, P<0.001], shorter average extubating time [(5.53±1.83) vs. (6.17±1.44) vs. (4.96±1.91) d, P=0.007]. The rate of immediate stone removal was higher in the the upper tract group (40.56% vs. 32.79% vs. 34.71% ), but there was no statistical difference among the three groups (P=0.447). There was no significant difference among the three groups in the fever incidence (25.44% vs. 24.24% vs. 26.85%, P=0.938) or bleeding incidence (3.54% vs. 3.03% vs. 4.03%, P=1.000). In addition, there were 8 cases of pleural injury in the upper tract group.ConclusionsCompared with the lower and middle tract, PCNL with upper tract has a higher rate of removing stones for complete staghorn calculus, but there was no significant difference among the three groups. The incidences of bleeding and fever after surgery are similar in the three groups, but the risk of pleural injury may be increased in the upper tract group.
目的:探讨急性上尿路梗阻性肾功能衰竭的治疗方法。方法:采用输尿管镜检查,酌情钬激光碎石,放置双J管内引流治疗32例急性上尿路梗阻性肾功能衰竭患者。结果:术后患者血清BUN、SCr均明显下降,尿量不同程度恢复,结石排净率90.6%(29/32)。结论:对于上尿路结石梗阻性急性肾功能衰竭的患者,急诊输尿管镜下钬激光碎石,疗效确切,创伤小,可同时处理双侧输尿管结石。
ObjectivesTo systematically review the efficacy and safety of laparoscopic pyelolithotomy (LP) versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) in treating large (>2 cm) renal pelvic calculi.MethodsDatabases including PubMed, EMbase, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library, CBM, CNKI and WanFang Data were searched for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing LP with PNL for the treatment of large renal pelvic calculi from inception to September 23th, 2017. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of eligible studies. Meta-analysis was then performed by using RevMan 5.2 software.ResultsFive RCTs with 447 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that: compared with PNL group, LP group provided a significantly higher stone-free rate (RR=1.07, 95%CI 1.01 to 1.13, P=0.01), lower auxiliary procedure rate (RR=0.36, 95%CI 0.13 to 1.01, P=0.05), less hemoglobin decrease (MD=–0.83, 95%CI –1.05 to –0.61, P<0.000 01) and lower postoperative fever rate (RR=0.36, 95%CI 0.18 to 0.72,P=0.004). However, no significant differences were detected in conversion rate (RR=0.76, 95%CI 0.19 to 3.07, P=0.70), blood transfusion rate (RR=0.40, 95%CI 0.14, to 1.12, P=0.08), postoperative leakage rate (RR=1.87, 95%CI 0.67 to 5.21, P=0.23), operative time (MD=10.49, 95%CI –17.14 to 38.13, P=0.46) and hospital stay (MD=0.53, 95%CI –0.22 to 1.28, P=0.17).ConclusionsLP is superior to PNL with regard to stone-free rate, auxiliary procedure rate, hemoglobin decrease and postoperative fever rate. Due to limited quality and quantity of included studies, more high quality studies are required to verify above conclusions.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of the third-generation super-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy (SMP) for the treatment of kidney calculi with diameter of ≤2.5 cm and CT value of ≥700 Hu, and discuss the feasibility of adopting the technology in primary hospitals.MethodsThe clinical data of 64 patients with unilateral kidney calculi (CT value ≥700 Hu, diameter ≤2.5 cm) treated in the People’s Hospital of Leshan Central District between July 2017 and July 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. After random assignment, 30 patients were treated with SMP and 34 were with mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy (MPCNL). The pre-, intra-, and post-operative data were compared and analyzed to evaluate the efficacy and safety.ResultsThe unilateral lesion operations of both groups were successfully completed in the first phase. All patients were given double J tubes after operation, and there were no major complications such as post-operative hemorrhage and sepsis. There was no statistically significant difference in the post-operative hemoglobin decrease, post-operative immediate stone removal rate, post-operative stone removal rate after one month, or the rate of procalcitonin >0.1 μg/L between the two groups (P>0.05). The differences in the lithotripsy time [(29.63±6.28) vs. (25.21±5.19) minutes], post-operative hospital stay [(5.33±0.61) vs. (9.44±0.96) days], rate of indwelling renal fistula (3.3% vs. 50.0%), analgesic demand rate (10.0% vs. 58.8%), and postoperative infectious fever rate (6.7% vs. 26.5%) between SMP group and MPCNL group were statistically significant (P<0.05).ConclusionsSMP has the advantages of less trauma, low systemic inflammatory response syndrome incidence, less pain, quick rehabilitation, short hospital stay, tubeless after surgery, etc. It is worthy of extensive promotion in primary hospitals.